Logic Pluralism in Mobile Platform Ecosystems: A Study of Indie App Developers on the iOS App Store

References

• Abran A, Moore JW, Bourque P, Dupuis R (2004) Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA).Google Scholar
• Adams TL (2007) Interprofessional relations and the emergence of a new profession: Software engineering in the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada. Sociol. Quart. 48(3):507–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adler PA, Adler P (1987) Membership Roles in Field Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agar M (1996) The Professional Stranger: An Informal Introduction to Ethnography, 2nd ed. (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK).Google Scholar
• Agerfalk P, Fitsgerald BA, Slaughter SA (2009) Flexible and distributed information systems development: State of the art and research challenges. Inform. Systems Res. 20(3):317–328.Link, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Arunachalam VS, Asundi J, Fernandes R (2001) The Indian software services industry. Res. Policy 30(8):1267–1287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker RD, Slaughter SA (1997) A field study of scale economies in software maintenance. Management Sci. 43(12):1709–1725.Link, Google Scholar
• Battilana J (2006) Agency and institutions: The enabling role of individuals’ social position. Organization 13(5):653–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berente N, Yoo Y (2012) Institutional contradictions and loose coupling: Post-implementation of NASA’s enterprise information system. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):376–396.Link, Google Scholar
• Birks DF, Fernandez W, Levina N, Nasirin S (2013) Grounded theory method in information systems research: Its nature, diversity and opportunities. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 22(1):1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boehm BW (1984) Software engineering economics. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. 10(1):4–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau K (2010) Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. devolving control. Management Sci. 56(10):1849–1872.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau K (2012) Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1409–1427.Link, Google Scholar
• Carmel E (1997) American hegemony in packaged software trade and the "culture of software." Inform. Soc. 13(1):125–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MA, Eliashberg J, Ho T (1996) New product development: The performance and time-to-market tradeoff. Management Sci. 42(2):173–186.Link, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 48(2):147–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunn MB, Jones C (2010) Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: The contestation of care and science logics in medical education, 1967–2005. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(1):114–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eaton B, Elaluf-Calderwood S, Sørensen C, Yoo Y (2015) Distributed tuning of boundary resources: The case of Apple‘s iOS service system. MIS Quart. 39(1):217–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eikhof DR, Haunschild A (2007) For art’s sake! Artistic and economic logics in creative production. J. Organ. Behav. 28(5):523–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedland R, Alford RR (1991) Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 232–263.Google Scholar
• Garud R, Hardy C, Maguire CS (2007) Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organ. Stud. 28(7):957–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawer A (2014) Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Towards an integrative framework. Res. Policy 43(7):1239–1249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The Discovery Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Inquiry (Aldin, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Glynn MA (2000) When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organ. Sci. 11(3):285–298.Link, Google Scholar
• Gopal A, Mukhopadhyay T, Krishnan MS (2005) The impact of institutional forces on software metrics programs. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. 31(8):679–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gopal A, Sivaramakrishnan K, Krishnan MS, Mukhopadhyay T (2003) Contracts in offshore software development: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 49(12):1671–1683.Link, Google Scholar
• Gupta AK, Smith KG, Shalley CE (2006) The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad. Management J. 49(4):693–706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris ML, Collins RW, Hevner AR (2009) Control of flexible software development under uncertainty. Inform. Systems Res. 20(3):400–419.Link, Google Scholar
• Harter DE, Krishnan MS, Slaughter SA (2000) Effects of process maturity on quality, cycle time, and effort in software product development. Management Sci. 46(4):451–466.Link, Google Scholar
• Heart of the Nation Strategic Working Group (2000) The Heart of the Nation. A cultural strategy for Aotearoa New Zealand. McDermott Miller Ltd., Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
• Henderson JC, Lee SS (1992) Managing I/S design teams: A control theories perspective. Management Sci. 38(6):757–777.Link, Google Scholar
• Humphrey WS (1988) Characterizing the software process: A maturity framework. IEEE Software 5(2):73–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iivari J, Hirschheim RR, Klein HK (1998) A paradigmatic analysis contrasting information systems development approaches and methodologies. Inform. Systems Res. 9(2):164–193.Link, Google Scholar
• Jain S, George G, Maltarich M (2009) Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity. Res. Policy 38(6):922–935.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones C (2009) Software Engineering Best Practices (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Jones TC (1978) Measuring programming quality and productivity. IBM Systems J. 17(1):39–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jorgensen M, Shepperd M (2007) A systematic review of software development cost estimation studies. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. 33(1):33–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnan M, Kriebel CH, Kekre S, Mukhopadhyay T (2000) An empirical analysis of productivity and quality in software products. Management Sci. 46(6):745–759.Link, Google Scholar
• Lakhani KR (2015) Managing communities and contests to innovate with crowds. Harhoff D, Lakhani K, eds. Revolutionizing Innovation: Users, Communities, and Open Innovation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 109–134.Google Scholar
• Lakhani KR, Wolf R (2005) Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. Feller J, Fitzgerald B, Hissam S, Lakhani KR, eds. Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 3–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee G, Raghu TS (2014) Determinants of mobile apps’ success: Evidence from the AppStore market. J. Management Inform. Systems 31(2):133–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lethbridge TC (2000) What knowledge is important to a software professional? Computer 33(5):44–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B, March JG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14(1):319–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy S (1984) Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution (Anchor Press/Doubleday, Garden City, New York).Google Scholar
• Li S, Shang J, Slaughter SA (2010) Why do software firms fail? Capabilities, competitive actions, and firm survival in the software industry from 1995 to 2007. Inform. Systems Res. 21(3):631–654.Link, Google Scholar
• Locke K (2001) Grounded Theory in Management Research (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Lounsbury M (2007) A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Acad. Management J. 50(2):289–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacMillan D, Burrows P, Ante SE (2009) Inside the app economy. Bloomberg Businessweek (October 22), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2009-10-22/inside-the-app-economy.Google Scholar
• Marquis C, Lounsbury M (2007) Vive la résistance: Competing logics and the consolidation of U.S. community banking. Acad. Management J. 50(4):799–820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maruping LM, Venkatesh VV, Agarwal R (2009) A control theory perspective on agile methodology use and changing user requirements. Inform. Systems Res. 20(3):377–399.Link, Google Scholar
• Maxwell K, Van Wassenhove LL, Dutta S (1999) Performance evaluation of general and company specific models in software development effort estimation. Management Sci. 45(6):787–803.Link, Google Scholar
• Miles M, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd ed. (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).Google Scholar
• Murray F (2010) The oncomouse that roared: Hybrid exchange strategies as a source of distinction at the boundary of overlapping institutions. Amer. J. Sociol. 116(2):341–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nag R, Corley KG, Gioia DA (2007) The intersection of organizational identity, knowledge, and practice: Attempting strategic change via knowledge grafting. Acad. Management J. 50(4):821–847.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S, Bechky BA (2008) Boundary organizations: Enabling collaboration among unexpected allies. Admin. Sci. Quart. 53(3):422–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pressman RS (1993) A Manager’s Guide to Software Engineering (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Pressman RS (2005) Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach (Palgrave Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Purdy JM, Gray BB (2009) Conflicting logics, mechanisms of diffusion, and multilevel dynamics in emerging institutional fields. Acad. Management J. 52(2):355–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramesh B, Mohan K, Cao L (2012) Ambidexterity in agile distributed development: An empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):323–339.Link, Google Scholar
• Raymond E (1996) The New Hacker’s Dictionary, Third ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Reay T, Hinings CR (2005) The recomposition of an organizational field: Health care in Alberta. Organ. Stud. 26(3):351–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reay T, Hinings CR (2009) Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organ. Stud. 30(6):629–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauermann H, Stephan P (2013) Conflicting logics? A multidimensional view of industrial and academic science. Organ. Sci. 24(3):889–909.Link, Google Scholar
• Schmidt DC (2006) Model-driven engineering. Comput. 39(2):25–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah SK (2006) Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Sci. 52(7):1000–1014.Link, Google Scholar
• Slaughter SA, Harter DE, Krishnan MS (1998) Evaluating the cost of software quality. Comm. ACM 41(8):67–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Procedures and Techniques for Developing Grounded Theory (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Subramanyam R, Ramasubbu N, Krishnan MS (2012) In search of efficient flexibility: Effects of software component granularity on development effort, defects, and customization effort. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3):787–803.Link, Google Scholar
• Telang R, Wattal S (2007) An empirical analysis of the impact of software vulnerability announcements on firm stock price. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. 33(8):544–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH (2002) The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: Conflict and conformity in institutional logics. Acad. Management J. 45(1):81–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W (1999) Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. Amer. J. Sociol. 105(3):801–843.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton PH, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M (2012) The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush AA (2010) Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):675–687.Link, Google Scholar
• Townley B (1997) The institutional logic of performance appraisal. Organ. Stud. 18(2):261–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Townley B (2002) The role of competing rationalities in institutional change. Acad. Management J. 45(1):163–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tschang FT (2007) Balancing the tensions between rationalization and creativity in the video games industry. Organ. Sci. 18(6):989–1005.Link, Google Scholar
• Van Meeteren M, Poorthuis AM, Dugundji E (2010) Mapping communities in large virtual social networks: Using Twitter data to find the indie Mac community. IEEE Internat. Workshop Bus. Applications Social Network Analysis (BASNA), 1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Volberda HW (1996) Toward the flexible form: How to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments. Organ. Sci. 7(4):359–374.Link, Google Scholar
• Wagner J (2007) What a difference a Y makes–female and male nascent entrepreneurs in Germany. Small Bus. Econom. 28(1):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh I, Holton JA, Bailyn L, Fernandez W, Levina N, Glaser BB (2015) What grounded theory is … A critically reflective conversation among scholars. Organ. Res. Methods 18(4):581–599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman T (2010) Software engineering issues for mobile application development. Proc. FSE/SDP Workshop Future Software Engrg. Res. (ACM, New York), 397–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Boland RJ Jr, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A (2012) Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1398–1408.Link, Google Scholar