Should Online Content Providers Be Allowed To Subsidize Content?—An Economic Analysis

References

• Bourreau M, Kourandi F, Valletti T (2015) Net neutrality with competing Internet platforms. J. Indust. Econom. 63(1):30–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brodkin J (2015a) Google Fiber confirmed for four new metro areas, 18 cities. arstechnica (January 27), http://arstechnica.com/business/2015/01/google-fiber-confirmed-for-four-new-metro-areas-18-cities/.Google Scholar
• Brodkin J (2015b) Netflix opposes data cap exemptions, except when it benefits from them. arstechnica (March 4), http://arstechnica.com/business/2015/03/netflix-opposes-data-cap-exemptions-except-when-it-benefits-from-them/.Google Scholar
• Brodkin J (2016) Verizon Wireless selling data cap exemptions to content providers. arstechnica (January 19), http://arstechnica.com/business/2016/01/verizon-wireless-selling-data-cap-exemptions-to-content-providers/.Google Scholar
• Chaudhury R, Rooke J (2014) Wrestling the subsidy challenge in telecom. AT Kearney, http://www.atkearney.com/en/paper/-/asset_publisher/dVxv4Hz2h8bS/content/wrestling-the-subsidy-challenge/10192.Google Scholar
• Cheng HK, Bandyopadhyay S, Guo H (2011) The debate on net neutrality: A policy perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 22(1):60–82.Link, Google Scholar
• Choi JP, Kim B (2010) Net neutrality and investment incentives. RAND J. Econom. 41(3):446–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi JP, Jeon DS, Kim BC (2015) Net neutrality, business models, and Internet interconnection. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics 7(3):104–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cisco (2014) Cisco visual networking index: Global mobile data traffic forecast update, 2014–2019. White paper, http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/white_paper_c11-520862.pdf.Google Scholar
• Curien N, Moreau F (2007) The convergence between contents and access: Internalizing the market complementarity. Rev. Network Econom. 6(2):161–174.Google Scholar
• Economides N, Hermalin BE (2012) The economics of network neutrality. RAND J. Econom. 43(4):602–629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economides N, Hermalin BE (2015) The strategic user of download limits by a monopoly platform. RAND J. Econom. 46(2):297–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economides N, Tåg J (2012) Network neutrality on the Internet: A two-sided market analysis. Inform. Econom. Policy 24(2):91–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Facebook (2015) Internet.org app now available in India. (February 10), http://newsroom.fb.com/news/2015/02/internet-org-app-now-available-in-india/.Google Scholar
• Fung B (2014) AT&T complains it needs more money for infrastructure upgrade. No, it doesn’t. Washington Post (March 25), http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2014/03/25/att-complains-it-needs-more-money-for-infrastructure-upgrades-no-it-doesnt/.Google Scholar
• Goel V (2015) Indian regulators suspend Facebook’s free basic services. New York Times (December 23), http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/12/23/indian-regulators-suspend-facebooks-free-basic-services/?_r=0.Google Scholar
• Greenstein S, Peitz M, Valletti T (2016) Net neutrality: A fast lane to understanding the trade-offs. J. Econom. Perspectives 30(2):127–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo H, Cheng HK, Bandyopadhyay S (2013) Broadband network management and the net neutrality debate. Production Oper. Management 22(3):1287–1298.Google Scholar
• Hande P, Chiang M, Calderbank AR, Rangan S (2009) Network pricing and rate allocation with content provider participation. Proc. IEEE Infocom, 990–998.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong E (2016) Zero-rating, explained. New York Times (February 8), http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2016/02/why_activists_are_fighting_facebook_t_mobile_over_zero_rating.html.Google Scholar
• Hotelling H (1929) Stability in competition. Econom. J. 39(153): 41–57.Google Scholar
• Inoue A, Kurosawa T, Takano Y, Iwashita M, Nishimatsu K (2011) Mobile-carrier choice modeling under competitive conditions. 1st ACIS/JNU Internat. Conf. Comput., Networks, Systems, Indust. Engrg. (CNSI 2011), Jeju Island, South Korea, 164–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kang C (2015) F.C.C. asks Comcast, AT&T and T-Mobile about “zero-rating” services. New York Times (December 17), http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/12/17/f-c-c-asks-comcast-att-and-t-mobile-about-zero-rating-services/?_r=0.Google Scholar
• Kastrenakes J (2015) YouTube doesn’t like T-Mobile’s low-quality video scheme. The Verge (December 22), http://www.theverge.com/2015/12/22/10654730/youtube-criticizes-tmobile-binge-on-video-quality-throttling.Google Scholar
• Knutason R, Gryta T (2014) AT&T to let content companies subsidize users’ data costs. Wall Street Journal (January 6), http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304887104579304451794540152.Google Scholar
• Kourandi F, Krämer J, Valletti T (2016) Net neutrality, exclusivity contracts, and Internet fragmentation. Inform. Systems Res. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Krämer J, Wiewiorra L (2012) Network neutrality and congestion sensitive content providers: Implications for content variety, broadband investment, and regulation. Inform. Systems Res. 23(4):1303–1321.Link, Google Scholar
• Kravets D (2014) AT&T thumbs nose at net neutrality with “sponsored” bandwidth scheme. Wired (January 6), http://www.wired.com/2014/01/att-sponsored-data/.Google Scholar
• Kumparak G (2014) T-Mobile stops counting data used with Spotify, Pandora, and certain other music services. TechCrunch (June 18), http://techcrunch.com/2014/06/18/t-mobile-stops-counting-data-used-with-spotify-pandora-itunes-radio-and-certain-other-music-services/.Google Scholar
• Ma RTB (2014) Subsidization competition: Vitalizing the neutral Internet. Proc. 10th ACM Internat. Conf. Emerging Networking Experiments Tech. (ACM, New York), 283–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marcus JS (2011) Network operators and content providers: Who bears the cost? Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste, Bad Honnef, Germany, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1926768.Google Scholar
• Melendez S (2015) T-Mobile “binge on” video streaming program accused of throttling traffic to YouTube. FastCompany (December 23), http://www.fastcompany.com/3054977/fast-feed/t-mobile-binge-on-video-streaming-program-accused-of-throttling-traffic-to-youtube?partner=rss.Google Scholar
• Nichols S (2015) Zuck’ed up: Facebook opens up free Internet in India—But bans HTTPS. The Register (May 4), http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/05/04/internet_org_facebook/.Google Scholar
• Nicolas C, François M (2007) The convergence between content and access: Internalizing the market complementarity. Rev. Network Econom. 6(2):161–173.Google Scholar
• Reardon M (2014) AT&T says “sponsored data” does not violate net neutrality. cnet (January 9), http://www.cnet.com/news/at-t-says-sponsored-data-does-not-violate-net-neutrality/.Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Ante SE, Troianovski A (2013) ESPN eyes subsidizing wireless-data plans. Wall Street Journal (May 9), http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887324059704578473400083982568.Google Scholar
• Snider M, Yu R, Brown E (2015) What is net neutrality and what does it mean for me? USA Today (February 27), http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2015/02/24/net-neutrality-what-is-it-guide/23237737/.Google Scholar
• Troianovski A (2012) Cellphones are eating the family budget. Wall Street Journal (September 28), http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10000872396390444083304578018731890309450.Google Scholar
• Van Schewick B (2016) T-mobile’s binge on violates key net neutrality principles. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. https://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/downloads/vanSchewick-2016-Binge-On-Report.pdf.Google Scholar