The Impact of User Personality Traits on Word of Mouth: Text-Mining Social Media Platforms

References

• Adamopoulos P, Todri V (2014) Social media analytics: The effectiveness of promotional events on brand user base in social media. Proc. 35th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS ’14). http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2014/proceedings/SocialMedia/8/.Google Scholar
• Adamopoulos P, Todri V (2015a) Personality-based recommendations: Evidence from Amazon.com. Proc. 9th ACM Conf. Recommender Systems (RecSys ’15) (ACM, New York), 32–33.Google Scholar
• Adamopoulos P, Todri V (2015b) The effectiveness of marketing strategies in social media. Proc. 21st ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (KDD ’15) (ACM, New York), 1641–1650.Google Scholar
• Adamopoulos P, Tuzhilin A (2015) The business value of recommendations: A privacy-preserving econometric analysis. Proc. 36th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS ’15). http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2015/proceedings/GeneralIS/12/.Google Scholar
• AddShoppers (2013) Social commerce metrics among social network sites and email users worldwide: Q3 2013. Report, AddShoppers, Charlotte, NC.Google Scholar
• AlchemyApi (2012) Orchestr8, LLC. Accessed October 15, 2017, http://www.alchemyapi.com/.Google Scholar
• Allport GW (1961) Pattern and Growth in Personality (Holt, Reinhart & Winston, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Aral S, Walker D (2012) Identifying influential and susceptible members of social networks. Science 337(6092):337–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arun R, Suresh V, Madhavan CV, Murthy MN (2010) On finding the natural number of topics with latent Dirichlet allocation: Some observations. Zaki MJ, Yu JX, Ravindran B, Pudi V, eds. Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Part II (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), 391–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• AYTM (2013) March 2013 AYTM market research study. Report, AYTM Market Research, San Francisco.Google Scholar
• Back MD, Stopfer JM, Vazire S, Gaddis S, Schmukle SC, Egloff B, Gosling SD (2010) Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psych. Sci. 21(3):372–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Umyarov A (2015) Do your online friends make you pay? A randomized field experiment on peer influence in online social networks. Management Sci. 61(8):1902–1920.Link, Google Scholar
• Barrick MR, Mount MK (1991) The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psych. 44(1):1–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrick MR, Mount MK, Judge TA (2001) Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? Internat. J. Selection Assessment 9(1–2):9–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrick MR, Mount MK, Strauss JP (1993) Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. J. Appl. Psych. 78(5):715–722.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumgartner H (2002) Toward a personology of the consumer. J. Consumer Res. 29(2):286–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Machine Learn. Res. 3(4–5):993–1022.Google Scholar
• Botwin MD, Buss DM, Shackelford TK (1997) Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction. J. Personality 65(1):107–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byrne D, Griffitt W (1969) Similarity and awareness of similarity of personality characteristics as determinants of attraction. J. Experiment. Res. Personality 3(3):179–186.Google Scholar
• Byrne D, London O, Reeves K (1968) The effects of physical attractiveness, sex, and attitude similarity on interpersonal attraction. J. Personality 36(2):259–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaiken S (1980) Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 39(5):752–766.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaiken S (1987) The heuristic model of persuasion. Zanna MP, Olson JM, Herman CP, eds. Soc. Influence: Ontario Sympos., Vol. 5 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 3–39.Google Scholar
• Chaiken S, Maheswaran D (1994) Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 66(3):460–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang C (2004) Country of origin as a heuristic cue: The effects of message ambiguity and product involvement. Media Psych. 6(2): 169–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen J, Haber E, Kang R, Hsieh G, Mahmud J (2015) Making use of derived personality: The case of social media ad targeting. Proc. 9th Internat. AAAI Conf. Web Soc. Media (AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA), 51–60.Google Scholar
• Cohen GL (2003) Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 85(5):808–822.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Costa PT, McCrae RR (1992) Four ways five factors are basic. Personality Individual Differences 13(6):653–665.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crosby LA, Evans KR, Cowles D (1990) Relationship quality in services selling: An interpersonal influence perspective. J. Marketing 54(3):68–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C (2006) Strategic manipulation of Internet opinion forums: Implications for consumers and firms. Management Sci. 52(10):1577–1593.Link, Google Scholar
• Devaraj S, Easley RF, Crant JM (2008) How does personality matter? Relating the five-factor model to technology acceptance and use. Inform. Systems Res. 19(1):93–105.Link, Google Scholar
• Digman JM (1990) Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Rev. Psych. 41(1):417–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fast LA, Funder DC (2008) Personality as manifest in word use: Correlations with self-report, acquaintance report, and behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 94(2):334–346.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman SP, Spencer MC (1965) The Effect of Personal Influence on the Selection of Consumer Services (Center for Regional Studies, Lawrence, KS).Google Scholar
• Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7(2):117–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Ghose A, Wiesenfeld B (2008) Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Inform. Systems Res. 19(3):291–313.Link, Google Scholar
• Forrester (2013) North American Consumer Technographics online benchmark survey. Report, Forrester Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Gardner BO, Titcomb C, Cramer RJ, Stroud CH, Bate BP (2013) Perceived personality similarity and perceptions of expert testimony. J. Individual Differences 34(4):185–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A (2017) Tap: Unlocking the Mobile Economy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Todri-Adamopoulos V (2016) Towards a digital attribution model: Measuring the impact of display advertising on online consumer behavior. MIS Quart. 40(4):889–910.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Goldfarb A, Han SP (2013) How is the mobile Internet different? Search costs and local activities. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):613–631.Link, Google Scholar
• GlobalWebIndex (2015) GWI social report. Report, GlobalWebIndex, London.Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2004) Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. 23(4):545–560.Link, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2009) Firm-created word-of-mouth communication: Evidence from a field test. Marketing Sci. 28(4):721–739.Link, Google Scholar
• Golbeck J, Robles C, Edmondson M, Turner K (2011) Predicting personality from Twitter. 2011 IEEE Third Internat. Conf. Privacy, Security, Risk Trust/IEEE Internat. Conf. Soc. Comput. (PASSAT/SocialCom 2011) (IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA), 149–156.Google Scholar
• Goldberg LR (1981) Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. Rev. Personality Soc. Psych. 2(1):141–165.Google Scholar
• Grover A, Leskovec J (2016) node2vec: Scalable feature learning for networks. Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, New York), 855–864.Google Scholar
• Hass RG (1981) Effects of source characteristics on cognitive responses and persuasion. Petty RE, Ostrom TM, Brock TC, eds. Cognitive Responses in Persuasion (Psychology Press, New York), 141–172.Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirsh JB, Peterson JB (2009) Personality and language use in self-narratives. J. Res. Personality 43(3):524–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman M, Bach FR, Blei DM (2010) Online learning for latent Dirichlet allocation. Lafferty JD, Williams CKI, Shawe-Taylor J, Zemel RS, Culotta A, eds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 23 (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY), 856–864.Google Scholar
• Horton RL (1979) Some relationships between personality and consumer decision-making. J. Marketing Res. 16(2):233–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu R, Pu P (2011) Enhancing collaborative filtering systems with personality information. Proc. Fifth ACM Conf. Recommender Systems (ACM, New York), 197–204.Google Scholar
• Jensen-Campbell LA, Graziano WG (2001) Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. J. Personality 69(2):323–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• John OP, Srivastava S (1999) The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Pervin LA, John OP, eds. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, Vol. 2 (Guilford Press, New York), 102–138.Google Scholar
• Judge TA, Bono JE (2000) Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. J. Appl. Psych. 85(5):751–765.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL (2011) The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Kang Y-S, Herr PM (2006) Beauty and the beholder: Toward an integrative model of communication source effects. J. Consumer Res. 33(1):123–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karney BR, Bradbury TN (1997) Neuroticism, marital interaction, and the trajectory of marital satisfaction. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 72(5):1075–1092.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelman HC (1961) Processes of opinion change. Public Opinion Quart. 25(1):57–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein KJ, Lim B-C, Saltz JL, Mayer DM (2004) How do they get there? An examination of the antecedents of centrality in team networks. Acad. Management J. 47(6):952–963.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Komarraju M, Karau SJ (2005) The relationship between the Big Five personality traits and academic motivation. Personality Individual Differences 39(3):557–567.Crossref, Google Scholar
• KPMG (2013) 2013 Retail industry outlook survey. Report, KPMG, Amstelveen, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Kullback S, Leibler RA (1951) On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Statist. 22(1):79–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenthal JD, Tellefsen T (2001) Toward a theory of business buyer-seller similarity. J. Personal Selling Sales Management 21(1):1–14.Google Scholar
• Lin C-F (2002) Segmenting customer brand preference: Demographic or psychographic. J. Product Brand Management 11(4):249–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin DY, Wei L-J (1989) The robust inference for the Cox proportional hazards model. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 84(408):1074–1078.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mackie DM, Worth LT, Asuncion AG (1990) Processing of persuasive in-group messages. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 58(5):812–822.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahmud J, Zhou MX, Megiddo N, Nichols J, Drews C (2013) Recommending targeted strangers from whom to solicit information on social media. Proc. 2013 Internat. Conf. Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI ’13) (ACM, New York), 37–48.Google Scholar
• Mairesse F, Walker M (2006) Words mark the nerds: Computational models of personality recognition through language. Proc. 28th Annual Conf. Cognitive Sci. Soc. (Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX), 543–548.Google Scholar
• McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr (1987) Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 52(1):81–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCrae RR, Costa PT (1991) Adding Liebe und Arbeit: The full five-factor model and well-being. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 17(2): 227–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden D (1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Zarembka P, ed. Frontiers in Econometrics (Academic Press, New York), 105–142.Google Scholar
• Menon T, Blount S (2003) The messenger bias: A relational model of knowledge valuation. Res. Organ. Behav. 25:137–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nielsen (2013) Global trust in advertising and brand messages. Report, Nielsen, New York.Google Scholar
• Norman WT (1963) Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 66(6):574–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ogunlade JO (1979) Personality characteristics related to susceptibility to behavioral contagion. Soc. Behav. Personality 7(2):205–208.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oreg S, Sverdlik N (2014) Source personality and persuasiveness: Big Five predispositions to being persuasive and the role of message involvement. J. Personality 82(3):250–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owoputi O, O’Connor B, Dyer C, Gimpel K, Schneider N, Smith NA (2013) Improved part-of-speech tagging for online conversational text with word clusters. 2013 Conf. North Amer. Chap. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics: Human Language Tech. (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), 380–390.Google Scholar
• Parish L, Eysenck HJ, Eysenck SGB (1965) The Eysenck personality inventory. British J. Ed. Stud. 14(1):140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pennebaker JW, Chung CK, Ireland M, Gonzales A, Booth RJ (2007) The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007. White paper, LIWC.net, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
• Perozzi B, Al-Rfou R, Skiena S (2014) DeepWalk: Online learning of social representations. Proc. 20th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, New York),701–710.Google Scholar
• Pornpitakpan C (2004) The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 34(2):243–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rentfrow PJ, Gosling SD (2003) The do re mi’s of everyday life: The structure and personality correlates of music preferences. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 84(6):1236–1256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaver PR, Brennan KA (1992) Attachment styles and the “Big Five” personality traits: Their connections with each other and with romantic relationship outcomes. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 18(5):536–545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sigurdsson JF (1991) Computer experience, attitudes toward computers and personality characteristics in psychology undergraduates. Personality Individual Differences 12(6):617–624.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simpson EM, Snuggs T, Christiansen T, Simples KE (2000) Race, homophily, and purchase intentions and the black consumer. Psych. Marketing 17(10):877–889.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh R, Ho SY (2000) Attitudes and attraction: A new test of the attraction, repulsion and similarity-dissimilarity asymmetry hypotheses. British J. Soc. Psych. 39(2):197–211.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Susarla A, Oh J-H, Tan Y (2016) Influentials, imitables, or susceptibles? Virality and word-of-mouth conversations in online social networks. J. Management Inform. Systems 33(1):139–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan DTY, Singh R (1995) Attitudes and attraction: A developmental study of the similarity-attraction and dissimilarity-repulsion hypotheses. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 21(9):975–986.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tausczik YR, Pennebaker JW (2009) The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. J. Language Soc. Psych. 29(1):24–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Todri V, Adamopoulos P (2014) Social commerce: An empirical examination of the antecedents and consequences of commerce in social network platforms. Proc. 35th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS’14). http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2014/proceedings/EBusiness/54/.Google Scholar
• Trusov M, Bucklin RE, Pauwels K (2009) Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: Findings from an Internet social networking site. J. Marketing 73(5):90–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tupes EC, Christal RE (1992) Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. J. Personality 60(2):225–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• v. Wangenheim F, Bayón T (2004) The effect of word of mouth on services switching: Measurement and moderating variables. Eur. J. Marketing 38(9/10):1173–1185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yarkoni T (2010) Personality in 100,000 words: A large-scale analysis of personality and word use among bloggers. J. Res. Personality 44(3):363–373.Crossref, Google Scholar