Research Note—Leader Influence on Sustained Participation in Online Collaborative Work Communities: A Simulation-Based Approach

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2016.0632

References

  • Abrahamson E, Rosenkopf L (1997) Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: A computer simulation. Organ. Sci. 8(3):289–309.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Adams JS (1965) Inequity in social exchange. Berkowitz L, ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2 (Academic Press, New York), 267–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agle BR, Nagarajan NJ, Sonnenfeld JA, Srinivasan D (2006) Does CEO charisma matter? An empirical analysis of the relationships among organizational performance, environmental uncertainty, and top management team perceptions of CEO charisma. Acad. Management J. 49(1):161–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson P (1999) Complexity theory and organization science. Organ. Sci. 10(3):216–232.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aral S (2011) Identifying social influence: A comment on opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. 30(2):217–223.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2006) The architecture of participation: Does code architecture mitigate free riding in the open source development model? Management Sci. 52(7):1116–1127.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barabási A-L, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439):509–512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bass BM, Norton FT (1951) Group size and leaderless discussions. J. Appl. Psych. 35(6):397–400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bateman PJ, Gray PH, Butler B (2011) The impact of community commitment on participation in online communities. Inform. Systems Res. 22(4):841–854.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Benkler Y (2006) The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
  • Bock GW, Ng WL, Shin YY (2008) The effect of a perceived leader’s influence on the motivation of the members of nonwork-related virtual communities. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 55(2):292–303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burke M, Kraut RE (2008) Mopping up: Modeling Wikipedia promotion decisions. ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (ACM, New York), 27–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt RS (1982) Toward a Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure, Perception, and Action (Academic Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Butler BS (2001) Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: A resource-based model of online social structures. Inform. Systems Res. 12(4):346–362.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Butler BS, Bateman PJ, Gray PH, Diamant EI (2014) An attraction-selection-attrition theory of online community size and resilience. MIS Quart. 38(3):699–728.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Butler BS, Sproull LS, Kiesler S, Kraut RE (2007) Community effort in online groups: Who does the work and why? Weisband SP, ed. Leadership at a Distance: Research in Technologically Supported Work (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ), 171–194.Google Scholar
  • Campion MA, Medsker GJ, Higgs AC (1993) Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psych. 46(4):823–850.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carson JB, Tesluk PE, Marrone JA (2007) Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1217–1234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Casti J (1994) Complexification: Explaining a Paradoxical World Through the Science of Surprise (HarperCollins, New York).Google Scholar
  • Chang RM, Oh W, Pinsonneault A, Kwon D (2010) A network perspective of digital competition in online advertising industries: A simulation-based approach. Inform. Systems Res. 21(3):571–593.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Z, Lam W, Zhong JA (2007) Leader–member exchange and member performance: A new look at individual-level negative feedback-seeking behavior and team-level empowerment climate. J. Appl. Psych. 92(1):202–212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chengalur-Smith I, Sidorova A, Daniel S (2010) Sustainability of free/libre open source projects: A longitudinal study. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 11(Special Issue):657–683.Google Scholar
  • Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ (2004) Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Rev. Psych. 55:591–621.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cialdini RB, Trost MR (1998) Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G, eds. The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th ed., Vol. 2 (McGraw-Hill, New York), 151–192.Google Scholar
  • Dansereau F, Graen G, Haga WJ (1975) A vertical dyad approach to leadership within formal organizations. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 13(1):46–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis JP, Bingham CB, Eisenhardt KM (2007) Developing theory through simulation methods. Acad. Management Rev. 32(2):480–499.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Di Gangi PM, Wasko MM (2009) Steal my idea! Organizational adoption of user innovations from a user innovation community: A case study of Dell IdeaStorm. Decision Support Systems 48(1):303–312.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Di Gangi PM, Wasko MM, Hooker RE (2010) Getting customers’ ideas to work for you: Learning from Dell how to succeed with online user innovation communities. MIS Quart. Executive 9(4):163–178.Google Scholar
  • Dienesch RM, Liden RC (1986) Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Acad. Management Rev. 11(3):618–634.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio P, Powell W (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collectivity rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ducheneaut N (2005) Socialization in an open source software community: A socio-technical analysis. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work 14(4):323–368.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Epitropaki O, Martin R (1999) The impact of relational demography on the quality of leader-member exchanges and employees’ work attitude and well-being. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 72(2):237–240.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erdős P, Rényi A (1960) On the evolution of random graphs. Publications Math. Inst. Hungarian Acad. Sci. 5:17–61.Google Scholar
  • Faraj S, Jarvenpaa SL, Majchrzak A (2011) Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1224–1239.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fielding RT (1999) Shared leadership in the Apache project. Comm. ACM 42(4):42–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finkelstein S (1992) Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Management J. 35(3):505–538.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L, Waguespack DM (2007) Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities. Organ. Sci. 18(2):165–180.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ford J (1981) Departmental context and formal structure as constraints on leader behavior. Acad. Management J. 24(2):274–288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forte A, Lampe C (2013) Defining, understanding, and supporting open collaboration: Lessons from the literature. Amer. Behavioral Scientist 57(5):535–547.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gallaugher J, Ransbotham S (2010) Social media and customer dialog management at Starbucks. MIS Quart. Executive 9(4):197–212.Google Scholar
  • Gerstner CR, Day DV (1997) Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. J. Appl. Psych. 82(6):827–844.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goh S, Wasko M (2012) The effects of leader-member exchange on member performance in virtual world teams. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 13(10):861–885.Google Scholar
  • Goode L (2009) Social news, citizen journalism and democracy. New Media Soc. 11(8):1287–1305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graen G, Cashman JF (1975) A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. Hunt JG, Larson LL, eds. Leadership Frontiers (Kent State University Press, Kent, OH), 143–165.Google Scholar
  • Graen G, Uhl-Bien M (1995) Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quart. 6(2):219–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graen G, Novak M, Sommerkamp P (1982a) The effects of leader-member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 30(1):109–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graen GB, Liden RC, Hoel W (1982b) Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process. J. Appl. Psych. 67(6):868–872.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Green SG, Blank W, Liden RC (1983) Market and organizational influences on bank employees’ work attitudes and behaviors. J. Appl. Psych. 68(2):298–306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harris KJ, Wheeler AR, Kacmar KM (2011) The mediating role of organizational job embeddedness in the LMX-outcomes relationships. Leadership Quart. 22(2):271–281.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hertel G, Niedner S, Herrmann S (2003) Motivation of software developers in open source projects: An Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Res. Policy 32(7):1159–1177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holland JH (1995) Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity (Perseus Books, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
  • Holyst JA, Kacperski K (2001) Social impact models of opinion dynamics. Annual Rev. Comput. Phys. 9:253–273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • House RJ, Javidan M (2004) Overview of GLOBE. House RJ, Hanges PJ, Javidan M, Dorfman PW, Gupta V, eds. Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 9–28.Google Scholar
  • Huffaker D (2010) Dimensions of leadership and social influence in online communities. Human Comm. Res. 36(4):593–617.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iriberri A, Leroy G (2009) A life-cycle perspective on online community success. ACM Comput. Surv. 41(2):1–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ising E (1925) Beitrag zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus. Zeitschrift für Physik 31(1):253–258.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Janssen P (2001) Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job satisfaction. Acad. Management J. 44(5):1039–1050.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa SL, Lang KR (2011) Boundary management in online communities: Case studies of the Nine Inch Nails and ccMixter music remix sites. Long Range Planning 44(5–6):440–457.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jeppesen LB, Frederiksen L (2006) Why do users contribute to firm-hosted communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments. Organ. Sci. 17(1):45–63.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson SL (2008) Impact of Leadership on Continued Participation in Online Groups (University of Maryland, College Park, MD).Google Scholar
  • Johnson SL, Faraj S, Kudaravalli S (2014) Emergence of power laws in online communities: The role of social mechanisms and preferential attachment. MIS Quart. 38(3):795–808.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson SL, Safadi H, Faraj S (2015) The emergence of online community leadership. Inform. Systems Res. 26(1):165–187.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Joyce E, Kraut RE (2006) Predicting continued participation in newsgroups. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 11(3):723–747.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koh J, Kim YG (2003) Sense of virtual community: A conceptual framework and empirical validation. Internat. J. Electronic Comm. 8(2):75–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lakhani KR, Wolf R (2005) Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source projects. Feller J, Fitzgerald B, Hissam S, Lakhani KR, eds. Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 3–21.Google Scholar
  • Lave C, March JG (1975) An Introduction to Models in the Social Sciences (Harper & Row, New York).Google Scholar
  • Law AM, Kelton DW (1991) Simulation Modeling and Analysis, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Lee GK, Cole RE (2003) From a firm-based to a community-based model of knowledge creation: The case of the Linux kernel development. Organ. Sci. 14(6):633–649.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lerner J, Tirole J (2002) Some simple economics of open source. J. Indust. Econom. 50(2):197–234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luther K, Bruckman A (2011) Leadership and success factors in online creative collaboration. IEEE Potentials 30(5):27–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malarz K (2003) Social phase transition in Solomon network. Internat. J. Modern Phys. C 14(5):561–565.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martin R, Thomas G, Charles K, Epitropaki O, McNamara R (2005) The role of leader-member exchanges in mediating the relationship between locus of control and work reactions. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 78(1):141–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mason WA, Conrey FR, Smith ER (2007) Situating social influence processes: Dynamic, multidirectional flows of influence within social networks. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 11(3):279–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merton RK (1949) Social Theory and Social Structure (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Mullen B, Johnson C, Salas E (1991) Effects of communication network structure: Components of positional centrality. Soc. Networks 13(2):169–185.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mullen B, Johnson DA, Drake SD (1987) Organizational productivity as a function of group composition: A self-attention perspective. J. Soc. Psych. 127(2):143–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nov O (2007) What motivates Wikipedians? Comm. ACM 50(11):60–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oh W, Jeon S (2007) Membership herding and network stability in the open-source community: The Ising perspective. Management Sci. 53(7):1086–1101.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • O’Mahony S (2003) Guarding the commons: How community managed software projects protect their work. Res. Policy 32(7):1179–1198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O’Mahony S, Ferraro F (2007) The emergence of governance in an open source community. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1079–1106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Organ DW, Konovsky M (1989) Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 74(1):157–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pollard WE, Mitchell TR (1972) Decision theory analysis of social power. Psych. Bull. 78(6):433–446.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Qin X, Salter-Townshend M, Cunningham P (2014) Exploring the relationship between membership turnover and productivity in online communities. Proc. 8th Internat. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media (ICWSM 2014) (AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA).Google Scholar
  • Ransbotham S, Kane GC (2011) Membership turnover and collaboration success in online communities: Explaining rises. MIS Quart. 35(3):613–627.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ren Y, Harper FM, Drenner S, Terveen L, Kiesler S, Riedl J, Kraut RE (2012) Building member attachment in online communities: Applying theories of group identity and interpersonal bonds. MIS Quart. 36(3):841–864.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salganik MJ, Watts DJ (2009) Web-based experiments for the study of collective social dynamics in cultural markets. Topics Cognitive Sci. 1(3):439–468.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seeman MA (1957) A comparison of general and specific leader behavior descriptions. Stogdill RM, Coons AE, eds. Leader Behavior: Its Description and Measurement (Ohio State University, Columbus, OH), 86–102.Google Scholar
  • Seers A, Petty MM, Cashman JF (1995) Team-member exchange under team and traditional management. Group Organ. Management 20(1):18–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shamir B, Howell JM (1999) Organizational and contextual influences on the emergence and effectiveness of charismatic leadership. Leadership Quart. 10(2):257–284.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherony KM, Green SG (2002) Coworker exchange: Relationships between coworkers, leader-member exchange, and work attitudes. J. Appl. Psych. 87(3):542–548.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shirky C (2008) Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations (Penguin Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Sias PM, Jablin FM (1995) Differential superior-subordinate relations, perceptions of fairness, and coworker communication. Human Comm. Res. 22(1):5–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singh PV, Tan Y, Youn N (2011) A hidden Markov model of developer learning dynamics in open source software projects. Inform. Systems Res. 22(4):790–807.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sparrowe RT, Liden RC (2005) Two routes to influence: Integrating leader-member exchange and social network perspectives. Admin. Sci. Quart. 50(4):505–535.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sproull L, Arriaga M (2007) Online communities. Bidgoli H, ed. Handbook of Computer Networks: Distributed Networks, Network Planning, Control, Management, and New Trends and Applications, Vol. 3 (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ), 898–914.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stewart KJ, Ammeter AP, Maruping LM (2006) Impacts of license choice and organizational sponsorship on user interest and development activity in open source software projects. Inform. Systems Res. 17(2):126–144.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tal Z, Babad E (1989) The “teacher’s pet” phenomenon as viewed by Israeli teachers and students. Elementary School J. 90(1):97–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Townsend J, Phillips JS, Elkins TJ (2000) Employee retaliation: The neglected consequence of poor leader-member exchange relations. J. Occupational Health Psych. 5(4):457–463.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tyler TR (1989) The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 57(5):830–838.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Breukelen W, Konst D, van der Vlist R (2002) Effects of LMX and differential treatment on work unit commitment. Psych. Reports 91(1):220–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vaughan-Nichols SJ (2005) Commercializing open-source stirs debate. eWeek (August 4), http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Linux-and-Open-Source/Commercializing-OpenSource-Stirs-Debate.Google Scholar
  • von Hippel E, von Krogh G (2003) Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organ. Sci. 14(2):209–223.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • von Krogh G, Spaeth S, Lakhani KR (2003) Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Res. Policy 32(7):1217–1241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wagner C (2004) Wiki: A technology for conversational knowledge management and group collaboration. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 13(1):265–289.Google Scholar
  • Waldman DA, Yammarino FJ (1999) CEO charismatic leadership: Levels-of-management and levels-of-analysis effects. Acad. Management Rev. 24(2):266–285.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Waldman DA, Ramirez G, House R, Puranam P (2001) Does leadership matter? CEO leadership attributes and profitability under conditions of perceived environmental uncertainty. Acad. Management J. 44(1):134–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walsh JP, Kucker S, Maloney NG, Gabbay S (2000) Connecting minds: Computer-mediated communication and scientific work. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 51(14):1295–1305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watts D, Dodds P (2007) Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. J. Consumer Res. 34(4):441–458.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weber S (2004) The Success of Open Source (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xu B, Jones D, Shao B (2009) Volunteers’ involvement in online community based software development. Inform. Management 46(3):151–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yu CP, Chu TH (2007) Exploring knowledge contribution from an OCB perspective. Inform. Management 44(3):321–331.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yukl GA (2006) Leadership in Organizations (Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Zhang C, Hahn J, De P (2013) Continued participation in online innovation communities: Does community response matter equally for everyone? Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):1112–1130.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu H, Kraut RE, Kittur A (2013) Effectiveness of shared leadership in Wikipedia. Human Factors: J. Human Factors Ergonomics Soc. 55(6):1021–1043.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu H, Kraut RE, Wang Y-C, Kittur A (2011) Identifying shared leadership in Wikipedia. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 3431–3434.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.