Embarrassing Exposures in Online Social Networks: An Integrated Perspective of Privacy Invasion and Relationship Bonding

References

• Abril PS (2007) A (My)Space of one’s own: On privacy and online social networks. Northwestern J. Tech. Intellectual Property 6(1):74–88.Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, Gross R (2006) Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. Danezis G, Golle P, eds. Privacy Enhancing Technologies, Lecture Notes Comput. Sci., Vol. 4258 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), 36–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agnew CR, Van Lange PA, Rusbult CE, Langston CA (1998) Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 74(4):939–954.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alberts JK, Kellar-Guenther Y, Corman SR (1996) That’s not funny: Understanding recipients’ responses to teasing. Western J. Comm. 60(4):337–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alge BJ (2001) Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice. J. Appl. Psych. 86(4):797–804.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altman I, Vinsel A, Brown BB (1981) Dialectic conceptions in social psychology: An application to social penetration and privacy regulation. Berkowitz L, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 14 (Academic Press, New York), 108–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson CL, Agarwal R (2011) The digitization of healthcare: Boundary risks, emotion, and consumer willingness to disclose personal health information. Inform. Systems Res. 22(3):469–490.Link, Google Scholar
• Arazy O, Gellatly IR (2012) Corporate wikis: The effects of owners’ motivation and behavior on group members’ engagement. J. Management Inform. Systems 29(3):87–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Awad NF, Krishnan MS (2006) The personalization privacy paradox: An empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization. MIS Quart. 30(1):13–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6):1173–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beatty SE, Mayer M, Coleman JE, Reynolds KE, Lee J (1996) Customer-sales associate retail relationships. J. Retailing 72(3):223–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau P (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Boxer D, Cortés-Conde F (1997) From bonding to biting: Conversational joking and identity display. J. Pragmatics 27(3):275–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brass DJ, Burkhardt ME (1993) Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behavior. Acad. Management J. 36(3):441–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campos B, Keltner D, Beck JM, Gonzaga GC, John OP (2007) Culture and teasing: The relational benefits of reduced desire for positive self-differentiation. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 33(1):3–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheek JM, Buss AH (1981) Shyness and sociability. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 41(2):330–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi BCF, Jiang Z, Ramesh B, Dong Y (2015) Privacy tradeoff and social application usage. Proc. 48th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sciences (HICSS), Kauai, HI, January 5–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi CF, Jiang Z (2012) The effects of social structure overlap and profile extensiveness on online social connectivity regulation. Proc. 12th Pre-ICIS SIGHCI Workshop, Orlando, FL, December 16.Google Scholar
• Choi CF, Jiang Z (2013a) Trading friendship for value: An investigation of collective privacy concerns in social application usage. Proc. 34th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS), Milan, December 15–18.Google Scholar
• Choi CF, Jiang Z (2013b) Responses to social predicament on online social networks. Proc. 19th Americas Conf. Inform. Systems (AMCIS), Chicago, August 15–17.Google Scholar
• Cook KS, Whitmeyer JM (1992) Two approaches to social structure: Exchange theory and network analysis. Annual Rev. Sociol. 18(1):109–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cropanzano R, Mitchell MS (2005) Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. J. Management 31(6):874–900.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Culnan MJ (1993) “How did they get my name?”: An exploratory investigation of consumer attitudes toward secondary information use. MIS Quart. 17(3):341–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahl DW, Manchanda RV, Argo JJ (2001) Embarrassment in consumer purchase: The roles of social presence and purchase familiarity. J. Consumer Res. 28(3):473–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Debatin B, Lovejoy JP, Horn A-K, Hughes BN (2009) Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 15(1):83–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dinev T, Hart P (2006) An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Inform. Systems Res. 17(1):61–80.Link, Google Scholar
• Drew P (1987) Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics 25:219–253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Armeli S, Rexwinkel B, Lynch PD, Rhoades L (2001) Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. J. Appl. Psych. 86(1):42–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eldon E (2010) Facebook tests new “subscribe to” option for friends and pages. Social Times (September 3), http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/facebook-tests-new-subscribe-to-option-for-friends-and-pages/246731.Google Scholar
• Ellison NB, Steinfield C, Lampe C (2011) Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media Soc. 13(6):873–892.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emerson RM (1972a) Exchange theory, part I: A psychological basis for social exchange. Berger JM Jr, Anderson B, eds. Sociological Theories in Progress (Houghton Mifflin, Boston), 38–57.Google Scholar
• Emerson RM (1972b) Exchange theory, part II: Exchange relations and network structures. Berger JM Jr, Anderson B, eds. Sociological Theories in Progress (Houghton Mifflin, Boston), 58–87.Google Scholar
• Fusilier MR, Hoyer WD (1980) Variables affecting perceptions of invasion of privacy in a personnel selection situation. J. Appl. Psych. 65(5):623–626.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenhow C, Robelia B (2009) Old communication, new literacies: Social network sites as social learning resources. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 14(4):1130–1161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grosser TJ, Lopez-Kidwell V, Labianca G (2010) A social network analysis of positive and negative gossip in organizational life. Group Organ. Management 35(2):177–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homans GC (1958) Social behavior as exchange. Amer. J. Sociol. 63(6):597–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang Z, Heng CS, Choi BCF (2013) Privacy concerns and privacy-protective behavior in synchronous online social interactions. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):579–595.Link, Google Scholar
• Jones DC, Newman JB, Bautista S (2005) A three-factor model of teasing: The influence of friendship, gender, and topic on expected emotional reactions to teasing during early adolescence. Soc. Development 14(3):421–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keltner D, Capps L, Kring AM, Young RC, Heerey EA (2001) Just teasing: A conceptual analysis and empirical review. Psych. Bull. 127(2):229–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keltner D, Young RC, Heerey EA, Oemig C, Monarch ND (1998) Teasing in hierarchical and intimate relations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 75(5):1231–1247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kotthoff H (2003) Responding to irony in different contexts: On cognition in conversation. J. Pragmatics 35(9):1387–1411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kowalski RM (2000) “I was only kidding!”: Victims’ and perpetrators’ perceptions of teasing. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 26(2):231–241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kowalski RM (2001) Behaving Badly: Aversive Behaviors in Interpersonal Relationships (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kruger J, Gordon CL, Kuban J (2006) Intentions in teasing: When “just kidding” just isn’t good enough. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 90(3):412–425.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhl J (1981) Motivational and functional helplessness: The moderating effect of state versus action orientation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 40(1):155–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lampert MD, Ervin-Tripp SM (2006) Risky laughter: Teasing and self-directed joking among male and female friends. J. Pragmatics 38(1):51–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lange PG (2007) Publicly private and privately public: Social networking on YouTube. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. 13(1):361–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawler EJ, Thye SR (1999) Bringing emotions into social exchange theory. Annual Rev. Sociol. 25:217–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lenhart A (2008) Teens, online stranger contact and cyberbullying: What the research is telling us. Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington, DC. Accessed November 17, 2015, http://www.slideshare.net/PewInternet/teens-online-stranger-contact-cyberbullying.Google Scholar
• Lewis K, Kaufman J, Christakis N (2008) The taste for privacy: An analysis of college student privacy settings in an online social network. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 14(1):79–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang H, Xue Y (2009) Avoidance of information technology threats: A theoretical perspective. MIS Quart. 33(1):71–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang H, Xue Y, Wu L (2013) Ensuring employees’ IT compliance: Carrot or stick? Inform. Systems Res. 24(2):279–294.Link, Google Scholar
• Long JS (2000) Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Ma H (2013) An experimental study on implicit social recommendation. Proc. 36th Internat. ACM SIGIR Conf. Res. Development Inform. Retrieval, SIGIR ’13 (ACM, New York), 73–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madden M (2012) Privacy management on social media sites. Pew Internet, Washington, DC. Accessed November 17, 2015, http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Privacy-management-on-social-media/Summary-of-findings.aspx.Google Scholar
• Madden M, Smith A (2010) Reputation management and social media. Pew Internet, Washington, DC. Accessed November 17, 2015, http://pewinternet.org/2010/05/26/reputation-management-and-social-media/.Google Scholar
• Madden M, Lenhart A, Cortesi S, Gasser U, Duggan M, Smith A, Beaton M (2013) Teens, social media, and privacy. Pew Internet, Washington, DC. Accessed November 17, 2015, http://pewinternet.org/2013/05/21/teens-social-media-and-privacy.Google Scholar
• Marsh AA, Ambady N, Kleck RE (2005) The effects of fear and anger facial expression on approach- and avoidance-related behaviors. Emotion 5(1):119–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maslach C, Stapp J, Santee RT (1985) Individuation: Conceptual analysis and assessment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 49(3):729–738.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCullagh P (1980) Regression models for ordinal data. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B: Methodological 42(2):109–142.Google Scholar
• McLaughlin C, Vitak J (2012) Norm evolution and violation on Facebook. New Media Soc. 14(2):299–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menzel JE, Schaefer LM, Burke NL, Mayhew LL, Brannick MT, Thompson JK (2010) Appearance-related teasing, body dissatisfaction, and disordered eating: A meta-analysis. Body Image 7(4):261–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Molm LD, Takahashi N, Peterson G (2003) In the eye of the beholder: Procedural justice in social exchange. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 68(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray SL, Holmes JG, Griffin DW (1996) The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 71(6):1155–1180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nosko A, Wood E, Molema S (2010) All about me: Disclosure in online social networking profiles: The case of Facebook. Comput. Human Behav. 26(3):406–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oetzel JG, Garcia AJ, Ting-Toomey S (2008) An analysis of the relationships among face concerns and facework behaviors in perceived conflict situations: A four-culture investigation. Internat. J. Conflict Management 19(4):382–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oldmeadow JA, Quinn S, Kowert R (2013) Attachment style, social skills, and Facebook use amongst adults. Comput. Human Behav. 29(3):1142–1149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peng CY, Lee KL, Ingersoll GM (2002) An introduction to logistic regression analysis and reporting. J. Educational Res. 96(1):3–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petronio S (2002) Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure (State University of New York Press, Albany).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Postmes T, Spears R (1998) Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis. Psych. Bull. 123(3):238–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qian H, Scott CR (2007) Anonymity and self-disclosure on weblogs. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. 12(4):1428–1451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross C, Orr ES, Sisic M, Arseneault JM, Simmering MG, Orr RR (2009) Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Comput. Human Behav. 25(2):578–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rusbult CE, Martz JM (1995) Remaining in an abusive relationship: An investment model analysis of nonvoluntary dependence. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 21(6):558–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sabini J, Garvey B, Hall AL (2001) Shame and embarrassment revisited. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 27(1):104–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sabini J, Siepmann M, Stein J, Meyerowitz M (2000) Who is embarrassed by what? Cognition Emotion 14(2):213–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schnurr S, Chan A (2011) When laughter is not enough. Responding to teasing and self-denigrating humour at work. J. Pragmatics 43(1):20–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith HJ, Milberg SJ, Burke SJ (1996) Information privacy: Measuring individuals’ concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quart. 20(2):167–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith N (2013) How much is a Facebook friend worth? $174.17. BusinessNewsDaily (April 26), http://www.businessnewsdaily.com/4402-value-facebook-friend-marketing.html.Google Scholar
• Smock AD, Ellison NB, Lampe C, Wohn DY (2011) Facebook as a toolkit: A users and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Comput. Human Behav. 27(6):2322–2329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Solove DJ (2006) A taxonomy of privacy. University of Pennsylvania Law Rev. 154(3):477–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Son JY, Kim SS (2008) Internet users’ information privacy-protective responses: A taxonomy and a nomological model. MIS Quart. 32(3):503–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sueda K, Wiseman RL (1992) Embarrassment remediation in Japan and the United States. Internat. J. Intercultural Relations 16(2):159–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutanto J, Palme E, Tan CH, Phang CW (2013) Addressing the personalization-privacy paradox: An empirical assessment from a field experiment on smartphone users. MIS Quart. 37(4):1141–1164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tam J, Choi BCF, Jiang Z (2015) The effect of online privacy information on privacy evaluations in using mobile fitness applications. Proc. 19th Pacific Asia Conf. Inform. Systems (PACIS), Singapore, July 5–9.Google Scholar
• Tedeschi JT (2001) Social power and aggression. Forgas JP, Williams KD, eds. Social Influence: Direct and Indirect Processes (Psychology Press, Philadelphia), 109–126.Google Scholar
• Tidwell LC, Walther JB (2002) Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Comm. Res. 28(3):317–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ting-Toomey S, Oetzel JG (2001) Managing Intercultural Conflict Effectively (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Tolchinsky PD, McCuddy MK, Adams J, Ganster DC, Woodman RW, Fromkin HL (1981) Employee perceptions of invasion of privacy: A field simulation experiment. J. Appl. Psych. 66(3):308–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Norcie G, Komanduri S, Acquisti A, Leon PG, Cranor LF (2011) “I regretted the minute I pressed share”: A qualitative study of regrets on Facebook. Proc. Seventh Sympos. Usable Privacy and Security (ACM, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wattal S, Telang R, Mukhopadhyay T, Boatwright P (2012) What’s in a “name”? Impact of use of customer information in e-mail advertisements. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3):679–697.Link, Google Scholar
• Wheeless LR, Grotz J (1976) Self-disclosure and interpersonal solidarity: Measurement, validation, and relationships. Human Comm. Res. 3(1):47–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaichkowsky JL (1985) Familiarity: Product use, involvement or expertise. Adv. Consumer Res. 12(1):296–299.Google Scholar
• Zakriski AL, Wright JC, Underwood MK (2005) Gender similarities and differences in children’s social behavior: Finding personality in contextualized patterns of adaptation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 88(5):844–855.Crossref, Google Scholar