Governance Practices in Platform Ecosystems: Navigating Tensions Between Cocreated Value and Governance Costs

References

• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (2006) The architecture of participation: Does code architecture mitigate free riding in the open source development model? Management Sci. 52(7):1116–1127.Link, Google Scholar
• Berente N, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y, King JL (2016) Routines as shock absorbers during organizational transformation: Integration, control, and NASA’s enterprise information system. Organ. Sci. 27(3):551–572.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau K (2010) Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. devolving control. Management Sci. 56(10):1849–1872.Link, Google Scholar
• Ceccagnoli M, Forman C, Huang P, Wu DJ (2012) Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem: The case of enterprise software. MIS Quart. 36(1):263–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charmaz K (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Research (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Corbin J, Strauss A (1990) Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociol. 13(1):3–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D, Dunne D (2011) Organizing ecologies of complex innovation. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1214–1223.Link, Google Scholar
• Ghazawneh A, Henfridsson O (2013) Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: The boundary resources model. Inform. Systems J. 23(2):173–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Puranam P, Tushman M (2012) Meta-organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts. Strategic Management J. 33(6):571–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber TL, Fischer TA, Dibbern J, Hirschheim R (2013) A process model of complementarity and substitution of contractual and relational governance in IS outsourcing. J. Management Inform. Systems 30(3):81–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• IBM (2014) IBM PartnerWorld program guide. http://www.ibm.com/partnerworld.Google Scholar
• Jay J (2013) Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Acad. Management J. 56(1):137–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kale P, Singh H, Perlmutter H (2000) Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management J. 21(3):217–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kude T, Dibbern J, Heinzl A (2012) Why do complementors participate? An analysis of partnership networks in the enterprise software industry. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 59(2):250–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 12(1):1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levina N, Vaast E (2008) Innovating or doing as told? Status differences and overlapping boundaries in offshore collaboration. MIS Quart. 32(2):307–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus ML, Robey D (1988) Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Sci. 34(5):583–598.Link, Google Scholar
• Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):709–734.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. 23(2):242–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouchi WG (1980) Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Admin. Sci. Quart. 25(1):129–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW (2005) Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. 51(10):1494–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Perrone V, Zaheer A, McEvily B (2003) Free to be trusted? Organizational constraints on trust in boundary spanners. Organ. Sci. 14(4):422–439.Link, Google Scholar
• Rolland KH, Monteiro E (2002) Balancing the local and the global in infrastructural information systems. Inform. Soc. 18(2):87–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarker S, Sarker S, Sahaym A, Bjørn-Andersen N (2012) Exploring value cocreation in relationships between an ERP vendor and its partners: A revelatory case study. MIS Quart. 36(1):317–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush AA (2010) Research commentary—Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):675–687.Link, Google Scholar
• Wareham J, Fox PB, Cano Giner JL (2014) Technology ecosystem governance. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1195–1215.Link, Google Scholar
• Williamson O (1981) The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. Amer. J. Sociol. 87(3):548–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin R (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage, London).Google Scholar