Information Feedback, Targeting, and Coordination: An Experimental Study

References

• 2D Boy (2008) 90%. http://2dboy.com/2008/11/13/90/.Google Scholar
• Adomavicius G, Curley SP, Gupta A, Sanyal P (2012) Effect of information feedback on bidder behavior in continuous combinatorial auctions. Management Sci. 58(4):811–830.Link, Google Scholar
• Adomavicius G, Curley SP, Gupta A, Sanyal P (2013) Impact of information feedback in continuous combinatorial auctions: An experimental study of economic performance. MIS Quart. 37(1):55–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson L, Stafford S (2009) An experimental study of the effect of announcements on public goods contributions. Working paper, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA.Google Scholar
• Andreoni J (1990) Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Econom. J. 100(401):464–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni T, Croson R (2008) Partners versus strangers: Random rematching in public goods experiments. Plott CR, Smith VL, eds. Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, Vol. 1 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 776–783.Crossref, Google Scholar
• August T, Tunca TI (2008) Let the pirates patch? An economic analysis of software security patch restrictions. Inform. Systems Res. 19(1):48–70.Link, Google Scholar
• Ayres I, Raseman S, Shih A (2013) Evidence from two large field experiments that peer comparison feedback can reduce residential energy usage. J. Law, Econom. Organ. 29(5):992–1022.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagnoli M, Ben-David S, McKee M (1992) Voluntary provision of public goods: The multiple unit case. J. Public Econom. 47(1):85–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Dellarocas C, Rice S (2010) Vertically differentiated simultaneous Vickrey auctions: Theory and experimental evidence. Management Sci. 56(7):1074–1092.Link, Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Ramaprasad J, Shmueli G, Umyarov A (2016) One-way mirrors in online dating: A randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 62(11):3100–3122.Link, Google Scholar
• Berninghaus SK, Erhart K-M (2001) Coordination and information: Recent experimental evidence. Econom. Lett. 73(3):345–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee S, Gopal R, Marsden JR, Sankaranarayanan R, Telang R (2009) To theme or not to theme: Can theme strength be the music industry’s “killer app”? Decision Support Systems 48(1):141–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Ockenfels A (2000) ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(1):166–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandimarte L, Acquisti A, Loewenstein G (2013) Misplaced confidences: Privacy and the control paradox. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 4(3):340–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandts J, Cooper D (2006) A change would do you good: An experimental study on how to overcome coordination failure in organizations. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(3):669–693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2013) An empirical examination of the antecedents and consequences of contribution patterns in crowd-funded markets. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):499–519.Link, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2015) The hidden cost of accommodating crowdfunder privacy preferences: A randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 61(5):949–962.Link, Google Scholar
• Cason TN, Khan FU (1999) A laboratory study of voluntary public goods provision with imperfect monitoring and communication. J. Development Econom. 58(2):533–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cason TN, Kannan KN, Siebert R (2011) An experimental study of information revelation policies in sequential auctions. Management Sci. 57(4):667–688.Link, Google Scholar
• Charness G (2004) Attribution and reciprocity in an experimental labor market. J. Labor Econom. 22(3):665–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chellappa RK, Shivendu S (2005) Managing piracy: Pricing and sampling strategies for digital experience goods in vertically segmented markets. Inform. Systems Res. 16(4):400–417.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y-N, Png I (2003) Information goods pricing and copyright enforcement: Welfare analysis. Inform. Systems Res. 14(1):107–123.Link, Google Scholar
• Cho W-Y, Ahn B-H (2010) Versioning of information goods under the threat of piracy. Inform. Econom. Policy 22(4):332–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox JC (2004) How to identify trust and reciprocity. Games Econom. Behav. 46(2):260–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R (1996) Partners and strangers revisited. Econom. Lett. 53(1):25–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R (2001) Feedback in voluntary contribution mechanisms: An experiment in team production. Res. Experiment. Econom. 8:85–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Marks M (1998) Identifiability of individual contributions in a threshold public goods experiment. J. Math. Psych. 42(2–3):167–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Fatás EE, Neugebauer T, Morales AJ (2015) Excludability: A laboratory study on forced ranking in team production. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 114:13–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danaher B, Smith MD, Telang R (2014) Piracy and copyright enforcement mechanisms. Innovation Policy Econom. 14(1):25–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis D, Holt C (1993) Experimental Economics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Devetag G (2005) Precedent transfer in coordination games: An experiment. Econom. Lett. 89(2):227–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devetag G, Ortmann A (2007) When and why? A critical survey on coordination failure in the laboratory. Experiment. Econom. 10(3):171–178.Google Scholar
• Engelmann D, Strobel M (2004) Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(4):857–869.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Heckman JJ (2009) Lab experiments are a major source of knowledge in the social sciences. Science 326:535–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Falk A, Fehr E, Fischbacher U (2000) On the nature of fair behavior. Econom. Inquiry 41(1):20–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Neufeld D (2009) Understanding sustained participation in open source software projects. J. Management Inform. Systems 25(4):9–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Gächter S (2000) Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):980–994.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3):817–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10(2):171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U, Gächter S (2010) Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public goods experiments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):541–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gächter S, Renner E (2010) The effects of (incentivized) belief elicitation in public goods experiments. Experiment. Econom. 13(3):364–377.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gopal R, Gupta A (2010) Trading higher software piracy for higher profits: The case of phantom piracy. Management Sci. 56(11):1946–1962.Link, Google Scholar
• Hahn J, Moon JY, Zhang C (2008) Emergence of new project teams from open source software developer networks: Impact of prior collaboration ties. Inform. Systems Res. 19(3):369–391.Link, Google Scholar
• Hashim MJ, Kannan KN, Maximiano S, Rees Ulmer J (2014) Digital piracy, teens, and the source of advice: An experimental study. J. Management Inform. Systems 31(2):211–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herzenstein M, Dholakia UM, Andrews RL (2011) Strategic herding behavior in peer-to-peer loan auctions. J. Interactive Marketing 25(1):27–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• IFPI (2009) Digital music report 2009. http://www.ifpi.org/content/library/DMR2009-real.pdf.Google Scholar
• Isaac RM, Walker JM (1988) Communication and free-riding behavior: The voluntary contribution mechanism. Econom. Inquiry 26(4):585–608.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isaac RM, Schmidtz D, Walker JM (1989) The assurance problem in a laboratory market. Public Choice 62(3):217–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Isaac RM, Walker JM, Williams AW (1994) Group size and the voluntary provision of public goods: Experimental evidence utilizing large groups. J. Public Econom. 54(1):1–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jain S (2008) Digital piracy: A competitive analysis. Marketing Sci. 27(4):610–626.Link, Google Scholar
• Johnson JP (2002) Open source software: Private provision of a public good. J. Econom. Management Strategy 11(4):637–662.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones C (2000) Metallica rips Napster. Wired (April 13), http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/2000/04/35670.Google Scholar
• Kannan K, Rahman M, Tawarmalani M (2016) Economic and policy implications of restricted patch distribution. Management Sci. 62(11):3161–3182.Link, Google Scholar
• Kaufman G (2003) Madonna to pirates: “what the f— do you think you’re doing?” singer lashes out at file traders on p2p networks. MTV News (April 16), http://www.mtv.com/news/1471321/madonna-to-pirates-what-the-f-do-you-think-youre-doing/.Google Scholar
• Khouja M, Park S (2008) Optimal pricing of digital experience goods under piracy. J. Management Inform. Systems 24(3):109–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kosfeld M, Okada A, Riedl A (2009) Institution formation in public goods games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(4):1335–1355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lahiri A (2012) Revisiting the incentive to tolerate illegal distribution of software products. Decision Support Systems 53(2):357–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lahiri A, Dey D (2013) Effects of piracy on quality of information goods. Management Sci. 59(1):245–264.Link, Google Scholar
• Landsberger HA (1958) Hawthorne revisited: Management and the worker: its critics, and developments in human relations in industry (Cornell University, Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
• Levin D (2011) Rick Chazan on music piracy. Mess and Noise, http://www.messandnoise.com/features/4172775.Google Scholar
• Lin M, Prabhala NR, Viswanathan S (2013) Judging borrowers by the company they keep: Friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending. Management Sci. 59(1):17–35.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Cheng HK, Tang QC, Eryarsoy E (2011) Optimal software pricing in the presence of piracy and word-of-mouth effect. Decision Support Systems 51(1):99–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCabe KA, Rigdon ML, Smith VL (2003) Positive reciprocity and intentions in trust games. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 52(2):267–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Normann H-T, Rau HA (2011) Step-level public goods: Experimental evidence. Working paper, DICE, Dusseldorf, Germany.Google Scholar
• Palfrey TR, Rosenthal H (1984) Participation and the provision of discrete public goods. J. Public Econom. 24(2):171–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reuben E, Riedl A (2013) Enforcement of contribution norms in public good games with heterogeneous populations. Games Econom. Behav. 77(1):122–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts JA, Hann I-H, Slaughter SA (2006) Understanding the motivations, participation, and performers of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the Apache projects. Management Sci. 52(7):984–999.Link, Google Scholar
• Sell J, Wilson RK (1991) Levels of information and contributions to public goods. Soc. Force 70(1):107–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shang J, Croson R (2009) A field experiment in charitable contribution: The impact of social information on the voluntary provision of public goods. Econom. J. 119(540):1422–1439.Google Scholar
• Solomon J, Ma W, Wash R (2015) Don’t wait! How timing affects coordination of crowdfunding donations. Proc. 18th ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work Social Comput. (CSCW ’15) (ACM, New York), 547–556.Google Scholar
• Sundararajan A (2004) Managing digital piracy: Pricing and protection. Inform. Systems Res. 15(3):287–308.Link, Google Scholar
• Takahashi S (2010) Community enforcement when players observe partners’ past play. J. Econom. Theory 145(1):42–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Telang R, Waldfogel J (2014) Piracy and new product creation: A Bollywood story. Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
• Tsai JY, Edelman S, Cranor L, Acquisti A (2011) The effect of online privacy information on purchasing behavior: An experimental study. Inform. Systems Res. 22(2):254–268.Link, Google Scholar
• Van Huyck JB, Battalio RC, Beil RO (1990) Tacit coordination games, strategic uncertainty, and coordination failure. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(1):234–248.Google Scholar
• Varian HR (1998) Markets for information goods. Working paper, University of California Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Wash R, Solomon J (2014) Coordinating donors on crowdfunding websites. Proc. 17th ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work Soc. Comput. (ACM, New York), 38–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weimann J (1994) Individual behavior in a free riding experiment. J. Public Econom. 54(2):185–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Liu P (2012) Rational herding in microloan markets. Management Sci. 58(5):892–912.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Wang C (2012) Network positions and contributions to online public goods: The case of Chinese Wikipedia. J. Management Inform. Systems 29(2):11–40.Crossref, Google Scholar