Strategic Intellectual Property Sharing: Competition on an Open Technology Platform Under Network Effects

References

• Anderson EG, Parker GG, Tan B (2014) Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities. Inform. Systems Res. 25(1):152–172.Link, Google Scholar
• Argenziano R (2008) Differentiated networks: Equilibrium and efficiency. RAND J. Econom. 39(3):747–769.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baake P, Boom A (2001) Vertical product differentiation, network externalities, and compatibility decisions. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 19(1):267–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakos Y, Katsamakas E (2008) Design and ownership of two-sided networks: Implications for Internet platforms. J. Management Inform. Systems 25(2):171–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker RD, Kemerer CF (1989) Scale economies in new software development. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. 15(10):1199–1205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barge-Gil A (2010) Open, semi-open and closed innovators: Towards an explanation of degree of openness. Indust. Innovation 17(6):577–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boehm BW (1981) Software Engineering Economics, Vol. 197 (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Boehm BW, Abts C, Chulani S (2000) Software development cost estimation approaches—a survey. Ann. Software Engrg. 10(1–4):177–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau K (2010) Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. devolving control. Management Sci. 56(10):1849–1872.Link, Google Scholar
• Cabral L (2011) Dynamic price competition with network effects. Rev. Econom. Stud. 78(1):83–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen HC, Chen CC (2011) Compatibility under differentiated duopoly with network externalities. J. Indust., Competition Trade 11(1):43–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng HK, Liu Y (2012) Optimal software free trial strategy: The impact of network externalities and consumer uncertainty. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):488–504.Link, Google Scholar
• Cheng HK, Liu Y, Tang Q (2011) The impact of network externalities on the competition between open source and proprietary software. J. Management Inform. Systems 27(4):201–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H (2006) Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. Chesbrough H, Vanhaverbeke W, West J, eds. Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 1–12.Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. 35(1):128–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conner KR (1995) Obtaining strategic advantage from being imitated: When can encouraging “clones” pay? Management Sci. 41(2):209–225.Link, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L, Gann DM (2010) How open is innovation? Res. Policy 39(6):699–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dou Y, Niculescu MF, Wu DJ (2013) Engineering optimal network effects via social media features and seeding in markets for digital goods and services. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):164–185.Link, Google Scholar
• Economides N (1996) Network externalities, complementarities, and invitations to enter. Eur. J. Political Econom. 12(2):211–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenmann TR, Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2009) Opening platforms: How, when and why? Annabelle G, ed. Platforms, Markets and Innovation (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK),131–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J, Gallini NT (1988) Second-sourcing as a commitment: Monopoly incentives to attract competition. Quart. J. Econom. 103(4):673–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallini NT (1984) Deterrence by market sharing: A strategic incentive for licensing. Amer. Econom. Rev. 74(5):931–941.Google Scholar
• Garud R, Kumaraswamy A (1993) Changing competitive dynamics in network industries: An exploration of Sun Microsystems’ open systems strategy. Strategic Management J. 14(5):351–369.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawer A, Cusumano MA (2002) Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Griva K, Vettas N (2011) Price competition in a differentiated products duopoly under network effects. Inform. Econom. Policy 23(1):85–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang H, Parker G, Tan Y, Xu H (2016) Altruism or shrewd business? Implications of technology openness on platform innovations and competition. Working paper, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2778834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hull D (2016) The Tesla advantage: 1.3 billion miles of data. Bloomberg (December 20), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-12-20/the-tesla-advantage-1-3-billion-miles-of-data.Google Scholar
• Inagaki K (2015) Toyota to share fuel-cell vehicle patents free of charge. Financial Times (January 6), https://www.ft.com/content/68e00992-9581-11e4-b3a6-00144feabdc0?mhq5j=e2.Google Scholar
• Jones R, Mendelson H (2011) Information goods vs. industrial goods: Cost structure and competition. Management Sci. 57(1):164–176.Link, Google Scholar
• Katz ML, Shapiro C (1985) Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(3):424–440.Google Scholar
• Katz ML, Shapiro C (1994) Systems competition and network effects. J. Econom. Perspect. 8(2):93–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolodny L (2017) Investors are betting 3DR can find life after solo as a drone data platform. TechCrunch (April 27), https://techcrunch.com/2017/04/27/investors-are-betting-3dr-can-find-life-after-solo-as-a-drone-data-platform/.Google Scholar
• Mac R (2016) Behind the crash of 3D Robotics, North America’s most promising drone company. Forbes (October 5), https://www.forbes.com/sites/ryanmac/2016/10/05/3d-robotics-solo-crash-chris-anderson/#1ac520353ff5.Google Scholar
• Moore JF (1993) Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Bus. Rev. 71(3):75–83.Google Scholar
• Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2017) Innovation, openness, and platform control. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print August 11, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2757.Link, Google Scholar
• Ramsey M (2014) Tesla motors offers open licenses to its patents. Wall Street Journal (June 12), http://www.wsj.com/articles/tesla-motors-says-it-will-allow-others-to-use-its-patents-1402594375.Google Scholar
• Roberts N, Galluch PS, Dinger M, Grover V (2012) Absorptive capacity and information systems research: Review, synthesis, and directions for future research. MIS Quart. 36(2):625–648.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun B, Xie J, Cao HH (2004) Product strategy for innovators in markets with network effects. Marketing Sci. 23(2):243–254.Link, Google Scholar