On the Longitudinal Effects of IT Use on Firm-Level Employment

References

• Acemoglu D (1998) Why do new technologies complement skills? Directed technical change and wage inequality. Quart. J. Econom. 113(4):1055–1089.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acemoglu D (2002) Technical change, inequality, and the labor market. J. Econom. Literature 40(1):7–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB (1988) Innovation in larger and small firms: An empirical analysis. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(4):678–690.Google Scholar
• Aral S, Brynjolfsson E, Wu DJ (2006) Which came first, IT or productivity? The virtuous cycle of investments and use in enterprise systems. Proc. 27th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Milwaukee, 1819–1839.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong C, Sambamurthy V (1999) Information technology assimilation in firms: The influence of senior leadership and IT infrastructures. Inform. Systems Res. 10(4):304–327.Link, Google Scholar
• Atasoy H (2013) The effects of broadband Internet expansion on labor market outcomes. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 66(2):315–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor D, Dorn D (2013) The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the U.S. labor market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(5):1553–1597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor D, Katz F, Kruger B (1998) Computing inequality: Have computers changed the labor market? Quart. J. Econom. 113(4):1169–1213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Autor D, Levy F, Murane R (2003) The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. Quart. J. Econom. 118(4):1279–1333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barki H, Titah C, Boffo C (2007) Information systems use related activity: An expanded behavioral conceptualization of individual-level information systems use. Inform. Systems Res. 18(2):173–192.Link, Google Scholar
• Barua A, Konana P, Whinston A, Yin F (2004) Assessing Internet-enabled business value: An exploratory investigation. MIS Quart. 28(4):585–620.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bia M, Mattei A (2008) A Stata package for the estimation of the dose-response function through adjustment for the generalized propensity score. Stata J. 8(3):354–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan T, Greenstein S (1996) Technical progress and co-invention in computing and in the uses of computers. Brookings, Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics , Washington, DC, 1–78.Google Scholar
• Bresnahan T, Brynjolfsson E, Hitt L (2002) Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. Quart. J. Econom. 117(1):339–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt L (1996) Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Sci. 42(4):541–558.Link, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt L (2003) Computing productivity: Firm-level evidence. Rev. Econom. Statist. 85(4):793–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A (2011) A Race Against the Machine (Digital Frontier Press, Lexington, MA).Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM, Yang S (2002) Intangible assets: Computers and organizational capital. Brookings, Papers on Economic Activity: Macroeconomics , Washington, DC, 137–199.Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Malone T, Gurbaxani V, Kambil A (1994) Does information technology lead to smaller firms? Management Sci. 40(12):1628–1644.Link, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee D, Grewal R, Sambamurthy V (2002) Shaping up for e-commerce: Institutional enablers of the organizational assimilation of Web technologies. MIS Quart. 26(2):65–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crandall RW, Lehr W, Litan RE (2007) The effects of broadband deployment on output and employment: A cross-sectional analysis of U.S. data. Brookings Institution, Report 6, Issues in Economic Policy Series, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Dedrick J, Gurbaxani V, Kraemer K (2003) Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Comput. Surveys 35(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devaraj S, Kohli R (2003) Impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Sci. 49(3):273–289.Link, Google Scholar
• Economist, The (2014) Technology isn’t working. (October 4), http://www.economist.com/news/special-report/21621237-digital-revolution-has-yet-fulfil-its-promise-higher-productivity-and-better?fsrc=scn/fb/wl/pe/vi/technotworking.Google Scholar
• Forman C, McElheran C (2013) The digital reorganization of firm boundaries: IT use and vertical integration in U.S. manufacturing. Working paper, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.Google Scholar
• Forman C, Goldfarb A, Greenstein S (2012) The Internet and wages: A puzzle. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):556–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granger WJ (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37(3):424–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt L (1999) Information technology and firm boundaries: Evidence from panel data. Inform. Systems Res. 10(2):134–149.Link, Google Scholar
• Hall B (1987) The relationship between firm size and firm growth in the U.S. manufacturing sector. J. Indust. Econom. 35(4):583–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris SE, Katz JL (1991) Organizational performance and information technology investment intensity in the insurance industry. Organ. Sci. 2(3):263–295.Link, Google Scholar
• Hirano K, Imbens G (2004) The propensity score with continuous treatments. Gelman A, Meng X, eds. Applied Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference from Incomplete-Data Perspectives (Wiley, West Sussex, UK), 73–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Idson TL, Oi WY (1999) Workers are more productive in large firms. Amer. Econom. Rev. Papers Proc. 89(2):104–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imai K, Van Dyke D (2004) Causal inference with general treatment regimes: Generalizing the propensity score. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 99(467):854–866.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kluve J, Schneider H, Uhlendorff A, Zhao Z (2012) Evaluating continuous training programs using the generalized propensity score. J. Royal Statist. Soc.: Ser. A 175(2):587–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolko J (2010) Does broadband boost local economic development? Report, Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco.Google Scholar
• Liang H, Saraf N, Hu Q, Xue Y (2007) Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of external institutional pressure and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quart. 31(1):59–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenberg F (1995) The output contributions of computer equipment and personnel: A firm-level analysis. Econom. Innovation New Tech. 3(3):201–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malone T (1987) Modeling coordination in organizations and markets. Management Sci. 33(10):1317–1332.Link, Google Scholar
• McAfee A (2006) Mastering the three worlds of information technology. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(11):141–149.Google Scholar
• Mishra AN, Agarwal R (2010) Technological frames, organizational capabilities, and IT use: An empirical investigation of electronic procurement. Inform. Systems Res. 21(2):249–270.Link, Google Scholar
• MIT Technology Review (2015) Open letter on the digital economy. (June 4), www.technologyreview.com/view/538091/open-letter-on-the-digital-economy/.Google Scholar
• Mittal N, Nault B (2009) Investments in information technology: Indirect effects and information technology intensity. Inform. Systems Res. 20(1):140–154.Link, Google Scholar
• Osterman P (1986) The impact of computers on the employment of clerks and managers. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 39(2):175–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, El Sawy OA (2006) From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments. Inform. Systems Res. 17(3):198–227.Link, Google Scholar
• Peffers K, Dos Santos BL (1996) Performance effects of innovative IT applications over time. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 43(4):381–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ray G, Xue L, Barney JB (2013) Impact of information technology capital on firm scope and performance: The characteristics of asset characteristics. Acad. Management J. 56(4):1125–1147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reis D (1991) Information technology payoff in the health care industry: A longitudinal study. J. Management Inform. Systems 16(4):41–67.Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P, Rubin D (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh P, Tan Y, Youn N (2011) A hidden Markov model of developer learning dynamics in open source software projects. Inform. Systems Res. 22(4):790–807.Link, Google Scholar
• Tambe P, Hitt L (2012) The productivity of information technology investments: New evidence from IT labor data. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3):599–617.Link, Google Scholar
• Weill P (1992) The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: A study of the valve manufacturing sector. Inform. Systems Res. 3(4):307–333.Link, Google Scholar
• Zenger T, Hesterly W (1997) The disaggregation of corporations: Selective intervention, high-powered incentives, and molecular units. Organ. Sci. 8(3):209–222.Link, Google Scholar