Managing Citizens’ Uncertainty in E-Government Services: The Mediating and Moderating Roles of Transparency and Trust

References

• Achrol RS, Stern LW (1988) Environmental determinants of decision-making uncertainty in marketing channels. J. Marketing Res. 25(1):36–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Prasad J (1998) The antecedents and consequents of user perceptions in information technology adoption. Decision Support Systems 22(1):15–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SC (1991) Multiple Regression Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Andersen KN, Henriksen HZ, Medaglia R, Danziger JN, Sannarnes MK, Enemærke M (2010) Fads and facts of e-government: A review of impacts of e-government (2003–2009). Internat. J. Public Admin. 33(11):564–579.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antheunis ML, Valkenburg PM, Peter J (2010) Getting acquainted through social network sites: Testing a model of online uncertainty reduction and social attraction. Comput. Human Behav. 26(1):100–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi RP (2007) The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 8(4):244–254.Google Scholar
• Barnes SJ, Vidgen R (2004) Interactive e-government: Evaluating the Web site of the UK inland revenue. J. Electronic Commerce Organ. 2(1):42–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6):1173–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belanger F, Carter L (2008) Trust and risk in e-government adoption. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 17(2):165–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belanger F, Carter L (2012) Digitizing government interactions with constituents: An historical review of e-government research in information systems. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 13(5):363–394.Google Scholar
• Berger CR (1986) Uncertain outcome values in predicted relationships—Uncertainty reduction theory then and now. Human Comm. Res. 13(1):34–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger CR, Calabrese RJ (1975) Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a development theory of interpersonal communication. Human Comm. Res. 1(2):99–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berner ES (2008) Ethical and legal issues in the use of health information technology to improve patient safety. HEC Forum 20(3):243–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry LL, Seiders K, Grewal D (2002) Understanding service convenience. J. Marketing 66(3):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertot JC, Jaeger PT, Grimes JM (2010) Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Inform. Quart. 27(3):264–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonoma TV (1976) Conflict, cooperation, and trust in three power systems. Behavioral Sci. 21(6):499–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown SA, Venkatesh V, Kuruzovich J, Massey AP (2008) Expectation confirmation: An examination of three competing models. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 105(1):52–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter L, Belanger F (2005) The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Inform. Systems J. 15(1):5–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter L, Schaupp LC, McBride ME (2011) The U.S. e-file initiative: An investigation of the antecedents to adoption from the individual taxpayers’ perspective. e-Service J. 7(3):2–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan FKY, Thong JYL, Venkatesh V, Brown SA, Hu PJH, Tam KY (2010) Modeling citizen satisfaction with mandatory adoption of an e-government technology. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 11(10):519–549.Google Scholar
• Cho YH, Choi BD (2004) E-government to combat corruption: The case of Seoul metropolitan government. Internat. J. Public Admin. 27(10):719–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choudhury V, Hartzel KS, Konsynski BR (1998) Uses and consequences of electronic markets: An empirical investigation in the aircraft parts industry. MIS Quart. 22(4):471–507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Compeau DR, Higgins CA (1995) Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quart. 19(2):189–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cullen R, Houghton C (2000) Democracy online: An assessment of New Zealand government websites. Government Inform. Quart. 17(3):243–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curran JM, Meuter ML (2005) Self-service technology adoption: Comparing three technologies. J. Services Marketing 19(2):103–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daugherty T, Li H, Biocca F (2008) Consumer learning and the effects of virtual experience relative to indirect and direct product experience. Psych. Marketing 25(7):568–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeLone WH, McLean ER (2003) The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. J. Management Inform. Systems 19(4):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Downey HK, Slocum JW (1975) Uncertainty: Measures, research, and sources of variation. Acad. Management J. 18(3):562–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flanagin AJ (2007) Commercial markets as communication markets: Uncertainty reduction through mediated information exchange in online auctions. New Media Soc. 9(3):401–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Karahanna E, Straub DW (2003) Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quart. 27(1):51–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert D, Balestrini P, Littleboy D (2004) Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-government. Internat. J. Public Sector Management 17(4/5):286–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen M, Pfitzmann A, Steinbrecher S (2008) Identity management throughout one’s whole life. Inform. Security Tech. Report 13(2):83–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinnant CC, O’Looney JA (2003) Examining pre-adoption interest in online innovations: An exploratory study of e-service personalization in the public sector. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 50(4):436–447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho SY, Bodoff D, Tam KY (2011) Timing of adaptive Web personalization and its effects on online consumer behavior. Inform. Systems Res. 22(3):660–679.Link, Google Scholar
• Hong W, Chan FKY, Thong JYL, Chasalow LC, Dhillon G (2014) A framework and guidelines for context-specific theorizing in information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 25(1):111–136.Link, Google Scholar
• Hu PJH, Brown SA, Thong JYL, Chan FKY, Tam KY (2009) Determinants of service quality and continuance intention of online services: The case of eTax. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 60(2):292–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Im I, Hong S, Kang MS (2011) An international comparison of technology adoption: Testing the UTAUT model. Inform. Management 48(1):1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James LR, Brett JM (1984) Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. J. Appl. Psych. 69(2):307–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judd CM, Kenny DA, McClelland GH (2001) Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. Psych. Methods 6(2):115–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim JW, Kim KT, Choi JU (2006) Securing e-government services. Computer 39(11):111–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim YJ, Kishore R, Sanders GL (2005) From DQ to EQ: Understanding data quality in the context of e-business systems. Comm. ACM 48(10):75–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kramer MW (1994) Uncertainty reduction during job transitions—An exploratory study of the communication experiences of newcomers and transferees. Management Comm. Quart. 7(4):384–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LaPorte TM, Demchak CC, de Jong M (2002) Democracy and bureaucracy in the age of the Web: Empirical findings and theoretical speculations. Admin. Soc. 34(4):411–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Layne K, Lee J (2001) Developing fully functional e-government: A four stage model. Government Inform. Quart. 18(2):122–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lind EA, Van den Bos K (2002) When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. Staw BM, Kramer RM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 24 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 181–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luhmann N (1979) Trust and Power (John Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• MacKinnon DP, Fairchild AJ, Fritz MS (2007) Mediation analysis. Annual Rev. Psych. 58(1):592–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marakas GM, Johnson RD, Clay PF (2007) The evolving nature of the computer self-efficacy construct: An empirical investigation of measurement construction, validity, reliability and stability over time. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 8(1):16–46.Google Scholar
• Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD (1995) An integration model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):709–734.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McIvor R, McHugh M, Cadden C (2002) Internet technologies: Supporting transparency in the public sector. Internat. J. Public Sector Management 15(3):170–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKinney V, Yoon K, Zahedi F (2002) The measurement of web-customer satisfaction: An expectation and disconfirmation approach. Inform. Systems Res. 13(3):296–315.Link, Google Scholar
• McKnight DH, Choudhury V, Kacmar C (2002) Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Inform. Systems Res. 13(3):334–359.Link, Google Scholar
• McKnight DH, Cummings LL, Chervany NL (1998) Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3):473–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKnight DH, Carter M, Thatcher JB, Clay PF (2011) Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures. ACM Trans. Management Inform. Systems 2(2):Article 12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meuter ML, Bitner MJ, Ostrom AL, Brown SW (2005) Choosing among alternative service delivery modes: An investigation of customer trial of self-service technologies. J. Marketing 69(2):61–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meuter ML, Ostrom AL, Roundtree RI, Bitner MJ (2000) Self-service technologies: Understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounters. J. Marketing 64(3):50–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milliken FJ (1987) Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty. Acad. Management Rev. 12(1):133–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mills PK, Moberg DJ (1982) Perspectives on the technology of service operations. Acad. Management Rev. 7(3):467–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan RM, Hunt SD (1994) The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. J. Marketing 58(3):20–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgeson FV, Mithas S (2009) Does e-government measure up to e-business? Comparing end user perceptions of U.S. federal government and e-business Web sites. Public Admin. Rev. 69(4):740–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morris MG, Venkatesh V (2000) Age differences in technology adoption decisions: Implications for a changing work force. Personnel Psych. 53(2):375–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray KB (1991) A test of services marketing theory: Consumer information acquisition activities. J. Marketing 55(1):10–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muthitcharoen A, Palvia PC, Grover V (2011) Building a model of technology preference: The case of channel choices. Decision Sci. 42(1):205–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newcomer K, Caudle SL (1991) Evaluating public sector information systems: More than meets the eye. Public Admin. Rev. 51(5):377–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nicolaou AI, McKnight DH (2006) Perceived information quality in data exchanges: Effects on risk, trust, and intention to use. Inform. Systems Res. 17(4):332–351.Link, Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, Scott BM, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. 88(5):879–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40(3):879–891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reddick CG (2005) Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to servers. Government Inform. Quart. 22(1):38–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Petkova AP (2007) When is a new thing a good thing? Technology change, product form design, and perceptions of value for product innovations. Organ. Sci. 18(2):217–232.Link, Google Scholar
• Schmenner RW (2004) Service businesses and productivity. Decision Sci. 35(3):333–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sia CL, Teo HH, Tan BCY, Wei KK (2004) Effects of environmental uncertainty on organizational intention to adopt distributed work arrangements. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 51(3):253–267.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siehl C, Bowen DE, Pearson CM (1992) Service encounters as rites of integration: An information processing model. Organ. Sci. 3(4):537–555.Link, Google Scholar
• Siemsen E, Roth A, Oliveira P (2010) Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organ. Res. Methods 13(3):456–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slocum JW, Sims H (1980) A typology for integrating technology, organization, and job design. Human Relations 33(3):193–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sobel ME (1982) Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Leinhardt S, ed. Sociological Methodology 1982 (American Sociological Association, Washington, DC), 290–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song M, Montoya-Weiss MM (2001) The effect of perceived technological uncertainty on Japanese new product development. Acad. Management J. 44(1):61–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sykes TA (2015) Support structures and their impacts: A longitudinal field study of an enterprise system implementation. MIS Quart. 39(2):473–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sykes TA, Venkatesh V, Gosain S (2009) Model of acceptance with peer support: A social network perspective to understand employees’ system use. MIS Quart. 33(2):371–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sykes TA, Venkatesh V, Johnson JL (2014) Enterprise system implementation and employee job performance: Understanding the role of advice networks. MIS Quart. 38(1):51–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tam KY, Ho SY (2006) Understanding the impact of Web personalization on user information processing and decision outcomes. MIS Quart. 30(4):865–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor MS, Masterson SS, Renard MK, Tracy KB (1998) Managers’ reactions to procedurally just performance management systems. Acad. Management J. 41(5):568–579.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teo TSH, Srivastava SC, Jiang L (2008) Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study. J. Management Inform. Systems 25(3):99–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas JC, Streib G (2003) The new face of government: Citizen-initiated contacts in the era of e-government. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 13(1):83–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tidwell LC, Walther JB (2002) Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: Getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Comm. Res. 28(3):317–348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tolbert CJ, Mossberger K (2006) The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Admin. Rev. 66(3):354–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Torkzadeh G, Dhillon G (2002) Measuring factors that influence the success of Internet commerce. Inform. Systems Res. 13(2):187–204.Link, Google Scholar
• United Nations (2012) United Nations e-government survey 2012: E-government for the people. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/Portals/egovkb/Documents/un/2012-Survey/unpan048065.pdf.Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V (2000) Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inform. Systems Res. 11(4):342–365.Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Bala H (2008) Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sci. 39(2):273–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Goyal S (2010) Expectation disconfirmation and technology adoption: Polynomial modeling and response surface analysis. MIS Quart. 34(2):281–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Sykes TA (2013) Digital divide initiative success in developing countries: A longitudinal field study. Inform. Systems Res. 24(2):239–260.Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Chan FKY, Thong JYL (2012a) Designing e-government services: Key service attributes and citizens’ preference structures. J. Oper. Management 30(1–2):116–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Ackerman PL (2000) A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual technology adoption decision-making processes. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 83(1):33–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Xu X (2012b) Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quart. 36(1):157–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 27(3):425–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Chan FKY, Hu PJH, Brown SA (2011) Extending the two-stage information systems continuance model: Incorporating UTAUT predictors and the role of context. Inform. Systems J. 21(6):527–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Warkentin M, Gefen D, Pavlou PA, Rose GM (2002) Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust. Electronic Markets 12(3):157–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman IM, Richmond-Abbott M (2005) Gender and the Internet: Causes of variation in access, level, and scope of use. Soc. Sci. Quart. 86(1):252–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Welch EW, Hinnant CC, Moon MJ (2005) Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 15(3):371–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• West DM (2004) E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Admin. Rev. 64(1):15–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westerman D, Van Der Heide B, Klein KA, Walther JB (2008) How do people really seek information about others? Information seeking across Internet and traditional communication channels. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 13(3):751–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson EV, Lankton NK (2004) Modeling patients’ acceptance of provider-delivered e-health. J. Amer. Medical Informatics Assoc. 11(4):241–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wixom BH, Todd PA (2005) A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inform. Systems Res. 16(1):85–102.Link, Google Scholar
• Xu X, Thong JYL, Venkatesh V (2014) Effects of ICT service innovation and complementary strategies on brand equity and customer loyalty in a consumer technology market. Inform. Systems Res. 25(4):710–729.Link, Google Scholar
• Yao Y, Murphy L (2007) Remote electronic voting systems: An exploration of voters’ perceptions and intention to use. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 16(2):106–120.Crossref, Google Scholar