A Systematic Framework for Multilevel Theorizing in Information Systems Research

References

• Bacharach SB (1989) Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):496–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bélanger F, Cefaratti M, Carte T, Markham SE (2014) Multilevel research in information systems: Concepts, strategies, problems, and pitfalls. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 15(9):614–650.Google Scholar
• Bock GW, Zmud RW, Kim YG, Lee JN (2005) Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quart. 29(1):87–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A, Gallivan MJ (2007) Toward a deeper understanding of system usage in organizations: A multilevel perspective. MIS Quart. 31(4):657–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cenfetelli RT, Schwarz A (2011) Identifying and testing the inhibitors of technology usage intentions. Inform. Systems Res. 22(4): 808–823.Link, Google Scholar
• Chan D (1998) Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. J. Appl. Psych. 83(2):234–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. 13(3):319–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeLone WH, McLean ER (1992) Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inform. Systems Res. 3(1):60–95.Link, Google Scholar
• Dubin R (1978) Theory Building (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(4):660–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallivan MJ, Benbunan-Fich R (2005) A framework for analyzing levels of analysis issues in studies of e-collaboration. IEEE Trans. Professional Comm. 48(1):87–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregor S (2006) The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quart. 30(3):611–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R (1998) Alliances and networks. Strategic Management J. 19(4):293–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• House R, Rousseau DM, Thomas-Hunt M (1995) The meso paradigm—A framework for the integration of micro and macro organizational-behavior. Res. Organ. Behav. 17:71–114.Google Scholar
• Hox J (2010) Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications, 2nd ed. (Routledge, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaccard J, Jacoby J (2010) Theory Construction and Model-Building Skills: A Practical Guide for Social Scientists (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Kane GC, Borgatti SP (2011) Centrality–IS proficiency alignment and workgroup performance. MIS Quart. 35(4):1063–1078.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kane GC, Labianca G (2011) IS avoidance in health-care groups: A multilevel investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 22(3):504–522.Link, Google Scholar
• Kang S, Lim KH, Kim MS, Yang H-D (2012) A multilevel analysis of the effect of group appropriation on collaborative technologies use and performance. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):214–230.Link, Google Scholar
• Klein KJ, Dansereau F, Hall RJ (1994) Levels issues in theory development, data-collection, and analysis. Acad. Management Rev. 19(2):195–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SWJ, Klein KJ (2000) A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ, eds. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 3–90.Google Scholar
• Lapointe L, Rivard S (2005) A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Quart. 29(3):461–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu JE, Chen G (2011) The etiology of the multilevel paradigm in management research. J. Management 37(2):610–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath JE (1984) Groups: Interaction and Performance (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Melville N, Kraemer K, Gurbaxani V (2004) Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quart. 28(2):283–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgeson FP, Hofmann DA (1999) The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Acad. Management Rev. 24(2):249–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman MEJ (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 45(2):167–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederman F, Beise CM, Beranek PM (1996) Issues and concerns about computer-supported meetings: The facilitator’s perspective. MIS Quart. 20(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petter S, DeLone W, McLean E (2008) Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 17(3):236–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter ME (1998) Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Rai A, Maruping LM, Venkatesh V (2009) Offshore information systems project success: The role of social embeddedness and cultural characteristics. MIS Quart. 33(3):617–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ransbotham S, Kane GC (2011) Membership turnover and collaboration success in online communities: Explaining rises and falls from grace in Wikipedia. MIS Quart. 35(3):613–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravishankar MN, Pan SL, Leidner DE (2011) Examining the strategic alignment and implementation success of a KMS: A subculture-based multilevel analysis. Inform. Systems Res. 22(1):39–59.Link, Google Scholar
• Rivard S (2014) The ions of theory construction. MIS Quart. 38(2): iii–xiv.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rousseau DM (1985) Issues of levels in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Res. Organ. Behav. 7:1–37.Google Scholar
• Rousseau DM (2011) Reinforcing the micro/macro bridge: Organizational thinking and pluralistic vehicles. J. Management 37(2): 429–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarker S, Valacich JS (2010) An alternative to methodological individualism: A non-reductionist approach to studying technology adoption by groups. MIS Quart. 34(4):779–808.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seddon PB, Staples S, Patnayakuni R, Bowtell M (1999) Dimensions of information systems success. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 2 Article 20.Google Scholar
• Snijders T, Bosker RJ (1999) Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Straub D, Keil M, Brenner W (1997) Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three country study. Inform. Management 33(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tallon PP, Pinsonneault A (2011) Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: Insights from a mediation model. MIS Quart. 35(2):463–486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Sci. 46(2):186–204.Link, Google Scholar
• Weber R (2012) Evaluating and developing theories in the information systems discipline. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 13(1):1–30.Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1989) Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):516–531.Crossref, Google Scholar