Information Technology, Revenues, and Profits: Exploring the Role of Foreign and Domestic Operations

References

• Aeppel T (2007) Overseas profits provide shelter for U.S. firms. Wall Street Journal (August 9), A1.Google Scholar
• Andersen T, Foss NJ (2005) Strategic opportunity and economic performance in multinational enterprises: The role and effects of information and communication technology. J. Internat. Management 11(2):293–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2010) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Aral S, Weill P (2007) IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: How resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organ. Sci. 18(5):763–780.Link, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Brynjolfsson E, Wu DJ (2006) Which came first, IT or productivity? The virtuous cycle of investment and use in enterprise systems. Proc. 27th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS), Milwaukee, 1819–1840.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N, Thaler R (2003) A survey of behavioral finance. Constatinides GM, Harris M, Stulz R, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Finance (Elsevier, Amsterdan), 1053–1128.Google Scholar
• Barnett WP, Pontikes EG (2008) The red queen, success bias, and organizational inertia. Management Sci. 54(7):1237–1251.Link, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj AS, Bharadwaj SG, Konsynski BR (1999) Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s q. Management Sci. 45(7):1008–1024.Link, Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2007) Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Quart. J. Econom. 122(4):1351–1408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau M-C, Loch KD, Robey D, Straub D (1998) Going global: Using information technology to advance the competitiveness of the virtual organization. Acad. Management Executive 12(4): 120–128.Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM (1996) Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Sci. 42(4):541–558.Link, Google Scholar
• Calmes J, Andrews EL (2009) Obama asks curb on use of havens to reduce taxes. New York Times (May 5), A1.Google Scholar
• Chesbrough HW, Teece DJ (1996) Organizing for innovation: When is virtual virtuous? Harvard Bus. Rev. 74(1):65–73.Google Scholar
• Chwelos P, Ramirez RV, Kraemer K, Melville N (2010) Does technological progress alter the nature of information technology as a production input? New evidence and new results. Inform. Systems Res. 21(2):392–408.Link, Google Scholar
• Davis GF (2010) Do theories of organizations progress? Organ. Res. Methods 13(4):690–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis GF (2015) Editorial essay: What is organizational research for? Admin. Sci. Quart. 60(2):179–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dedrick J, Gurbaxani V, Kraemer KL (2003) Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of empirical evidence. ACM Comput. Surveys 35(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economist, The (2010) The world turned upside down. (April 15), http://www.economist.com/node/15879369.Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Moingeon B, Dessain V, Jensen AD (2008) Global knowledge management at Danone. Harvard Business School Case 608-107, Boston, 1–22.Google Scholar
• El Sawy OA, Pavlou PA (2008) IT-enabled business capabilities for turbulent environments. MIS Quart. Executive 7(3):139–150.Google Scholar
• El Sawy OA, Kraemmergaard P, Amsinck H, Vinther AL (2016) How Lego built the foundations and enterprise capabilities for digital leadership. MIS Quart. Executive 15(2):141–166.Google Scholar
• El Sawy OA, Malhotra A, Park Y, Pavlou PA (2010) Seeking the configurations of digital ecodynamics: It takes three to tango. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):835–848.Link, Google Scholar
• Fama E (1998) Market efficiency, long term returns, and behavioral finance. J. Financial Econom. 49(3):283–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farhoomand A, Huang M (2009) Does IT payoff? Strategies of two banking giants. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 24:821–836.Google Scholar
• Farrell D (2004) Beyond offshoring: Assess your company’s global potential. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82(12):82–90.Google Scholar
• Finnegan P, Longaigh SN (2002) Examining the effects of information technology on control and coordination relationships: An exploratory study in subsidiaries of pan-national corporations. J. Inform. Tech. 17(3):149–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiss PC (2011) Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Acad. Management J. 54(2):393–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foerderer J, Kude T, Mithas S, Heinzl A (2016) Does platform owner’s entry crowd out innovation? Evidence from Google photos. Agerfalk P, Levina N, Kien SS, eds. Proc. 35th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (AIS, Atlanta), 1–17.Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Mithas S, Morgeson FV (2009) The economic and statistical significance of stock returns on customer satisfaction. Marketing Sci. 28(5):820–825.Link, Google Scholar
• Gereffi G, Humphrey J, Sturgeon T (2005) The governance of global value chains. Rev. Internat. Political Econom. 12(1):78–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P (2001) Distance still matters: The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Bus. Rev. 79(8):137–147.Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P (2007a) Managing differences: The central challenge of global strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 85(3):58–68.Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P (2007b) Redefining Global Strategy: Crossing Borders in a World Where Differences Still Matter (HBS Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Gregory RW, Keil M, Muntermann J, Mahring M (2015) Paradoxes and the nature of ambidexterity in IT transformation programs. Inform. Systems Res. 26(1):57–80.Link, Google Scholar
• Grover V, Ramanlal P (1999) Six myths of information and markets: Information technology networks, electronic commerce, and the battle for consumer surplus. MIS Quart. 23(4):465–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamel G, Prahalad CK (1983) Managing strategic responsibility in the MNC. Strategic Management J. 4(4):341–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanson GH, Mataloni RJ, Slaughter MJ (2005) Vertical production networks in multinational firms. Rev. Econom. Statist. 87(4):664–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman JA (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46(6):1251–1271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennart J-F (2012) Emerging market multinationals and the theory of the multinational enterprise. Global Strategy J. 2(3):168–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong JFL, Easterby-Smith M, Snell RS (2006) Transferring organizational learning systems to Japanese subsidiaries in China. J. Management Stud. 43(5):1027–1058.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Im G, Rai A (2008) Knowledge sharing ambidexterity in long-term interorganizational relationships. Management Sci. 54(7):1281–1296.Link, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S, Ives B (1994) The global network organization of the future: Information management opportunities and challenges. J. Management Inform. Systems 10(4):25–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaussad J, Schapper J (2006) Control mechanisms of their subsidiaries by international firms: A multidimensional perspective. J. Internat. Management 12(1):23–45.Google Scholar
• Jean R-J, Sinkovics RR, Kim D (2008) Information technology and organizational performance within international business to business relationships. Internat. Marketing Rev. 25(5):563–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johanson J, Vahlne J-E (1977) The internationalization process of the firm–a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 8(1):23–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson K (2014) Honda’s global stratgy? Go local. Washington Post (August 10), http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/how-honda-makes-globalization-work/2014/08/07/b84f16be-1cd0-11e4-ab7b-696c295ddfd1_story.html.Google Scholar
• Kettinger WJ, Marchand DA, Davis JM (2010) Designing enterprise IT architectures to optimize flexibility and standardization in global business. MIS Quart. Executive 9(2):95–113.Google Scholar
• Kim K, Mithas S, Kimbrough M (2017) Information technology investments, and firm risk across industries: Evidence from the bond market. MIS Quart. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King WR, Sethi V (1999) An empirical assessment of the organization of transnational information systems. J. Management Inform. Systems 15(4):7–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleis L, Chwelos P, Ramirez RV, Cockburn I (2012) Information technology and intangible output: The impact of IT investment on innovation productivity. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):42–59.Link, Google Scholar
• Kogut B (1985) Designing global strategies: Comparative and competitive value-added chains. Sloan Management Rev. 26(4):15–28.Google Scholar
• Kohli R (2007) Innovating to create IT-based new business opportunities at United Parcel Service. MIS Quart. Executive 6(4):199–210.Google Scholar
• Kraemer KL, Dedrick J, Melville N, Zhu K (2006) Global E-Commerce: Impacts of National Environment and Policy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar V (2016) Introduction: Is customer satisfaction (ir)relevant as a metric? J. Marketing 80(5):108–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee O-K, Sambamurthy V, Lim KH, Wei KK (2015) How does IT ambidexterity impact organizational agility? Inform. Systems Res. 26(2):398–417.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewin AY, Massini S, Peeters C (2009) Why are companies offshoring innovation? The emerging global race for talent. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 40(6):901–925.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merle R (2016) U.S. officials tout this company as one of America’s fi-nest. It’s actually based in Ireland. Washington Post (September 11),G1, https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/us-officials-tout-this-company-as-one-of-americas-finest-its-actually-based-in-ireland/2016/09/09/01aec9f0-5e59-11e6-8e45-477372e89d78_story.html.Google Scholar
• Mithas S (2015) Making the Elephant Dance: The Tata Way to Innovate, Transform and Globalize (Penguin Portfolio, New Delhi, India), http://www.amazon.in/dp/B012G9MSCA.Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Rust RT (2016) How information technology strategy and investments influence firm performance: Conjecture and empirical evidence. MIS Quart. 40(1):223–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Whitaker J (2007) Is the world flat or spiky? Information intensity, skills and global service disaggregation. Inform. Systems Res. 18(3):237–259.Link, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Krishnan MS, Fornell C (2005) Why do customer relationship management applications affect customer satisfaction? J. Marketing 69(4):201–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Ramasubbu N, Sambamurthy V (2011) How information management capability influences firm performance. MIS Quart. 35(1):237–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Tafti AR, Bardhan IR, Goh JM (2012) Information technology and firm profitability: Mechanisms and empirical evidence. MIS Quart. 36(1):205–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Whitaker J, Lee D, Srivastava SC, Arora R (2016) Managing trade-offs in innovation outcomes: Evidence from a leading conglomerate. Working paper, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
• Mudambi R (2002) Knowledge management in multinational firms. J. Internat. Management 8(1):1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mudambi R, Navarra P (2004) Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 35(1):385–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy C (2012) General Motors will slash outsourcing in IT overhaul. InformationWeek, 21–26, http://www.informationweek.com/global-cio/interviews/general-motors-will-slash-outsourcing-in/240002892.Google Scholar
• Nachum L, Zaheer S (2005) The persistence of distance? The impact of technology on MNE motivations for foreign investment. Strategic Management J. 26(8):747–767.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oh W, Pinsonneault A (2007) On the assessment of the business value of information systems: Conceptual and measurement alternatives. MIS Quart. 31(2):239–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Keefe B, Jones M (2015) How Uber plays the tax shell game. Fortune (October 22), http://fortune.com/2015/10/22/uber-tax-shell/.Google Scholar
• O’Reilly CA III, Tushman ML (2013) Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, future. Acad. Management Perspect. 27(4):324–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Padmanabhan S (2015) Every global group has a language: TBEM and TCoC define the language of the Tatas. Indian Management 54(9):51.Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, El Sawy O (2010) The “third hand”: IT-enabled competitive advantage in turbulence through improvisational capabilities. Inform. Systems Res. 21(3):443–471.Link, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1986) Changing patterns of international competition. California Management Rev. 28(2):9–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (2008) The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 86(1):78–93.Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40(3):879–891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preston DS, Karahanna E, Rowe F (2006) Development of shared understanding between the chief information officer and top management team in U.S. and French organizations: A cross-cultural comparison. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 53(2):191–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragin CC (2014) The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies (University of California Press, Oakland, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai A, Patnayakuni R, Patnayakuni N (1997) Technology investment and business performance. Comm. ACM 40(7):89–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai A, Pavlou P, Im G, Du S (2012) Inter-firm IT capabilities and communications for co-creating relational value: Evidence from the logistics industry. MIS Quart. 36(1):233–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramamurti R (2012) What is really different about emerging market multinationals? Global Strategy J. 2(1):41–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramarapu NK, Lado AA (1995) Linking information technology to global business strategy to gain competitive advantage: An integrative model. J. Inform. Tech. 10(2):115–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rangan S, Sengul M (2009) Information technology and transnational integration: Theory and evidence on the evolution of the modern multinational enterprise. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 40(9):1496–1514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravichandran T, Han S, Mithas S (2017) Mitigating diminishing returns to R&D: The role of information technology in innovation. Inform. Systems Res. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
• Reese AK (2008) Enabling GM’s global supply chain. Supply Demand Chain Executive, http://www.sdcexec.com/article/10289524/enabling-gms-global-supply-chain.Google Scholar
• Rosenbush S (2013) How GM lost a mainframe, but gained an IT department. Wall Street Journal (May 15), http://blogs.wsj.com/cio/2013/05/15/how-gm-lost-a-mainframe-but-gained-an-it-department/.Google Scholar
• Saldanha T, Mithas S, Krishnan MS (2017) Leveraging customer involvement for fueling innovation: The role of relational and analytical information processing capabilities. MIS Quart. 41(1):267–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sambharya RB, Kumaraswamy A, Banerjee S (2005) Information technologies and the future of the multinational enterprise. J. Internat. Management 11(2):143–161.Google Scholar
• Sandino T, Kaplan RS (2001) Accounting for computer software development costs. Harvard Business School Case Collection, 9-102-034, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Shin N (1999) Does information technology improve coordination? An empirical analysis. Logist. Inform. Management 12(1/2):138–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sia SK, Soh C, Weill P (2010) Global IT management: Structuring for scale, responsiveness, and innovation. Comm. ACM 53(3):59–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stabell CB, Fjeldstad ØD (1998) Configuring value for competitive advantage: On chains, shops and networks. Strategic Management J. 19(5):413–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Su N (2013) Internationalization strategies of Chinese IT service suppliers. MIS Quart. 37(1):175–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tafti A, Mithas S, Krishnan MS (2013) The effect of information technology-enabled flexibility on formation and market value of alliances. Management Sci. 59(1):207–225.Link, Google Scholar
• Tallon PP, Kraemer KL, Gurbaxani V (2000) Executives’ perceptions of the business value of information technology: A process oriented approach. J. Management Inform. Systems 16(4):145–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A (2010) Systems development ambidexterity: Explaining the complementary and substitutive roles of formal and informal controls. J. Management Inform. Systems 27(2):87–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A (2014) Separating signal from noise: Evaluating emerging technologies. MIS Quart. Executive 13(1):45–61.Google Scholar
• Tiwana A, Kim SK (2015) Discriminating IT governance. Inform. Systems Res. 26(4):656–674.Link, Google Scholar
• Tully S (2010) Fortune 500: Profits bounce back. Fortune (May 3),139–144.Google Scholar
• Vowler J (2005) The global power of IT. Computer Weekly (April 5), 22–23.Google Scholar
• Waring GF (1996) Industry difference in the persistence of firm-specific returns. Amer. Econom. Rev. 86(5):1253–1265.Google Scholar
• Weill P, Ross J (2005) A matrixed approach to designing IT governance. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 46(2):26–34.Google Scholar
• Whitaker J, Mithas S, Krishnan MS (2011) Organizational learning and capabilities for onshore and offshore business process outsourcing. J. Management Inform. Systems 27(3):11–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2003) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (Thomson, Mason, OH).Google Scholar
• Xue L, Mithas S, Ray G (2014) Earnings management and IT investments: An examination of IT infrastructure development. Srinivasan A, Tan B, Karahanna E, eds. Proc. 34th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (AIS, Atlanta), 1–18.Google Scholar
• Yadron D, Linebaugh K, Lessin JE (2013) Apple avoided taxes on overseas billions, Senate panel finds. Wall Street Journal (May 20), http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887324787004578495250424727708.Google Scholar
• Yang Q, Mudambi R, Meyer KE (2008) Conventional and reverse knowledge flows in multinational corporations. J. Management 34(5):882–902.Google Scholar
• Yu J, Han K, Mithas S (2013) The role of information technology as a firm-specific advantage in internationalization of firms: Theory and evidence. Baskerville R, Chau M, eds. Proc. 33rd Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (AIS, Atlanta).Google Scholar
• Zaheer S (1995) Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Acad. Management J. 38(2):341–363.Crossref, Google Scholar