Battle of the Internet Channels: How Do Mobile and Fixed-Line Quality Drive Internet Use?

References

• Agarwal R, Animesh A, Prasad K (2009) Social interactions and the “digital divide”: Explaining variations in Internet use. Inform. Systems Res. 20(2):277–294.Link, Google Scholar
• AT&T (2011) AT&T ends bid to add network capacity through T-Mobile USA purchase. Accessed August 28, 2017, https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20111219006448/en/ATT-Ends-Bid-Add-Network-Capacity-T-Mobile.Google Scholar
• Avery J, Steenburgh T, Deighton J, Caravella M (2012) Adding bricks to clicks: Predicting the patterns of cross-channel elasticities over time. J. Marketing Res. 76(3):96–111.Google Scholar
• Bang YS, Lee DJ, Han KS, Hwang MH, Ahn JH (2013) Channel capabilities, product characteristics, and the impacts of mobile channel introduction. J. Management Inform. Systems 30(2):101–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennett S, Maton K, Kervin L (2008) The “digital natives” debate: A critical review of evidence. British J. Ed. Tech. 39(5):775–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blum B, Goldfarb A (2006) Does the Internet defy the law of gravity? J. Internat. Econom. 70(2):384–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boer DB, Evans L (1996) The economic efficiency of telecommunications in a deregulated market: The case of New Zealand. Econom. Record 72(216):24–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowling C (2013) More hellos than goodbyes: Topography forces cell phone companies to weigh cost-benefit of erecting new towers. Smoky Mountain News (May 1), http://www.smokymountainnews.com/news/item/10216-more-hellos-than-goodbyes-topography-forces-cell-phone-companies-to-weigh-cost-benefit-of-erecting-new-towers.Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hu Y, Rahman MS (2009) Battle of the retail channels: How product selection and geography drive cross-channel competition. Management Sci. 55(11):1755–1765.Link, Google Scholar
• Cardona M, Schwarz A, Yurtoglu BB, Zulehner C (2009) Demand estimation and market definition for broadband Internet services. J. Regulatory Econom. 35(1):70–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan J, Ghose A, Seamans R (2016) The Internet and racial hate crime: Offline spillovers from online access. MIS Quart. 40(2):381–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cincera M, Dewulf L, Estache A (2014) How much does speed matter in fixed to mobile broadband substitution in Europe? Working Paper 2014-010, Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels.Google Scholar
• Czernich N, Falck O, Kretschmer T, Woessmann L (2011) Broadband infrastructure and economic growth. Econom. J. 121(552):505–532.Google Scholar
• Dai M (2008) Strategic interactions and market structure in the U.S. mobile telecommunications industry. Working paper, Drexel University, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Deaton A (1985) Panel data from time series of cross-sections. J. Econometrics 30(1–2):109–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewan S, Ganley D, Kraemer K (2005) Across the digital divide: A cross-country multi-technology analysis of the determinants of IT penetration. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 6(12):409–432.Google Scholar
• Dewan S, Ganley D, Kraemer K (2010) Complementarities in the diffusion of personal computers and the Internet: Implications for the global digital divide. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):925–940.Link, Google Scholar
• Elmore G (2004) U.S. Patent EP1393478A2 (Method and apparatus for information conveyance and distribution). Filed May 11, 2001; issued March 3, 2004. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Federal Communications Commission (2010) Connecting America: The National Broadband Plan. Accessed August 24, 2017, https://transition.fcc.gov/national-broadband-plan/national-broadband-plan.pdf.Google Scholar
• Federal Communications Commission (2016) 2016 broadband progress report. GN Docket No. 15-191. Accessed August 3, 2017, https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-16-6A1.pdf.Google Scholar
• Forman C, Ghose A, Goldfarb A (2009) Competition between local and electronic markets: How the benefit of buying online depends on where you live. Management Sci. 55(1):47–57.Link, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Goldfarb A, Greenstein S (2005) How did location affect adoption of the commercial Internet? Global village vs. urban leadership. J. Urban Econom. 58(3):389–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Goldfarb A, Greenstein S (2012) The Internet and local wages: A puzzle. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(1):556–575.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Goldfarb A, Greenstein S (2018) How geography shapes—and is shaped by—the Internet. Clark GL, Feldman MP, Gertler MS, Wojcik D, eds. The New Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 269–285.Google Scholar
• Free State Foundation (2016) Comments submitted to the Federal Communications Commission. WT Docket 15-191. Accessed August 4, 2017, http://www.freestatefoundation.org/images/Section_706_Inquiry_Comments_-_Final_091615.pdf.Google Scholar
• Gentzkow M (2007) Valuing new goods in a model with complementarity: Online newspapers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(3):713–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• German K (2013) Quick guide to cell phone carriers. Accessed August 28, 2017, https://www.cnet.com/au/news/quick-guide-to-cell-phone-carriers/?tb_iframe=true.Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Goldfarb A, Han SP (2013) How is the mobile Internet different? Search costs and local activities. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):613–631.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Prince J (2008) Internet adoption and usage patterns are different: Implications for the digital divide. Inform. Econom. Policy 20(1):2–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon-Larsen P, Nelson MC, Page P, Popkin BM (2006) Inequality in the built environment underlies key health disparities in physical activity and obesity. Pediatrics 117(2):417–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Government Accountability Office (2006) Broadband deployment is extensive throughout the United States, but it is difficult to assess the extent of deployment gaps in rural areas. Report GAO-06-426, Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Green R (2001) Area’s topography, tower locations limit use of cell phones. TribLive (July 15), http://triblive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/pittsburgh/s_51125.html.Google Scholar
• Greene WH (1998) Econometric Analysis, 3rd ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Grzybowski L, Verboven F (2016) Substitution between fixed-line and mobile access: The role of complementarities. J. Regulatory Econom. 49(2):113–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grzybowski L, Nitsche R, Verboven F, Wiethaus L (2014) Market definition for broadband Internet in Slovakia—Are fixed and mobile technologies in the same market? Inform. Econom. Policy 28(September):39–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargittai E (2010) Digital na(t)ives? Variation in Internet skills and uses among members of the “net generation.” Sociol. Inquiry 80(1):92–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henry KA, Boscoe FP (2008) Estimating the accuracy of geographical imputation. Internat. J. Health Geographics 7(1):3.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsieh JJ, Rai A, Keil M (2008) Understanding digital inequality: Comparing continued use behavioral models of the socio-economically advantaged and disadvantaged. MIS Quart. 32(1):97–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens G, Wooldridge J (2007) Control function and related methods. Presentation, What’s New in Econometrics, National Bureau of Economic Research Summer Institute, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• International Telecommunication Union (2013) The world in 2013: ICT facts and figures. Report, ICT Data and Statistics Division, International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
• Jain AK, Dubes RC (1988) Algorithms for Clustering Data (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Jank W, Kannan PK (2005) Understanding geographic markets of online firms using spatial models of customer choice. Marketing Sci. 24(4):623–634.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Telang R, Vogt WB, Krishnan R (2010) An empirical analysis of mobile voice service and SMS: A structural model. Management Sci. 56(2):234–252.Link, Google Scholar
• Kolko J (2012) Broadband and local growth. J. Urban Econom. 71(1):100–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koutroumpis P, Leiponen A (2016) Crowdsourcing mobile coverage. Telecomm. Policy 40(6):532–544.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitz J, Bauerlein V (2017) Rural America is stranded in the dial-up age. Wall Street Journal (June 15), https://www.wsj.com/articles/rural-america-is-stranded-in-the-dial-up-age-1497535841.Google Scholar
• Liu H, Chintagunta PK, Zhu T (2010) Complementarties and the demand for home broadband Internet services. Marketing Sci. 29(4):701–720.Link, Google Scholar
• Luo X, Andrews M, Fang Z, Phang CW (2014) Mobile targeting. Management Sci. 60(7):1738–1756.Link, Google Scholar
• McHenry G (2016) Evolving technologies change the nature of Internet use. NTIA Blog (April 19), https://www.ntia.doc.gov/blog/2016/evolving-technologies-change-nature-internet-use.Google Scholar
• National Telecommunications and Information Administration (2011) NTIA unveils National Broadband Map and new broadband adoption survey results. Accessed August 28, 2017, http://www.ntia.doc.gov/press-releases/2011/commerce%C3%A2%E2%82%AC%E2%84%A2s-ntia-unveils-national-broadband-map-and-new-broadband-adoption-survey/.Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center (2015) U.S. smartphone use in 2015. Accessed August 3, 2017, http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/us-smartphone-use-in-2015/.Google Scholar
• Prieger JE (2003) The supply side of the digital divide: Is there equal availability in the broadband Internet access market? Econom. Inquiry 41(2):346–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodini M, Ward M, Woroch G (2003) Going mobile: Substitution between fixed and mobile access. Telecomm. Policy 27(5):457–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sinai T, Waldfogel J (2004) Geography and the Internet: Is the Internet a substitute or complement for cities? J. Urban Econom. 56(1):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinuan P, Srinuan C, Bohlin E (2012) Fixed and mobile broadband substitution in Sweden. Telecomm. Policy 27(3):457–476.Google Scholar
• Stock JH, Yogo M (2005) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. Andrews DWK, ed. Identification and Inference for Econometric Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 80–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tapscott D (1998) Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation (McGraw Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Verbeek M, Vella F (2005) Estimating dynamic models from repeated cross-sections. J. Econometrics 127(1):83–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vogelsang I (2010) The relationship between mobile and fixed-line communications: A survey. Inform. Econom. Policy 22(1):4–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ward M, Woroch G (2010) The effect of prices on fixed and mobile telephone penetration: Using price subsidies as natural experiments. Inform. Econom. Policy 22(1):18–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheeler T (2014) The facts and future of broadband competition. (September 4), http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2014/db0904/DOC-329161A1.pdf.Google Scholar
• Woodford C (2015) Mobile broadband. Explain that Stuff (blog), http://www.explainthatstuff.com/mobilebroadband.html.Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2014) Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation and testing for nonlinear models with endogenous explanatory variables. J. Econometrics 182(1):226–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu J, Forman C, Kim JB, Van Ittersum K (2014) News media platforms: Complements or substitutes? Evidence from mobile phone usage. J. Marketing 78(4):97–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu K, Chan J, Ghose A, Han SP (2017) Battle of the Channels: The Impact of tablets on digital commerce. Management Sci. 63(5):1469–1492.Link, Google Scholar