Effects of Online Recommendations on Consumers’ Willingness to Pay

References

• Adomavicius G, Tuzhilin A (2005) Toward the next generation of recommendation system: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 17(6):734–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adomavicius G, Bockstedt J, Curley S, Zhang J (2013) Do recommender systems manipulate consumer preferences? A study of anchoring effects. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):956–975.Link, Google Scholar
• Amatriain X, Basilico J (2012) Netflix recommendations: Beyond the 5 stars (part 1). Netflix Tech Blog (April 5). http://techblog.netflix.com/2012/04/netflix-recommendations-beyond-5-stars.html.Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Loewenstein G, Prelec D (2003) “Coherent arbitrariness”: Stable demand curves without stable preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 118(1):73–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Loewenstein G, Prelec D (2006) Tom Sawyer and the construction of value. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 60(1):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GM, DeGroot MH, Marschak J (1964) Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behav. Sci. 9(3):226–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennet J, Lanning S (2007) The Netflix Prize. KDD Cup and Workshop (ACM, New York), 3–6.Google Scholar
• Box GEP (1954a) Some theorems on quadratic forms applied in the study of analysis of variance problems, I. Effect of inequality of variance in the one-way classification. Ann. Math. Statist. 25(2):290–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Box GEP (1954b) Some theorems on quadratic forms applied in the study of analysis of variance problems, II. Effects of inequality of variance and of correlation between errors in the two-way classification. Ann. Math. Statist. 25(3):484–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C, Hogarth R (1999) The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. J. Risk Uncertainty 19(1/3):7–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapman G, Bornstein B (1996) The more you ask for, the more you get: Anchoring in personal injury verdicts. Appl. Cognitive Psych. 10(6):519–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapman G, Johnson E (2002) Incorporating the irrelevant: Anchors in judgments of belief and value. Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D, eds. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 120–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Xie J (2005) Third-party product review and firm marketing strategy. Marketing Sci. 24(2):218–240.Link, Google Scholar
• Cosley D, Lam S, Albert I, Konstan JA, Riedl J (2003) Is seeing believing? How recommender interfaces affect users’ opinions. CHI 2003 Conf. (ACM, New York), 585–592.Google Scholar
• Donaldson C, Jones A, Mapp T, Olson JA (1998) Limited dependent variables in willingness to pay studies: Applications in health care. Appl. Econom. 30(5):667–677.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Epley N, Gilovich T (2010) Anchoring unbound. J. Consumer Psych. 20(1):20–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleder D, Hosanagar K (2009) Blockbuster culture’s next rise or fall: The impact of recommender systems on sales diversity. Management Sci. 55(5):697–712.Link, Google Scholar
• Godinho de Matos M, Ferreira P, Smith MD, Telang R (2016) Culling the herd: Using real-world randomized experiments to measure social bias with known costly goods. Management Sci. 62(9):2563–2580.Link, Google Scholar
• Hosanagar K, Fleder D, Lee D, Buja A (2014) Will the global village fracture into tribes? Recommender systems and their effects on consumer fragmentation. Management Sci. 60(4):805–823.Link, Google Scholar
• Jacowitz KE, Kahneman D (1995) Measures of anchoring in estimation tasks. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 21(11):1161–1166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York).Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein S, Slovic P, eds. (2006) The Construction of Preference (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marshall M (2006) Aggregate knowledge raises $5 m from Kleiner, on a roll. Venture Beat (December 10). Accessed April 29, 2012, http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/10/aggregate-knowledge-raises-5m-from-kleiner-on-a-roll/.Google Scholar
• Mauchly JW (1940) Significance test for sphericity of a normal N-variate distribution. Ann. Math. Statist. 11(2):204–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Müller H, Kroll EB, Vogt B (2012) Do real payments really matter? A re-examination of the compromise effect in hypothetical and binding choice settings. Marketing Lett. 23(1):73–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mussweiler T, Strack F (1999) Hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming in the anchoring paradigm: A selective accessibility model. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 35(2/3):136–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Northcraft G, Neale M (1987) Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 39(1):84–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ricci F, Rokach L, Shapira B (2015) Recommender Systems Handbook (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salganik MJ, Watts DJ (2008) Leading the herd astray: An experimental study of self-fulfilling prophecies in an artificial cultural market. Soc. Psych. Quart. 74(4):338–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salganik MJ, Dodds PS, Watts DJ (2006) Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science 311(5762):854–856.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarwar B, Karypis G, Konstan JA, Riedl J (2001) Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. 10th Internat. WWW Conf. (ACM, New York), 285–295.Google Scholar
• Schkade DA, Johnson EJ (1989) Cognitive processes in preference reversals. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 44(2):203–231.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro C, Varian HR (1999) Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (Harvard Business Review Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Surowiecki J (2004) The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies, and Nations, 1st ed. (Doubleday, New York).Google Scholar
• Thaler R, Sunstein C (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT).Google Scholar
• Tucker C, Zhang J (2011) How does popularity information affect choices? A field experiment. Management Sci. 57(5):828–842.Link, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Sattath S, Slovic P (1988) Contingent weighting in judgement and choice. Psych. Rev. 95(3):371–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson TD, Houston CE, Etling KM, Brekke N (1996) A new look at anchoring effects: Basic anchoring and its antecedents. J. Experiment. Psych. 125(4):387–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright WF, Anderson U (1989) Effects of situation familiarity and financial incentives on use of the anchoring and adjustment heuristic for probability assessment. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 44(1):68–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Liu P (2012) Rational herding in microloan markets. Management Sci. 58(5):892–912.Link, Google Scholar