Assessing the Impact of Granular Privacy Controls on Content Sharing and Disclosure on Facebook

References

• Acquisti A, Gross R (2006) Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. Danezis G, Golle P, eds. 6th Workshop Privacy Enhancing Tech., Lecture Notes Comput. Sci., Vol. 4258 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg), 36–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Airoldi EM, Rubin DB (2017) Some fundamental ideas for causal inference on networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Altman I (1975) The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, and Crowding (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA).Google Scholar
• Anderson CL, Agarwal R (2011) The digitization of healthcare: Boundary risks, emotion, and consumer willingness to disclose personal health information. Inform. Systems Res. 22(3):469–490.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson K (2010) Is Facebook eroding privacy? Or does social media require us to lower our expectations? The Scholarly Kitchen (May 10). https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2010/05/10/is-facebook-eroding-privacy-or-does-social-media-require-us-to-lower-our-expectations/.Google Scholar
• Awad NF, Krishnan MS (2006) The personalization privacy paradox: An empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization. MIS Quart. 30(1):13–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bankston K (2009) Facebook’s new privacy changes: The good, the bad, and the ugly. EFF (December 9). https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/12/facebooks-new-privacy-changes-good-bad-and-ugly.Google Scholar
• Bélanger F, Crossler RE (2011) Privacy in the digital age: A review of information privacy research in information systems. MIS Quart. 35(4):1017–1042.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berman JJ, Meyer J, Coats G (1984) Effects of program characteristics on treatment outcome: An interrupted time-series analysis. J. Stud. Alcohol 45(5):405–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• boyd DM, Hargittai E (2010) Facebook privacy settings: Who cares? First Monday 15(8). http://firstmonday.org/article/view/3086/2589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandimarte L, Acquisti A, Loewenstein G (2013) Misplaced confidences: Privacy and the control paradox. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 4(3):340–347.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caverlee J, Webb S (2008) A large-scale study of Myspace: Observations and implications for online social networks. Internat. Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media (AAAI, Palo Alto, CA).Google Scholar
• Chellappa R, Sin R (2005) Personalization versus privacy: An empirical examination of the online consumer’s dilemma. Inform. Tech. Management 6:181–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen X, van der Lans R, Phan TQ (2016) Uncovering the importance of relationship characteristics in social networks: Implications for seeding strategies. J. Marketing Res. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng J (2009) An updated guide to Facebook privacy: December 2009 edition. Ars Technica (December 27). http://arstechnica.com/business/2009/12/an-updated-guide-to-facebook-privacy-december-2009-edition/.Google Scholar
• CNN (2009) Facebook unveils privacy changes. (December 10), http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/12/10/facebook.privacy/.Google Scholar
• Coates TJ, Jeffery RW, Slinkard LA (1981) Heart healthy eating and exercise: Introducing and maintaining changes in health behaviors. Amer. J. Public Health 71(1):15–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coburn AF, Fortinsky R, McGuire C, McDonald TP (1993) Effect of prospective reimbursement on nursing home costs. Health Services Res. 28(1):45–68.Google Scholar
• Community Tool Box (2014) Selecting an appropriate design for the evaluation. http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/evaluate/evaluate-community-interventions/experimental-design/main.Google Scholar
• Cook TD, Campbell DT (1979) Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
• Culnan M, Armstrong P (1999) Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Organ. Sci. 10(1):104–115.Link, Google Scholar
• Dey R, Jelveh Z, Ross K (2012) Facebook users have become much more private. IEEE Internat. Conf. Pervasive Comput. Comm. Workshops (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), 346–352.Google Scholar
• Dinev T, Hart P (2006) An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Inform. Systems Res. 17(1):61–80.Link, Google Scholar
• Dinev T, Bellotto M, Hart P, Russo V, Serra I, Colautti C (2006) Privacy calculus model in e-commerce—A study of Italy and the United States. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 15(4):389–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donath J, boyd D (2004) Public displays of connection. BT Tech. J. 22(4):71–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Electronic Privacy Information Center (2013) Social networking privacy. http://epic.org/privacy/socialnet/.Google Scholar
• Emerson RM (1976) Social exchange theory. Annual Rev. Sociol. 2:335–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Facebook (2015) Facebook reports third quarter 2015 results. Report, Press release, https://investor.fb.com/investor-news/press-release-details/2015/Facebook-Reports-Third-Quarter-2015-Results/.Google Scholar
• FB News Room (2010) Facebook redesigns privacy. (May 26). https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2010/05/facebook-redesigns-privacy/.Google Scholar
• Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S, Read S, Combs B (1978) How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sci. 8:127–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forastiere L, Airoldi EM, Mealli F (2016) Identification and estimation of treatment and interference effects in observational studies on networks. Arxiv/Stat.ME. 1609.06245. https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.06245.Google Scholar
• Freeman K (2012) Facebook privacy: This service alerts you when it changes [INFOGRAPHIC]. Mashable (May 14), http://mashable.com/2012/05/14/privacywatch-infographic/.Google Scholar
• Gillings D, Makuc D, Siegel E (1981) Analysis of interrupted time series mortality trends: An example to evaluate regionalized perinatal care. Amer. J. Public Health 71:38–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glass GV (1997) Interrupted time-series quasi-experiments. Jaeger RM, ed. Complementary Methods for Research in Education, 2nd ed. (American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC), 589–609.Google Scholar
• Gottlieb JD, Townsend RR, Xu T (2016) Experimenting with entrepreneurship: The effect of job-protected leave. Tuck School of Business Working Paper 2714577, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gross R, Acquisti A (2005) Information revelation and privacy in online social network (the Facebook case). ACM Workshop Privacy Electronic Soc. (ACM, New York), 71–80.Google Scholar
• Hann IH, Hui KL, Lee SYT, Png IPL (2007) Overcoming online information privacy concerns: An information-processing theory approach. J. Management Inform. Systems 24(2):13–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoadley CM, Xu H, Lee JJ, Rosson MB (2010) Privacy as information access and illusory control: The case of the Facebook news feed privacy outcry. Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. 9(1):50–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson B, Christensen L (2010) Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches, 4th ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Jones H, Soltren JH (2005) Facebook: Threats to privacy. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/student-papers/fall05-papers/facebook.pdf.Google Scholar
• Kincaid J (2009) The Facebook privacy fiasco begins. TechCrunch (December 9), http://techcrunch.com/2009/12/09/facebook-privacy/.Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick M (2009) Why Facebook changed its privacy strategy. ReadWrite (December 10). http://readwrite.com/2009/12/10/why_facebook_changed_privacy_policies/.Google Scholar
• Klopfer PH, Rubenstein DI (1977) The concept privacy and its biological basis. J. Soc. Issues 33(3):52–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Korth A (2012) On privacy in social networks: The provider’s perspective. ReadWrite (May 7), http://readwrite.com/2012/05/07/on-privacy-in-social-networks-the-providers-perspective.Google Scholar
• Krasnova HS, Koroleva K, Hildebrand T (2010) Online social networks: Why we disclose. J. Inform. Tech. 25(2):109–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lampe C, Ellison NB, Steineld C (2006) A face(book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. Proc. ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (ACM, New York), 167–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lampinen A, Tamminen S, Oulasvirta A (2006) All my people right here, right now: Management of group co-presence on a social networking site. Proc. ACM 2009 Internat. Conf. Supporting Group Work (ACM, New York), 281–290.Google Scholar
• Lampinen A, Lehtinen V, Lehmuskallio A, Tamminen S (2011) We’re in it together: Interpersonal management of disclosure in social network services. Proc. 2011 Annual Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 3217–3226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langer EJ (1975) The illusion of control. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 32(2):311–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laufer RS, Wolfe M (1977) Privacy as a concept and a social issue—Multidimensional developmental theory. J. Soc. Issues 33:22–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee DS, Lemieux T (2010) Regression discontinuity designs in economics. J. Econom. Literature 48(2):281–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis K (2011) The co-evolution of social network ties and online privacy behaviour. Trepte S, Reinecke L, eds. Privacy Online (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg), 91–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis K, Kaufman J, Christakis N (2008) The taste for privacy: An analysis of college student privacy settings in an online social network. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. 14(1):79–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra NK, Kim SS, Agarwal J (2004) Internet users’ information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Inform. Systems Res. 15(4):336–355.Link, Google Scholar
• Margulis ST (2003) Privacy as a social issue and behavioral concept. J. Soc. Issues 59:243–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marwick AE, boyd DM (2011) I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media Soc. 13(1):114–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Michielutte R, Shelton B, Paskett ED, Tatum CM, Velez R (2000) Use of an interrupted time-series design to evaluate a cancer screening program. Health Educ. Res. 15(5):615–623.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milberg SJ, Burke SJ, Smith HJ, Kallman EA (1995) Values, personal information privacy, and regulatory approaches. Comm. ACM 38(12):65–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Naone E (2010) The changing nature of privacy on Facebook. MIT Tech. Rev. (May 3), https://www.technologyreview.com/s/418766/the-changing-nature-of-privacy-on-facebook/.Google Scholar
• Opshal K (2010) Facebook’s eroding privacy policy: A timeline. EFF (April 28), https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/04/facebook-timeline/.Google Scholar
• Peltzman S (1975) The effects of automobile safety regulation. J. Political Econom. 83:677–726.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petronio S (1999) Preface: The meaning of balance. Petronio S, ed. Balancing the Secrets of Private Disclosures (Psychology Press, New York), xiii–xvi.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petronio SS (2002) Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure (SUNY Press, Albany, NY).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phan TQ, Airoldi EM (2015) A natural experiment of social network formation and dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112(21):6595–6600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Posner RA (1981) The economics of privacy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(2):405–409.Google Scholar
• Ross HL, Campbell DT, Glass GV (1970) Determining the social effects of a legal reform. Nagel SS, ed. Law and Social Change (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA), 15–32.Google Scholar
• Sanghvi R (2009) New tools to control your experience. Facebook (December 9). https://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook/new-tools-to-control-your-experience/196629387130/.Google Scholar
• Singel R (2009) Public posting now the default on Facebook. Wired (December 9), http://www.wired.com/2009/12/facebook-privacy-update/.Google Scholar
• Smith HJ, Dinev T, Xu H (2011) Information privacy research: An interdisciplinary review. MIS Quart. 35(4):989–1016.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith HJ, Milberg SJ, Burke SJ (1996) Information privacy: Measuring individuals’ concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quart. 20(2):167–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stone B (2009) Facebook’s privacy changes draw more scrutiny. New York Times (December 10), http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/10/facebooks-privacy-changes-draw-more-scrutiny/.Google Scholar
• Stutzman F (2006) An evaluation of identity-sharing behavior in social network communities. Internat. Digital Media Arts J. 3(1):10–18.Google Scholar
• Stutzman F, Gross R, Acquisti A (2012) Silent listeners: The evolution of privacy and disclosure on Facebook. J. Privacy Confidentiality 4(2):7–41.Google Scholar
• Stutzman FD, Duffield JK (2010) Friends only: Examining a privacy-enhancing behavior in Facebook. Inter. Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 1553–1562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thelwall M (2008) Social networks, gender and friending: An analysis of Myspace member profiles. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 59(8):1321–1330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson SC (1999) Illusions of control: How we overestimate our personal influence. Current Directions Psych. Sci. 8(6):187–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker C (2014) Social networks, personalized advertising, and privacy controls. J. Marketing Res. 51(5):546–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tufekci Z (2008) Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites. Bull. Sci. Tech. Soc. 28(1):20–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vroom VH (1964) Work and Motivation (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Williams D (2012) How Facebook’s ‘frictionless sharing’ can create better ads on Facebook. AdvertisingAge (January 30), http://adage.com/article/digitalnext/facebook-s-frictionless-sharing-create-ads-facebook/232419/.Google Scholar
• Xu H (2007) The effects of self-construal and perceived control on privacy concerns. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (AIS, Atlanta), 1–14.Google Scholar
• Xu H, Teo HH, Tan BCY, Agarwal R (2009) The role of push–pull technology in privacy calculus: The case of location-based services. J. Management Inform. Systems 26(3):135–173.Crossref, Google Scholar