How Can We Develop Contextualized Theories of Effective Use? A Demonstration in the Context of Community-Care Electronic Health Records

References

• Agarwal R (2011) Editorial notes. Inform. Systems Res. 22(1):1–4.Link, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Angst CM, DesRoches CM, Fischer MA (2010) Technological viewpoints (frames) about electronic prescribing in physicial practices. J. Amer. Medical Informatics Assoc. 17(4):425–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avgerou C (2013) Social mechanisms for causal explanation in social theory based IS research. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 14(8):399–419.Google Scholar
• Barki H, Titah R, Boffo C (2007) Information system use-related activity: An expanded conceptualization of information system use. Inform. Systems Res. 18(2):173–192.Link, Google Scholar
• Beckett D (1996) Critical judgment and professional practice. Educational Theory 46(2):135–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blumenthal D (2011) Wiring the health system—Origins and provisions of a new federal program. New England J. Medicine 365(24): 2323–2329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blumenthal D, Tavenner M (2010) The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. New England J. Medicine 363(6):501–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boud D (2010) Relocating reflection in the context of practice. Bradbury H, Frost N, Kilminster S, Zukas M, eds. Beyond Reflective Practice: New Approaches to Professional Lifelong Learning (Routledge, Abingdon, UK), 25–36.Google Scholar
• Boudreau M-C, Seligman L (2005) Quality of use of a complex technology: A learning-based model. J. Organ. End User Comput. 17(4):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A, Gallivan MJ (2007) Towards a deeper understanding of system usage in organizations: A multilevel perspective. MIS Quart. 31(4):657–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A, Grange C (2013) From use to effective use: A representation theory perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):632–658.Link, Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A, Straub D (2006) Reconceptualizing system usage. Inform. Systems Res. 17(3):228–246.Link, Google Scholar
• Charmaz K (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis (Sage Publications, London).Google Scholar
• CIHI (2009) The CIHI data quality framework. Canadian Institute for Health Information, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
• Cordoba J-R, Pilkington A, Bernroider EWN (2012) Information systems as a discipline in the making: Comparing EJIS and MISQ between 1995 and 2008. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 21(5):479–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis R, Thurecht R (2001) Care planning and case conferencing: Building effective multidisciplinary teams. Australian Family Physician 30(1):78–81.Google Scholar
• Elmes MB, Strong DM, Volkoff O (2005) Panoptic empowerment and reflective conformity in enterprise systems-enabled organizations. Inform. Organ. 15(1):1–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson JJ (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (Taylor and Francis, New York).Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory (Aldine, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Glaser R (1978) Theoretical Sensitivity (Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA).Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Potts HWW, Wong G, Bark P, Swinglehurst D (2009) Tensions and paradoxes in electronic patient record research: A systematic literature review using the meta-narrative method. Milbank Quart. 87(4):729–788.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, Starfield BH, Adair CE, McKendry R (2003) Continuity of care: A multidisciplinary review. British Medical J. 327(7425):1219–1221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins D (2011) Editorial: Why reflect? Recognising the link between learning and reflection. Reflective Practice 12(5):583–584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong W, Chan KY, Thong JYL, Chasalow L, Dhillon G (2014) The role of context in theory development: A framework and guidelines for context-specific theorizing in information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 25(1):111–136.Link, Google Scholar
• Jarvis P (1992) Reflective practice and nursing. Nurse Ed. Today 12(3):174–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jha AK (2010) Meaningful use of electronic health records: The road ahead. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 304(15):1709–1710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johns G (2006) The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Acad. Management Rev. 31(2):386–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keevers L, Trelaven L (2011) Organizing practices of reflection: A practice-based study. Management Learn. 42(5):505–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuhn T, Basch P, Barr M, Yackel T (2015) Clinical documentation in the 21st century: Executive summary of a policy position paper from the American College of Physicians. Ann. Internal Medicine 162(4):301–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lackoff G (1987) Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind (Chicago University Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lanham HJ, Leykum LK, McDaniel RR (2011) Same organization, same electronic health records (EHRs), different use: Exploring the linkage between practice member communication patterns and EHR use patterns in an ambulatory care setting. J. Amer. Medical Informatics Assoc. 19(3):382–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larman C (2001) Applying UML and Patterns: An Introduction to Object-Oriented Analysis and Design, and the Unified Process (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Lawson T (1998) Economic science without experimentation. Archer MS, Bhaskar R, Collier A, Lawson T, Norrie A, eds. Critical Realism: Essential Readings (Routledge, London), 144–169.Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2013) When does technology use enable network change in organizations? A comparative study of feature use and shared affordances. MIS Quart. 37(3):749–775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LeRouge C, Hevner AR, Collins RW (2007) It’s more than just use: An exploration of telemedicine use quality. Decision Support Systems 43(4):1287–1304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levina N (2005) Collaborating on multiparty information systems development projects: A collective reflection-in-action view. Inform. Systems Res. 16(2):109–130.Link, Google Scholar
• Mann K, Gordon J, MacLeod A (2009) Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: A systematic review. Adv. Health Sci. Ed. 14(4):595–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marcolin BL, Compeau D, Munro MC, Huff SL (2000) Assessing user competence: Conceptualization and measurement. Inform. Systems Res. 11(1):37–60.Link, Google Scholar
• Mathieu JE, Chen G (2011) The etiology of the multilevel paradigm in management research. J. Management 37(2):610–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgeson FP, Hofmann DA (1999) The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Acad. Management Rev. 24(2):249–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 11(4):404–428.Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Iacono CS (2001) Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research—A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inform. Systems Res. 12(2):121–134.Link, Google Scholar
• Osterlund C (2002) Documenting dreams: Patient-centered records versus practice-centered records. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
• Palen L, Salzman M, Youngs E (2000) Going wireless: Behavior and practice of new mobile phone users. Kellog WA, Whittaker S, eds. Proc. 2000 ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (ACM, New York), 201–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Recker J, Wyner G (2015) A thermometer for interdependence: Exploring patterns of interdependence using networks of affordances. Proc. 36th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Fort Worth, TX, 1–11.Google Scholar
• Ramiller NC, Pentland BT (2009) Management implications in information systems research: The untold story. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 10(6):474–494.Google Scholar
• Sandberg J, Tsoukas H (2011) Grasping the logic of practice: Theorizing through practical rationality. Acad. Management Rev. 36(2):338–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sartori G (1970) Concept misformation in comparative politics. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 64(4):1033–1053.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schon DA (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Strong DM, Lee YW, Wang RY (1997) Data quality in context. Comm. ACM 40(5):103–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strong DM, Volkoff O, Johnson SA, Pelletier LR, Tulu B, Bar-On I, Trudel J, Garber L (2014) A theory of organization-EHR affordance actualization. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 15(2):53–85.Google Scholar
• Thompson N, Pascal J (2012) Developing critically reflective practice. Reflective Practice 13(2):311–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trudel M-C, Pare G, Laflamme J (2012) Health information technology success and the art of being mindful: Preliminary insights from a comparative case study analysis. Health Care Management Rev. 37(1):31–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urquhart C, Fernandez W (2013) Using grounded theory method in information systems: The researcher as blank slate and other myths. J. Inform. Tech. 28(3):224–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Volkoff O, Strong DM (2013) Critical realism and affordances: Theorizing IT-associated organizational change processes. MIS Quart. 37(3):819–834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Roberts KH (1993) Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(3): 357–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick KE, Sutcliff KM, Obstfeld D (1999) Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. Res. Organ. Behav. 21:81–123.Google Scholar
• Wysocki A, Butler M, Kane RL, Kane RA, Shippee T, Sainfort F (2015) Long-term services and supports for older adults: A review of home and community-based services versus institutional care. J. Aging Soc. Policy 27(3):255–279.Google Scholar
• Xu J, Gao X, Sorwar G, Croll P (2013) Implementation of e-health record systems in Australia. Internat. Tech. Management Rev. 3(2): 92–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yanow D, Tsoukas H (2009) What is reflection-in-action? A phenomenological account. J. Management Stud. 46(8):1339–1364.Crossref, Google Scholar