Research Note—Using Expectation Disconfirmation Theory and Polynomial Modeling to Understand Trust in Technology

References

• Adobor H (2005) Trust as sensemaking: The microdynamics of trust in interfirm alliances. J. Bus. Res. 58(3):330–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agustin C, Singh J (2005) Curvilinear effects of consumer loyalty determinants in relational exchanges. J. Marketing Res. 42(1):96–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson EW, Sullivan MW (1993) The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms. Marketing Sci. 12(2):125–143.Link, Google Scholar
• Aronson E, Carlsmith JM (1962) Performance expectancy as a determinant of actual performance. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 65(3):178–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bamberger PA (2008) Beyond contextualization: Using context in theories to narrow the micro-macro gap in management research. Acad. Management J. 51(5):839–846.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barki H, Harwick J (1994) Measuring user participation, user involvement, and user attitude. MIS Quart. 3(1):59–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Finkenauer C, Vohs KD (2001) Bad is stronger than good. Rev. General Psych. 5(4):323–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benamati JS, Fuller MA, Serva MA, Baroudi J (2010) Clarifying the integration of trust and TAM in e-commerce environments: Implications for systems design and management. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 57(3):380–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berscheid E (1983) Emotion. Kelley HH, Berscheid E, Christensen A, Harvey JH, Huston TL, Levinger G, McClintock E, Peplau LA, Peterson DR, eds. Close Relationships (W. H. Freeman, New York), 110–168.Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee A, Premkumar G (2004) Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: A theoretical model and longitudinal test. MIS Quart. 28(2):229–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown SA, Venkatesh V, Goyal S (2012) Expectation confirmation in technology use. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):474–487.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown SA, Venkatesh V, Kuruzovich J, Massey AP (2008) Expectation confirmation: An examination of three competing models. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 105(1):52–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlsmith JM, Aronson E (1963) Some hedonic consequences of the confirmation and disconfirmation of expectancies. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 66(2):151–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter M, Wright RT, Thatcher JB, Klein RR (2014) Understanding online customers’ ties to merchants: The moderating influence of trust on the relationship between switching costs and e-loyalty. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 23(1):185–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chakravarty A, Liu Y, Mazumdar T (2010) The differential effects of online word-of-mouth and critics’ reviews on pre-release movie evaluation. J. Interactive Marketing 24(3):185–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheung CMK, Lee MKO (2009) User satisfaction with an Internet-based portal: An asymmetric and nonlinear approach. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 60(1):111–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin WW, Dibbern J (2010) A permutation based procedure for multi-group PLS analysis: Results of tests of differences on simulated data and a cross of information system services between Germany and the USA. Vinzi VE, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H, eds. Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications in Marketing and Related Fields (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg), 171–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LA (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Cook TD, Campbell DT (1979) Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings (Rand McNally, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Deutsch M (1973) The Resolution of Conflict: Constructive and Destructive Processes (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards JR (1994) The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 58(1):51–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards JR (2002) Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology. Drasgow F, Schmidt N, eds. Measuring and Analyzing Behavior in Organizations: Advances in Measurement and Data Analysis (Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer, San Francisco), 350–400.Google Scholar
• Edwards JR, Parry ME (1993) On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Acad. Management J. 36(6):1577–1613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A (2007) G*Power3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavioral Res. Methods 39(2):175–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleenor JW, McCauley CD, Brutus S (1996) Self-other rating agreement and leader effectiveness. Leadership Quart. 7(4):487–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman B, Khan PH Jr, Howe DC (2000) Trust online. Comm. ACM 43(12):34–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gambetta D (2000) Can we trust trust? Gambetta D, ed. Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (Basil Blackwell Ltd., Oxford, UK), 213–237.Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Pavlou PA (2011) The boundaries of trust and risk: The quadratic moderating role of institutional structures. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3):940–959.Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Karahanna E, Straub DW (2003) Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quart. 27(1):51–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghoshal S, Moran P (1996) Bad for practice: A critique of transaction cost theory. Acad. Management Rev. 21(1):13–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmes JG (1991) Trust and the appraisal process in close relationships. Jones WH, Perlman D, eds. Advances in Personal Relationships, Vol. 2 (Jessica Kingsley, London), 57–104.Google Scholar
• Hong WF, Chan KY, Thong JYL, Chasalow LC, Dhillon G (2014) A framework and guidelines for context-specific theorizing in information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 25(1):111–136.Link, Google Scholar
• Hornstein D, Houston BK (1976) The expectation-reality discrepancy and premature termination from psychotherapy. J. Clinical Psych. 32(2):373–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa SL, Shaw TR, Staples DS (2004) Toward contextualized theories of trust: The role of trust in global virtual teams. Inform. Systems Res. 15(3):250–267.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karahanna E, Straub DW, Chervany NL (1999) Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quart. 23(2):183–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kettinger WJ, Lee CC (2005) Zones of tolerance: Alternative scales for measuring information systems service quality. MIS Quart. 29(4):607–618.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim E, Tadisina S (2007) A model of customers’ trust in e-business: Micro-level inter-party trust formation. J. Comput. Inform. Systems 48(1):88–104.Google Scholar
• Kim PH, Cooper CD, Ferrin DL, Dirks KT (2004) Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations. J. Appl. Psych. 89(1):104–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambert LS, Edwards JR, Cable DM (2003) Breach and fulfillment of the psychological contract: A comparison of traditional and expanded views. Personnel Psych. 56(4):895–934.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lamsa AM, Pucetaite R (2006) Development of organizational trust among employees from a contextual perspective. Bus. Ethics 15(2):130–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lankton NK, McKnight DH (2012) Examining two expectation disconfirmation theory models: Assimilation and asymmetry effects. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 13(2):88–115.Google Scholar
• Lewicki RJ, Bunker BB (1995) Trust in relationships: A model of trust development and decline. Bunker BB, Rubin JZ, eds. Conflict, Cooperation, and Justice (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 133–173.Google Scholar
• Lewicki RJ, Tomlinson ED, Gillespie N (2006) Models of interpersonal trust development: Theoretical approaches, empirical evidence, and future directions. J. Management 32(6):991–1022.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lippert SK (2001) An exploratory study into the relevance of trust in the context of information systems technology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Washington University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):709–734.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McEvily B, Perrone V, Zaheer A (2003) Trust as an organizing principle. Organ. Sci. 14(1):91–103.Link, Google Scholar
• McKnight DH (2005) Trust in information technology. Davis GB, ed. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management: Management Information Systems (Blackwell, Malden, MA), 329–331.Google Scholar
• McKnight DH, Choudhury V, Kacmar C (2002) Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Inform. Systems Res. 13(3):334–359.Link, Google Scholar
• McKnight DH, Cummings LL, Chervany NL (1998) Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3):473–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKnight DH, Kacmar C, Choudhury V (2004) Shifting factors and the ineffectiveness of third party assurance seals: A two-stage model of initial trust in a Web business. Electronic Markets 14(3):252–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKnight DH, Carter M, Thatcher JB, Clay PF (2011) Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures. ACM Trans. Management Inform. Systems 2(2):1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mittal V, Ross WT Jr, Baldasare PM (1998) The asymmetric impact of negative and positive attribute-level performance on overall satisfaction and repurchase intentions. J. Marketing 62(1):33–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore GC, Benbasat I (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Systems Res. 2(3):192–222.Link, Google Scholar
• Oliver RL (1976) Hedonic reactions to the disconfirmation of product performance expectations: Some moderating conditions. J. Appl. Psych. 61(2):246–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver RL (1980) A cognitive model for the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction. J. Marketing Res. 17(3):460–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver RL (1989) Processing of the satisfaction response in consumption: A suggested framework and research propositions. J. Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction Complaining Behav. 2:1–6.Google Scholar
• Oliver RL (1997) Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Oliver RL, DeSarbo WS (1988) Response determinants in satisfaction judgments. J. Consumer Res. 14(4):495–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qureshi I, Compeau D (2009) Assessing between-group differences in information systems research: A comparison of covariance- and component-based SEM. MIS Quart. 33(1):197–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robert LP, Dennis AR, Hung YTC (2009) Individual swift trust and knowledge-based trust in face-to-face and virtual team members. J. Management Inform. Systems 26(2):241–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson S, Dirks K, Ozcelik H (2004) Untangling the knot of trust and betrayal. Kramer RM, Cook KS, eds. Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), 327–341.Google Scholar
• Robinson SL (1996) Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(4):574–599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rousseau DM, Sitkin SB, Burt RS, Camerer C (1998) Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3):393–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shanock LR, Baran BE, Gentry WA, Pattison SC (2010) Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. J. Bus. Psych. 25(4):543–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spreng RA, Page TJ Jr (2003) A test of alternative measures of disconfirmation. Decision Sci. 34(1):31–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe AL (1968) Constructing Social Theories (Harcourt, Brace & World, New York).Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Terry RL, Lindsay D (1974) Expectancy confirmation and affectivity: A role playing variation. Psych. Record 24(4):469–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thatcher JB, McKnight DH, Baker EW, Arsal RE, Roberts NH (2011) The role of trust in postadoption IT exploration: An empirical examination of knowledge management systems. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 58(1):56–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Goyal S (2010) Expectation disconfirmation and technology adoption: Polynomial modeling and response surface analysis. MIS Quart. 34(2):281–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Chan FKY, Hu PJH, Brown SA (2011) Extending the two-stage information systems continuance model: Incorporating UTAUT predictors and the role of context. Inform. Systems J. 21(6):527–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vlachos PA, Vrechopoulos AP, Pramatari K (2011) Too much of a good thing: Curvilinear effects in the evaluation of services and the mediating role of trust. J. Services Marketing 25(6):440–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang W, Benbasat I (2005) Trust in and adoption of online recommendation agents. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 6(3):72–101.Google Scholar
• Weaver D, Brickman P (1974) Expectancy, feedback, and disconfirmation as independent factors in outcome satisfaction. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 30(3):420–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whetten DA (2009) An examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organizations. Management Organ. Rev. 5(1):29–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yi Y (1990) A critical review of consumer satisfaction. Zeithaml VA, ed. Review of Marketing (American Marketing Association, Chicago), 68–123.Google Scholar
• Yin RK (1989) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Zand DE (1972) Trust and managerial problem solving. Admin. Sci. Quart. 17(2):229–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Zhang Q (2005) Online trust forming mechanism: Approaches and an integrated model. Proc. 7th Internat. Conf. Electronic Commerce (ICEC ’05) (ACM, New York), 201–209.Crossref, Google Scholar