Differences are Different: Examining the Effects of Communication Media on the Impacts of Racial and Gender Diversity in Decision-Making Teams

References

• Acker J (2006) Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender Soc. 20(4):441–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adrianson L (2001) Gender and computer-mediated communication: Group processes in problem solving. Comput. Human Behav. 17(1):71–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Alavi M, Tiwana A (2002) Knowledge integration in virtual teams: The potential role of KMS. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 53(12):1029–1037.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alcoff LM (2005) Visible Identities: Race, Gender, and the Self (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Baltes BB, Dickson MW, Sherman MP, Bauer CC, LaGanke JS (2002) Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: A meta-analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 87(1):156–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrett E, Lally V (1999) Gender differences in an on-line learning environment. J. Comput. Assisted Learn. 15(1):48–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baugh J (2003) Linguistic profiling. Black Linguistics: Language, Soc., Politics Africa Americas 1(1):155–168.Google Scholar
• Berdahl JL, Craig KM (1995) Equality of participation and influence in groups: The effects of communication medium and sex composition. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work 4(2):179–201.Google Scholar
• Bhappu AD, Griffith TL, Northcraft GB (1997) Media effects and communication bias in diverse groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 70(3):199–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau PM (1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Byron K (2008) Carrying too heavy a load? The communication and miscommunication of emotion by email. Acad. Management Rev. 33(2):309–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carte TA, Chidambaram L (2004) A capabilities-based theory of technology deployment in diverse teams: Leapfrogging the pitfalls of diversity and leveraging its potential with collaborative technology. J. AIS 5(11):448–471.Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay P, George E, Shulman AD (2008) The asymmetrical influence of sex dissimilarity in distributive vs. collocated work groups. Organ. Sci. 19(4):581–593.Link, Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay P, Tluchowska M, George E (2004) Identifying the ingroup: A closer look at the influence of demographic dissimilarity on employee social identity. Acad. Management Rev. 29(2):180–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin WW, Marcolin B, Newsted P (2003) A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic mail adoption study. Inform. Systems Res. 14(2):189–217.Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd ed. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA (2008) Publishing laboratory research in AMJ: A question of when, not if. Acad. Management J. 51(4):616–620.Google Scholar
• Cramton CD (2001) The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. 12(3):346–371.Link, Google Scholar
• Craver CB (2002) Gender and negotiation performance. Sociol. Practice 4(3):183–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlin KB, Weingart LR, Hinds PJ (2005) Team diversity and information use. Acad. Management J. 48(6):1107–1123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daniel S, Agarwal R, Stewart KJ (2013) The effects of diversity in global, distributed collectives: A study of open source project success. Inform. Systems Res. 24(2):312–333.Link, Google Scholar
• Dennis AR (1996) Information exchange and use in group decision making: You can lead a group to information, but you can’t make it think. MIS Quart. 20(4):433–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis AR, Valacich JS (1999) Rethinking media richness: Towards a theory of media synchronicity. Nunamaker J, ed. Proc. 32nd Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci., Vol. 1 (IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA), 1–10.Google Scholar
• Dennis AR, Wixom BH (2002) Investigating the moderators of group support system use. J. Management Inform. Systems 18(3):235–258.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis AR, Fuller RM, Valacich JS (2008) Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quart. 32(3):575–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis AR, Hilmer KM, Taylor NJ (1998) Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision making: Effects of minority influence. J. Management Inform. Systems 14(3):61–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis AR, Kinney ST, Hung Y-T (1999) Gender differences in the effects of media richness. Small Group Res. 30(4):405–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeRosa DM, Hantula DA, Kock N, D’Arcy J (2004) Trust and leadership in virtual teamwork: A media naturalness perspective. Human Resource Management 43(2–3):219–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diehl M, Stroebe W (1987) Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 53(3):497–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiTomaso N, Post C, Parks-Yancy R (2007) Workforce diversity and inequality: Power, status, and numbers. Annual Rev. Sociol. 33:473–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dreachslin J, Hunt P, Sprainer E (2000) Workforce diversity: Implications for the effectiveness of health care delivery teams. Soc. Sci. Medicine 50(10):1403–1414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dreachslin JL, Hunt PL, Sprainer E (1999) Communication patterns and group composition: Implications for patient-centered care team effectiveness. J. Healthcare Management 44(4):252–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubrovsky VJ, Kiesler S, Sethna BN (1991) The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Human-Comput. Interaction 6(2):119–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eagly AH, Carli LL (1981) Sex of researchers and sex-typed communications as determinants of sex differences in influenceability: A meta-analysis of social influence studies. Psych. Bull. 90(1):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsass PM, Graves LM (1997) Demographic diversity in decision-making groups: The experience of women and people of color. Acad. Management Rev. 22(4):946–973.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fahy P (2002) Epistolary and expository interaction patterns in a computer conference transcript. J. Distance Ed. 17(1):20–35.Google Scholar
• Flynn FJ, Ames R (2006) What’s good for the goose may not be as good for the gander: The benefits of self-monitoring for men and women in task groups and dyadic conflicts. J. Appl. Psych. 91(2):272–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox S, Rainie L (2014) The Web at 25 in the U.S. The overall verdict: The Internet has been a plus for society and an especially good thing for individual users. Pew Res. Center (February 27), http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/02/27/the-web-at-25-in-the-u-s/.Google Scholar
• Fuller RM, Dennis AR (2009) Does fit matter? The impact of task-technology fit and appropriation on team performance in repeated tasks. Inform. Systems Res. 20(1):2–17.Link, Google Scholar
• Garrison G, Wakefield RL, Xu X, Kim SH (2010) Globally distributed teams: The effect of diversity on trust, cohesion and individual performance. ACM SIGMIS Database 41(3):27–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Straub D (1997) Gender difference in the perception and use of e-mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Quart. 21(4):389–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giambatista RC, Bhappu AD (2010) Diversity’s harvest: Interactions of diversity sources and communication technology on creative group performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 111(2):116–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilligan C (1992) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Griffith TL, Fuller MA, Northcraft GB (1998) Facilitator influence in group support systems: Intended and unintended effects. Inform. Systems Res. 9(1):20–36.Link, Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Hall JA (1984) Nonverbal Sex Differences: Communication Accuracy and Expressive Style (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Klein KJ (2007) What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 32(4):1199–1228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison DA, Price KH, Gavin JH, Florey AT (2002) Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Acad. Management J. 45(5):1029–1045.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heninger WG, Dennis AR, Hilmer KM (2006) Research note: Individual cognition and dual-task interference in group support systems. Inform. Systems Res. 17(4):415–424.Link, Google Scholar
• Herring SC (1993) Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. Electronic J. Comm. 3(2):476–489.Google Scholar
• Herring SC (1996) Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. Kling R, ed. Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices (Academic Press, San Diego), 476–489.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herring SC (2000) Gender differences in CMC: Findings and implications. Comput. Professionals Soc. Responsibility 18(1).Google Scholar
• Hess TJ, Fuller MA, Mathew J (2006) Involvement and decision-making performance with a decision aid: The influence of social multimedia, gender, and playfulness. J. Management Inform. Systems 22(3):15–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hilmer KM, Dennis AR (2001) Stimulating thinking in decision making: Cultivating better decisions with groupware one individual at a time. J. Management Inform. Systems 17(3):93–114.Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Mortensen M (2005) Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ. Sci. 16(3):290–307.Link, Google Scholar
• Hogg MA, Terry DI (2000) Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):121–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homan AC, van Knippenberg DL, van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW (2007) Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work. J. Appl. Psych. 92(5):1189–1199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homan AC, Hollenbeck JR, Humphrey SE, van Knippenberg D, Ilgen DR, van Kleef GA (2008) Facing differences with an open mind: Openness to experience, salience of intra-group differences, and performance of diverse work groups. Acad. Management J. 51(6):1204–1222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Horwitz SK, Horwitz IB (2007) The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. J. Management 33(6):987–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard JA (2000) Social psychology of identities. Annual Rev. Sociol. 26:367–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn KA, Northcraft GB, Neale MA (1999) Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(4):741–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeong A, Davidson-Shivers G (2006) The effects of gender interaction patterns on student participation in computer-supported collaborative argumentation. Ed. Tech., Development Res. 54(6):543–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kankanhalli A, Tan BCY, Wei KK (2007) Conflict and performance in global virtual teams. J. Management Inform. Systems 23(3):237–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kearny E, Gebert D, Voelpel SC (2009) When and how diversity benefits teams—The importance of team members’ need for cognition. Acad. Management J. 52(3):581–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiesler S, Sproull L (1992) Group decision making and communication technology. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 52(1):96–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiesler S, Siegel J, McGuire TW (1984) Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. Amer. Psychologist 39(10):1123–1134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kochan T, Bezrukova K, Ely R, Jackson S, Joshi A, Jehn K, Leonard J, Levine D, Thomas D (2003) The effects of diversity on business performance: Report of the diversity research network. Human Resource Management 42(1):3–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koeszegi ST, Pesendorfer E, Stolz S (2006) Gender salience in electronic negotiations. Electronic Markets 16(3):173–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kooij-de Bode HJ, van Knippenberg D, van Ginkel WP (2008) Ethnic diversity and distributed information in group decision making: The importance of information elaboration. Group Dynam.: Theory, Res., Practice 12(4):307–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraut RE, Fussell SR, Brennan SE, Seigel J (2002) Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. Hinds PJ, Kiesler S, eds. Distributed Work (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 137–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kushins ER (2014) Sounding like your race in the employment process: An experiment on speaker voice, race identification, and stereotyping. Race Soc. Problems 6(3):237–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawlor C (2006) Gendered interactions in computer-mediated computer conferencing. J. Distance Ed. 21(2):26–43.Google Scholar
• Lee AS, Baskerville RL (2003) Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 14(3):221–243.Link, Google Scholar
• Li J, Karakowsky L, Siegel JP (1999) The effects of proportional representation on intragroup behavior in mixed-race decision-making groups. Small Group Res. 30(3):259–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lillis MP, Tian RG (2009) Cross-cultural communication and emotional intelligence: Inferences from case studies of gender diverse groups. Marketing Intelligence Planning 27(3):428–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin B, Chen C (2006) Fostering product innovation in industry network: The mediating role of knowledge integration. Internat. J. Human Resources Management 17(1):155–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• London M, Larsen HH, Thisted LN (1999) Relationships between feedback and self-development. Group Organ. Management 24(1):5–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mannix E, Neale MA (2005) What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psych. Sci. Public Interest 6(2):31–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu J, Goodwin GF, Heffner TS, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA (2000) The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. J. Appl. Psych. 85(2):273–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu JE, Heffner TS, Goodwin GF, Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E (2005) Scaling the quality of teammates’ mental models: Equifinality and normative comparisons. J. Organ. Behav. 26(1):37–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maznevski ML (1994) Understanding our differences: Performance in decision-making groups with diverse members. Human Relations 47(5):531–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McLeod PL, Lobel SA, Cox TH (1996) Ethnic diversity and creativity in small groups. Small Group Res. 27(2):248–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mesmer-Magnus JR, DeChurch LA, Jimenez-Rodriguez M, Wildman J, Shuffler M (2011) A meta-analytic investigation of virtuality and information sharing in teams. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 115(2):214–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miranda SM, Saunders CS (2003) The social construction of meaning: An alternative perspective on information sharing. Inform. Systems Res. 14(1):87–106.Link, Google Scholar
• Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasserman W (1996) Applied Linear Statistical Models, 4th ed. (Irwin, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Newell S, Tansley C, Huang J (2004) Social capital and knowledge integration in an ERP project team: The importance of bridging and bonding. British J. Management 15(S1):S43–S57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nowak KL (2003) Sex categorization in computer mediated communication (CMC): Exploring the utopian promise. Media Psych. 5(1):83–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunamaker J, Dennis A, Valacich J, Vogel D, George J (1991) Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Comm. ACM 34(7):40–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pelled LH, Eisenhardt KM, Xin KR (1999) Exploring the black box: An analysis of workgroup diversity, conflict, and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J (1983) Organizational demography. Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behaviour, Vol. 5 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 299–357.Google Scholar
• Phillips KW, Northcraft GB, Neale MA (2006) Surface-level diversity and decision-making in groups: When does deep-level similarity help? Group Processes Intergroup Relations 9(4):467–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rancer AS, Baukus RA (1987) Discriminating males and females on belief structure about argument. Nadler LB, Nadler MK, Todd-Mancillas WR, eds. Advances in Gender and Communication Research (University Press of America, Lanham, MD), 155–174.Google Scholar
• Robert LP, Dennis AR (2005) Paradox of richness: A cognitive model of media choice. IEEE Trans. Professional Comm. 48(1):10–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robert LP, Dennis AR, Ahuja MK (2008) Social capital and knowledge integration in digitally enabled teams. Inform. Systems Res. 19(3):1–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Robert LP, Dennis AR, Hung Y-TC (2009) Individual swift trust and knowledge-based trust in face-to-face and virtual team members. J. Management Inform. Systems 26(2):241–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Savicki V, Kelley M, Lingenfelter D (1996) Gender, group composition and task type in small task groups using computer-mediated communication. Comput. Human Behav. 12(4):549–565.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shore LM, Randel AE, Chung BG, Dean MA, Ehrhart KH, Singh G (2011) Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. J. Management 37(4):1262–1289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sia CL, Tan BCY, Wei KK (2002) Group polarization and computer-mediated communication: Effects of communication cues, social presence, and anonymity. Inform. Systems Res. 13(1):70–90.Link, Google Scholar
• Siegel J, Dubrovsky V, Kiesler S, McGuire TW (1986) Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 37(2):157–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staples DS, Zhao L (2006) The effects of cultural diversity in virtual teams versus face-to-face teams. Group Decision Negotiation 15(4):389–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staples DS, Wong IK, Cameron AR (2004) Best practices for virtual team effectiveness. Pauleen D, ed. Virtual Teams: Projects, Protocols and Processes (Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA), 160–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stasser G (1992) Pooling of unshared information during group discussion. Worchel S, Wood W, Simpson JA, eds. Group Process and Productivity (Sage, Newbury Park, CA), 48–67.Google Scholar
• Stasser G, Titus W (1985) Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 48(6):1467–1478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sussman NM, Tyson D (2000) Sex and power: Gender differences in computer mediated interaction. Comput. Human Behav. 16(1):381–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner JC (1986) The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. Worchel S, Austin LW, eds. Psychology of Intergroup Relations (Nelson-Hall, Chicago), 7–24.Google Scholar
• Tannen D (1994) Talking from 9 to 5: How Women’s and Men’s Conversational Styles Affect Who Gets Heard, Who Gets Credit, and What Gets Done at Work (William Morrow and Co., New York).Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum SI, Mathieu JE, Salas S, Cohen D (2012) Teams are changing—Are research and practice evolving fast enough? Indust. Organ. Psych.: Perspect. Sci. Practice 5(1):56–61.Google Scholar
• Tett RP, Fox KE, Wang A (2005) Development and validation of a self-report measure of emotional intelligence as a multidimensional trait domain. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 31(7):859–888.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A (2004) Beyond the black-box: Knowledge overlaps in software outsourcing. IEEE Software 21(5):51–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A, McLean ER (2005) Expertise integration and creativity in information systems development. J. Management Inform. Systems 22(1):13–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Torres JG, Conaway R (2014) Managerial use of text messaging in international organizations. Global Adv. Bus. Comm. 3(1):5.Google Scholar
• Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS (1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory (Blackwell, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Umphress EE, Smith-Crowe K, Brief AP, Dietz J, Watkins MB (2007) When birds of a feather flock together and when they do not: Status composition, social dominance orientation, and organizational attractiveness. J. Appl. Psych. 92(2):396–409.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Ginkel WP, van Knippenberg D (2009) Knowledge about the distribution of information and group decision making: When and why does it work? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 108(2):218–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D, Schippers MC (2007) Work group diversity. Annual Rev. Psych. 58(1):515–541.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg D, van Knippenberg A (1994) Social categorization, focus of attention and judgments of group opinions. British J. Soc. Psych. 33(4):477–489.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D, De Dreu CKW, Homan AC (2004) Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. J. Appl. Psych. 89(6):1008–1022.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg D, Kooij-de Bode HJM, van Ginkel WP (2010) The interactive effects of mood and trait negative affect in group decision making. Organ. Sci. 21(3):731–744.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang SC (2015) Emotional intelligence, information elaboration, and performance: The moderating role of informational diversity. Small Group Res. 46(6):324–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watson WE, Kumar K, Michaelsen LK (1993) Cultural diversity’s impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Acad. Management J. 36(3): 590–602.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiley MG, Eskilson A (1985) Speech style, gender stereotypes and corporate success: What if women talk more like men? Sex Roles 12(9–10):993–1007.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams KY, O’Reilly CA (1998) Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Staw BM, Cummings LL, eds. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 20 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 77–140.Google Scholar
• Woolley AW, Chabris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW (2010) Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science 330(6004):686–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Lowry PB, Zhou L, Fu X (2007) The impact of individualism-collectivism, social presence, and group diversity on group decision making under majority influence. J. Management Inform. Systems 23(4):53–80.Crossref, Google Scholar