Generating Value Through Open Source: Software Service Market Regulation and Licensing Policy

References

• Andreoni J (1988) Privately provided public goods in a large economy: The limits of altruism. J. Public Econom. 35(1):57–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 29(3):155–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asundi J, Carare O, Dogan K (2012) Competitive implications of software open-sourcing. Decision Support Systems 54(1):153–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• August T, Chen W, Zhu K (2014) Competition among proprietary and open-source software firms: The role of licensing on strategic contribution. Working paper, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
• August T, Shin H, Tunca TI (2013) Licensing and competition for services in open source software. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):1068–1086.Link, Google Scholar
• Bain JS (1949) A note on pricing in monopoly and oligopoly. Amer. Econom. Rev. 39(2):448–464.Google Scholar
• Bessen J (2006) Open source software: Free provision of complex public goods. Bitzer J, Schroder PJ, eds. The Economics of Open Source Software Development (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 57–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bulow JI, Geanakoplos JD, Klemperer PD (1985) Multimarket oligopoly: Strategic substitutes and complements. J. Political Econom. 93(3):488–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casadesus-Masanell R, Ghemawat P (2006) Dynamic mixed duopoly: A model motivated by Linux vs. Windows. Management Sci. 52(7):1072–1084.Link, Google Scholar
• Casadesus-Masanell R, Llanes G (2011) Mixed source. Management Sci. 57(7):1212–1230.Link, Google Scholar
• Cheng HK, Liu Y, Tang QC (2011) The impact of network externalities on the competition between open source and proprietary software. J. Management Inform. Systems 27(4):201–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark D (2014) Intel’s investment into Cloudera totals $740 million. Wall Street Journal (March 31). https://www.wsj.com/articles/intels-investment-into-cloudera-totals-740-million-1396281655.Google Scholar
• Cohan P (2013) With $141 million in capital, IPO-bound Cloudera sprints to $1 billion in revenue. Forbes (October 29). https://www.forbes.com/sites/petercohan/2013/10/29/with-141-million-in-capital-ipo-bound-cloudera-sprints-to-1-billion-in-revenue/#5f2e794c368b.Google Scholar
• Colazo J, Fang Y (2009) Impact of license choice on open source software development activity. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 60(5):997–1011.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Columbus L (2016) Miško Hevery, inventor of angular and how open source languages are redefining enterprise software. Forbes (November 14). https://www.forbes.com/sites/louiscolumbus/2016/11/14/misko-hevery-inventor-of-angular-and-how-open-source-languages-are-redefining-enterprise-software/#15ef0c29270d.Google Scholar
• Dorroh JR, Gulledge TR, Womer NK (1994) Investment in knowledge: A generalization of learning by experience. Management Sci. 40(8):947–958.Link, Google Scholar
• Dutton JM, Thomas A (1984) Treating progress functions as a managerial opportunity. Acad. Management Rev. 9(2):235–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fine CH (1986) Quality improvement and learning in productive systems. Management Sci. 32(10):1301–1315.Link, Google Scholar
• Fishman S (2004) Open source licenses are not all the same. O’Reilly ONLamp.com (November 18). http://www.onlamp.coms/pub/a/onlamp/2004/11/18/licenses.html.Google Scholar
• FTC (2017) About the FTC. Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC. https://www.ftc.gov/about-ftc/.Google Scholar
• Gabszewicz JJ, Thisse J-F (1979) Price competition, quality and income disparities. J. Econom. Theory 20(3):340–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaudeul A (2004a) Competition between open-source and proprietary software: The LaTeX case study. Working paper, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.Google Scholar
• Gaudeul A (2004b) Open source software development patterns and license terms. Working paper, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.Google Scholar
• Glick B (2013) Government mandates “preference” for open source. ComputerWeekly (March 15). http://www.computerweekly.com/news/2240179643/Government-mandates-preference-for-open-source.Google Scholar
• Groves T, Ledyard J (1977) Optimal allocation of public goods: A solution to the “free rider” problem. Econometrica 45(4):783–809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hars A, Ou S (2002) Working for free? Motivations for participating in open-source projects. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce 6(3):25–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haruvy E, Sethi SP, Zhou J (2008) Open source development with a commercial complementary product or service. Production Oper. Management 17(1):29–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawkins RE (2004) The economics of open source software for a competitive firm. Why give it away for free? Netnomics 6(2):103–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herz J, Lucas M, Scott J (2006) Open technology development: Roadmap plan. U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Hillesley R (2008) Red Hat at the crossroads. ITPRO (January 14). http://www.itpro.co.uk/155277/red-hat-at-the-crossroads.Google Scholar
• Hitt LM, Wu DJ, Zhou X (2002) Investment in enterprise resource planning: Business impact and productivity measures. J. Management Inform. Systems 19(1):71–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B, Milgrom P (1991) Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 7:24–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• HP (2007) Open source and Linux from HP. Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
• Iansiti M, Richards GL (2006) The business of free software: Enterprise, incentives, investment, and motivation in the open source community. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• IBM (2012) IBM 2012 annual report. Armonk, NY.Google Scholar
• JBoss (2008) Professional open source licensing. JBoss, Inc., http://www.jboss.org/company/licensing/.Google Scholar
• Kerstetter J (2004) Redemption for JBoss’s boss. BusinessWeek. https://www.linuxtoday.com/it_management/2004102000726insvsw.Google Scholar
• King R (2014) Open source “eating” software world: Samsung. Wall Street Journal. https://blogs.wsj.com/cio/2014/05/05/open-source-eating-software-world-samsung/.Google Scholar
• Kuan J (2001) Open source software as consumer integration into production. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Gordon BR, Srinivasan K (2011) Competitive strategy for open source software. Marketing Sci. 30(6):1066–1078.Link, Google Scholar
• Laffont J-J, Tirole J (1988) The dynamics of incentive contracts. Econometrica 56(5):1153–1175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakshminarayanan R (2014) Open source provides compelling benefits to business. ZDNet (July 31). http://www.zdnet.com/article/open-source-provides-compelling-benefits-to-business/.Google Scholar
• Lee D, Mendelson H (2008) Divide and conquer: Competing with free technology under network effects. Production Oper. Management 17(1):12–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Pathak PA, Tirole J (2006) The dynamics of open-source contributors. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(2):114–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Tirole J (2002) Some simple economics of open source. J. Indust. Econom. 50(2):197–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Tirole J (2005a) The economics of technology sharing: Open source and beyond. J. Econom. Perspect. 19(2):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J, Tirole J (2005b) The scope of open source licensing. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 21(1):20–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy FK (1965) Adaptation in the production process. Management Sci. 11(6):B136–B154.Link, Google Scholar
• Li G, Rajagopalan S (1998) Process improvement, quality, and learning effects. Management Sci. 44(11):1517–1532.Link, Google Scholar
• Li L, McKelvey RDM, Page T (1987) Optimal research for cournot oligopolists. J. Econom. Theory 42(1):140–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Linux Foundation (2013) 2013 enterprise end user report. Linux Foundation, San Francisco.Google Scholar
• Markon J, Crites A (2013) Health-care web site’s lead contractor employs executives from troubled IT company. Washington Post (November 15). https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/health-care-web-sites-lead-contractor-employs-executives-from-troubled-it-company/2013/11/15/6e107e2e-487a-11e3-a196-3544a03c2351_story.html?utm_term=.25a635d47832.Google Scholar
• McMillan R (2012) Red Hat becomes open source’s first $1 billion baby. Wired (March 28). https://www.wired.com/2012/03/red-hat/.Google Scholar
• Mehra A, Mookerjee V (2012) Human capital development for programmers using open source software. MIS Quart. 36(1):107–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehra A, Dewan R, Freimer M (2011) Firms as incubators of open-source software. Inform. Systems Res. 22(1):22–38.Link, Google Scholar
• Modigliani F (1958) New developments on the oligopoly front. J. Political Econom. 66(3):215–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moldovanu B, Sela A (2001) The optimal allocation of prizes in contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(3):542–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montague B (2008) Why you should use a BSD style license for your open source project. https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/bsdl-gpl/article.html.Google Scholar
• Noyes K (2014) Security and quality top companies’ reasons for using open source. PCWorld (April 7). https://www.pcworld.com/article/2140210/why-use-open-source-security-and-quality-top-companies-lists.html.Google Scholar
• Paulnock C (2016) Open source solves and supports today’s business needs. CIOReview. https://opensource.cioreview.com/cxoinsight/open-source-solves-and-supports-today-s-business-needs-nid-23389-cid-92.html.Google Scholar
• Pesendorfer W, Swinkels JM (2000) Efficiency and information aggregation in auctions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(3):499–525.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Radner R, Myerson R, Maskin E (1986) An example of a repeated partnership game with discounting and with uniformly inefficient equilibria. Rev. Econom. Stud. 53(1):59–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts JA, Hann I-H, Slaughter SA (2006) Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the Apache projects. Management Sci. 52(7):984–999.Link, Google Scholar
• Rusin Z (2008) Open source licenses. KDE, Brighton, MA. http://developer.kde.org/documentation/licensing/licenses_summary.html.Google Scholar
• Samuelson PA (1954) The pure theory of public expenditure. Rev. Econom. Statist. 36(4):387–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sen R (2007) A strategic analysis of competition between open source and proprietary software. J. Management Inform. Systems 24(1):233–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sen R, Subramaniam C, Nelson ML (2009) Determinants of the choice of open source software license. J. Management Inform. Systems 25(3):207–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sen R, Subramaniam C, Nelson ML (2011) Open source software licenses: Strong-copyleft, non-copyleft, or somewhere in between? Decision Support Systems 52(1):199–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh PV, Phelps C (2013) Networks, social influence, and the choice among competing innovations: Insights from open source software licenses. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):207–239.Link, Google Scholar
• Spence AM (1981) The learning curve and competition. Bell J. Econom. 12(1):49–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart KJ, Ammeter AP, Maruping LM (2006) Impacts of license choice and organizational sponsorship on user interest and development activity in open source software projects. Inform. Systems Res. 17(2):126–144.Link, Google Scholar
• Tunca TI, Wu Q (2013) Fighting fire with fire: Commercial piracy and the role of file sharing on copyright protection policy for digital goods. Inform. Systems Res. 24(2):436–453.Link, Google Scholar
• Vanian J (2016) Red Hat CEO on Microsoft, Google, and cutting edge software. Fortune (November 18). http://fortune.com/2016/11/18/red-hat-ceo-james-whitehurst-microsoft-google-software/.Google Scholar
• Varian H (2004) System reliability and free riding. Camp LJ, Lewis S, eds. Economics of Information Security (Springer, New York), 1–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vereshchagina G, Hopenhayn HA (2009) Risk taking by entrepreneurs. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(5):1808–1830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Krogh G, von Hippel E (2006) The promise of research on open source software. Management Sci. 52(7):975–983.Link, Google Scholar
• Von Krogh G, Haefliger S, Spaeth S, Wallin MW (2012) Carrots and rainbows: Motivation and social practice in open source software development. MIS Quart. 36(2):649–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wen W, Ceccagnoli M, Forman C (2016) Opening up intellectual property strategy: Implications for open source software entry by start-up firms. Management Sci. 62(9):2668–2691.Link, Google Scholar
• West J (2003) How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Res. Policy 32(7):1259–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu KX, Zhou ZZ (2012) Lock-in strategy in software competition: Open-source software vs. proprietary software. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):536–545.Link, Google Scholar