Electronic Markets and Geographic Competition Among Small, Local Firms
Published Online:5 Nov 2018https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0754
References
- (2016) Mobile ad effectiveness: Hyper-contextual targeting with crowdedness. Marketing Sci. 35(2):218–233.Link, Google Scholar
- (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 58(2):277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Price competition in e-tailing under service and recognition differentiation. Electronic Commerce Res. Appl. 6(3):322–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Relationships among minimum requirements, Facebook likes, and Groupon deal outcomes. ACM Trans. Managament Inform. Systems 6(3):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Reducing search costs: Implications for electronic marketplaces. Management Sci. 43(12):1676–1692.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) Does the Internet defy the law of gravity? J. Internat. Econom. 70(2):384–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Dynamic panel data models: A guide to micro data methods and practice. Portuguese Econom. J. 1(2):141–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) Frictionless commerce? A comparison of Internet and conventional retailers. Management Sci. 46(4):563–585.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Battle of the retail channels: How product selection and geography drive cross-channel competition. Management Sci. 55(11):1755–1765.Link, Google Scholar
- (2001) The Death of Distance: How the Communications Revolution Is Changing Our Lives (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
- (2010) How effective are Groupon promotions for businesses. Working paper, Rice University, Houston.Google Scholar
- (2011a) How businesses fare with daily deals: A multi-site analysis of Groupon, LivingSocial, OpenTable, Travelzoo, and BuyWithMe promotions. Working paper, Rice University, Houston.Google Scholar
- (2011b) What makes Groupon promotions profitable for businesses? Working paper, Rice University, Houston.Google Scholar
- (2012) How businesses fare with daily deals as they gain experience: A multi-time period study of daily deal performance. Working paper, Rice University, Houston.Google Scholar
- (2014) To Groupon or not to Groupon: The profitability of deep discounts. Marketing Lett. 27(1):39–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Contemporaneous and delayed sales impact of location-based mobile promotions. Inform. Systems Res. 26(3):552–564.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) Geo-conquesting: Competitive locational targeting of mobile promotions. J. Marketing Res. 52(5):726–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Competition between local and electronic markets: How the benefit of buying online depends on where you live. Management Sci. 55(1):47–57.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century (Picador, New York).Google Scholar
- (2013) How is the mobile Internet different? Search costs and local activities. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):613–631.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Social media brand community and consumer behavior: Quantifying the relative impact of user- and marketer-generated content. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):88–107.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) Online and offline demand and price elasticities: Evidence from the air travel industry. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):164–181.Link, Google Scholar
- (1950) Concentration in the steel industry. Dissertation, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
- (2014) Product fit uncertainty in online markets: Nature, effects, and antecedents. Inform. Systems Res. 25(2):328–344.Link, Google Scholar
- (1929) Stability in competition. Econom. J. 39(153):41–57.Google Scholar
- (2011) The impact of geographic proximity on what to buy, how to buy, and where to buy: Evidence from high-tech durable goods market. Decision Sci. 42(4):889–919.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Social coupons as a marketing strategy: A multifaceted perspective. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 40(1):120–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Could deal promotion improve merchants’ online reputations? The moderating role of prior reviews. J. Management Inform. Systems 33(1):171–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Promotional marketing or word-of-mouth: Evidence from online restaurant reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 23(4):596–612.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) Revenue: The case of reviews, reputation, and revenue: The case of Yelp.com. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- (2014) Mobile targeting. Management Sci. 60(7):1738–1756.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) Group-buying deal popularity. J. Marketing 78(2):20–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Online deals?: The who, the why, and the effects of online deals. Working paper, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
- (2015) Deal or no deal? The effect online deals on consumer quality perceptions and competition. Adv. Consumer Res. 43:635–637.Google Scholar
- (2013) The effect of Internet distribution on brick-and-mortar sales. RAND J. Econom. 44(3):569–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. 71(1):135–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1982) Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 49(1):3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Economics of daily-deal business models. Theory Econom. Inform. Systems (TEIS 2014), Banff, Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar
- (2005) Competitive reactions to advertising and promotion attacks. Marketing Sci. 24(1):35–54.Link, Google Scholar
- U.S. Small Business Association (2014) Frequently asked questions. Accessed August 14, 2018, https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/FAQ_March_2014_0.pdf.Google Scholar
- (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 58(301):236–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (2012) Monopolistic competition: Beyond the constant elasticity of substitution. Econometrica 80(6):2765–2784.Crossref, Google Scholar

