Coalition-Based Pricing in Ascending Combinatorial Auctions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2016.0681

References

  • Adomavicius G, Gupta A (2005) Toward comprehensive real-time bidder support in iterative combinatorial auctions. Inform. Systems Res. 16(2):169–185.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Adomavicius G, Curley S, Gupta A, Sanyal P (2013) Impact of information feedback in continuous combinatorial auctions: An experimental study of economic performance. MIS Quart. 37(1):55–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aumann RJ (1987) Correlated equilibrium as an expression of Bayesian rationality. Econometrica: J. Econometric Soc. 57(1):1–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ausubel L (2006) An efficient dynamic auction for heterogeneous commodities. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(3):602–629.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ausubel L, Milgrom P (2006a) Ascending proxy auctions. Cramton P, Shoham Y, Steinberg R, eds. Combinatorial Auctions (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 79–98.Google Scholar
  • Ausubel L, Milgrom P (2006b) The lovely but lonely Vickrey auction. Cramton P, Shoham Y, Steinberg R, eds. Combinatorial Auctions (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 17–40.Google Scholar
  • Bernheim BD, Whinston MD (1986) Menu auctions, resource allocation, and economic influence. Quart. J. Econom. 101(1):1–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bichler M, Gupta A, Ketter W (2010) Designing smart markets. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):688–699.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bichler M, Shabalin P, Pikovsky A (2009) A computational analysis of linear-price iterative combinatorial auctions. Inform. Systems Res. 20(1):33–59.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bichler M, Shabalin P, Wolf J (2013) Do core-selecting combinatorial clock auctions always lead to high efficiency? An experimental analysis of spectrum auction designs. Experiment. Econom. 16(4):511–545.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bikhchandani S, Ostroy JM (2002) The package assignment model. J. Econom. Theory 107(2):377–406.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper R (1999) Coordination Games (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cramton P, Shoham Y, Steinberg R, eds. (2006) Combinatorial Auctions (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Day R, Milgrom P (2008) Core-selecting package auctions. Internat. J. Game Theory 36(3):393–407.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Vries S, Schummer J, Vohra R (2007) On ascending Vickrey auctions for heterogeneous objects. J. Econom. Theory 132(1):95–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dehez P (2007) Fair division of fixed costs defines the Shapley value. Technical report, University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.970910.Google Scholar
  • Goeree J, Holt C (2010) Hierarchical package bidding: A paper and pencil combinatorial auction. Games Econom. Behav. 70(1):146–169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goeree J, Lien Y (2016) On the impossibility of core-selecting auctions. Theoret. Econom. 11(1):41–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guler K, Bichler M, Petrakis I (2016) Ascending combinatorial auctions with risk averse bidders. Group Decision Negotiation 25(3):609–639.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krishna V, ed. (2002) Auction Theory (Elsevier Science, San Diego).Google Scholar
  • Kwasnica T, Ledyard JO, Porter D, DeMartini C (2005) A new and improved design for multiobjective iterative auctions. Management Sci. 51(3):419–434.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levin J, Skrzypacz A (2016) Properties of the combinatorial clock auction. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(9):2528–2551.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leyton-Brown K, Nudelman E, Shoham Y (2006) Empirical hardness models for combinatorial auctions. Cramton P, Shoham Y, Steinberg R, eds. Combinatorial Auctions (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 479–504.Google Scholar
  • McLennan A, Berg J (2005) Asymptotic expected number of Nash equilibria of two-player normal form games. Games Econom. Behav. 51(2):264–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nisan N (2006) Bidding languages. Cramton P, Shoham Y, Steinberg R, eds. Combinatorial Auctions (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA),215–232.Google Scholar
  • Nisan N, Segal I (2006) The communication requirements of efficient allocations and supporting prices. J. Econom. Theory 129(1):192–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parkes D (2006) Iterative combinatorial auctions. Cramton P, Shoham Y, Steinberg R, eds. Combinatorial Auctions (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 41–78.Google Scholar
  • Parkes D (2007) Online mechanisms. Nisan N, Roughgarden T, Tardos E, Vazirani V, eds. Algorithmic Game Theory (Cambridge University Press, New York), 411–439.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parkes D, Ungar LH (2000) Iterative combinatorial auctions: Theory and practice. Kautz H, Porter B, eds. 17th Natl. Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-00) (AAAI Press, Austin, TX), 74–81.Google Scholar
  • Petrakis I, Ziegler G, Bichler M (2013) Ascending combinatorial auctions with allocation constraints: On game-theoretical and computational properties of generic pricing rules. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):768–786.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rothkopf MH, Pekeč A, Harstad RM (1998) Computationally manageable combinatorial auctions. Management Sci. 44(8):1131–1147.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sano R (2012) Non-bidding equilibrium in an ascending core-selecting auction. Games Econom. Behav. 74(2):637–650.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scheffel T, Ziegler A, Bichler M (2012) On the impact of package selection in combinatorial auctions: An experimental study in the context of spectrum auction design. Experiment. Econom. 15(4):667–692.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scheffel T, Pikovsky A, Bichler M, Guler K (2011) An experimental comparison of linear and non-linear price combinatorial auctions. Inform. Systems Res. 22(2):346–368.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schneider S, Shabalin P, Bichler M (2010) On the robustness of non-linear personalized price combinatorial auctions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 206(1):248–259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shoham Y, Leyton-Brown K (2009) Multiagent Systems: Algorithmic, Game-Theoretic, and Logical Foundations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilson R (1987) Game-theoretic analyses of trading processes. Advances in Economic Theory: Fifth World Congress (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.