Research Commentary—Data-Driven Computationally Intensive Theory Development

References

• Agarwal R, Dhar V (2014) Editorial—Big data, data science, and analytics: The opportunity and challenge for IS research. Inform. Systems Res. 25(3):443–448.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderberg MR (1973) Cluster Analysis for Applications (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Anonymous (2015) The case of the hypothesis that never was; Uncovering the deceptive use of post hoc hypotheses. J. Management Inquiry 24(2):214–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Attenberg J, Ipeirotis P, Provost F (2015) Beat the machine: Challenging humans to find a predictive model’s “unknown unknowns.” J. Data Inform. Quality 6(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bacharach SB (1989) Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):496–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bridewell W, Langley P, Todorovski L, Džeroski S (2008) Inductive process modeling. Machine Learn. 71:1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bryant A, Charmaz K (2007) Grounded theory research: Methods and practices. Bryant A, Charmaz K, eds. The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory (Sage, London), 1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butts CT (2008) A relational event framework for social action. Sociol. Methodology 38:155–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charmaz K (2000) Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 509–535.Google Scholar
• Charmaz K (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Davis GF (2010) Do theories of organizations progress? Organ. Res. Methods 12(2):690–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davison RM (2010) Retrospect and prospect: Information systems in the last and next 25 years: response and extension. J. Inform. Tech. 25(4):352–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhar V (2013) Data science and prediction. Comm. ACM 56(12):64–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ (1995) Comments on “What Theory is Not.” Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3):391–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ (2015) Adapting computational text analysis to social science (and vice versa). Big Data Soc. 2(2):1–5.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duchscher JE, Morgan B (2004) Grounded theory: Reflections on the emergence vs. forcing debate. J. Advanced Nursing 48(6):605–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork DG (2001) Pattern Classification, Second Edition (John Wiley and Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Džeroski S, Langley P, Todorovski L (2007) Computational discovery of scientific knowledge. Džeroski S, Todorovski L, eds. Computational Discovery of Scientific Knowledge: Introduction, Techniques, and Applications in Environmental and Life Sciences (Springer, Berlin), 1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14:532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fayyad UM, Piatetsky-Shapiro G, Smyth P, Uthurusamy R (1996) Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Fillmore CJ (1976) Frame semantics and the nature of language. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 280(1):20–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher DH (1987) Knowledge acquisition via incremental conceptual clustering. Machine Learn. 2:139–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaber MM (2010) Scientific Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery: Principles and Foundations (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R (2015) Eyes wide shut? A commentary on the hypothesis that never was. J. Management Inquiry 24(4):450–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaskin J, Berente N, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y (2014) Toward generalizable sociomaterial inquiry: A computational approach for zooming in and out of sociomaterial routines. MIS Quart. 38(3):849–871.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geiger RS, Ribes D (2011) Trace ethnography: Following coordination through documentary practices. Proc. 44th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci., January 4–7, Koloa, Hawaii.Google Scholar
• Glaser BG (1978) Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory (Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA).Google Scholar
• Glaser BG (1992) Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence vs. Forcing (Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA).Google Scholar
• Glaser BG (2008) Doing Quantitative Grounded Theory (Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA).Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Glymour C (2004) The automation of discovery. Daedalus 133(1):69–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glymour C, Madigan D, Pregibon D, Smyth P (1996) Statistical inference and data mining. Comm. ACM 39(11):35–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gopal R, Marsden JR, Vanthienen J (2011) Information mining—Reflections on recent advancements and the road ahead in data, text, and media mining. Decision Support Systems 51(4):727–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goulding C (2002) Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide for Management, Business and Market Researchers (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwald AG (2012) There is nothing so theoretical as a good method. Perspectives Psych. Sci. 7(2):99–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grolemund G, Wickham H (2014) A cognitive interpretation of data analysis. Internat. Statist. Rev 82(2):184–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grover V (2013) Muddling along to moving beyond in IS research: Getting from good to great. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 14:274–282.Google Scholar
• Günther CW, Van Der Aalst WMP (2007) Fuzzy mining—Adaptive process simplification based on multi-perspective metrics. Alonso G, Dadam P, Rosemann M, eds. Business Process Management. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4714 (Springer, Berlin), 328–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Habermas J (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1 (Beacon Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Habermas J (2003) Truth and Justification (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman JH (2003) The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Hipp J, Güntzer U, Nakhaeizadeh G (2000) Algorithms for association rule mining—A general survey and comparison. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 2(1):58–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holland JH, Holyoak KJ, Nisbett RE, Thagard PR (1986) Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery (MIT Press, Cambridge MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holton JA (2007) The coding process and its challenges. Bryant A, Charmaz K, eds. The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory (Sage, London), 265–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howison J, Wiggins A, Crowston K (2011) Validity issues in the use of social network analysis with digital trace data. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 12(12):767–797.Google Scholar
• Huff AS (1999) Writing for Scholarly Publication (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Jaccard J, Jacoby J (2010) Theory Construction and Model-Building Skills (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Jones R, Noble G (2007) Grounded theory and management research: A lack of integrity? Qualitative Res. Organ. Management: Internat. J. 2(2):84–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelle U (2007) The development of categories: Different approaches in grounded theory. Bryant A, Charmaz K, eds. The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory (Sage, London), 191–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klösgen W, Żytkow JM (1996) Knowledge discovery in databases terminology. Smyth P, Uthurusamy R, Piatetsky-Shapiro G, Fayyad U, eds. Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA), 573–592.Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24:691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langley P (2000) The computational support of scientific discovery. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 53(3):393–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latour B (2010) Tarde’s idea of quantification. Candea M, ed. The Social After Gabriel Tarde: Debates and Assessments (Routledge, New York), 145–162.Google Scholar
• Lazer D, Pentland AS, Adamic L, Aral S, Barabasi AL, Brewer D, Christakis Net al. (2009) Life in the network: The coming age of computational social science. Science 323(5915):721–723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Legewie H, Schervier-Legewie B (2004) Research is hard work, it’s always a bit suffering. Therefore on the other side it should be fun. Anselm Strauss in conversation with Heiner Legewie and Barbara Schervier-Legewie. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Soc. Res. 5(3):22.Google Scholar
• Levina N, Vaast E (2016) Leveraging archival data from online communities for grounded process theorizing. Elsbach KD, Kramer RM, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Organizational Research: Innovative Pathways and Methods (Routledge, New York), 215–224.Google Scholar
• Lindberg A, Berente N, Gaskin J, Lyytinen K (2016) Coordinating interdependencies in online communities: A study of an open source software project. Inform. Systems Res. 27(4):751–772.Link, Google Scholar
• Locke EA (2007) The case for inductive theory building. J. Management 33(6):867–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matavire R, Brown I (2011) Profiling grounded theory approaches in information systems research. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 22(1):119–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Michalski RS (1980) Knowledge acquisition through conceptual clustering: A theoretical framework and an algorithm for partitioning data into conjunctive concepts. J. Policy Anal. Inform. Systems 4:219–244.Google Scholar
• Miranda SM, Kim I, Summers JD (2015) Jamming with social media: How cognitive structuring of organizing vision facets affects IT innovation diffusion. Mis Quart. 39:591–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohr LB (1982) Explaining Organizational Behavior (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Morse J (2007) Sampling in grounded theory. Bryant A, Charmaz K, eds. The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory (Sage, London),229–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ (2007) Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organ. Stud. 28(9):1435–1448.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pearl J (2011) Statistics and causality: Separated to reunite—Commentary on Bryan Dowd’s “Separated at Birth.” Health Services Res. 46:421–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pedersen J (2008) Habermas’s method: Rational reconstruction. Philos. Soc. Sci. 38(4):457–485.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP (2016) Recommendations for creating better concept definitions in the organizational, behavioral, and social sciences. Organ. Res. Methods 19(2):159–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quintane E, Conaldi G, Tonellato M, Lomi A (2014) Modeling relational events: A case study on an open source software project. Organ. Res. Methods 17:23–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rose D, Langley P (1986) Chemical discovery as belief revision. Machine Learn. 1(4):423–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saito K, Langley P (2007) Quantitative revision of scientific models. Dzeroski S, Todorovski L, eds. Computational Discovery of Scientific Knowledge. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 4660 (Springer, Berlin), 120–137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwabacher M, Langley P (2001) Discovering communicable scientific knowledge from spatio-temporal data. 18th Internat. Conf. Machine Learning, June 28–July 1, Williamstown, MA.Google Scholar
• Seidel S, Urquhart C (2013) On emergence and forcing in information systems grounded theory studies: The case of Strauss and Corbin. J. Inform. Tech. 28(3):237–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shmueli G, Koppius OR (2011) Predictive analytics in information systems research. MIS Quart. 35(3):553–572.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H (1977) Models of Discovery (D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss AL (1987) Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists (University of Cambridge Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss AL, Corbin J (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research, 1st ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Strauss AL, Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed. (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Sutton RI, Staw BM (1995) What theory is not. Admin. Sci. Quart.40(3):371–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson K, Langley P (1991) Concept formation in structured domains. Fisher DH, Pazzani MJ, Langley P, eds. Concept Formation: Knowledge and Experience in Unsupervised Learning (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA), 127–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Todorovski L, Džeroski S (2007) Integrating domain knowledge in equation discovery. Džeroski S, Todorovski L, eds. Computational Discovery of Scientific Knowledge. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4660 (Springer, Berlin), 69–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urquhart C (2013) Grounded Theory for Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide (Sage, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urquhart C, Fernández W (2013) Using grounded theory method in information systems: The researcher as blank slate and other myths. J. Inform. Tech. 28(3):224–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vaast E, Safadi H, Lapointe L, Negoita B (2017) Social media affordances for connective action: An examination of microblogging use during the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. MIS Quart. 41(4):1179–1206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven AH (2007) Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Van De Ven AH, Poole MS (1995) Explaining development and change in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 20:510–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Varian HR (2014) Big data: New tricks for econometrics. J. Econom. Perspect. 28:3–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagman M (1997) General Unified Theory of Intelligence: Its Central Conceptions and Specific Application to Domains of Cognitive Science (Praeger, Westport, CT).Google Scholar
• Wagman M (2000) Scientific Discovery Processes in Humans and Computers: Theory and Research in Psychology and Artificial Intelligence (Praeger, Westport, CT).Google Scholar
• Walsh I (2014) Using grounded theory to avoid research misconduct in management science. Grounded Theory Rev. 13(1).Google Scholar
• Walsh I (2015) Using quantitative data in mixed-design grounded theory studies: An enhanced path to formal grounded theory in information systems. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 24:531–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh I, Holton JA, Bailyn L, Fernandez W, Levina N, Glaser BG (2015) What grounded theory is … A critically reflective conversation among scholars. Organ. Res. Methods 18(4):581–599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webb E, Campbell DT, Schwartz RD, Sechrest L (1966) Unobtrusive Measures: Non-Reactive Research in the Social Sciences, Sage Classics ed. (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Weick KE (1995) What theory is not, theorizing is. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3):385–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson J (2009) The philosophy of science and its relation to machine learning. Gaber MM, ed. Scientific Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery (Springer, Berlin), 77–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wisniewski EJ, Medin DL (1991) Harpoons and long sticks: The interaction of theory and similarity in rule induction. Fisher DH, Pazzani MJ, Langley P, eds. Concept Formation: Knowledge and Experience in Unsupervised Learning (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA), 237–278.Crossref, Google Scholar