Mitigating Diminishing Returns to R&D: The Role of Information Technology in Innovation

References

• Abaogye A, Pyle D, Sibley A (2014) By the numbers: R&D productivity in the semiconductor industry. McKinsey (4). http://www.mckinsey.com/industries/semiconductors/our-insights/by-the-numbers-r-and-d-productivity-in-the-semiconductor-industry.Google Scholar
• Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB (1988) Innovation in large and small firms: An empirical analysis. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(4):678–690.Google Scholar
• Ahuja G (2000) Collaboation networks, structrual holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):425–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albert MB, Avery D, Narin F, McAllister P (1991) Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Res. Policy 20(3):251–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anthony SD, Johnson MW, Sinfield JV (2008) Institutionalizing innovation. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 49(2):45–53.Google Scholar
• Aral S, Weill P (2007) IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: How resource allocations and organizational difference explain performance variation. Organ. Sci. 18(5):763–780.Link, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Brynjolfsson E, Wu L (2012) Three-way complementarities: Performance pay, human resource analytics, and information technology. Management Sci. 58(5):913–931.Link, Google Scholar
• Argyres N, Silverman B (2004) R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management J. 25(8/9):925–958.Google Scholar
• Argyres NS (1999) The impact of information technology on coordination: Evidence from the B-2 “stealth” bomber. Organ. Sci. 10(2):162–180.Link, Google Scholar
• Arora A, Gambardella A (1990) Complementarity and external linkages: The strategies of the large firms in biotechnology. J. Indust. Econom. 38(4):361–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker RD, Hu N, Pavlou PA, Luftman J (2011) CIO reporting structure, strategic positioning, and firm performance. MIS Quart. 35(2):487–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barr A (2015) Google lab puts a time limit on innovations. Wall Street Journal (March 31), http://www.wsj.com/articles/google-lab-puts-a-time-limit-on-innovations-1427844751.Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj A (2000) A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 24(1):169–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj A, Keil M, Mahring M (2009) Effects of information technology failures on the market value of firms. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 18(2):66–79.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj AS, Bharadwaj SG, Konsynski BR (1999) Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s Q. Management Sci. 45(7):1008–1024.Link, Google Scholar
• Bound J, Cummings C, Griliches Z, Hall BH, Jaffe A (1984) Who does R&D and who patents? Griliches Z, ed. R&D, Patents, and Productivity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 21–54.Google Scholar
• Carlile P (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. 13(4):442–455.Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile P (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5):555–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Carr D (2008) Wyeth’s prescription for business process management success. CIO (May 30). https://www.cio.com/article/2435989/business-process-management/wyeth-s-prescription-for-business-process-management-success.html.Google Scholar
• Chan SH, Martin J, Kesinger J (1990) Corporate research and development expenditures and share value. J. Financial Econom. 26(2):255–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chwelos P, Ramirez R, Kraemer K, Melville N (2010) Does technoloigcal progress alter the nature of information technology as a production input? New evidence and new results. Inform. Systems Res. 21(2):392–408.Link, Google Scholar
• Constant D, Sproull L, Kiesler S (1996) The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organ. Sci. 7(2):119–135.Link, Google Scholar
• David E, Tromontin T, Zemmel R (2010) Pharmaceutical R&D: The road to positive returns. McKinsey Quart. (February). http://www.mckinsey.com/industries/pharmaceuticals-and-medical-products/our-insights/the-road-to-positive-r-and-38d-returns. Google Scholar
• Dedrick J, Gurbaxani V, Kraemer KL (2003) Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of empirical evidence. ACM Comput. Surveys 35(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dedrick J, Kraemer KL, Linden G (2010) Who profits from innovation in global value chains? A study of the iPod and notebook PCs. Indust. Corporate Change 19(1):81–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewan S, Shi C, Gurbaxani V (2007) Investigating the risk-return relationship of information technology investment: Firm-level empirical analysis. Management Sci. 53(12):1829–1842.Link, Google Scholar
• Duncan NB (1995) Capturing flexibility of information technology infrastructure: A study of resource characteristics and their measure. J. Management Inform. Systems 12(2):37–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• El Sawy OA, Kraemmergaard P, Amsinck H, Vinther AL (2016) How Lego built the foundations and enterprise capabilities for digital leadership. MIS Quart. Executive 15(2):141–166.Google Scholar
• El Sawy OA, Malhotra A, Park Y, Pavlou PA (2010) Seeking the configurations of digital ecodynamics: It takes three to tango. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):835–848.Link, Google Scholar
• Feldman M (1987) Electronic mail and weak ties in organizations. Inform. Tech. People 3(2):83–101.Google Scholar
• Fichman RG, Keil M, Tiwana A (2005) Beyond valuation: “Options thinking” in IT project management. California Management Rev. 47(2):74–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Sorenson O (2001) Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Res. Policy 30(7):1019–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L, Mingo S, Chen D (2007) Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52(3):443–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foerderer J, Kude T, Mithas S, Heinzl A (2016) Does platform owner’s entry crowd out innovation? Evidence from Google photos. Agerfalk P, Levina N, Kien SS, eds. Proc. 35th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (AIS, Dublin, Ireland), 1–17.Google Scholar
• Furman J, Kyle M, Cockburn I, Henderson R (2010) Public & private spillovers, location and the productivity of pharmaceutical research. Mairesse J, Trajtenberg M, eds. Contributions in Memory of Zvi Griliches (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA), 165–188.Google Scholar
• Garcia-Vega M (2006) Does technological diversification promote innovation? An empirical analysis for European firms. Res. Policy 35(2):230–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghazawneh A, Henfridsson O (2013) Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: The boundary resources model. Inform. Systems J. 23(2):173–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert R, Newbery D (1982) Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. 72(3):514–526.Google Scholar
• Golbruner T, Doz Y, Wilson K (2006) The well-desgined global R&D network. Strategy+Business (May 30). https://www.strategy-business.com/article/06217?gko=0a6cc.Google Scholar
• Gold A, Malhotra A, Segars A (2001) Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems 18(1):185–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant RM (1996) Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. 7(4):375–387.Link, Google Scholar
• Graves SB, Langowitz NS (1993) Innovative productivity and returns to scale in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. 14(8):593–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (2003) A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Acad. Management J. 46(6):685–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z (1979) Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell J. Econom. 10(1):92–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z (1998) R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guira SI, Ravichandran T (2013) Alliance partners’ symmetry and knowledge flows. Acad. Management Proc. (Acadmey of Management, Orlando, FL). http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2013.11787abstract.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haans RFJ, Pieters C, He Z-L (2016) Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U- and inverted U–shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management J. 37(7):1177–1195.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2001) The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. Working Paper w8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall BH, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M (2005) Market value and patent citations. RAND J. Econom. 36(1):16–38.Google Scholar
• Hausman J, Hall BH, Griliches Z (1984) Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica 52(4):909–938.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R (1993) Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry. RAND J. Econom. 24(2):248–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Cockburn I (1994) Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management J. 15(S1):63–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hickins M (2012) IT takes charge at AstraZeneca. Wall Street Journal (May 13), http://blogs.wsj.com/cio/2012/05/13/it-takes-charge-at-astrazeneca/.Google Scholar
• Ho JL, Tian F, Wu A, Xu SX (2017) Seeking value through deviation? Economic impacts of IT overinvestment and underinvestment. Inform. Systems Res. 28(4):850–862.Link, Google Scholar
• Huang P, Tafti A, Mithas S (2018) Platform sponsor’s investments and user contributions in knowledge communities: The role of knowledge seeding. MIS Quart. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hunt J, Gauthier-Loiselle M (2010) How much does immigration boost innovation? Amer. Econom. J.: Macroeconomics 2(2):31–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Im KS, Grover V, Teng JTC (2013) Do large firms become smaller by using information technology? Inform. Systems Res. 24(2):470–491.Link, Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market values. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(5):984–1001.Google Scholar
• Jaruzelski B, Dehoff K (2010) How the top innovators keep winning. Strategy + Business (61). https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/media/uploads/Strategyand_Global_Innovation_1000_2010_How_Top_Innovators_Keep_Winning.pdf.Google Scholar
• Jaruzelski B, Loehr J, Holman R (2011) The global innovation 1000: Why culture is key. Strategy + Business (65). https://www.strategy-business.com/article/11404?gko=dfbfc.Google Scholar
• Joshi A, Nerkar A (2011) When do strategic alliances inhibit innovation by firms? Evidence from patent pools in the global optical disc industry. Strategic Management J. 32(11):1139–1160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joshi KD, Chi L, Datta A, Han S (2010) Changing the competitive landscape: Continuous innovation through IT-enabled knowledge capabilities. Inform. Systems Res. 21(3):472–495.Link, Google Scholar
• Kennedy P (1998) A Guide to Econometrics, Fourth ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Kerr WR, Lincoln WF (2010) The supply side of innovation: H-1B visa reforms and U.S. ethnic invention. J. Labor Econom. 28(3):473–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim K, Mithas S, Kimbrough M (2017) Information technology investments, and firm risk across industries: Evidence from the bond market. MIS Quart. 41(4):1347–1367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleis L, Nault BR, Dexter AS (2014) Producing synergy: Innovation, IT and productivity. Decision Sci. 45(5):939–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleis L, Chwelos P, Ramirez RV, Cockburn I (2012) Information technology and intangible output: The impact of IT investment on innovation productivity. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):42–59.Link, Google Scholar
• Knott AM (2012) The trillion-dollar R&D fix. Harvard Bus. Rev. (May):77–82.Google Scholar
• Kohli R, Melville NP (2009) Learning to build an IT innovation platform. Comm. ACM 52(8):122–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kotha R, Zheng Y, George G (2011) Entry into new niches: The effects of firm age and the expansion of technoloigical capabilities on innovative output and impact. Strategic Management J. 32(9):1011–1024.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kude T, Schmidt CT, Mithas S, Heinzl A (2015) Disciplined autonomy and innovation effectiveness: The role of team efficacy and task volatility. Humphreys J, ed. Acad. Management Proc. (Academy of Management, Vancouver). http://proceedings.aom.org/content/2015/1/18802.short?rss=1.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lahiri N (2010) Geographic dispersion of R&D units: How does it help innovation quality? Acad. Management J. 53(5):1194–1209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leiponen A, Helfat CE (2010) Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and the benefits of breadth. Strategic Management J. 31(2):224–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leiponen A, Helfat CE (2011) Location, decentralization, and knowledge sources for innovation. Organ. Sci. 22(3):641–658.Link, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D (1992) Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. 13(Special Issue):111–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levina N, Vaast E (2005) The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quart. 29(2):335–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B, March J (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. 14(1):319–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin B-W, Chen J-S (2005) Corporte technology portfolios and R&D performance measures: A study of technology intensive firms. R&D Management 35(2):153–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linden G, Dedrick J, Kraemer KL (2011) Innovation and job creation in a global economy: The case of Apple’s iPod. J. Internat. Commerce Econom. 3(1):223–240.Google Scholar
• Linden G, Kraemer KL, Dedrick J (2009) Who captures value in a global innovation network? The case of Apple’s iPod. Comm. ACM 52(3):140–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Link A, Rees J (1990) Firm size, university based research, and the returns to R&D. Small Bus. Econom. 2(1):25–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu A, Liu H, Xu SX (2013) How do competitive environments moderate CRM value? Decision Support Systems 56(December):462–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mandviwalla M, Palmer J (2008) The globalization of Wyeth. Harvard Business Review Case Study 908M17.Google Scholar
• Mank DA, Nystrom HE (2001) Decreasing returns to shareholders from R&D spending in the computer industry. Engrg. Management J. 13(3):3–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mims C (2015) At Google, the science of working better. Wall Street Journal (March 29), http://www.wsj.com/articles/at-google-the-science-of-working-better-1427673486.Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Arora R (2015) Lessons from Tata’s corporate innovation strategy. IEEE IT Professional 17(2):2–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Lucas HC (2014) Information technology and firm value: Productivity paradox, profitability paradox and new frontiers. Topi H, Tucker A, eds. Information Systems Information Technology, Vol. 2 (Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL), 71:1–71:20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Rust RT (2016) How information technology strategy and investments influence firm performance: Conjecture and empirical evidence. MIS Quart. 40(1):223–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Krishnan MS, Fornell C (2005) Why do customer relationship management applications affect customer satisfaction? J. Marketing 69(4):201–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Krishnan MS, Fornell C (2016) Information technology, customer satisfaction, and profit: Theory and evidence. Inform. Systems Res. 27(1):166–181.Link, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Tafti AR, Bardhan IR, Goh JM (2012) Information technology and firm profitability: Mechanisms and empirical evidence. MIS Quart. 36(1):205–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitra S (2005) Information technology as an enabler of growth in firms: An empirical assessment. J. Management Inform. Systems 22(2):279–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A, Song M (2017) Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quart. 41(1):223–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nerkar A (2003) Old is gold? The value of temporal exploration in the creation of new knowledge. Management Sci. 49(2):211–229.Link, Google Scholar
• Nohria N, Gulati R (1996) Is slack good or bad for innovation? Acad. Management J. 39(5):1245–1264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pakes A, Griliches Z (1984) Patents and R&D at the firm level: A first look. Griliches Z, ed. R&D, Patents, and Productivity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 55–72.Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, El Sawy O (2010) The “third hand”: IT-enabled competitive advantage in turbulence through improvisational capabilities. Inform. Systems Res. 21(3):443–471.Link, Google Scholar
• Pawlowski SD, Robey D (2004) Bridging user organizations: Knowledge brokering and the work of IT professionals. MIS Quart. 28(4):645–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phene A, Fladmoe-Lindquist K, Marsh L (2006) Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: The effects of technological space and geograpic origin. Strategic Management J. 27(4):369–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai A, Patnayakuni R, Patnayakuni N (1997) Technology investment and business performance. Comm. ACM 40(7):89–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravichandran T, Lertwongsatien C (2005) Effect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: A resource-based perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems 21(4):237–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reed DP (2001) The law of the pack. Harvard Bus. Rev. (February):23–24.Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A (2001) Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. 22(4):287–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sabherwal R, Jeyaraj A (2015) Information technology impacts on firm performance: An extension of Kohli and Devaraj. MIS Quart. 39(4):809–836.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sakkab NY (2002) Connect and develop complements research and develop at P&G. Res. Technology Management 45(2):38–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saldanha T, Mithas S, Krishnan MS (2017) Leveraging customer involvement for fueling innovation: The role of relational and analytical information processing capabilities. MIS Quart. 41(1):267–286.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandino T, Kaplan RS (2001) Accounting for computer software development costs. Harvard Business School Case Collectio n9-102-034.Google Scholar
• Schilling MA, Phelps CC (2007) Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Sci. 53(7):1113–1126.Link, Google Scholar
• SFAS 2 (1974) Statement of financial accounting standards 2: Accounting for research and development costs. Financial Accounting Standards Board, http://www.fasb.org/resources/ccurl/286/565/fas2.pdf.Google Scholar
• SFAS 86 (1985) Statement of financial accounting standards 86: Accounting for the costs of computer software to be sold, leased, or otherwise marketed. Financial Accounting Standards Board, http://www.fasb.org/jsp/FASB/Document_C/DocumentPage?cid=1218220127961&acceptedDisclaimer=true.Google Scholar
• Singh J (2008) Distributed R&D, cross-regional knowledge integration and quality of innovative output. Res. Policy 37(1):77–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srivastava SC, Mithas S, Jha B (2013) What is your global innovation strategy? IEEE IT Professional 15(6):2–6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tafti A, Mithas S, Krishnan MS (2013) The effect of information technology-enabled flexibility on formation and market value of alliances. Management Sci. 59(1):207–225.Link, Google Scholar
• Tafti A, Sachdev V, Mithas S, Mallik L (2015) Alliances, R&D and profitability of software firms. Carte T, Heinzl A, Urquhart C, eds. Proc. 35th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (AIS, Fort Worth, TX), 1–17.Google Scholar
• Tambe PB, Hitt LM (2012) The productivity of information technology investments: New evidence from IT labor data. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3 Part 1):599–617.Link, Google Scholar
• Tambe PB, Hitt LM, Brynjolfsson E (2012) The extroverted firm: How external information practices affect innovation and productivity. Management Sci. 58(5):843–859.Link, Google Scholar
• Teo TSH, Ranganathan C, Srivastava SC, Loo JWK (2007) Fostering IT-enabled business innovation at YCH group. MIS Quart. Executive 6(4):211–223.Google Scholar
• Tian F, Xu SX (2015) How do enterprise resource planning systems affect firm risk? Post-implementation impact. MIS Quart. 39(1):39–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M (1990) A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. RAND J. Econom. 21(1):172–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu S, Levitas E, Priem RL (2005) CEO tenure and company invention under differing levels of technological dynamism. Acad. Management J. 48(5):859–873.Crossref, Google Scholar