Direct and Indirect Information System Use: A Multimethod Exploration of Social Power Antecedents in Healthcare

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0708

References

  • Ahmad MM (2005) Psychometric evaluation of the cognitive appraisal of health scale with patients with prostate cancer. J. Adv. Nursing 49(1):78–86.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 50(2):179–211.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ames RT, Hall DL (2001) Focusing the Familiar: A Translation and Philosophical Interpretation of the Zhongyong (University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu).Google Scholar
  • Ash JS, Sittig DF, Dykstra RH, Guappone K, Carpenter JD, Seshadri V (2007) Categorizing the unintended sociotechnical consequences of computerized provider order entry. Internat. J. Medical Informatics 76(1):21–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barkema HG, Chen XP, George G, Luo Y, Tsui AS (2015) West meets east: New concepts and theories. Acad. Management J. 58(2):460–479.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bisaso R, Kereteletswe O, Selwood I, Visscher A (2008) The use of information technology for educational management in Uganda and Botswana. Internat. J. Ed. Development 28(6):656–668.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton-Jones A, Straub D (2006) Reconceptualizing system usage: An approach and empirical test. Inform. Systems Res. 17(3):228–246.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carlson ED, Grace BF, Sutton JA (1977) Case studies of end user requirements for interactive problem-solving systems. MIS Quart. 1(1):51–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carson PP, Carson KD, Roe CW (1993) Social power bases: A meta-analytic examination of interrelationships and outcomes. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 23(14):1150–1169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen CC, Chen YR, Xin K (2004) Guanxi practices and trust in management: A procedural justice perspective. Organ. Sci. 15(2):200–209.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Zahedi FM (2016) “Individuals” Internet security perceptions and behaviors: Polycontextual contrasts between the United States and China. MIS Quart. 40(1):205–222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen ZX, Aryee S (2007) Delegation and employee work outcomes: An examination of the cultural context of mediating processes in China. Acad. Management J. 50(1):226–238.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ (2004) Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Rev. Psych. 55:591–621.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Culnan MJ (1983) Chauffeured versus end user access to commercial databases: The effects of task and individual differences. MIS Quart. 7(1):55–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davidson E, Chiasson M (2005) Contextual influences on technology use mediation: A comparative analysis of electronic medical record systems. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 14(1):6–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeLone WH, McLean ER (2003) The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. J. Management Inform. Systems 19(4):9–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dooley K (2001) Social Research Methods, 4th ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Agency theory: An assessment and review. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1):57–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farh JL, Tsui AS, Xin K, Cheng BS (1998) The influence of relational demography and guanxi: The Chinese case. Organ. Sci. 9(4):471–488.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Farhoomand AF, Drury DH (2002) Managerial information overload. Comm. ACM 45(10):127–131.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fichman RG, Kohli R, Krishnan R (2011) The role of information systems in healthcare: Current research and future trends. Inform. Systems Res. 22(3):419–428.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • French JRP, Raven BH (1959) The bases of social power. Cartwright D, ed. Studies in Social Power (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI), 150–167.Google Scholar
  • Green L, Myerson J (2004) A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psych. Bull. 130(5):769–792.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffith TL (1999) Technology features as triggers for sensemaking. Acad. Management Rev. 24(3):472–488.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Halford S, Leonard P (2001) Gender, Power and Organisations (Palgrave Macmillan, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hartwick J, Barki H (1994) Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Sci. 40(4):440–465.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • He J, King WR (2008) The role of user participation in information systems development: Implications from a meta-analysis. J. Management Inform. Systems 25(1):301–331.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsieh JPA, Rai A, Xu SX (2011) Extracting business value from IT: A sensemaking perspective of post-adoptive use. Management Sci. 57(11):2018–2039.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jasperson JS, Carter PE, Zmud RW (2005) A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quart. 29(3):525–557.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jasperson JS, Carte TA, Saunders CS, Butler BS, Croes HJP, Zheng W (2002) Review: Power and information technology research: A metatriangulation review. MIS Quart. 26(4):397–459.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kane GC, Alavi M (2008) Casting the net: A multimodal network perspective on user-system interactions. Inform. Systems Res. 19(3):253–272.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Karahanna E, Straub DW, Chervany NL (1999) Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quart. 23(2):183–213.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keen GW (1976) “Interactive” computer systems for managers: A modest proposal. Sloan Management Rev. 18(1):1–17.Google Scholar
  • Kelman HC (1958) Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. J. Conflict Resolution 2(1):51–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keshet S, Kark R, Pomerantz-Zorin L, Koslowsky M, Schwarzwald J (2006) Gender, status and the use of power strategies. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 36(1):105–117.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein HK, Myers MD (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quart. 23(1):67–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kohli R, Kettinger WJ (2004) Informating the clan: Controlling physicians’ costs and outcomes. MIS Quart. 28(3):363–394.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koslowsky M, Schwarzwald J, Ashuri S (2001) On the relationship between subordinates’ compliance to power sources and organisational attitudes. Appl. Psych. Internat. Rev. 50(3):455–476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kraemer KL, Danziger JN, Dunklem DE, King JL (1993) The usefulness of computer-based information to public managers. MIS Quart. 17(2):129–148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lamb R, Kling R (2003) Reconceptualizing users as social actors in information systems research. MIS Quart. 27(2):197–235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lapointe L, Rivard S (2005) A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Quart. 29(3):461–491.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larsen TJ (1993) Middle managers’ contribution to implemented information technology innovation. J. Management Inform. Systems 10(2):155–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonardi PM (2011) When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quart. 35(1):147–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levina N, Gallivan M, Su N, Pan SL, Hsu J, Mao JY (2011) Studying China’s IT services industry: Generalizations, particularities, and the competitive outlook. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Shanghai, China, Paper 6.Google Scholar
  • Lewis W, Agarwal R, Sambamurthy V (2003) Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: An empirical study of knowledge workers. MIS Quart. 27(4):657–678.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liang H, Xue Y, Wu L (2013) Ensuring employees’ IT compliance: Carrot or stick? Inform. Systems Res. 24(2):279–294.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mingers J (2001) Combining IS research methods: Towards a pluralist methodology. Inform. Systems Res. 12(3):240–259.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ministry of Health (2010) Basic guidelines for electronic medical record. Accessed August 2017, http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2010-03/04/content_1547432.htm.Google Scholar
  • Morris MG, Venkatesh V (2000) Age differences in technology adoption decisions: Implications for a changing work force. Personnel Psych. 53(2):375–403.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mulder M, de Jong RD, Koppelaar L, Verhage J (1986) Power, situation, and leaders’ effectiveness: An organizational field study. J. Appl. Psych. 71(4):566–570.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nederhof AJ (1985) Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 15(3):263–280.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski WJ (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 11(4):404–428.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Raven BH (1999) Kurt Lewin address: Influence, power, religion, and the mechanisms of social control. J. Soc. Issues 55(1):161–186.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raven BH, Schwarzwald J, Koslowsky M (1998) Conceptualizing and measuring a power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 28(4):307–332.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saunders C, Chiasson M (2009) Using knowledge management systems to structure knowledgeable practices. 42nd Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci., Big Island, HI.Google Scholar
  • Schwarzwald J, Koslowsky M, Allouf M (2005) Group membership, status, and social power preference. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 35(3):644–665.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seeman T, Glei D, Goldman N, Weinstein M, Singer B, Lin YH (2004) Social relationships and allostatic load in Taiwanese elderly and near elderly. Soc. Sci. Medicine 59(11):2245–2257.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro SP (2005) Agency theory. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 31:263–284.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Sci. 46(2):186–204.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V, Morris MG (2000) Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behaviour. MIS Quart. 24(1):115–139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V, Thong J, Xu X (2012) Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quart. 36(1):157–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wager KA, Lee FW, Glaser JP (2013) Health Care Information Systems: A Practical Approach for Health Care Management, 3rd ed. (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  • Wang Y, Meister DB, Gray PH (2013) Social influence and knowledge management systems use: Evidence from panel data. MIS Quart. 37(1):299–313.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (2001) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Xie JL, Schaubroeck J, Lam SSK (2008) Theories of job stress and the role of traditional values: A longitudinal study in China. J. Appl. Psych. 93(4):831–848.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xue Y, Liang H, Wu L (2011) Punishment, justice, and compliance with mandatory IT usage. Inform. Systems Res. 22(2):400–414.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang Y, Waldman DA, Han YL, Li XB (2015) Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Acad. Management J. 58(2):538–566.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.