Characteristics and Economic Consequences of Jump Bids in Combinatorial Auctions

References

• Adomavicius G, Gupta A (2005) Towards comprehensive real-time bidder support in iterative combinatorial auctions. Inform. Systems Res. 16(2):169–185.Link, Google Scholar
• Adomavicius G, Curley SP, Gupta A, Sanyal P (2012) Effect of information feedback on bidder behavior in continuous combinatorial auctions. Management Sci. 58(4):811–830.Link, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Simonson I (2003) Buying, bidding, playing, or competing? Value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions. J. Consumer Psych. 13(1):113–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ausubel LM, Milgrom P (2002) Ascending auctions with package bidding. Frontiers Theoret. Econom. 1(1):1–42.Google Scholar
• Ausubel LM, Milgrom P (2006) The lovely but lonely Vickrey auction. Cramton P, Shoham Y, Steinberg R, eds. Combinatorial Auction (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 17–40.Google Scholar
• Avery C (1998) Strategic jump bidding in English auctions. Rev. Econom. Stud. 65(2):185–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banks J, Ledyard JO, Porter DP (1989) Allocating uncertain and unresponsive resources: An experimental approach. RAND J. Econom. 20(1):1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banks J, Olson M, Porter DP, Rassenti SJ, Smith VL (2003) Theory, experiment and the Federal Communications Commission spectrum auctions. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 51(3):303–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bichler M (2000) An experimental analysis of multi-attribute auctions. Decision Support Systems 29(3):249–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bichler M, Shabalin P, Pikovsky A (2009) A computational analysis of linear price iterative combinatorial auction formats. Inform. Systems Res. 20(1):33–59.Link, Google Scholar
• Bichler M, Shabalin P, Ziegler G (2013) Efficiency with linear prices? A theoretical and experimental analysis of the combinatorial clock auction. Inform. Systems Res. 24(2):394–417.Link, Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani S, Ostroy JM (2002) The package assignment model. J. Econom. Theory 107(2):377–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Börgers T, Dustmann C (2005) Strange bids: Bidding behaviour in the United Kingdom’s third generation spectrum auction. Econom. J. 115(505):551–578.Google Scholar
• Brewer PJ, Plott CR (1996) A binary conflict ascending price (BICAP) mechanism for the decentralized allocation of the right. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 14(6):857–886.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brunner C, Goeree JK, Holt CA, Ledyard JO (2010) An experimental test of combinatorial FCC spectrum auctions. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics 2(1):39–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bulow J, Klemperer P (2009) Why do sellers (usually) prefer auctions? Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(4):1544–1575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bulow J, Levin J, Milgrom P (2009) Winning play in spectrum auctions. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bykowsky MM, Cull RJ, Ledyard JO (2000) Mutually destructive bidding: The FCC auction design problem. J. Regulatory Econom. 17(3):205–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Ledyard JO (2008) Mechanism design experiments. Durlauf SN, Blume LE, eds. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Second ed. (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstroke, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conover WJ (1980) Practical Nonparametric Statistics (John Wiley and Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Cramton PC (1995) Money out of thin air: The nationwide narrowband PCS auction. J. Econom. Management Strategy 4(2):267–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cramton PC (1997) The FCC spectrum auctions: An early assessment. J. Econom. Management Strategy 6(3):431–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cramton PC, Shoham Y, Steinberg R (2006) Introduction to combinatorial auctions. Cramton PC, Shoham Y, Steinberg R, eds. Combinatorial Auction (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 1–13.Google Scholar
• Daniel K, Hirshleifer D (1998) A theory of costly sequential bidding. Working Paper 98028, Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
• de Vries S, Schummer R, Vohra V (2007) On ascending Vickrey auctions for heterogeneous objects. J. Econom. Theory 132(1):95–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Easley RF, Tenorio R (2004) Jump bidding strategies in Internet auctions. Management Sci. 50(10):1407–1419.Link, Google Scholar
• Garey MR, Johnson DS (1979) Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness (W.H. Freeman, New York).Google Scholar
• Goeree JK, Holt CA (2010) Hierarchical package bidding: A paper and pencil combinatorial auction. Games Econom. Behav. 70(1):146–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goetzendorff A, Bichler M, Day B, Shabalin P (2015) Compact bid languages and core-pricing in large multi-item auctions. Management Sci. 61(7):1684–1703.Link, Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G, Goldstein DG (1996) Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psych. Rev. 103(4):650–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G, Selten R, eds. (2002) Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein DG, Gigerenzer G (2002) Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psych. Rev. 109(1):75–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haile PA, Tamer E (2003) Inference with an incomplete model of English auctions. J. Political Econom. 111(1):1–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haruvy E, Katok E (2013) Increasing revenue by decreasing information in procurement auctions. Production Oper. Management 22(1):19–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isaac RM, Salmon TC, Zillante A (2005) An experimental test of alternative models of bidding in ascending auctions. Internat. J. Game Theory 33(2):287–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isaac RM, Salmon TC, Zillante A (2007) A theory of jump bidding in ascending auctions. J. Econom. Behav. 62(1):144–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kagel JH, Lien Y, Milgrom P (2010) Ascending prices and package bidding: A theoretical and experimental analysis. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics 2(1):160–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (1992) Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 51(2):296–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kannan KN (2012) Effects of information revelation policies under cost uncertainty. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):75–92.Link, Google Scholar
• Kelly F, Steinberg R (2000) A combinatorial auction with multiple winners for universal service. Management Sci. 46(4):586–596.Link, Google Scholar
• Kwasnica AM, Katok E (2007) The effect of timing on jump bidding in ascending auctions. Production Oper. Management 16(4):483–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwasnica AM, Ledyard JO, Porter DP, DeMartini C (2005) A new and improved design for multiobject iterative auctions. Management Sci. 51(3):419–434.Link, Google Scholar
• Lucking-Reiley D (1999) Using field experiments to test equivalence between auction formats: Magic on the Internet. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(5):1063–1080.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazumdar T, Raj SP, Sinha I (2005) Reference price research: Review and propositions. J. Marketing 69(4):84–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAfee RP, McMillian J (1996) Analyzing the airwaves auction. J. Econom. Perspectives 10(1):159–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom PR (2004) Putting Auction Theory to Work (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Jones JL (2007) Do auction parameters affect buyer surplus in e-auctions for procurement? Production Oper. Management 16(4):455–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nowlis SM, Simonson I (1997) Attribute-task compatibility as a determinant of consumer preference reversals. J. Marketing Res. 24(2):205–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parkes DC (1999) iBundle: An efficient ascending price bundle auction. Proc. First ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York), 148–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parkes DC (2006) Iterative combinatorial auctions. Cramton P, Shoham Y, Steinberg R, eds. Combinatorial Auction (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 41–77.Google Scholar
• Petrakis I, Ziegler G, Bichler M (2013) Ascending combinatorial auctions with allocation constraints: On game theoretical and computational properties of generic pricing rules. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):768–786.Link, Google Scholar
• Plott CR, Salmon TC (2004) The simultaneous, ascending auction: Dynamics of price adjustment in experiments and in the UK3G spectrum auction. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 53(3):353–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Plott CR, Lee HY, Maron T (2014) The continuous combinatorial auction architecture. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(5):452–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter D, Rassenti SJ, Roopnarine A, Smith VL (2003) Combinatorial auction design. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100(19):11153–11157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Putler DS (1992) Incorporating reference price effects into a theory of consumer choice. Marketing Sci. 11(3):287–309.Link, Google Scholar
• Raviv Y (2008) The role of the bidding process in price determination: Jump bidding in sequential English auctions. Econom. Inquiry 46(3):325–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothkopf MH (2007) Thirteen reasons why the Vickrey–Clarke–Groves process is not practical. Oper. Res. 55(2):191–197.Link, Google Scholar
• Rothkopf MH, Pekec A, Harstad RM (1998) Computationally manageable combinatorial auctions. Management Sci. 44(8):1131–1147.Link, Google Scholar
• Scheffel T, Ziegler G, Bichler M (2012) On the impact of package selection in combinatorial auctions: An experimental study in the context of spectrum auction design. Experiment. Econom. 15(4):667–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scheffel T, Pikovsky A, Bichler M, Guler K (2011) An experimental comparison of linear and non-linear price combinatorial auctions. Inform. Systems Res. 22(2):346–368.Link, Google Scholar
• Shiv B, Edell JA, Payne JW (1997) Factors affecting the impact of negatively and positively framed ad messages. J. Consumer Res. 24(3):285–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1956) Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psych. Rev. 63(2):129–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith VL (1976) Experimental economics: Induced value theory. Amer. Econom. Rev. 66(2):274–279.Google Scholar
• Smith VL, McCabe KA, Rassenti SJ (1991) Testing Vickrey’s and other simultaneous multiple unit versions of the English auction. Res. Experiment. Econom. 4.Google Scholar
• Steinberg R (2012) Auction pricing. Özer Ö, Phillips R, eds. Oxford Handbook of Pricing Management (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 679–712.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strecker S (2010) Information revelation in multi-attribute English auctions: A laboratory study. Decision Support Systems 49(3):272–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1130.Crossref, Google Scholar