Rules, Practices, and Information Technology: A Trifecta of Organizational Regulation

References

• Alter N (2000) La logique de l’innovation ordinaire (Presses Universitaires de France, Paris).Google Scholar
• Alter N (2003) Mouvement et dyschronies dans les organisations. L’Année sociologique 53(2):489–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aron R, Dutta S, Janakiraman R, Pathak PA (2011) The impact of automation of systems on medical errors: Evidence from field research. Inform. Systems Res. 22(3):429–446.Link, Google Scholar
• Bach K, Harnish RM (1979) Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Barad K (2003) Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: J. Women Culture Soc. 28(3):801–831.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barad K (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning (Duke University Press, Durham, NC).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley SR (1986) Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. 31(1):78–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beck N, Kieser A (2003) The complexity of rule systems, experience and organizational learning. Organ. Stud. 24(5):793–814.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berente N, Yoo Y (2012) Institutional contradictions and loose coupling: Postimplementation of NASA’s enterprise information system. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):376–396.Link, Google Scholar
• Bhaskar R (1993) Dialectic: The Pulse of Freedom (Verso, London).Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P (1990) The Logic of Practice (Polity Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bubenko J, Rolland C, Loucopoulos P, DeAntonellis V (1994) Facilitating “fuzzy to formal” requirements modelling. Requirements Engrg., 1994, Proc. First Internat. Conf. Requirements Engrg.,154–157.Google Scholar
• Callon M, Muniesa F (2005) Peripheral vision: Economic markets as calculative collective devices. Organ. Stud. 26(8):1229–1250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cecez-Kecmanovic D, Galliers RD, Henfridsson O, Newell S, Vidgen R (2014) The sociomateriality of information systems: Current status, future directions. MIS Quart. 38(3):809–830.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chai S, Das S, Rao HR (2011) Factors affecting bloggers’ knowledge sharing: An investigation across gender. J. Management Information Systems 28(3):309–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiasson MW, Davidson E (2005) Taking industry seriously in information systems research. MIS Quart. 29(4):591–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christiaanse E, Venkatraman N (2002) Beyond Sabre: An empirical test of expertise exploitation in electronic channels. MIS Quart. 26(1):15–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corbin J, Strauss A (2007) Basics of Qualitative Research: Procedures and Techniques for Developing Grounded Theory (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Crozier M (1964) The Bureaucratic Phenomenon (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Crozier M, Friedberg E (1977) L’Acteur et le Système (Seuil, Paris).Google Scholar
• Cummings TG (1978) Self-regulating work groups: A socio-technical synthesis. Acad. Management Rev. 3(3):625–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• de Certeau M, Giard L, Mayol P (1998) The Practice of Everyday Life: Living and Cooking, Vol. 2 (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis).Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G, Poole MS (1994) Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. 5(2): 121–147.Link, Google Scholar
• de Vaujany FX (2010) A new perspective on the genealogy of collective action through the history of religious organizations. Management Organ. History 5(1):65–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Vaujany FX, Mitev N (2017) The post-Macy paradox, information management and organizing: Good intentions and road to hell? Culture Organ. 23(5):379–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewey J (2007) Logic: The Theory of Inquiry (Saerchinger Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Feldman MS, Orlikowski WJ (2011) Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organ. Sci. 22(5):1240–1253.Link, Google Scholar
• Gherardi S (2012) How to Conduct a Practice-Based Study: Problems and Methods (Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson J (1986) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Giddens A (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of a Theory of Structuration (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
• Gosden C (1994) Social Being and Time (Blackwell Publishers, London).Google Scholar
• Hage J, Aiken M (1969) Routine technology, social structure and organization goals. Admin. Sci. Quart. 14(3):366–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanseth O, Monteiro E (1998) Understanding Information Infrastructure (University of Oslo, Oslo).Google Scholar
• Heidegger M (1996) Being and Time: A Translation of Sein und Zeit (SUNY Press, Albany, NY). [Trans. Stambaugh J.]Google Scholar
• Hernes TA (2014) Process Theory of Organization (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hevner AR (2007) A three cycle view of design science research. Scandinavian J. Inform. Systems 19(2):87–92.Google Scholar
• Hosein I, Tsiavos P, Whitley E (2003) Regulating architecture and architectures of regulation: Contributions from information systems. Internat. Rev. Law, Comput. Tech. 17(1):85–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Husserl E (1973) Logical Investigations (Routledge, London). [Trans. Findlay JN.]Google Scholar
• Husserl E (1990) On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time (1893–1917) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands). [Trans. Brough JB.]Google Scholar
• Iivari J (2007) A paradigmatic analysis of information systems as a design science. Scandinavian J. Inform. Systems 19(2):39–64.Google Scholar
• Ingold T (2007) Materials against materiality. Archaeological Dialogues 14(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones MR, Karsten H (2009) Divided by a common language? A response to Marshall Scott Poole. MIS Quart. 33(3):589–595.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kallinikos J (2011) Governing Through Technology: Information Artefacts and Social Practice Technology, Work and Globalization (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kallinikos J (2012) Form, function, and matter: Crossing the border of materiality. Leonardi PM, Nardi BA, Kallinikos J, eds. Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 67–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kappos A, Rivard S (2008) A three-perspective model of culture, information systems, and their development and use. MIS Quart. 32(3):601–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kardasis P, Loucopoulos P (1998) Aligning legacy information systems to business processes. Advanced Information Systems Engineering (Springer, Berlin), 25–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley A, Smallman C, Tsoukas H, Van de Ven AH (2013) Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Acad. Management J. 56(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lanzara GF, de Vaujany F-X, Mitev N, Mukherjee A, eds. (2015) Materiality, Rules and Regulation: New Trends in Management and Organization Studies (Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK).Google Scholar
• Latour B (1992) Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. Bijker W, Law J, eds. Shaping Technology/Building Society (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 225–258.Google Scholar
• Latour B (1994) Une sociologie sans objet? Remarques sur l’interobjectivité. Sociologie du travail 36(4):587–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latour B (1996) Petites leçon de sociologie des sciences (Editions du Seuil, Paris).Google Scholar
• Latour B (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor–Network Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Law J (2008) On sociology and STS. Sociol. Rev. 56(4):623–649.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leblebici H, Salancik GR (1982) Stability in interoganizational exchanges: Rule-making processes of the Chicago Board of Trade. Admin. Sci. Quart. 27(2):227–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2011) When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quart. 35(1):147–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonardi PM (2012) Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: What do these terms mean? How are they different? Do we need them? Leonardi PM, Nardi BA, Kallinikos J, eds. Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 25–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lessig L (1995) The path of cyberlaw. Yale Law J. 104:1743–1755.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lessig L (2009) Code: And other laws of cyberspace. ReadHowYouWant.com.Google Scholar
• Levina N, Vaast E (2006) Turning a community into a market: A practice perspective on information technology use in boundary spanning. J. Management Inform. Systems 22(4):13–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li E, Timon Y, Du C, Wong JW (2007) Access control in collaborative commerce. Decision Support Systems 43(2):675–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty M (1942) Structure du comportement (Gallimard, Paris).Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty M (1945) Phénoménologie de la perception (Gallimard, Paris).Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty M (1960) Signes (Gallimard, Paris).Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty M (1964) Le Visible et l’invisible (Gallimard, Paris).Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty M (2003) L’institution, la passivité (Belin Editeurs, Paris).Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1957) Social Theory and Social Structure (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Mills AJ, Murgatroyd SJ (1991) Organizational Rules: A Framework for Understanding Organizational Action (Open University Press, Milton Keynes, UK).Google Scholar
• Mills JH (2003) Making Sense of Organizational Change (Routledge, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mingers J, Willcocks L (2014) An integrative semiotic framework for information systems: The social, personal and material worlds. Inform. Organ. 24(1):48–70.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mutch A (2010) Technology, organization, and structure—A morphogenetic approach. Organ. Sci. 21(2):507–520.Link, Google Scholar
• Mutch A (2013) Sociomateriality—Taking the wrong turning? Inform. Organ. 23(1):28–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nicolini D (2009) Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organ. Stud. 30(12):1391–1418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nicolini D (2013) Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (1991) Integrated information environment or matrix of control? The contradictory implications of information technology. Accounting, Management Inform. Tech. 1(1):9–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (1992) The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. 3(3):398–427.Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Iacono CS (2001) Research commentary: Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research. A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inform. Systems Res. 12(2):121–134.Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Robey D (1991) Information technology and the structuring of organizations. Inform. Systems Res. 2(2):143–169.Link, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Yates J (2002) It’s about time: Temporal structuring in organizations. Organ. Sci. 13(6):684–700.Link, Google Scholar
• Panofsky E (2018) Studies in Iconology: Humanistic Themes in the Art of the Renaissance (Routledge, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland BT, Rueter HH (1994) Organizational routines as grammars of action. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(3):484—510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poole MS (2009) Response to Jones and Karsten, “Giddens’s structuration theory and information systems research.” MIS Quart. 33(3):583–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reckwitz A (2002) Towards a theory of social practice: A development in cultural theorizing. Eur. J. Soc. Theory 5(2):243–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reynaud J-D (1988) Les régulations dans les organisations: Régulation de contrôle et régulation autonome. Revue Française de Sociologie 31(1):5–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reynaud J-D (1997) Les Règles du jeu: L’action collective et la régulation sociale (Armand Colin, Paris).Google Scholar
• Reynaud JD (2003) Réflexion I. Régulation de contréle, régulation autonome, régulation conjointe. de Terssac G, ed. La théorie de la régulation sociale de Jean-Daniel Reynaud, Débats et prolongements (Editions La Découverte, Paris), 103–113.Google Scholar
• Reynaud JD (2005) Dans une relation de régulation, il y a une relation de pouvoir. Cabin P, Choc B, eds. Les organisations, Etat des savoirs (Editions Sciences Humaines, Paris), 155–168.Google Scholar
• Reynaud JD, Riechbé N (2009) Rules, conventions, and values: A plea in favor of ordinary normativity. Revue Française de Sociologie 50(5):3–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robey D (1981) Computer information systems and organization structure. Comm. ACM 24(10):679–687.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robey D, Boudreau M-C (1999) Accounting for the contradictory organizational consequences of information technology: Theoretical directions and methodological implications. Inform. Systems Res. 10(2):167–185.Link, Google Scholar
• Schatzki TR (2010) The Timespace of Human Activity: On Performance, Society, and History as Indeterminate Teleological Events (Lexington Books, Plymouth, UK).Google Scholar
• Schulz M (1998) Limits to bureaucratic growth: The density dependence of organizational rule births. Admin. Sci. Quart. 43(4):845–876.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schultze U, Orlikowski WJ (2004) A practice perspective on technology-mediated network relations: The use of Internet-based self-serve technologies. Inform. Systems Res. 15(1):87–106.Link, Google Scholar
• Simmel G (1981) Sociologie Et épistémologie (PUF, Paris).Google Scholar
• Suddaby R, Cooper DJ, Greenwood R (2007) Transnational regulation of professional services: Governance dynamics of field level organizational change. Accounting Organ. Soc. 32(4):333–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor C (1993) To follow a rule. Calhoun C, LiPuma E, Postone M, eds. Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 45–60.Google Scholar
• Tillquist J, King JL, Woo C (2002) A representational scheme for analyzing information technology and organizational dependency. MIS Quart. 26(2):91–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trist E (1981) The evolution of socio-technical systems. A conceptual framework and an action research program. Occasional paper, Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre, Toronto.Google Scholar
• Twining W, Miers D (1999) How to Do Things with Rules: A Primer of Interpretation, 4th ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• von Wright GH (1963) Norm and Action (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London).Google Scholar
• Weber M (1968) Economy and Society: Outline of an Interpretive Sociology, 4th ed. (University of California Press, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1990) Technology as equivoque: Sensemaking in new technologies. Goodman, PS, Sproull, LS, eds. Technology and Organizations (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 281–299.Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations, Vol. 3 (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Whitehead AN (1957) Process and Reality (Macmillan, New York).Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein L (1973) Philosophical Investigations, 3rd ed. (Macmillan, New York). [Trans. Anscombe GEM.]Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein L (1984) Notebooks, 1914–1916, 2nd ed. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago). [Trans. Anscombe GEM.]Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Singhal S, Xu Y (2012) Alternate strategies for a win-win seeking agent in agent-human negotiations. J. Management Information Systems 29(3):223–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yates J (1989) Control Through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).Google Scholar
• Zhou X (1993) The dynamics of organizational rules. Amer. J. Sociol. 98(5):1134–1166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuboff S (1988) In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Zuboff S (1985) Automate/informate: The two faces of intelligent technology. Organ. Dynam. 14(2):5–18.Crossref, Google Scholar