Research Note—Information Technology, Customer Satisfaction, and Profit: Theory and Evidence

References

• Aksoy L, Cooil B, Groening C, Keiningham TL, Yalcin A (2008) The long term stock market valuation of customer satisfaction. J. Marketing 72(4):105–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andal-Ancion A, Cartwright PA, Yip GS (2003) The digital transformation of traditional businesses. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 44(4):34–41.Google Scholar
• Anderson EW (1996) Customer satisfaction and price tolerance. Marketing Lett. 7(3):265–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson EW, Mansi SA (2009) Does customer satisfaction matter to investors? Findings from the bond market. J. Marketing Res. 43(5):703–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson EW, Sullivan MW (1993) The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms. Marketing Sci. 12(2):125–143.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson EW, Fornell C, Lehmann DR (1994) Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability: Findings from Sweden. J. Marketing 58(3):53–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson EW, Fornell C, Mazvancheryl SK (2004) Customer satisfaction and shareholder value. J. Marketing 68(4):172–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson EW, Fornell C, Rust RT (1997) Customer satisfaction, productivity, and profitability: Differences between goods and services. Marketing Sci. 16(2):129–145.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson MC, Banker RD, Ravindran S (2003) The new productivity paradox. Comm. ACM 46(3):91–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson MC, Banker RD, Ravindran S (2006) Value implications of investments in information technology. Management Sci. 52(9):1359–1376.Link, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Weill P (2007) IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: How resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organ. Sci. 18(5):763–780.Link, Google Scholar
• Baumol WJ (2012) The Cost Disease: Why Computers Get Cheaper and Health Care Doesn’t (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Beatson A, Coote LV, Rudd JM (2006) Determining consumer satisfaction and commitment through self-service technology and personal service usage. J. Marketing Management 22(7–8):853–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Mehta P, Mullainathan S (2002) Ferreting out tunneling: An application to Indian business groups. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1):121–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj A (2000) A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 24(1):169–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj AS, Bharadwaj SG, Konsynski BR (1999) Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s q. Management Sci. 45(7):1008–1024.Link, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj A, El Sawy O, Pavlou P, Venkatraman N (2013) Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quart. 37(2):471–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bitner MJ, Brown SW, Meuter ML (2000) Technology infusion in service encounters. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 28(1):138–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Black SE, Lynch LM (2001) How to compete: The impact of workplace practices and information technology on productivity. Rev. Econom. Statist. 83(3):434–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Sadun R, Van Reenen J (2012) Americans do IT better: US multinationals and the productivity miracle. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):167–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (1996) Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Sci. 42(4):541–558.Link, Google Scholar
• Chang YB, Gurbaxani V (2013) An empirical analysis of technical efficiency: The role of IT intensity and competition. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):561–578.Link, Google Scholar
• Chari MDR, Devaraj S, David P (2008) Research note: The impact of information technology investments and diversification strategies on firm performance. Management Sci. 54(1):224–234.Link, Google Scholar
• Chwelos P, Ramirez R, Kraemer K, Melville N (2010) Does technological progress alter the nature of information technology as a production input? New evidence and new results. Inform. Systems Res. 21(2):392–408.Link, Google Scholar
• Demos T (2007) Global 500: The world’s largest corporations. Fortune (July 23) 131.Google Scholar
• Devaraj S, Kohli R (2000) IT payoff in the healthcare industry: A longitudinal study. J. Management Inform. Systems 16(4):41–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doms M, Dunne T, Troske KR (1997) Workers, wages, and technology. Quart. J. Econom. 112(1):253–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economist, The (2004) Make it simple. (October 28), http://www.economist.com/node/3307363.Google Scholar
• El Sawy OA, Pavlou PA (2008) IT-enabled business capabilities for turbulent environments. MIS Quart. Executive 7(3):139–150.Google Scholar
• Fornell C (1992) A national customer satisfaction barometer: The Swedish experience. J. Marketing 56(1):6–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Mithas S, Morgeson FV (2009a) The economic and statistical significance of stock returns on customer satisfaction. Marketing Sci. 28(5):820–825.Link, Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Mithas S, Morgeson FV (2009b) The statistical significance of portfolio returns. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 26(2):162–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Rust RT, Dekimpe MG (2010) The effect of customer satisfaction on consumer spending growth. J. Marketing Res. 47(1):28–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Mithas S, Morgeson FV, Krishnan MS (2006) Customer satisfaction and stock prices: High returns, low risk. J. Marketing 70(1):3–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Johnson MD, Anderson EW, Cha J, Bryant BE (1996) The American customer satisfaction index: Nature, purpose, and findings. J. Marketing 60(4):7–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z (1998) Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Griliches Z, ed. R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 287–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grover V, Ramanlal P (1999) Six myths of information and markets: Information technology networks, electronic commerce, and the battle for consumer surplus. MIS Quart. 23(4):465–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grover V, Ramanlal P (2004) Digital economics and the e-business dilemma. Bus. Horizons 47(4):71–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Lehmann DR (2003) Customers as assets. J. Interactive Marketing 17(1):9–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Zeithaml V (2006) Customer metrics and their impact on financial performance. Marketing Sci. 25(6):718–739.Link, Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Hanssens D, Hardie B, Kahn W, Kumar V, Lin N, Ravishanker N, Sriram S (2006) Modeling customer lifetime value. J. Service Res. 9(2):139–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gurbaxani V, Kraemer K, Vitalari N (1997) An economic analysis of IS budgets. Management Sci. 43(12):1745–1755.Link, Google Scholar
• Han K, Mithas S (2013) Information technology outsourcing and non-IT operating costs: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 37(1):315–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt LM, Brynjolfsson E (1996) Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quart. 20(2):121–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoadley E, Kohli R (2014) Business value of IS investments. Topi H, Tucker A, eds. Computing Handbook, Information Systems and Information Technology, 3rd ed. (Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL), 71-1–71-14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogan JE, Lehmann DR, Merino M, Srivastava RK, Thomas JS, Verhoef PC (2002) Linking customer assets to financial performance. J. Service Res. 5(1):26–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ittner CD, Larcker DF (1998) Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction. J. Accounting Res. 36(Suppl.):1–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson MD, Fornell C (1991) A framework for comparing customer satisfaction across individuals and product categories. J. Econom. Psych. 12(2):267–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim K, Mithas S (2011) How does bond market view IT investments of firms? An empirical evidence of bond ratings and yield spreads. Kumar S, Mukhopadhyay T, Stylianou A, eds. Proc. 16th Ann. INFORMS Conf. Inform. Systems Tech. (Information Systems Society, Charlotte, NC), 1–18.Google Scholar
• Kleis L, Chwelos P, Ramirez RV, Cockburn I (2012) Information technology and intangible output: The impact of IT investment on innovation productivity. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):42–59.Link, Google Scholar
• Kohli R, Devaraj S, Ow TT (2012) Does information technology investment influence a firm’s market value? A case of non-publicly traded healthcare firms. MIS Quart. 36(4):1145–1163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krasnikov A, Jayachandran S, Kumar V (2009) The impact of customer relationship management implementation on cost and profit efficiencies: Evidence from the U.S. commercial banking industry. J. Marketing 73(6):61–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kude T, Schmidt CT, Mithas S, Heinzl A (2015) Disciplined autonomy and innovation effectiveness: The role of team efficacy and task volatility. Humphreys J, ed. Proc. Acad. Management Ann. Meeting, Vancouver. http://proceedings.aom.org/content/2015/1/18802.short?related-urls=yes&legid=amproc;2015/1/18802&cited-by=yes&legid=amproc;2015/1/18802.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kudyba S, Diwan R (2002) Research report: Increasing returns to information technology. Inform. Systems Res. 13(1):104–111.Link, Google Scholar
• Lariviere B, Keiningham TL, Aksoy L, Yalcin A, Morgeson FV, Mithas S (2016) Modeling heterogeneity in the satisfaction, loyalty intention, and shareholder value linkage: A cross-industry analysis at the customer and firm level. J. Marketing Res. 53(1):91–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lev B (2001) Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Liu A, Liu H, Xu SX (2013) How do competitive environments moderate CRM value? Decision Support Systems 56:462–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu CW, Kude T, Mithas S (2015) How strategy and governance choices influence innovation success in software products and services. Carte T, Heinzl A, Urquhart C, eds. Proc. 35th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (AIS, Fort Worth, TX), 1–18.Google Scholar
• Mani D, Barua A, Whinston AB (2013) Outsourcing contracts and equity prices. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):1028–1049.Link, Google Scholar
• Meuter ML, Bitner MJ, Ostrom AL, Brown SW (2005) Choosing among alternative service delivery modes: An investigation of customer trial of self-service technologies. J. Marketing 69(2):61–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meuter ML, Ostrom AL, Roundtree RI, Bitner MJ (2000) Self-service technologies: Understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounters. J. Marketing 64(3):50–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Jones JL (2007) Do auction parameters affect buyer surplus in e-auctions for procurement? Production Oper. Management 16(4):455–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Lucas HC (2014) Information technology and firm value: Productivity paradox, profitability paradox and new frontiers. Topi H, Tucker A, eds. Computing Handbook, Information Systems and Information Technology, 3rd ed. (Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL), 72-1–72-20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Rust RT (2016) How information technology strategy and investments influence firm performance: Conjectures and empirical evidence. MIS Quart. 40(1):223–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Almirall D, Krishnan MS (2006) Do CRM systems cause one-to-one marketing effectiveness? Statist. Sci. 21(2):223–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Jones JL, Mitchell W (2008) Buyer intention to use Internet-enabled reverse auctions? The role of asset specificity, product specialization, and non-contractibility. MIS Quart. 32(4):705–724.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Krishnan MS, Fornell C (2005) Why do customer relationship management applications affect customer satisfaction? J. Marketing 69(4):201–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Ramasubbu N, Sambamurthy V (2011) How information management capability influences firm performance. MIS Quart. 35(1):237–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Tafti AR, Mitchell W (2013) How a firm’s competitive environment and digital strategic posture influence digital business strategy. MIS Quart. 37(2):511–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Ramasubbu N, Krishnan MS, Fornell C (2006–07) Designing websites for customer loyalty: A multilevel analysis. J. Management Inform. Systems 23(3):97–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Tafti AR, Bardhan IR, Goh JM (2012) Information technology and firm profitability: Mechanisms and empirical evidence. MIS Quart. 36(1):205–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgeson FV III, Mithas S (2009) Does e-government measure up to e-business? Comparing end-user perceptions of U.S. federal government and e-business websites. Public Administration Rev. 69(4):740–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgeson FV III, Mithas S, Keiningham TL, Aksoy L (2011) An investigation of the cross-national determinants of customer satisfaction. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 39(2):198–215.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ngobo PV, Casta JF, Ramond OJ (2012) Is customer satisfaction a relevant metric for financial analysts? J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 40(3):480–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pang M-S, Mithas S, Lucas HC (2013) How channel choice and service failure influence customer satisfaction: The case of public services. Baskerville R, Chau M, eds. Proc. 33rd Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (AIS, Milan), 1–20.Google Scholar
• Parasuraman A, Grewal D (2000) The impact of technology on the quality-value-loyalty chain: A research agenda. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 28(1):168–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL (1988) SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J. Retailing 64(1):12–40.Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, El Sawy O (2006) From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Inform. Systems Res. 17(3):198–227.Link, Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, El Sawy O (2010) The “third hand”: IT-enabled competitive advantage in turbulence through improvisational capabilities. Inform. Systems Res. 21(3):443–471.Link, Google Scholar
• Prahalad CK, Krishnan MS (1999) The new meaning of quality in the information age. Harvard Bus. Rev. 77(5):109–118.Google Scholar
• Rai A, Sambamurthy V (2006) Editorial notes–the growth of interest in services management: Opportunities for information systems scholars. Inform. System Res. 17(4):327–331.Link, Google Scholar
• Rai A, Patnayakuni R, Patnayakuni N (1997) Technology investment and business performance. Comm. ACM 40(7):89–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai A, Patnayakuni R, Seth N (2006) Firm performance impacts of digitally-enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quart. 30(2):225–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai A, Pavlou P, Im G, Du S (2012) Inter-firm IT capabilities and communications for co-creating relational value: Evidence from the logistics industry. MIS Quart. 36(1):233–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramasubbu N, Mithas S, Krishnan MS, Kemerer CF (2008) Work dispersion, process-based learning and offshore software development performance. MIS Quart. 32(2):437–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravichandran T, Han S, Hasan I (2009) Effects of institutional pressures on information technology investments: An empirical investigation. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 56(4):677–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravichandran T, Han S, Mithas S (2015) How information technology influences innovation output of a firm: Theory and evidence. Working paper, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.Google Scholar
• Ray G, Muhanna WA, Barney JB (2005) Information technology and the performance of the customer service process: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quart. 29(4):625–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbush S (2015) CIOs face the “age of the customer.” Wall Street Journal (February 10) R5, http://www.wsj.com/articles/cios-face-the-age-of-the-customer-1423540849.Google Scholar
• Rust RT, Chung TS (2006) Marketing models of service and relationships. Marketing Sci. 25(6):560–580.Link, Google Scholar
• Rust RT, Miu C (2006) What academic research tells us about service. Comm. ACM 49(7):49–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rust RT, Moorman C, Dickson PR (2002) Getting return on quality: Revenue expansion, cost reduction, or both? J. Marketing 66(4):7–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rust RT, Zeithaml VA, Lemon KN (2000) Driving Customer Equity: How Customer Lifetime Value is Reshaping Corporate Strategy (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Rust RT, Ambler T, Carpenter GS, Kumar V, Srivastava RK (2004) Measuring marketing productivity: Current knowledge and future directions. J. Marketing 68(4):76–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saldanha T, Mithas S, Krishnan MS (2016) Leveraging customer involvement for fueling innovation: The role of relational and analytical information processing capabilities. MIS Quart. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Santhanam R, Hartono E (2003) Issues in linking information technology capability to firm performance. MIS Quart. 27(1):125–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schryen G (2013) Revisiting IS business value research: What we already know, what we still need to know, and how we can get there. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 22(2):139–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan S, Hanssens DM (2009) Marketing and firm value: Metrics, methods, findings, and future directions. J. Marketing Res. 46(3):293–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tafti A, Mithas S, Krishnan MS (2013) The effect of information technology-enabled flexibility on formation and market value of alliances. Management Sci. 59(1):207–225.Link, Google Scholar
• Tallon PP (2008) A process-oriented perspective on the alignment of information technology and business strategy. J. Management Inform. Systems 24(3):227–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tambe PB, Hitt LM (2012) The productivity of information technology investments: New evidence from IT labor data. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3, Part 1):599–617.Link, Google Scholar
• Tambe PB, Hitt LM, Brynjolfsson E (2012) The extroverted firm: How external information practices affect innovation and productivity. Management Sci. 58(5):843–859.Link, Google Scholar
• Tian F, Xu SX (2015) How do enterprise resource planning systems affect firm risk? Post-implementation impact. MIS Quart. 39(1):39–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Triplett JE, Bosworth B (2004) Productivity in the U.S. Services Sector: New Sources of Economic Growth (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Tuli K, Bharadwaj S (2009) Customer satisfaction and stock returns risk. J. Marketing 73(6):184–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vigna P, Shipman J (2010) Domestic sales lag. Wall Street Journal (April 20) B7, http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704671904575194253307667086.Google Scholar
• Villanueva J, Hanssens DM (2007) Customer equity: Measurement, management and research opportunities. Foundations Trends Marketing 1(1):1–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whitaker J, Mithas S, Krishnan MS (2011) Organizational learning and capabilities for onshore and offshore business process outsourcing. J. Management Inform. Systems 27(3):11–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2003) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason, OH).Google Scholar
• Yi Y (1990) A critical review of consumer satisfaction. Zeithaml VA, ed. Review of Marketing (American Marketing Association, Chicago), 68–123.Google Scholar