Coordinating Interdependencies in Online Communities: A Study of an Open Source Software Project

References

• Anjewierden A, Efimova L (2006) Understanding weblog communities through digital traces: A framework, a tool and an example. Meersman R, Tari Z, Herrero Pet al., eds. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006: OTM 2006 Workshops, Lecture Notes Comput. Sci. Vol. 4277 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg), 279–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashby WR (1956) An Introduction to Cybernetics (Chapman & Hall, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailey DE, Leonardi PM, Chong J (2010) Minding the gaps: Understanding technology interdependence and coordination in knowledge work. Organ. Sci. 21(3):713–730.Link, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (MIT Press, Boston).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bardsley WE, Jorgensen MA, Alpert P, Ben-Gai T (1999) A significance test for empty corners in scatter diagrams. J. Hydrology 219(1–2):1–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beer S (1984) The viable system model: Its provenance, development, methodology and pathology. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 35(1):7–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Gai T, Bitan A, Manes A, Alpert P (1993) Long-term change in October rainfall patterns in Southern Israel. Theoretical Appl. Climatology 46:209–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benkler Y (2006) The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Boisot M, McKelvey B (2011) Complexity and organization-environment relations: Revisiting Ashby’s law of requisite variety. Allen P, Maguire S, McKelvey B, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Complexity and Management (Sage, London), 279–298.Google Scholar
• Boland RJ Jr, Tenkasi RV (1995) Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organ. Sci. 6(4):350–372.Link, Google Scholar
• Bucciarelli L (1994) Designing Engineers (MIT Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Cataldo M, Herbsleb JD (2013) Coordination breakdowns and their impact on development productivity and software failures coordination. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. 39(3):343–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cataldo M, Wagstrom P (2006) Identification of coordination requirements: Implications for the design of collaboration and awareness tools. CSCW ’06 Proc. 2006 20th Anniversary Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (ACM, New York), 353–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cataldo M, Herbsleb JD, Carley KM (2008) Socio-technical congruence: A framework for assessing the impact of technical and work dependencies on software development productivity. Proc. Second ACM-IEEE Internat. Sympos. Empirical Software Engrg. Measurement (ACM, New York), 2–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J (1977) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Cohendet P, Llerena P (2003) Routines and incentives: The role of communities in the firm. Indust. Corporate Change 12(2):271–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cramton CD (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. 12(3):346–371.Link, Google Scholar
• Crowston K, Kammerer E (1998) Coordination and collective mind in software requirements development. IBM Systems J. 37(2):227–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crowston K, Wei K, Howison J, Wiggins A (2012) Free/libre open-source software development: What we know and what we do not know. ACM Comput. Surveys 44(2):1–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curtis B, Herb K, Neil I (1988) A field study of the software design process for large systems. Comm. ACM 31(11):1268–1287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Martin J (2000) Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. 21(10–11):1105–1121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ernst D (2005) Limits to modularity: Reflections on recent developments in chip design. Indust. Innovation 12(3):303–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Sproull L (2000) Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. 46(12):1554–1568.Link, Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Jarvenpaa SL, Majchrzak A (2011) Knowledge collaboration in online communities. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1224–1239.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. 48(1):94–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske S, Taylor S (1984) Social Cognition, 2nd ed. (Longman Higher Education, Boston).Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald B (2006) The transformation of open source software. MIS Quart. 30(3):587–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabadinho A, Ritschard G, Studer M (2011a) Analyzing and visualizing state sequences in R with TraMineR. J. Statist. Software 40(4):1–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabadinho A, Ritschard G, Studer M, Nicolas SM (2011b) Mining sequence data in R with the TraMineR package: A user’s guide. http://mephisto.unige.ch/pub/TraMineR/doc/1.2/TraMineR-1.2-Users-Guide_.pdf.Google Scholar
• Galbraith JR (1974) Organization design: An information processing view. Interfaces 4(3):28–36.Link, Google Scholar
• Gaskin J, Thummadi V, Lyytinen K, Yoo T (2011) Digital technology and the variation in design routines: A sequence analysis of four design processes. Thirty Second Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Shanghai, China, 1–16.Google Scholar
• Gaskin J, Berente N, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y (2014) Toward generalizable sociomaterial inquiry: A computational approach for zooming in and out of sociomaterial routines. MIS Quart. 38(3):849–871.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gousios G, Spinellis D (2012) GHTorrent: GitHub’s data from a firehose. 9th IEEE Working Conf. Mining Software Repositories, 12–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hærem T, Pentland B, Miller K (2015) Task complexity: Extending a core concept. Acad. Management Rev. 40(3):446–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen S, Rennecker J (2010) Getting on the same page: Collective hermeneutics in a systems development team. Inform. Organ. 20(1):44–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holten R, Rozenkranz C (2011) Designing viable social systems: The role of linguistic communication for self-organization. Kybernetes 40(3–4):559–580.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howison J (2009) Alone together: A socio-technical theory of motivation, coordination and collaboration technologies in organizing for free and open source software development. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
• Howison J, Crowston K (2014) Collaboration through open superposition: A theory of the open source way. MIS Quart. 38(1):29–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutchins E (1995) Cognition in the Wild (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kane GC, Johnson J, Majchrzak A (2014) Emergent life cycle: The tension between knowledge change and knowledge retention in open online coproduction communities. Management Sci. 60(12):3026–3048.Link, Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina K (1991) Epistemic Cultures: Forms of Reason in Science (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Krippendorff K (2013) Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 12(1):1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee J, Berente N (2011) Digital innovation and the division of innovative labor: Digital controls in the automotive industry. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1428–1447.Link, Google Scholar
• Lehman M (1980) Programs, life cycles, and laws of software evolution. Proc. IEEE 68(9):1060–1076.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma M, Agarwal R (2007) Through a glass darkly: Information technology design, identity verification, and knowledge contribution in online communities. Inform. Systems Res. 18(1):42–67.Link, Google Scholar
• MacCormack A, Baldwin C, Rusnak J (2012) Exploring the duality between product and organizational architectures: A test of the “mirroring” hypothesis. Res. Policy 41(8):1309–1324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra A, Majchrzak A (2014) Managing crowds in innovation challenges. California Management Rev. 56(4):103–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malone TW, Crowston K (1994) The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Comput. Surveys 26(1):87–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Michlmayr M, Hill BM (2003) Quality and the reliance on individuals in free software projects. Feller J, Fitzgerald B, Hissam S, Lakhani K, eds. Taking Stock of the Bazaar: Proc. 3rd Workshop Open Source Software Engrg., 105–109.Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H (1979) The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Nagelkerke NJD (1991) A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika 78(3):691–692.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• O’Brien RM (2007) A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality Quant. 41(5):673–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S, Lakhani KR (2011) Organizations in the shadow of communities. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Research in the Sociology of Organizations: Communities and Organizations, Vol. 11–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parnas D (1972) On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules. Comm. ACM 15(12):1053–1058.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland B (2003a) Conceptualizing and measuring variety in the execution of organizational work processes. Management Sci. 49(7):857–870.Link, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT (2003b) Sequential variety in work processes. Organ. Sci. 14(5):528–540.Link, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Haerem T, Hillison D (2010) Comparing organizational routines as recurrent patterns of action. Organ. Stud. 31(7):917–940.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perrow C (1986) Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay (Random House, New York).Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Alexy O, Reitzig M (2014) What’s “new” about new forms of organizing? Acad. Management Rev. 39(2):162–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Raveendran M, Knudsen T (2012) Organization design: The epistemic interdependence perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):419–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ransbotham S, Kane G (2011) Membership turnover and collaboration success in online communities: Explaining rises and falls from grace in Wikipedia. MIS Quart. 35(3):613–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scacchi W (2004) Free and open source development practices in the game community. IEEE Software 21(1):59–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scozzi B, Crowston K, Eseryel UY, Li Q (2008) Shared mental models among open source software developers. 41st Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci., 306–316.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shannon C (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical J. 27(3):379–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. 106(6):467–482.Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1996) The Sciences of the Artificial (MIT Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Stewart KJ, Ammeter AP, Maruping LM (2006) Impacts of license choice and organizational sponsorship on user interest and development activity in open source software projects. Inform. Systems Res. 17(2):126–144.Link, Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 3rd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. 18(7):509–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ).Google Scholar
• Tukey JW (1977) Exploratory Data Analysis (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Tushman M, Nadler D (1978) Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Acad. Management Rev. 3(3):613–624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vetrova VV, Bardsley WE (2012) Technical note: A significance test for data-sparse zones in scatter plots. Hydrology Earth System Sci. 16(4):1255–1257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E, von Krogh G (2003) Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organ. Sci. 14(2):209–223.Link, Google Scholar
• von Krogh G, von Hippel E (2006) The promise of research on open source software. Management Sci. 52(7):975–983.Link, Google Scholar
• Wageman R (1995) Interdependence and group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(1):145–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh I, Holton JA, Bailyn L, Fernandez W, Levina N, Glaser, B (2015) What grounded theory is…: A critically reflective conversation among scholars. Organ. Res. Methods 18(4):581–599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd ed., Topics Soc. Psych., Vol. 2 (Addison-Wesley, New York).Google Scholar
• Winter S, Berente N, Howison J, Butler B (2014) Beyond the organizational “container”: Conceptualizing 21st century sociotechnical work. Inform. Organ. 24(4):250–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood R (1986) Task complexity: Definition of the construct. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 37(1):60–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin RK (2008) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) Research commentary–The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4): 724–735.Link, Google Scholar
• Zammuto RF, Griffith TL, Majchrzak A, Dougherty DJ, Faraj S (2007) Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organ. Sci. 18(5):749–762.Link, Google Scholar