Managing Distributed Product Development Projects: Integration Strategies for Time-Zone and Language Barriers

References

• Abdel-Hamid TK, Madnick SE (1991) Software Project Dynamics: An Integrated Approach (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Ahlemann F (2009) Towards a conceptual reference model for project management information systems. Internat. J. Project Management 27(1):19–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aiken L, West S (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage Publications, London).Google Scholar
• Amaral J, Anderson EG Jr, Parker GG (2011) How to succeed in distributed product development. Sloan Management Rev. 52(2): 51–58.Google Scholar
• Anderson E, Parker G (2013) Integration of global knowledge networks. Production Oper. Management 22(6):1446–1463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson EG Jr, Davis-Blake A, Erzurumlu S, Joglekar N, Parker G (2007) The effects of outsourcing, offshoring, and distributed product development organization on coordinating the NPD process. Loch C, Kavadias S, eds. Handbook of New Product Development Management (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK), 259–290.Google Scholar
• Atuahene-Gima K (2003) The effects of centrifugal and centripetal forces on product development speed and quality: How does problem solving matter? Acad. Management J. 46(3):359–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailey DE, Leonardi PM, Chong JJ (2010) Minding the gaps: Understanding technology interdependence and coordination in knowledge work. Organ. Sci. 21(3):713–730.Link, Google Scholar
• Baldwin CY, Clark KB (1997) Managing in an age of modularity. Harvard Bus. Rev. 75(5):84–93.Google Scholar
• Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management 17(1):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bera AK, Jarque CM (1981) Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals: Monte Carlo evidence. Econom. Lett. 7(4):313–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berente N, Vandenbosch B, Aubert B (2009) Information flows and business process integration. Bus. Process Management J. 15(1):119–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhatt GD, Grover V (2005) Types of information technology capabilities and their role in competitive advantage: An empirical study. J. Management Inform. Systems 22(2):253–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollen KA, Barb KH (1981) Pearson’s r and coarsely categorized measures. Amer. Soc. Rev. 46(2):232–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice, Vol. 16 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bright W, ed. (1992) International Encyclopedia of Linguistics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Brown SA, Venkatesh V (2005) Model of adoption of technology in households: A baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS Quart. 29(3):399–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brusoni S, Prencipe A, Pavitt K (2001) Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? Admin. Sci. Quart. 46: 597–621.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlile P (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. 15(5):555–568.Link, Google Scholar
• Carmel E, Espinosa J (2011) I’m Working While They’re Sleeping: Time Zone Separation Challenges and Solutions (Nedder Stream Press, United States).Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran A, Mishra A (2012) Task design, team context and psychological safety. An empirical analysis of R&D projects. Production Oper. Management 21(6):977–996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen D (2014) The glitches of outsourcing IT services. Huffington Post Politics (January 24), http://www.huffingtonpost.com/donald-cohen/the-glitches-of-outsourcing_b_4648043.html.Google Scholar
• Cramton CD, Hinds PJ (2004) Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocentrism or cross-national learning? Res. Organ. Behav. 26:231–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cummings JN (2004) Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci. 50(3):352–364.Link, Google Scholar
• Davies A, Brady T (2000) Organizational capabilities and learning in complex product systems: Towards repeatable solutions. Res. Policy 29(7/8):931–953.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dougherty D (1992) Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. 3(2):179–202.Link, Google Scholar
• Dowlatshahi S (1992) Purchasing’s role in a concurrent engineering environment. Internat. J. Purchasing Materials Management 28(1):21–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doz YL, Hamel G (1998) Alliance Advantage: The Art of Creating Value Through Partnering (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Eppinger S, Chitkara A (2006) The new practice of global product development. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 47(4):22–30.Google Scholar
• Eppinger SD, Browning TR (2012) Design Structure Matrix Methods and Applications (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espinosa JA, Carmel E (2003) The impact of time separation on coordination in global software teams: A conceptual foundation. Software Process: Improvement Practice 8(4):249–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espinosa J, Slaughter S, Kraut R, Herbsleb J (2007) Familiarity, complexity, and team performance in geographically distributed software development. Organ. Sci. 18(4):613–630.Link, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj SK (2007) Allocation of inventive effort in complex product systems. Strategic Management J. 28(6):563–584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gates D (2013) Boeing 787’s problems blamed on outsourcing, lack of oversight. Seattle Times (February 3). https://www.seattletimes.com/business/boeing-787rsquos-problems-blamed-on-outsourcing-lack-of-oversight/.Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Carmel E (2008) Is the world really flat? A look at offshoring in an online programming marketplace. MIS Quart. 32(2):367–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson C, Cohen SG (2003) Virtual Teams That Work: Creating Conditions for Virtual Team Effectiveness (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Goffin K, Koners U (2011) Tacit knowledge, lessons learnt, and new product development. J. Product Innovation Management 28(2):300–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gokpinar B, Hopp WJ, Iravani SMR (2013) In-house globalization: The role of globally distributed design and product architecture on product development performance. Production Oper. Management 22(6):1509–1523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. 17:109–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin A, Hauser JR (1993) The voice of the customer. Marketing Sci. 12(1):1–27.Link, Google Scholar
• Grover V, Malhotra MK (2003) Transaction cost framework in operations and supply chain management research: Theory and measurement. J. Oper. Management 21(4):457–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gujarati D, Porter D (2009) Essentials of Econometrics (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Lawrence PR, Puranam P (2005) Adaptation in vertical relationships: Beyond incentive conflict. Strategic Management J. 26(5):415–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hacki R, Lighton J (2001) The future of the networked company. McKinsey Quart. 3:26–39.Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin B, Anderson R (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Harzing AW, Feely AJ (2008) The language barrier and its implications for HQ-subsidiary relationships. Cross Cultural Management: Internat. J. 15(1):49–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hillebrand B, Biemans WG (2004) Links between internal and external cooperation in product development: An exploratory study*. J. Product Innovation Management 21(2):110–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Kiesler S (2002) Distributed Work (MIT Press, Boston).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Mortensen M (2005) Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ. Sci. 16(3):290–307.Link, Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Neeley TB, Cramton CD (2014) Language as a lightning rod: Power contests, emotion regulation, and subgroup dynamics in global teams. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 45(5):536–561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoegl M, Weinkauf K, Gemuenden HG (2004) Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: A longitudinal study. Organ. Sci. 15(1):38–55.Link, Google Scholar
• Hong H (2010) Bicultural competence and its impact on team effectiveness. Internat. J. Cross Cultural Management 10(1):93–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hutchinson WK (2002) Does ease of communication increase trade? Commonality of language and bilateral trade. Scottish J. Political Econom. 49(5):544–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kane AA, Levina N (2017) Am I still one of them?: Bicultural immigrant managers navigating social identity threats when spanning global boundaries. J. Management Stud. 54(4):540–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy P (2003) A Guide to Econometrics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3): 383–397.Link, Google Scholar
• Kotha S, Srikanth K (2013) Managing a global partnership model: Lessons from the Boeing 787 “Dreamliner” program. Global Strategy J. 3:41–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kotlarsky J, Scarbrough H, Oshri I (2014) Coordinating expertise across knowledge boundaries in offshore-outsourcing projects: The role of codification. MIS Quart. 38(2):607–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krause D, Handfield RB, Scannel TV (1998) An empirical investigation of supplier development: Reactive and strategic processes. J. Oper. Management 17(1):39–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishna S, Sahay S, Walsham GG (2004) Managing cross-cultural issues in global software outsourcing. Comm. ACM 47(4):62–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levick R (2013) Spotlight on outsourcing: Boeing scrambles as Toyota triumphs. Forbes Leadership (January 30), http://www.forbes.com/sites/richardlevick/2013/01/30/spotlight-on-outsourcing-boeing-scrambles-as-toyota-triumphs/.Google Scholar
• Levina N, Vaast E (2005) The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quart. 29(2):335–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levina N, Vaast E (2008) Innovating or doing as told? Status differences and overlapping boundaries in offshore collaboration. MIS Quart. 32(2):307–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Aron R (2015) Organizational control, incentive contracts, and knowledge transfer in offshore business process outsourcing. Inform. Systems Res. 26(1):81–99.Link, Google Scholar
• Lyneis JM, Ford DN (2007) System dynamics applied to project management: A survey, assessment, and directions for future research. System Dynam. Rev. 23(2/3):157–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malone TW, Crowston K (1994) The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Comput. Surveys (CSUR) 26(1):87–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maloni M, Benton WC (2000) Power influences in the supply chain. J. Bus. Logist. 21(1):49–73.Google Scholar
• Mani D, Barua A, Whinston AB (2012) An empirical analysis of the contractual and information structures of business process outsourcing relationships. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3):618–634.Link, Google Scholar
• Mani D, Srikanth K, Bharadwaj A (2014) Efficacy of R&D work in offshore captive centers: An empirical study of task characteristics, coordination mechanisms, and performance. Inform. Systems Res. 25(4):846–864.Link, Google Scholar
• Manning S, Massini S, Lewin AY (2008) A dynamic perspective on next-generation offshoring: The global sourcing of science and engineering skills. Acad. Management Perspect. 22(3):35–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDonough ED, Kahn KB, Barczak G (2001) An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and colocated new product development teams. J. Product Innovation Management 18:110–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McIvor R (2008) A study of performance measurement in the outsourcing decision. Res. Executive Summary Ser. 4(3):1–13.Google Scholar
• Michaels D (2012) Hit by delays, Airbus tries new way of building planes. Wall Street Journal (July 11), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303879604577407861198472788.Google Scholar
• Naor M, Linderman K, Schroeder R (2010) The globalization of operations in eastern and western countries: Unpacking the relationship between national and organizational culture and its impact on manufacturing performance. J. Oper. Management 28(3):194–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neeley T (2013) Language matters: Status loss and achieved status distinctions in global organizations. Organ. Sci. 24(2):476–497.Link, Google Scholar
• Neeley T, Dumas T (2016) Unearned status gain: Evidence from a global language mandate. Acad. Management J. 59(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neeley T, Hinds P, Cramton C (2012) Walking through jelly: Language proficiency, emotions, and disrupted collaboration in global work. Organ. Dynam. 41(3):236–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neter J, Kutner M, Nachtsheim C, Li W (2004) Applied Linear Statistical Models, 5th ed. (McGraw Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Nickerson JA, Zenger T (2004) A knowledge-based theory of the firm—The problem solving perspective. Organ. Sci. 15(6): 617–632.Link, Google Scholar
• Nunnally J (1978) Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. (McGraw Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• O’Leary MB, Cummings JN (2007) The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams. MIS Quart. 31(3):433–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Leary MB, Wilson JM, Metiu A (2014) Information systems for symbolic action: Social media and beyond: Beyond being there: The symbolic role of communication and identification in perceptions of proximity to geographically dispersed colleagues. MIS Quart. 38(4):1219–1244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (2002) Knowledge in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. 13(3):249–273.Link, Google Scholar
• Parker G, Anderson EG (2002) From buyer to integrator: The transformation of the supply chain manager in the vertically disintegrating firm. Production Oper. Management 11(1):75–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parkhe A (1993) Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Acad. Management J. 36(4):794–829.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, El Sawy OA (2006) From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Inform. Systems Res. 17(3):198–227.Link, Google Scholar
• Petersen KJ, Handfield RB, Ragatz GL (2005) Supplier integration into new product development: Coordinating product, process and supply chain design. J. Oper. Management 23(3):371–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell TC, Dent-Micallef A (1997) Information technology as competitive advantage: The role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Management J. 18(5):375–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragatz GL, Handfield RB, Scannell TV (1997) Success factors for integrating suppliers into new product development. J. Product Innovation Management 14(3):190–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai A, Maruping LM, Venkatesh V (2009) Offshore information systems project success: The role of social embeddedness and cultural characteristics. MIS Quart. 33(3):617–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramdas K, Taylor R (2008) Does component sharing help or hurt reliability? An empirical study of auto industry. Management Sci. 54(5):922–938.Link, Google Scholar
• Raymond L, Bergeron F (2008) Project management information systems: An empirical study of their impact on project managers and project success. Internat. J. Project Management 26(2):213–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sahay S, Nicholson B, Krishna S (2003) Global IT Outsourcing: Software Development Across Borders (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schiele H (2010) Early supplier integration: The dual role of purchasing in new product development. R&D Management 40(2): 138–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt K, Simonee C (1996) Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 5(2–3):155–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snow CC, Lipnack J, Stamps J (1999) The virtual organization: promises and payoffs, large and small. J. Organ. Behav. 6:15–30.Google Scholar
• Sosa M, Eppinger S, Rowles C (2004) The misalignment of product architecture and organizational structure in complex product development. Management Sci. 50(12):1674–1689.Link, Google Scholar
• Sosa ME, Eppinger SD, Pich M, McKendrick DG, Stout SK (2002) Factors that influence technical communication in distributed product development: An empirical study in the telecommunications industry. Engrg. Management, IEEE Trans. 49(1):45–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srikanth K, Puranam P (2011) Integrating distrubuted work: Comparing task design, communication, and tacit coordination mechanisms. Strategic Management J. 32:849–875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srikanth K, Puranam P (2014) The firm as a coordination system: Evidence from software services offshoring. Strategic Management J. 25(4):1253–1271.Google Scholar
• Subramaniam M, Venkatraman N (2001) Determinants of transnational new product development capability: Testing the influence of transferring and deploying tacit overseas knowledge. Strategic Management J. 22(4):359–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tambe PB, Hitt LM (2010) How offshoring affects IT workers. Comm. ACM 53(10):62–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor JM, Ford DN (2007) System dynamics applied to project management: A survey, assessment, and directions for future research. System Dynam. Rev. 23:157–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Tracey M (2004) A holistic approach to new product development: New insights. J. Supply Chain Management 40(4):37–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner JR, Speiser A (1992) Program management: Concepts and its information systems requirements. Internat. J. Project Management 10(4):196–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (2011) Product Design and Development, 5th ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Moenaert RK (1998) The effects of R&D team co-location on communication patterns among R&D, marketing, and manufacturing. Management Sci. 44(11-part-2):S1–S18.Link, Google Scholar
• Varonis EM, Gass SM (1985) Miscommunication in native/non-native conversation. Language Soc. 14(3):327–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Brown SA, Bala H (2013) Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Quart. 37(1):21–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vlaar PWL, van Fenema PC, Tiwari V (2008) Cocreating understanding and value in distributed work: How members of onsite and offshore vendor teams give, make, demand, and break sense. MIS Quart. 32(2):227–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E (1994) Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Sci. 40(4): 429–440.Link, Google Scholar
• Wade M, Hulland J (2004) Review: The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quart. 28(1):107–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watson-Manheim MB, Chudoba KM, Crowston K (2012) Perceived discontinuities and constructed continuities in virtual work. Inform. Systems J. 22(1):29–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• West J, Graham JL (2004) A linguistic-based measure of cultural distance and its relationship to managerial values. MIR: Management Internat. Rev. 44(3):239–260.Google Scholar
• Wilcocks L, Griffiths C (2010) The crucial role of middle management in outsourcing. MIS Quart. Executive 9(3):177–193.Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (1991) Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36(2):269–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter SJ, Taylor SL (1996) The role of IT in the transformation of work: A comparison of post-industrial, industrial, and proto-industrial organization. Inform. Systems Res. 7(1):5–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Wynstra F, Van Weele A, Weggemann M (2001) Managing supplier involvement in product development: Three critical issues. Eur. Management J. 19(2):157–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wynstra F, Weggeman M, van Weele A (2003) Exploring purchasing integration in product development. Indust. Marketing Management 32(1):69–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin R (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd ed. (Sage Publications, New York).Google Scholar