Extrinsic versus Intrinsic Rewards for Contributing Reviews in an Online Platform

References

• Anderson M, Magruder J (2012) Learning from the crowd: Regression discontinuity estimates of the effects of an online review database. Econom. J. 122(563):957–989.Google Scholar
• Archak N, Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG (2011) Deriving the pricing power of product features by mining consumer reviews. Management Sci. 57(8):1485–1509.Link, Google Scholar
• Arun R, Suresh V, Madhavan CV, Murthy MN (2010) On finding the natural number of topics with latent Dirichlet allocation: Some observations. Zaki MJ, Yu JX, Ravindran B, Pudi V, eds. Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Lecture Notes Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 6118 (Springer, Berlin), 391–402.Google Scholar
• Baker WE, Bulkley N (2014) Paying it forward vs. rewarding reputation: Mechanisms of generalized reciprocity. Organ. Sci. 25(5):1493–1510.Link, Google Scholar
• Bansal HS, Voyer PA (2000) Word-of-mouth processes within a services purchase decision context. J. Service Res. 3(2):166–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bénabou R, Tirole J (2006) Incentives and prosocial behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1652–1678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blei DM (2012) Probabilistic topic models. Comm. ACM 55(4):77–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blumenstock JE (2008) Size matters: Word count as a measure of quality on Wikipedia. Proc. 17th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (ACM, New York), 1095–1096.Google Scholar
• Bolton GE, Katok E, Ockenfels A (2004) How effective are electronic reputation mechanisms? An experimental investigation. Management Sci. 50(11):1587–1602.Link, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hu Y, Simester D (2011) Goodbye pareto principle, hello long tail: The effect of search costs on the concentration of product sales. Management Sci. 57(8):1373–1386.Link, Google Scholar
• Cao J, Xia T, Li J, Zhang Y, Tang S (2009) A density-based method for adaptive LDA model selection. Neurocomputing 72(7):1775–1781.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan J, Ghose A (2013) Internets dirty secret: Assessing the impact of online intermediaries on HIV transmission. MIS Quart. 38(4):955–976.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheema A, Kaikati AM (2010) The effect of need for uniqueness on word of mouth. J. Marketing Res. 47(3):553–563.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen P-Y, Dhanasobhon S, Smith MD (2008) All reviews are not created equal: The disaggregate impact of reviews and reviewers at amazon.com. Working paper, Arizona State University, Tempe, http://ssrn.com/abstract=918083.Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Xie J (2005) Third-party product review and firm marketing strategy. Marketing Sci. 24(2):218–240.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Ho T-H, Kim Y-M (2010b) Knowledge market design: A field experiment at Google answers. J. Public Econom. Theory 12(4):641–664.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Harper FM, Konstan J, Li XS (2010a) Social comparisons and contributions to online communities: A field experiment on Movielens. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1358–1398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta PK, Gopinath S, Venkataraman S (2010) The effects of online user reviews on movie box office performance: Accounting for sequential rollout and aggregation across local markets. Marketing Sci. 29(5):944–957.Link, Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Koestner R, Ryan RM (1999) A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psych. Bull. 125(6):627–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C, Narayan R (2006) A statistical measure of a populations propensity to engage in post-purchase online word-of-mouth. Statist. Sci. 21(2):277–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C, Gao G, Narayan R (2010) Are consumers more likely to contribute online reviews for hit or niche products? J. Management Inform. Systems 27(2):127–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deveaud R, SanJuan E, Bellot P (2014) Accurate and effective latent concept modeling for ad hoc information retrieval. Document numérique 17(1):61–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunning T (2012) Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisend M (2006) Two-sided advertising: A meta-analysis. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 23(2):187–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erat S, Gneezy U (2012) White lies. Management Sci. 58(4):723–733.Link, Google Scholar
• Gao GG, Greenwood BN, Agarwal R, Jeffrey S (2015) Vocal minority and silent majority: How do online ratings reflect population perceptions of quality? MIS Quart. 39(3):565–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gastwirth JL (1971) A general definition of the Lorenz curve. Econometrica 39(6):1037–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG (2006) Designing ranking systems for consumer reviews: The impact of review subjectivity on product sales and review quality. Proc. 16th Annual Workshop Inform. Tech. Systems (ACM, New York), 303–310.Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG (2011) Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 23(10):1498–1512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Meier S, Rey-Biel P (2011) When and why incentives (don’t) work to modify behavior. J. Econom. Perspect. 25(4):191–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Silva J (2012) Sequential and temporal dynamics of online opinion. Marketing Sci. 31(3):448–473.Link, Google Scholar
• Goes PB, Lin M, Au Yeung C-M (2014) Popularity effect in user-generated content: Evidence from online product reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 25(2):222–238.Link, Google Scholar
• Good PI (2005) Permutation, Parametric, and Bootstrap Tests of Hypotheses (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Greiner B, Levati MV (2005) Indirect reciprocity in cyclical networks: An experimental study. J. Econom. Psych. 26(5):711–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grewal R, Cline TW, Davies A (2003) Early-entrant advantage, word-of-mouth communication, brand similarity, and the consumer decision-making process. J. Consumer Psych. 13(3):187–197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffiths TL, Steyvers M (2004) Finding scientific topics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101 (suppl 1):5228–5235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grün B, Hornik K (2011) Topicmodels: An r package for fitting topic models. J. Statist. Software 40(13):1–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gunning R (1969) The fog index after twenty years. J. Bus. Comm. 6(2):3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennig-Thurau T, Gwinner KP, Walsh G, Gremler DD (2004) Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? J. Interactive Marketing 18(1):38–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hosanagar K, Fleder D, Lee D, Buja A (2013) Will the global village fracture into tribes? Recommender systems and their effects on consumer fragmentation. Management Sci. 60(4):805–823.Link, Google Scholar
• Hsieh G, Kraut RE, Hudson SE (2010) Why pay?: Exploring how financial incentives are used for question and answer. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 305–314.Google Scholar
• Hu N, Pavlou PA, Zhang J (2006) Can online reviews reveal a product’s true quality?: Empirical findings and analytical modeling of online word-of-mouth communication. Proc. 7th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York), 324–330.Google Scholar
• Hu N, Zhang J, Pavlou PA (2009) Overcoming the j-shaped distribution of product reviews. Comm. ACM 52(10):144–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Singh PV, Ghose A (2015) A structural model of employee behavioral dynamics in enterprise social media. Management Sci. 61(12):2825–2844.Link, Google Scholar
• Jiang LC, Bazarova NN, Hancock JT (2013) From perception to behavior: Disclosure reciprocity and the intensification of intimacy in computer-mediated communication. Comm. Res. 40(1):125–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohn A (1999) Punished by Rewards: The Trouble with Gold Stars, Incentive Plans, A’s, Praise, and Other Bribes (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
• Korfiatis N, Rodríguez D, Sicilia M-A (2008) The impact of readability on the usefulness of online product reviews: A case study on an online bookstore. Lytras MD, Carroll JM, Damiani E, Tennyson RD, eds. Emerging Technologies and Information Systems for the Knowledge Society, WSKS 2008, Lecture Notes Comput. Sci., Vol. 5288 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg), 423–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreps DM (1997) Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(2):359–364.Google Scholar
• Kuran T, Sunstein CR (1999) Availability cascades and risk regulation. Stanford Law Rev. 51(4):683–768.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lappas T, Sabnis G, Valkanas G (2016) The impact of fake reviews on online visibility: A vulnerability assessment of the hotel industry. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):940–961.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee D, Hosanagar K (2014) Impact of recommender systems on sales volume and diversity. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems 2014 (AIS, Atlanta, GA).Google Scholar
• Lee Y-J, Hosanagar K, Tan Y (2015) Do I follow my friends or the crowd? Information cascades in online movie ratings. Management Sci. 61(9):2241–2258.Link, Google Scholar
• Li H, Zhang Z, Janakiraman R, Meng F (2016) How review sentiment and readability affect online peer evaluation votes?—An examination combining reviewers social identity and social network. ttra Annual Internat. Conf. Proc. 2016.Google Scholar
• Li X, Hitt LM (2008) Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 19(4):456–474.Link, Google Scholar
• Li Z, Huang K-W, Cavusoglu H (2012) Quantifying the impact of badges on user engagement in online Q&A communities. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems 2012 (TTRA, Whitehall, MI).Google Scholar
• Liu TX, Yang J, Adamic LA, Chen Y (2014) Crowdsourcing with all-pay auctions: A field experiment on taskcn. Management Sci. 60(8):2020–2037.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu Y (2006) Word of mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. J. Marketing 70(3):74–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loughran T, McDonald B (2011) When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10-ks. J. Finance 66(1):35–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Jerath K, Singh PV (2013) The emergence of opinion leaders in a networked online community: A dyadic model with time dynamics and a heuristic for fast estimation. Management Sci. 59(8):1783–1799.Link, Google Scholar
• Luca M (2011) Reviews, reputation, and revenue: The case of Yelp.com. Working paper, Harvard Business School, https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=41233.Google Scholar
• Luca M, Zervas G (2016) Fake it till you make it: Reputation, competition, and Yelp review fraud. Management Sci. 62(12):3412–3427.Link, Google Scholar
• Marlin B, Zemel RS, Roweis S, Slaney M (2007) Collaborative filtering and the missing at random assumption. 23rd Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence (AUAI Press, Arlington, VA), 267–275.Google Scholar
• Marlin BM, Zemel RS (2009) Collaborative prediction and ranking with non-random missing data. Proc. Third ACM Conf. Recommender Systems (ACM, New York), 5–12.Google Scholar
• May RM (1987) More evolution of cooperation. Nature 327(6117):15–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayzlin D, Dover Y, Chevalier J (2014) Promotional reviews: An empirical investigation of online review manipulation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(8):2421–2455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McQueeney R (2016) Can Amazon (AMZN) fix its incentivized reviews problem? Accessed March 20, 2017, http://finance.yahoo.com/news/amazon-amzn-fix-incentivized-reviews-165804949.html.Google Scholar
• Mellström C, Johannesson M (2008) Crowding out in blood donation: Was Titmuss right? J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 6(4):845–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moe WW, Schweidel DA (2012) Online product opinions: Incidence, evaluation, and evolution. Marketing Sci. 31(3):372–386.Link, Google Scholar
• Moe WW, Trusov M (2011) The value of social dynamics in online product ratings forums. J. Marketing Res. 48(3):444–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mudambi SM, Schuff D (2010) What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quart. 34(1):185–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nair H (2007) Intertemporal price discrimination with forward-looking consumers: Application to the U.S. market for console video-games. Quant. Marketing Econom. 5(3):239–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson P (1970) Information and consumer behavior. J. Political Econom. 78(2):311–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nowak MA, Roch S (2007) Upstream reciprocity and the evolution of gratitude. Proc. Roy. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 274(1610):605–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pan Y, Zhang JQ (2011) Born unequal: A study of the helpfulness of user-generated product reviews. J. Retailing 87(4):598–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park D-H, Kim S (2009) The effects of consumer knowledge on message processing of electronic word-of-mouth via online consumer reviews. Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. 7(4):399–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, Dimoka A (2006) The nature and role of feedback text comments in online marketplaces: Implications for trust building, price premiums, and seller differentiation. Inform. Systems Res. 17(4):392–414.Link, Google Scholar
• Rishika R, Kumar A, Janakiraman R, Bezawada R (2013) The effect of customers’ social media participation on customer visit frequency and profitability: An empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):108–127.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosario AB, Sotgiu F, De Valck K, Bijmolt TH (2016) The effect of electronic word of mouth on sales: A meta-analytic review of platform, product, and metric factors. J. Marketing Res. 53(3):297–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schlosser AE (2011) Can including pros and cons increase the helpfulness and persuasiveness of online reviews? The interactive effects of ratings and arguments. J. Consumer Psych. 21(3):226–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen W, Hu YJ, Rees J (2015) Competing for attention: An empirical study of online reviewers strategic behaviors. MIS Quart. 39(3):683–696.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi Z, Lee GM, Whinston AB (2015) Towards a better measure of business proximity: Topic modeling for industry intelligence. MIS Quart. 40(4):1035–1056.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh PV, Sahoo N, Mukhopadhyay T (2014) How to attract and retain readers in enterprise blogging? Inform. Systems Res. 25(1):35–52.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith MD, Telang R (2009) Competing with free: The impact of movie broadcasts on DVD sales and Internet piracy 1. MIS Quart. 33(2):321–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephen AT, Yakov B, Du Plessis C, Goncalves D (2012) Does paying for online product reviews pay off? The effects of monetary incentives on consumers product evaluations. Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.Google Scholar
• Tetlock PC, Saar-Tsechansky M, Macskassy S (2008) More than words: Quantifying language to measure firms’ fundamentals. J. Finance 63(3):1437–1467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tirole J (1988) The Theory of Industrial Organization (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Titmuss RM (1970) The Gift Relationship (New Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Wang J, Ghose A, Ipeirotis P (2012) Bonus, disclosure, and choice: What motivates the creation of high-quality paid reviews? Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems 2012 (AIS, Atlanta, GA).Google Scholar
• Wood AM, Brown GD, Maltby J (2011) Thanks, but I’m used to better: A relative rank model of gratitude. Emotion 11(1):175–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Yin D, Mitra S, Zhang H (2016) Research note: When do consumers value positive vs. negative reviews? An empirical investigation of confirmation bias in online word of mouth. Inform. Systems Res. 27(1):131–144.Link, Google Scholar
• Yoo KH, Gretzel U (2009) Comparison of deceptive and truthful travel reviews. Höpken W, Gretzel U, Law R, eds. Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2009 (Springer, Vienna), 37–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Zhang X (2010) Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. J. Marketing 74(2):133–148.Crossref, Google Scholar