Reexamining the Market Value of Information Technology Events

References

• Adner R (2002) When are technologies disruptive? A demand-based view of the emergence of competition. Strategic Management J. 23(8):667–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adner R, Levinthal D (2001) Demand heterogeneity and technology evolution: Implications for product and process innovation. Management Sci. 47(5):611–628.Link, Google Scholar
• Agrawal J, Kamakura WA (1995) The economic worth of celebrity endorsers: An event study analysis. J. Marketing 59(3):56–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal M, Kishore R, Rao HR (2006) Market reactions to e-business outsourcing announcements: An event study. Inform. Management 43(7):861–873.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreas H, Trott P (2006) Innovation risks of strategic outsourcing. Technovation 26(5–6):672–681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ang S, Cummings LL (1997) Strategic response to institutional influences on information systems outsourcing. Organ. Sci. 8(3):235–256.Link, Google Scholar
• Bajari P, Tadelis S (2001) Incentives versus transaction costs: A theory of procurement contracts. RAND J. Econom. 32(3):387–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barua A, Sophie Lee CH, Whinston AB (1996) The calculus of reengineering. Inform. Systems Res. 7(4):409–428.Link, Google Scholar
• Beasley M, Bradford M, Dehning B (2009) The value impact of strategic intent on firms engaged in information systems outsourcing. Internat. J. Accounting Inform. Systems 10(2):79–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya S, Ritter JR (1983) Innovation and communication: Signalling with partial disclosure. Rev. Econom. Stud. 50(2):331–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bin J, Frazier GV, Prater EL (2006) Outsourcing effects on firms’ operational performance: An empirical study. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management 26(12):1280–1300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown SJ, Warner JB (1985) Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. J. Financial Econom. 14(1):3–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt LM, Yang S (2002) Intangible assets: Computers and organizational capital. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity 2002(1):137–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Renshaw AA, van Alstyne M (1996) The matrix of change: A tool for business process reengineering. Sloan Management Rev. (Winter 1996).Google Scholar
• Carr NG (2003) IT doesn’t matter. Harvard Bus. Rev. (May). https://hbr.org/2003/05/it-doesnt-matter.Google Scholar
• Christensen CM (1997) The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Clancy H (2014) IBM scores another multi-billion dollar cloud contract. Fortune (December 1). http://fortune.com/2014/12/01/ibm-multi-billion-dollar-cloud-deal/.Google Scholar
• Clemons EK, Row MC (1991) Sustaining IT advantage: The role of structural differences. MIS Quart. 15(3):275–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen MW, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conner KR, Prahalad CK (1996) A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organ. Sci. 7(5):477–501.Link, Google Scholar
• Cooper VA, Molla A (2012) Developing green IT capability: An absorptive capacity perspective. Pacific Asia Conf. Inform. Systems 46.Google Scholar
• Daniel K, Titman S (1997) Evidence on the characteristics of cross sectional variation in stock returns. J. Finance 52(1):1–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daniel K, Titman S (2006) Market reactions to tangible and intangible information. J. Finance 61:1605–1643.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewan S, Shi C, Gurbaxani V (2007) Investigating the risk–return relationship of information technology investment: Firm-level empirical analysis. Inform. Systems Res. 53(12):1829–1842.Google Scholar
• Dos Santos BL, Peffers K, Mauer D (1993) The impact of information technology investment announcements on the market value of the firm. Inform. Systems Res. 4(1):1–23.Link, Google Scholar
• Dutta S, Narasimhan OM, Rajiv S (2005) Conceptualizing and measuring capabilities: Methodology and empirical application. Strategic Management J. 26(3):277–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer JH, Nobeoka K (2000) Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management J. 21(3):345–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Earl MJ (1996) The risks of outsourcing IT. Sloan Management Rev. 37:26–32.Google Scholar
• Eberhart AC, Maxwell W, Akhtar R (2004) An examination of long-term abnormal stock returns and operating performance following R&D increases. J. Finance 59(2):623–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF (1998) Market efficiency, long-term returns, and behavioral finance. J. Financial Econom. 49:283–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama EF, French KR (1992) The cross-section of expected stock returns. J. Finance 47(2):427–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geyskens I, Gielens K, Dekimpe MG (2002) The market valuation of Internet channel additions. J. Marketing 66(2):102–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gopal A, Sivaramakrishnan K, Krishnan MS, Mukhopadhyay T (2003) Contracts in offshore software development: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 49(12):1671–1683.Link, Google Scholar
• Gottfredson M, Puryear R, Phillips S (2005) Strategic sourcing. Harvard Bus. Rev. 8(2):132–139.Google Scholar
• Grossman GM, Helpman E (1991) Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth. Eur. Econom. Rev. 35(2):517–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Singh H (1998) The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(4):781–814.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gurbaxani V (1990) Diffusion in computing networks: The case of BITNET. Comm. ACM 33(12):65–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Healy PM, Palepu KG, Ruback RS (1992) Does corporate performance improve after mergers? J. Financial Econom. 31(2):135–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47:153–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helper S, MacDuffie JP, Sabel C (2000) Pragmatic collaborations: Advancing knowledge while controlling opportunism. Indust. Corporate Change 9(3):443–488.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendricks KB, Singhal VR (2001) The long-run stock price performance of firms with effective TQM programs. Management Sci. 47(3):359–368.Link, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D, Hou K, Teoh SH (2012) The accrual anomaly: Risk or mispricing? Management Sci. 58(2):320–335.Link, Google Scholar
• Hong KK, Kim YG (2002) The critical success factors for ERP implementation: An organizational fit perspective. Inform. Management 40(1):25–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Im KS, Dow KE, Grover V (2001) Research report: A reexamination of IT investment and the market value of the firm—An event study methodology. Inform. Systems Res. 12(1):103–117.Link, Google Scholar
• Jarrar YF, Al-Mudimigh A, Zairi M (2000) ERP implementation critical success factors–The role and impact of business process management. Proc. 2000 IEEE Internat. Conf. Management Innovation Tech. Vol. 1 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 122–127.Google Scholar
• Kalaignanam K, Kushwaha T, Steenkamp JBEM, Tuli KR (2013) The effect of CRM outsourcing on shareholder value: A contingency perspective. Management Sci. 59(3):748–769.Link, Google Scholar
• Kishore R, Agrawal M, Rao HR (2004) Determinants of sourcing during technology growth and maturity: An empirical study of e-commerce sourcing. J. Management Inform. Systems 21(3):47–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kothari SP, Warner JB (1997) Measuring long-horizon security performance. J. Financial Econom. 43:301–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kothari SP, Warner JB (2008) Econometrics of event studies. Espen Eckbo B, ed. Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance, Vol. A (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 3–36.Google Scholar
• Lambkin M, Day GS (1989) Evolutionary processes in competitive markets: Beyond the product life cycle. J. Marketing 53(3):4–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim K (2009) The many faces of absorptive capacity: Spillovers of copper interconnect technology for semiconductor chips. Indust. Corporate Change 18(6):1249–1284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lonsdale C (1999) Effectively managing vertical supply relationships: A risk management model for outsourcing. Supply Chain Management 4(4):176–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mani D, Barua A, Whinston AB (2010) An empirical analysis of the impact of information capabilities design on business process outsourcing performance. MIS Quart. 34(1):39–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mani D, Barua A, Whinston A (2012) An empirical analysis of the contractual and information structures of business process outsourcing relationships. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3-part-1):618–634.Link, Google Scholar
• Mani D, Barua A, Whinston AB (2013) Outsourcing contracts and equity prices. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):1028–1049.Link, Google Scholar
• Melville N, Kraemer K, Gurbaxani V (2004) Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quart. 28(2):283–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mendelson H, Pillai RR (1998) Clockspeed and informational response: Evidence from the information technology industry. Inform. Systems Res. 9(4):415–433.Link, Google Scholar
• Mitchell M, Stafford E (2000) Managerial decisions and long-term stock price performance. J. Bus. 73:287–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oh W, Gallivan M, Kim J (2006) The market’s perception of the transactional risks of information technology outsourcing announcements. J. Management Inform. Systems 22(4):271–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ohlson J (1995) Earnings, book values and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Res. 11:661–687.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oler DK, Harrison JS, Allen MR (2008) The danger of misinterpreting short-window event study findings in strategic management research: An empirical illustration using horizontal acquisitions. Strategic Organ. 6(2):151–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P, Gulati R (2005) The social and contractual structure of vertical relationships. Working paper, London Business School, London.Google Scholar
• Ranganathan C, Brown CV (2006) ERP investments and the market value of firms: Toward an understanding of influential ERP project variables. Inform. Systems Res. 17(2):145–161.Link, Google Scholar
• Ray G, Barney JB, Muhanna WA (2004) Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: Choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource-based view. Strategic Management J. 25(1):23–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers EM (1962) Diffusion of Innovations (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Subramani M, Walden E (2001) The impact of e-commerce announcements on the market value of firms. Inform. Systems Res. 12(2):135–154.Link, Google Scholar
• Swaminathan V, Moorman C (2009) Marketing alliances, firm networks, and firm value creation. J. Marketing 73(5):52–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thakker V, Mathur N (2010) Rise of IT-BPO outsourcing frontiers. Report, Global Services Media.Google Scholar
• The Economist (2004) The dot-coms come of age: E-commerce takes off. (May 13). http://www.economist.com/node/2668033.Google Scholar
• Verrecchia RE (2001) Essays on disclosure. J. Accounting Econom. 32(1):97–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weier MH (2007) Wal-MartrethinksRFID. InformationWeek(March 26). https://www.informationweek.com/wal-mart-rethinks-rfid/d/d-id/1053378?.Google Scholar
• Weiss JA, Dale BC (1998) Diffusing against mature technology: Issues and strategy. Indust. Marketing Management 27(4):293–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zajac EJ, Westphal JD (2004) The social construction of market value: Institutionalization and learning perspectives on stock market reactions. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 69(3):433–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu K (2004) The complementarity of information technology infrastructure and e-commerce capability: A resource-based assessment of their business value. J. Management Inform. Systems 21(1):167–202.Crossref, Google Scholar