Contextual Priming and the Design of 3D Virtual Environments to Improve Group Ideation

References

• Agarwal R, Karahanna E (2000) Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quart. 24(4):665–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alencar EMLS, Bruno-Faria MF (1997) Characteristics of an organizational environment which stimulate and inhibit creativity. J. Creative Behav. 31(4):271–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM (1983) The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 45(2):357–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Augustin S (2014) Rules for designing an engaging workplace. Harvard Bus. Rev. (October 28), https://hbr.org/2014/10/rules-for-designing-an-engaging-workplace.Google Scholar
• Bainbridge WS (2007) The scientific research potential of virtual worlds. Science 317(5837):472–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bargh JA, Chartrand TL (1999) The unbearable automaticity of being. Amer. Psych. 54(7):462–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bargh JA, Chartrand TL (2000) Studying the mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. Reis H, Judd C, eds. Handbook of Research Methods in Social Psychology (Cambridge University Press, New York), 253–285.Google Scholar
• Bargh JA, Chen M, Burrows L (1996) Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 71(2):230–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bargh JA, Gollwitzer PM, Lee-Chai A, Barndollar K, Trötschel R (2001) The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81(6):1014–1027.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker FD, Steele F (1995) Workplace by Design: Mapping the High-Performance Workspace (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Bowers P (1978) Hypnotizability, creativity and the role of effortless experiencing. Internat. J. Clinical Experiment. Hypnosis 26(3):184–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN, Lang PJ (1996) Picture media and emotion: Effects of a sustained affective context. Psychophysiology 33(6):662–670.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briggs RO, Reinig BA (2010) Bounded ideation theory: A new model of the relationship between idea-quantity and idea-quality during ideation. 40th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), 16.Google Scholar
• Carr TH, McCauley C, Sperber RD, Parmelee CM (1982) Words, pictures, and priming: On semantic activation, conscious identification, and the automaticity of information processing. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception Performance 8(6):757–777.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ceario J (2014) Priming, replication, and the hardest science. Psych. Sci. 9(1):40–48.Google Scholar
• Ceylan C, Dul J, Aytac S (2008) Can the office environment stimulate a manager’s creativity? Human Factors Ergonomics Manufacturing Service Indust. 18(6):589–602.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapman LJ, Chapman J (1982) Test results are what you think they are. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A, eds. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 238–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Compeau D, Marcolin B, Kelley H, Higgins C (2012) Research commentary–Generalizability of information systems research using student subjects–a reflection on our practices and recommendations for future research. Inform. Systems Res. 23(4):1093–1109.Link, Google Scholar
• Cury F, Elliot A, Sarrazin P, Da Fonseca D, Rufo M (2002) The trichotomous achievement goal model and intrinsic motivation: A sequential mediational analysis. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 38(5):473–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cuthbert BN, Schupp HT, Bradley MM, Birbaumer N, Lang PJ (2000) Brain potentials in affective picture processing: Covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report. Biological Psych. 52(2):95–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu CK, Baas M, Nijstad BA (2008) Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 94(5):739–756.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dean DL, Hender JM, Rodgers TL, Santanen EL (2006) Identifying quality, novel, and creative ideas: Constructs and scales for idea evaluation. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 7(10):646–698.Google Scholar
• DeCoster J, Claypool HM (2004) A meta-analysis of priming effects on impression formation supporting a general model of informational biases. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 8(1):2–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis AR, Valacich JS (1993) Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. J. Appl. Psych. 78(4):531–537.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis AR, Valacich JS (1999) Electronic brainstorming: Illusions and patterns of productivity. Inform. Systems Res. 10(4):375–377.Link, Google Scholar
• Dennis AR, Minas RK, Bhagwatwar A (2013) Sparking creativity: Improving electronic brainstorming with individual cognitive priming. J. Management Inform. Systems 29(4):195–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diehl M, Stroebe W (1987) Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 53(3):497–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dul J, Ceylan C, Jaspers F (2011) Knowledge workers’ creativity and the role of the physical work environment. Human Resource Management 50(6):715–734.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsbach KD, Pratt MG (2007) The physical environment in organizations. Acad. Management Ann. 1(1):181–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finneran CM, Zhang P (2005) Flow in computer-mediated environments: Promises and challenges. Comm. Assoc. Inform Systems 15(1):82–101.Google Scholar
• Gallupe RB, Dennis AR, Cooper WH, Valacich JS, Bastianutti LM, Nunamaker JF Jr (1992) Electronic brainstorming and group size. Acad. Management J. 35(2):350–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gassmann O, Zeschky M (2008) Opening up the solution space: The role of analogical thinking for breakthrough product innovation. Creativity Innovation Management 17(2):97–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilhooly KJ, Fioratou E, Anthony SH, Wynn V (2007) Divergent thinking: Strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects. British J. Psych. 98(4):611–625.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilson LL, Maynard MT, Young NCJ, Vartiainen M, Hakonen M (2015) Virtual teams research 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. J. Management 41(5):1313–1337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giner-Sorolla R, García MT, Bargh JA (1999) The automatic evaluation of pictures. Soc. Cognition 17(1):76–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haner UE (2005) Spaces for creativity and innovation in two established organizations. Creativity Innovation Management 14(3):288–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hemlin S, Allwood CM, Martin BR (2008) Creative knowledge environments. Creativity Res. J. 20(2):196–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung JJH, Schneider C, Valacich JS (2005) The influence of real-time identifiability and evaluability performance feedback on group electronic brainstorming performance. Proc. 38th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci., Big Island, HI.Google Scholar
• Karremans JC, Stroebe W, Claus J (2006) Beyond Vicary’s fantasies: The impact of subliminal priming and brand choice. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 42(6):792–798.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kent T (2007) Creative space: Design and the retail environment. Internat. J. Retail Distribution Management 35(9):734–745.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kerr NL, Tindale RS (2004) Group performance and decision making. Annual Rev. Psychol. 55:623–655.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knez I (1995) Effects of indoor lighting on mood and cognition. J. Environ. Psych. 15(1):39–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knez I, Kers C (2000) Effects of indoor lighting, gender, and age on mood and cognitive performance. Environ. Behav. 32(6):817–831.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kristensen T (2004) The physical context of creativity. Creativity Innovation Management 13(2):89–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lau HC, Passingham RE (2007) Unconscious activation of the cognitive control system in the human prefrontal cortex. J. Neuroscience 27(21):5805–5811.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee AS, Baskerville RL (2003) Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 14(3):221–243.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewis M, Moultrie J (2005) The organizational innovation laboratory. Creativity Innovation Management 14(1):73–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lippelt DP, Hommel B, Colzato LS (2014) Focused attention, open monitoring and loving kindness meditation: Effects on attention, conflict monitoring, and creativity—A review. Frontiers Psych. 5:1083–1094.Google Scholar
• Lynn SJ, Rhue JW (1986) The fantasy-prone person: Hypnosis, imagination, and creativity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(2):404–408.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manmiller JL, Kumar VK, Pekala RJ (2005) Hypnotizability, creative capacity, creativity styles, absorption, and phenomenological experience during hypnosis. Creativity Res. J. 17(1):9–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin AJ, Jackson SA (2008) Brief approaches to assessing task absorption and enhanced subjective experience: Examining “short” and “core” flow in diverse performance domains. Motivation Emotion 32(3):141–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCoy JM (2005) Linking the physical work environment to creative context. J. Creative Behav. 39(3):167–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCoy JM, Evans GW (2002) The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity. Creativity Res. J. 14(3/4):409–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montoya MM, Massey AP, Lockwood NS (2011) 3D collaborative virtual environments: Exploring the link between collaborative behaviors and team performance. Decision Sci. 42(2):451–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore R, Ducheneaut N, Nickell E (2006) Doing virtually nothing: Awareness and accountability in massively multiplayer online worlds. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work 16(3):265–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nijstad BA, Stroebe W (2006) How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 10(3):186–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nijstad BA, Stroebe W, Lodewijkx HF (2003) Production blocking and idea generation: Does blocking interfere with cognitive processes? J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 39(6):531–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nijstad BA, De Dreu CK, Rietzschel EF, Baas M (2010) The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psych. 21(1):34–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunamaker JF, Briggs RO, Mittleman DD, Vogel DR, Balthazard PA (1996) Lessons from a dozen years of group support systems research: A discussion of lab and field findings. J. Management Inform. Systems 13(3):163–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunamaker JF, Dennis AR, Valacich JS, Vogel D, George JF (1991) Electronic meeting systems. Comm. ACM 34(7):40–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osborn AF (1953) Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem Solving (Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Paulus PB, Brown VR (2007) Toward more creative and innovative group idea generation: A cognitive-social-motivational perspective of brainstorming. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 1(1):248–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paulus PB, Nijstad BA (2003) Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40(3):879–891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richins ML (1991) Social comparison and the idealized images of advertising. J. Consumer Res. 18(1):71–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ridoutt BG, Ball RD, Killerby SK (2002) Wood in the interior office environment: Effects on interpersonal perception. Forest Products J. 52(9):23–30.Google Scholar
• Saunders C, Rutkowski A, van Genuchten M, Vogel D, Orrego J (2011) Virtual space and place: Theory and test. MIS Quart. 35(4): 1079–1098.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schupp HT, Cuthbert BN, Bradley MM, Cacioppo JT, Ito T, Lang PJ (2000) Affective picture processing: The late positive potential modulated by motivational relevance. Psychophysiology 37(2):257–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shepherd MM, Briggs RO, Reinig BA, Yen J, Nunamaker JF (1995) Invoking social comparison to improve electronic brainstorming: Beyond anonymity. J. Management Inform. Systems 12(3):155–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shibata S, Suzuki N (2002) Effects of the foliage plant on task performance and mood. J. Environ. Psych. 22(3):265–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shibata S, Suzuki N (2004) Effects of an indoor plant on creative task performance and mood. Scandinavian J. Psych. 45(5):373–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slater M, Linakis V, Usoh M, Kooper R, Street G (1996) Immersion, presence, and performance in virtual environments: An experiment with tri-dimensional chess. ACM Virtual Reality Software and Technology, Vol. 163 (ACM, New York), 72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith SM (2003) The constraining effects of initial ideas. Paulus PB, Nijstad BA, eds. Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration (Oxford University Press, New York), 15–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steidle A, Werth L (2014) In the spotlight: Brightness increases self-awareness and reflective self-regulation. J. Environ. Psych. 39:40–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stone NJ, Irvine JM (1994) Direct and indirect window access, task type, and performance. J. Environ. Psych. 14:57–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urist J (1977) The Rorschach test and the assessment of object relations. J. Personality Assessment 41(1):3–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waber B, Magnolfi J, Lindsay G (2014) Workspaces that move people. Harvard Bus. Rev. 92(10):68–77.Google Scholar