Secret Admirers: An Empirical Examination of Information Hiding and Contribution Dynamics in Online Crowdfunding

References

• Acquisti A, John L, Loewenstein G (2013) What is privacy worth? J. Legal Stud. 42(2):249–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Catalini C, Goldfarb A (2015) Crowdfunding: Geography, social networks, and the timing of investment decisions. J. Econom. Management Strategy 24(2):253–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahlers GK, Cumming D, Gunther C, Schweizer D (2015) Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 39(4):955–980.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allcott H (2011) Social norms and energy conservation. J. Public Econom. 95(9):1082–1095.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson ET, Simester DI (2014) Reviews without a purchase: Low ratings, loyal customers, and deception. J. Marketing Res. 51(3):249–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arellano M, Bover O (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. J. Econometrics 68(1):29–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asch S (1951) Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. Groups, Leadership and Men (Carnegie Press, New York), 177–190.Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J. Econometrics 87(1):115–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2013) An empirical examination of the antecedents and consequences of contribution patterns in crowd-funded markets. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):499–519.Link, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2014) Cultural differences and geography as determinants of online pro-social lending. MIS Quart. 38(3):773–794.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2015) The hidden cost of accommodating crowdfunder privacy preferences: A randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 61(5):949–962.Link, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2016) An empirical analysis of crowdfunding campaign referrals. Working paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB, Trost MR (1998) Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. Gilbert D, Fiske S, Gardner L, eds. The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vols. 1 and 2 (McGraw-Hill, New York), 151–192.Google Scholar
• Cialdini R, Goldstein N (2004) Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Rev. Psych. 55:591–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini R, Kallgren C, Reno R (1991) A focus theory of normative conduct. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 24:201–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clarke R (2014) Persona missing, feared drowned: The digital persona concept, two decades later. Inform. Tech. People 27(2):182–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coakley J, Fuertes AM, Smith R (2006) Unobserved heterogeneity in panel time series models. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 50(9):2361–2380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferraro PJ, Price MK (2013) Using nonpecuniary strategies to influence behavior: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Rev. Econom. Statist. 95(1):64–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Ghose A, Wiesenfeld B (2008) Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Inform. Systems Res. 19(3):291–313.Link, Google Scholar
• Gerber EM, Hui J (2013) Crowdfunding: Motivations and deterrents for participation. ACM Trans. Comput.-Human Interaction 20(6):Article 34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerber AS, Rogers T (2009) Descriptive social norms and motivation to vote: Everybody’s voting and so should you. J. Politics 71(1):178–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Yao Y (2011) Using transaction prices to re-examine price dispersion in electronic markets. Inform. Systems Res. 22(2):269–288.Link, Google Scholar
• Gneezy A, Gneezy U, Riener G, Nelson LD (2012) Pay-what-you-want, identity, and self-signaling in markets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(19):7236–7240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein NJ, Cialdini RB, Griskevicius V (2008) A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. J. Consumer Res. 35(3):472–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartley S (2010) Kiva.org: Crowd-sourced microfinance and cooperation in group lending. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1572182.Google Scholar
• Herzenstein M, Dholakia U, Andrews RL (2011) Strategic herding behavior in peer-to-peer loan auctions. J. Interactive Marketing 25(1):27–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogg MA, Terry DJ (2000) Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):121–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hui J, Greenberg MD, Gerber EM (2014) Understanding the role of community in crowdfunding work. Proc. 17th Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (ACM, New York), 62–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang Z, Heng CS, Choi BCF (2013) Privacy concerns and privacy-protective behavior in synchronous online social interactions. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):579–595.Link, Google Scholar
• Johnson EJ, Bellman S, Lohse GL (2002) Defaults, framing and privacy: Why opting in-opting out. Marketing Lett. 13(1):5–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones D, Linardi S (2014) Wallflowers: Experimental evidence of an aversion to standing out. Management Sci. 60(7):1757–1771.Link, Google Scholar
• Jung JH, Schneider C, Valacich J (2010) Enhancing the motivational affordance of information systems: The effects of real-time performance feedback and goal setting in group collaboration environments. Management Sci. 56(4):724–742.Link, Google Scholar
• Kennedy P (2003) A Guide to Econometrics, 5th ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Kim K, Viswanathan S (2014) The experts in the crowd: The role of reputable investors in a crowdfunding market. Working paper, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
• Lee M (2009) Micro-Econometrics: Methods of Moments and Limited Dependent Variables, 2nd ed. (Springer Science+Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
• Lerman K, Yan X, Wu XZ (2016) The “majority illusion” in social networks. PloS One 11(2):e0147617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin M, Viswanathan S (2015) Home bias in online investments: An empirical study of an online crowdfunding market. Management Sci. 62(5):1393–1414.Link, Google Scholar
• Lin M, Prabhala N, Viswanathan S (2013) Judging borrowers by the company they keep: Friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending. Management Sci. 59(1):17–35.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Chen R, Chen Y, Mei Q, Salib S (2012) “I loan because…”: Understanding motivations for pro-social lending. Proc. 5th Web Search and Data Mining (ACM, New York), 503–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luca M, Zervas G (2016) Fake it till you make it: Reputation, competition and Yelp review fraud. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print January 28, http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2304.Link, Google Scholar
• Meyerson D, Weick K, Kramer RM (1996) Swift trust and temporary groups. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 166–195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mollick E (2014) The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. J. Bus. Venturing 29(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ordanini A, Miceli L, Pizzetti M, Parasuraman A (2010) Crowd-funding: Transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. J. Service Management 22(4):443–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peacey M, Sanders M (2014) Masked heroes: Endogenous anonymity in charitable giving. CMPO Working Paper 14/329, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
• Postmes T, Spears R (2000) Refining the cognitive redefinition of the group: Deindividuation effects in common bond vs. common identity groups. Postmes T, Spears R, Lea M, Reicher S, eds. SIDE Effects Centre Stage: Recent Developments in Studies of De-Individuation in Groups (KNAW, Amsterdam), 63–78.Google Scholar
• Postmes T, Spears R, Lea M (2000) The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication. Human Comm. Res. 26(3):341–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Postmes T, Spears R, Sakhel K, de Groot D (2001) Social influence in computer-mediated communication: The effects of anonymity on group behavior. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 27(10):1243–1254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Kraut R, Kiesler S (2007) Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organ. Stud. 28(3):377–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sassenberg K (2002) Common bond and common identity groups on the Internet: Attachment and normative behavior in on-topic and off-topic chats. Group Dynam.: Theory, Res. Practice 6(1):27–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonsohn U (2010) eBay’s crowded evenings: Competition neglect in market entry decisions. Management Sci. 56(7):1060–1073.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith S, Windmeijer F, Wright E (2015) Peer effects in charitable giving: Evidence from the (running) field. Econom. J. 125(585): 1053–1071.Google Scholar
• Solove DJ (2007) “I’ve got nothing to hide” and other misunderstandings of privacy. San Diego Law Rev. 44:745–772.Google Scholar
• Stock JH, Yogo M (2002) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. NBER Technical Working Paper 284, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Surowiecki J (2004) The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies and Nations (Little Brown, Boston).Google Scholar
• Thibaut J, Kelley H (1959) The Social Psychology of Groups (John Wiley, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Turner JC (1985) Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. Lawler EJ, ed. Advances in Group Processes: Theory and Research (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 77–122.Google Scholar
• Varian HR (2013) Public goods and private gifts. Working paper, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Liu P (2012) Rational herding in microloan markets. Management Sci. 58(5):892–912.Link, Google Scholar