A Structural Analysis of the Role of Superstars in Crowdsourcing Contests

References

• Ackerberg DA (2003) Advertising, learning, and consumer choice in experience goods markets: An empirical examination. Internat. Econom. Rev. 44(3):1007–1040.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ackerberg DA (2009) A new use of importance sampling to reduce computational burden in simulation estimation. Quant. Marketing Econom. 7(4):343–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aguirregabiria V, Mira P (2007) Sequential estimation of dynamic discrete games. Econometrica 75(1):1–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alchian A (1963) Reliability of progress curves in airframe production. Econometrica 31(4):679–693.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ales L, Cho S-H, Körpeoğlu E (2017) Optimal award scheme in innovation tournaments. Oper. Res. 65(3):693–702.Link, Google Scholar
• Archak N (2010) Money, glory and cheap talk: Analyzing strategic behavior of contestants in simultaneous crowdsourcing contests on TopCoder.com. Proc. 19th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 21–30.Google Scholar
• Archak N, Ghose A (2010) Learning-by-doing and project choice: A dynamic structural model of crowdsourcing. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS) Thirty First Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, St. Louis, 239.Google Scholar
• Arcidiacono P, Miller RA (2011) Conditional choice probability estimation of dynamic discrete choice models with unobserved heterogeneity. Econometrica 79(6):1823–1867.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L, Epple D (1990) Learning curves in manufacturing. Science 247(4945):920–4.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baik K (1994) Effort levels in contests with two asymmetric players. Southern Econom. J. 61(2):367–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajari P, Benkard CL, Levin J (2007) Estimating dynamic models of imperfect competition. Econometric 75(5):1331–1370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bellman R (1957) Dynamic Programming (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Benkard CL (2000) Learning and forgetting: The dynamics of aircraft production. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):1034–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bockstedt J, Druehl C, Mishra A (2016) Heterogeneous submission behavior and its implications in innovation contests with public submission. Production Oper. Management 25(7):1157–1176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boh WF, Slaughter S, Espinosa A (2007) Learning from experience in software development: A multilevel analysis. Management Sci. 53(8):1315–1331.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Lacetera N, Lakhani KR (2011) Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 57(5):843–863.Link, Google Scholar
• Brown J (2011) Quitters never win: The (adverse) incentive effects of competing with superstars. J. Political Econom. 119(5):982–1013.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ching A, Imai S, Ishihara M, Jain N (2012) A practitioner’s guide to Bayesian estimation of discrete choice dynamic programming models. Quant. Marketing Econom. 10(2):151–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeGroot MH (1970) Optimal Statistical Decisions (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Delaney PF, Reder LM, Staszewski JJ, Ritter FE (1998) The strategy specific nature of improvement: The power law applies by strategy within task. Psych. Sci. 9(1):1–7.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Keane MP (1996) Decision-making under uncertainty: Capturing dynamic choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Sci. 15(1):1–20.Link, Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Rubin DB (1992) Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statist. Sci. 7:457–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbride TJ, Allenby GM (2004) A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive, and compensatory screening rules. Marketing Sci. 23(3):391–406.Link, Google Scholar
• Harris C, Vickers J (1985) Perfect equilibrium in a model of a race. Rev. Econom. Stud. 52(2):193–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hatch N, Mowery D (1998) Process innovation and learning by doing in semiconductor manufacturing. Management Sci. 44(11):1461–1477.Link, Google Scholar
• Hotz VJ, Miller RA (1993) Conditional choice probabilities and the estimation of dynamic models. Rev. Econom. Stud. 63(3):497–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howe J (2006) The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Magazine 14(6):1–4.Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Singh PV, Ghose A (2015) A structural model of employee behavioral dynamics in enterprise social media. Management Sci. 61(12):2825–2844.Link, Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Singh PV, Mukhopadhyay T (2012) How to design crowdsourcing contest: A structural empirical analysis. Workshop Inform. Systems Econom., Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Singh PV, Srinivasan K (2014) Crowdsourcing new product ideas under consumer learning. Management Sci. 60(9):2138–2159.Link, Google Scholar
• Imai S, Jain N, Ching A (2009) Bayesian estimation of dynamic discrete choice models. Econometrica 77(6):1865–1899.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeppesen LB, Lakhani KR (2010) Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1016–1033.Link, Google Scholar
• Jovanovic B, Nyarko Y (1995) A Bayesian learning model fitted to a variety of empirical learning curves. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity: Microeconomics 26:247–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keane M, Wolpin K (1997) The career decisions of young men. J. Political Econom. 105(3):473–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Körpeoğlu E, Cho S-H (2018) Incentives in contests with heterogeneous solvers. Management Sci. 64(6):2709–2715.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu TX, Yang J, Adamic LA, Chen Y (2014) Crowdsourcing with all-pay auctions: A field experiment on Taskcn. Management Sci. 60(8):2020–2037.Link, Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Singh P, Sun B (2017) Is a core—Periphery network good for knowledge sharing? A structural model of endogenous network formation on a crowdsourced customer support forum. MIS Quart. 41(2):607–628.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lucas RE (1976) Econometric policy evaluation: A critique. Carnegie-Rochester Conf. Ser. Public Policy 1(1):19–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Magnac T, Thesmar D (2002) Identifying dynamic discrete decision processes. Econometrica 70(2):801–816.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mele E (2011) Mitigating Topcoder client’s concerns (blog). (November 30), http://elizabethmele.blogspot.com/2011/11/mitigating-topcoder-clients-concerns.html.Google Scholar
• Mitchell MF (2000) The scope and organization of production: Firm dynamics over the learning curve. RAND J. Econom. 31(1):180–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay T, Singh PV, Kim SH (2011) Learning curves of agents with diverse skills in information technology-enabled physician referral systems. Inform. Systems Res. 22(3):586–605.Link, Google Scholar
• Nti KO (2004) Maximum efforts in contests with asymmetric valuations. Eur. J. Political Econom. 20(4):1059–1066.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pisano G, Bohmer R, Edmondson A (2001) Organizational differences in rates of learning: Evidence from the adoption of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Sci. 47(6):752–768.Link, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Argote L, Brooks D (2005) Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Sci. 51(6):869–881.Link, Google Scholar
• Rossi PE, Allenby GM, McCulloch RE (2005) Bayesian Statistics and Marketing (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth Y (2015) The state of crowdsourcing in 2015. Report, eYeka, https://eyeka.pr.co/99215-eyeka-releases-the-state-of-crowdsourcing-in-2015-trend-report.Google Scholar
• Rust J (1987) Optimal replacement of GMC bus engines: An empirical model of Harold Zurcher. Econometrica 55(5):999–1033.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rust J (1994) Structural estimation of Markov decision processes. Engle RF, McFadden DL, eds. Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 4 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 3081–3143.Google Scholar
• Shingles M, Trichel J (2014) Tech trends 2014: Industrialized crowdsourcing. Deloitte Insights (February 21), https://www2.deloitte.com/insights/us/en/focus/tech-trends/2014/2014-tech-trends-crowdsourcing.html.Google Scholar
• Singh P, Tan Y, Youn N (2011) A hidden Markov model of developer learning dynamics in open source software projects. Inform. Systems Res. 22(4):790–807.Link, Google Scholar
• Tanaka R, Ishino K (2012) Testing the incentive effects in tournaments with a superstar. J. Japanese Internat. Econom. 26(3):393–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. 54(9):1529–1543.Link, Google Scholar
• Thurstone LL (1919) The learning curve equation. Psych. Monographs 26(3):1–51.Google Scholar
• Zhang J (2010) The sound of silence: Observational learning in the U.S. kidney market. Marketing Sci. 29(2):315–335.Link, Google Scholar