Information Systems Projects and Individual Developer Outcomes: Role of Project Managers and Process Control

References

• Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Albrecht AJ, Gaffney JE (1983) Software function, source lines of code, and development effort prediction: Software science validation. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. 9(6):639–648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ancona DG (1990) Outward bound: Strategies for team survival in an organization. Acad. Management J. 33(2):334–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ancona DG, Caldwell DF (1992) Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37(4):634–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersen NE, Kensing F, Lundin J, Mathiassen L, Munk-Madsen A, Rasbech M, Sørgaard P (1990) Professional Systems Development: Experiences, Ideas, and Action (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Andres HP, Zmud RW (2002) A contingency approach to software project coordination. J. Management Inform. Systems 18(3):41–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker RD, Slaughter SA (2000) The moderating effects of software structure on volatility and complexity in software enhancement. Inform. Systems Res. 11(3):219–240.Link, Google Scholar
• Barrick MR, Stewart GL, Neubert MJ, Mount MK (1998) Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. J. Appl. Psych. 83(3):377–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bauer DJ, Preacher KJ, Gil KM (2006) Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psych. Methods 11(2):142–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bliese PD (2000) Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ, eds. Multi-Level Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 349–381.Google Scholar
• Bliese PD, Hanges PJ (2004) Being both too liberal and too conservative: The perils of treating grouped data as though they were independent. Organ. Res. Methods 7(4):400–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boh WF, Slaughter SA, Espinosa JA (2007) Learning from experience in software development: A multilevel analysis. Management Sci. 53(8):1315–1331.Link, Google Scholar
• Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW (1992) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Choi JN (2002) External activities and team effectiveness: Review and theoretical development. Small Group Res. 33(2):181–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chong D, van Eerde W, Chai K, Rutte C (2011) A double-edged sword: The effects of challenge and hindrance time pressure on new product development teams. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 58(1):71–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chua C, Lim WK, Soh C, Sia SK (2012) Enacting clan control in complex IT projects: A social capital perspective. MIS Quart. 36(2):577–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Costa PT, McCrae RR (1992) Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEOFFI) Professional Manual (Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL).Google Scholar
• Driskell JE, Salas E, Johnston J (1999) Does stress lead to a loss of team perspective? Group Dynam.: Theory, Res. Practice 3(4):291–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Druskat VU, Wheeler JV (2003) Managing from the boundary: The effective leadership of self-managing work teams. Acad. Management J. 46(4):435–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards JR (1996) An examination of competing versions of the person-environment fit approach to stress. Acad. Management J. 39(2):292–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards JR, Lambert LS (2007) Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psych. Methods 12(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellis A (2006) System breakdown: The role of mental models and transactive memory in the relationship between acute stress and team performance. Acad. Management J. 49(3):576–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espinosa JA, Slaughter SA, Kraut RE, Herbsleb JD (2007) Familiarity, complexity, and team performance in geographically distributed software development. Organ. Sci. 18(4):613–630.Link, Google Scholar
• Gardner H (2012) Performance pressure as a double-edged sword: Enhancing team motivation but undermining use of team knowledge. Admin. Sci. Quart. 57(1):1–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gartner (2017) Global IT spending to reach $3.7 trillion in 2018. Orlando, FL (October 3), http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3811363.Google Scholar
• Gopal A, Gosain S (2010) The role of formal controls and boundary spanning in software development outsourcing: Implications for project performance. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):960–982.Link, Google Scholar
• Harter DE, Kemerer C, Slaughter SA (2012) Does software process improvement reduce the severity of defects? A longitudinal field study. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. 38(4):810–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henschen D (2013) Inside Avon’s failed order-management project. InformationWeek (December 16), http://www.informationweek.com/software/information-management/inside-avons-failed-order-management-project/d/d-id/1113100.Google Scholar
• Heusser M (2013) 6 software development lessons from healthcare.gov’s failed launch. CIO Magazine (November 18), http://www.cio.com/article/743366/6_Software_Development_Lessons_From_Healthcare.gov_s_Failed_Launch.Google Scholar
• Hoegl M, Gemuenden HG (2001) Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organ. Sci. 12(4):435–449.Link, Google Scholar
• Hofmann DA, Gavin MB (1998) Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. J. Management 24(5):623–641.Google Scholar
• Hunter L, Thatcher SMB (2007) Feeling the heat: Effects of stress, commitment, and job experience on job performance. Acad. Management J. 50(4):953–968.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iivari J, Hirscheim R, Klein HK (2004) Towards a distinctive body of knowledge for information systems experts: Coding ISD process knowledge in two IS journals. Inform. Systems J. 14(4):313–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James LR, Demaree RG, Wolf G (1984) Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. 69(1):85–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang JJ, Klein G, Margulis S (1998) Important behavioral skills for IS project managers: The judgments of experienced IS professionals. Project Management J. 29(1):39–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keil M, Rai A, Liu S (2013) How user and requirement risks moderate the effects of formal and informal controls on IT project performance. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 22(6):650–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keil M, Rai A, Mann J, Zhang P (2003) Why software projects escalate: The importance of project management constructs. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 50(3):251–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keller RT (2001) Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: Diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. Acad. Management J. 44(3):547–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirsch LJ (1997) Portfolios of control modes and IS project management. Inform. Systems Res. 8(3):215–239.Link, Google Scholar
• Kirsch LJ, Sambamurthy V, Ko DG, Purvis RL (2002) Controlling information systems development projects: The view from the client. Management Sci. 48(4):484–498.Link, Google Scholar
• Klein KJ, Dansereau F, Hall RJ (1994) Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Acad. Management Rev. 19(2):195–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozlowski SWJ, Klein KJ (2000) A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ, eds. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 3–90.Google Scholar
• Krull JL, MacKinnon DP (2001) Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behav. Res. 36(2):249–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazarus RS (1994) Psychological stress in the workplace. Crandall R, Perrewe PL, eds. Occupational Stress: A Handbook (Taylor and Francis, New York), 3–14.Google Scholar
• Lazarus RS (1999) Stress and Emotion: A New Synthesis (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• LePine JA, Podsakoff NP, LePine MA (2005) A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor-hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Acad. Management J. 48(5):764–775.Crossref, Google Scholar
• LePine JA, Piccolo RF, Jackson CL, Mathieu JE, Saul JR (2008) A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psych. 61(2):273–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindell MK, Whitney DJ (2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J. Appl. Psych. 86(1):114–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacCormack A, Verganti R, Iansiti M (2001) Developing products on “Internet time”: The anatomy of a flexible development process. Management Sci. 47(1):133–150.Link, Google Scholar
• Marks MA, Mathieu JE, Zaccaro SJ (2001) A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Acad. Management Rev. 26(3):356–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus ML, Robey D (1988) Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Sci. 34(5):583–598.Link, Google Scholar
• Marsh HW, Hocevar D (1985) Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self concept: First and higher order factors models and their invariance across groups. Psych. Bull. 97(3):562–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maruping LM, Venkatesh V, Agarwal R (2009a) A control theory perspective on agile methodology use and changing user requirements. Inform. Systems Res. 20(3):377–399.Link, Google Scholar
• Maruping LM, Zhang X, Venkatesh V (2009b) Role of collective ownership and coding standards in coordinating expertise in software project teams. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 18(4):355–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maruping LM, Venkatesh V, Thatcher SMB, Patel PC (2015) Folding under pressure or rising to the occasion? Perceived time pressure and the moderating role of team temporal leadership. Acad. Management J. 58(5):1313–1333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu JE, Chen G (2011) The etiology of the multilevel paradigm in management research. J. Management 37(2):610–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu JE, Gilson LL, Ruddy TM (2006) Empowerment and team effectiveness: An empirical test of an integrated model. J. Appl. Psych. 91(1):97–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muller D, Judd CM, Yzerbyt VY (2005) When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 89(6):852–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Napier NP, Keil M, Tan FB (2009) IT project managers’ construction of successful project management practice: A repertory grid investigation. Inform. Systems J. 19(3):255–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR (2007) IT project management: Infamous failures, classic mistakes, and best practices. MIS Quart. Executive 6(2):67–78.Google Scholar
• Nidumolu S (1995) The effect of coordination and uncertainty on software project performance: Residual performance risk as an intervening variable. Inform. Systems Res. 6(3):191–219.Link, Google Scholar
• Nidumolu SR, Subramani M (2003) The matrix of control: Combining process and structure approaches to managing software development. J. Management Inform. Systems 20(3):159–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Robey D (1991) Information technology and the structuring of organizations. Inform. Systems Res. 2(2):143–169.Link, Google Scholar
• Patnayakuni R, Rai A, Tiwana A (2007) Systems development process improvement: A knowledge integration perspective. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 54(2):286–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ply JK, Moore JE, Williams CK, Thatcher JB (2012) IS employee attitudes and perceptions at varying levels of software process maturity. MIS Quart. 36(2):601–624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai A, Maruping LM, Venkatesh V (2009) Offshore information systems project success: The role of social embeddedness and cultural characteristics. MIS Quart. 33(3):617–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravichandran T, Rai A (2000) Quality management in systems development: An organizational system perspective. MIS Quart. 24(3):381–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rerup C, Feldman MS (2011) Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning. Acad. Management J. 54(3):577–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rousseau DM (1985) Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Cummings LL, Staw BM, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 1–37.Google Scholar
• Rustagi S, King WR, Kirsch LJ (2008) Predictors of formal control usage in IT outsourcing partnership. Inform. Systems Res. 19(2):126–143.Link, Google Scholar
• Schmidt R, Lyytinen K, Keil M, Cule P (2001) Identifying software project risks: An international Delphi study. J. Management Inform. Systems 17(4):5–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slaughter SA, Kirsch LJ (2006) The effectiveness of knowledge transfer portfolios in software process improvement: A field study. Inform. Systems Res. 17(3):301–320.Link, Google Scholar
• Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ (1999) Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Tippins M, Sohi RS (2003) IT competency and firm performance: Is organizational learning a missing firm link? Strategic Management J. 24(8):745–761.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A, Keil M (2010) Control in internal and outsourced software projects. J. Management Inform. Systems 26(3):9–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trist E (1981) The sociotechnical perspective. Van de Ven AH, Joyce WF, eds. Perspectives on Organizational Design and Behavior (Wiley, New York), 19–75.Google Scholar
• Verner JM, Evanco WM (2005) In-house software development: What project management practices lead to success? IEEE Software 22(1):86–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wallace L, Keil M, Rai A (2004a) How software project risk affects project performance: An investigation of the dimensions of risk and an exploratory model. Decision Sci. 35(2):289–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wallace L, Keil M, Rai A (2004b) Understanding software project risk: A cluster analysis. Inform. Management 42(1):115–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Windeler JB, Maruping LM, Venkatesh V (2017) Systems development risk factors: The role of empowering leadership in lowering developers’ stress. Inform. Systems Res. 28(4):775–796.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Pham H (2000) An analysis of factors affecting software reliability. J. Systems Software 50(1):43–56.Crossref, Google Scholar