Catch Me If You Can: Effectiveness and Consequences of Online Copyright Enforcement

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2018.0778

References

  • Adda J, McConnell B, Rasul I (2014) Crime and the depenalization of cannabis possession: Evidence from a policing experiment. J. Political Econom. 122(5):1130–1199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adena M, Enikolopov R, Petrova M, Santarosa V, Zhuravskaya E (2015) Radio and the rise of the Nazis in prewar Germany. Quart. J. Econom. 130(4):1885–1939.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adermon A, Liang C-Y (2014) Piracy and music sales: The effects of an anti-piracy law. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 105:90–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aguiar L, Waldfogel J (2018) As streaming reaches flood stage, does it stimulate or depress music sales? Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 57:278–307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahn I, Shin I (2010) On the optimal level of protection in DRM. Inform. Econom. Policy 22(4):341–353.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Al-Rafee S, Cronan TP (2006) Digital piracy: Factors that influence attitude toward behavior. J. Bus. Ethics 63:237–259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amtsgericht Leipzig (2011) Urteil zum Verfahren KINO.TO. District Court Leipzig, Verdict 200 Ls 390 Js 184/11. Accessed January 17, 2018, http://www.justiz.sachsen.de/lentschweb/document.phtml?id=978.Google Scholar
  • Angrist JD, Kugler AD (2008) Rural windfall or a new resource curse? Coca, income, and civil conflict in Colombia. Rev. Econom. Statist. 90(2):191–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Antoniades D, Markatos EP, Dovrolis C (2009) One-click hosting services: A file-sharing hideout. Proc. 9th ACM SIGCOMM Conf. Internet Measurement Conf., IMC’09 (ACM, New York), 223–234.Google Scholar
  • Arnold M, Darmon E, Dejean S, Penard T (2014) Graduated response policy and the behavior of digital pirates: Evidence from the French three-strike (Hadopi) law. Working paper, University of Delaware, Newark.Google Scholar
  • Ayres I, Levitt SD (1998) Measuring positive externalities from unobservable victim precaution: An empirical analysis of lojack. Quart. J. Econom. 113(1):43–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bai J, Waldfogel J (2012) Movie piracy and sales displacement in two samples of Chinese consumers. Inform. Econom. Policy 24(3):187–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banerjee DS (2003) Software piracy: A strategic analysis and policy instruments. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 21(1):97–127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Batikas M, Claussen J, Peukert C (2017) Follow the money: Piracy and online advertising. Working paper, LMU Munich.Google Scholar
  • Becker GS, Murphy KM, Grossman M (2006) The market for illegal goods: The case of drugs. J. Political Econom. 114(1):38–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertoni M, Brunello G, Rocco L (2013) When the cat is near, the mice won’t play: The effect of external examiners in Italian schools. J. Public Econom. 104:65–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bild (2011) Illegales Filmportal ist zurück–Kino.to-Piraten verhühnen Ermittler. Accessed January 17, 2018, http://tinyurl.com/5usgxsu.Google Scholar
  • Burn-Callander R (2014) Amazon dominates CD, DVD and game sales in the UK. The Telegraph (May 26). Accessed January 17, 2018, http://tinyurl.com/jwvhbpo.Google Scholar
  • Business Software Alliance (2012) Shadow market: 2011 BSA global software piracy study. Report, Business Software Alliance, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Cameron S (1988) The economics of crime deterrence: A survey of theory and evidence. Kyklos 41(2):301–323.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Card D, Krueger AB (1994) Minimum wages and employment: A case study of the fast-food industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(4):772–793.Google Scholar
  • Chen P, Hitt LM (2002) Measuring switching costs and the determinants of customer retention in Internet-enabled businesses: A study of the online brokerage industry. Inform. Systems Res. 13(3):255–274.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Png I (2003) Information goods pricing and copyright enforcement: Welfare analysis. Inform. Systems Res. 14(1):107–123.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chiang EP, Assane D (2009) Estimating the willingness to pay for digital music. Contemporary Econom. Policy 27(4):512–522.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chiou JS, Huang CY, Lee HH (2005) The antecedents of music piracy attitudes and intentions. J. Bus. Ethics 57(2):161–174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chip Online (2011) GVU will Nutzer verfolgen und bestrafen. Accessed January 17, 2018, http://tinyurl.com/635vgcl.Google Scholar
  • Cho H, Salmon CT (2007) Unintended effects of health communication campaigns. J. Comm. 57:293–317.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conner KR, Rumelt RP (1991) Software piracy: An analysis of protection strategies. Management Sci. 37(2):125–139.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cook T, Campbell D (1979) Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings (Houghton Mifflin, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Cox J, Collins A (2014) Sailing in the same ship? Differences in factors motivating piracy of music and movie content. J. Behavioral Experiment. Econom. 50:70–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Danaher B, Smith MD (2014) Gone in 60 seconds: The impact of the Megaupload shutdown on movie sales. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 33(March):1–8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Danaher B, Smith MD, Telang R (2013) Piracy and copyright enforcement mechanisms. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 14 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 25–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Danaher B, Smith MD, Telang R (2015a) The effect of piracy website blocking on consumer behavior. Working paper, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Danaher B, Dhanasobhon S, Smith MD, Telang R (2010) Converting pirates without cannibalizing purchasers: The impact of digital distribution on physical sales and Internet piracy. Marketing Sci. 29(6):1138–1151.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Danaher B, Dhanasobhon S, Smith MD, Telang R (2015b) Understanding media markets in the digital age: Economics and methodology. Goldfarb A, Greenstein SM, Tucker C, eds. Economic Analysis of the Digital Economy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 385–406.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Danaher B, Smith MD, Telang R, Chen S (2014) The effect of graduated response anti-piracy laws on music sales: Evidence from an event study in France. J. Indust. Econom. 62(3):541–553.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dell M (2015) Trafficking networks and the Mexican drug war. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(6):1738–1779.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dey D, Kim A, Lahiri A (2016) Online piracy and the “longer arm” of enforcement. Working paper, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
  • DiTella R, Schargrodsky E (2004) Do police reduce crime? Estimates using the allocation of police forces after a terrorist attack. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(1):115–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dobkin C, Nicosia N, Weinberg M (2014) Are supply-side drug control efforts effective? Evaluating OTC regulations targeting methamphetamine precursors. J. Public Econom. 120:48–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Draca M, Machin S, Witt R (2011) Panic on the streets of London: Police, crime, and the July 2005 terror attacks. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(5):2157–2181.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Esser F, Brosius HB (1996) Television as arsonist? The spread of right-wing violence in Germany. Eur. J. Comm. 11(2):235–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Etzersdorfer E, Sonneck G (1998) Preventing suicide by influencing mass-media reporting. The Viennese experience 1980–1996. Archives Suicide Res. 4(1):67–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Focus Online (2011) Filmportal ist wieder online. (July 12), accessed January 18, 2018, http://tinyurl.com/6ad5dus.Google Scholar
  • Freenet (2011) Kino.to-Nutzer–diese rechtlichen Folgen drohen. Accessed January 17, 2018, http://tinyurl.com/lhx8ub8.Google Scholar
  • GfK, Bundesverband Audiovisuelle Medien (2013) Der Videomarkt 2013—GfK consumer panel. Accessed January 17, 2018, http://www.bvv-medien.de/jwb_pdfs/JWB2013.pdf.Google Scholar
  • GfK, German Federal Film Board (2012) Der Kinobesucher 2011—Strukturen und Entwicklungen auf Basis des GfK panels. Accessed January 17, 2018, http://www.ffa.de/start/download.php?file=publikationen/kinobesucher_2011.pdf.Google Scholar
  • GfK, Gesellschaft zur Verfolgung Von Urheberrechtsverletzungen, Börsenverein des Deutschen Buchhandels (2011) Studie zur digitalen Content-Nutzung (DCN Studie). Accessed January 17, 2018, http://www.musik industrie.de/uploads/media/DCN-Studie_2011_Presseversion_FINAL_02.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Godinho de Matos M, Ferreira P, Smith MD (2017) The effect of video-on-demand on piracy: Evidence from a household level randomized experiment. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print November 22, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2875.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goh KY, Hui KL, Png IPL (2011) Newspaper reports and consumer choice: Evidence from the do not call registry. Management Sci. 57(9):1640–1654.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goh K-Y, Hui KL, Png IPL (2015) Privacy and marketing externalities: Evidence from do not call. Management Sci. 61(12):2982–3000.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goldfarb A (2006a) State dependence at Internet portals. J. Econom. Management Strategy 15(2):317–352.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldfarb A (2006b) The medium-term effects of unavailability. Quant. Marketing Econom. 4:143–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gomez-Herrera E, Martens B (2015) Language, copyright and geographic segmentation in the EU digital single market for music and film. Working paper, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Joint Research Center, European Commission, Seville, Spain.Google Scholar
  • Gould MS (2001) Suicide and the media. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 932(1):200–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulli (2011) Kino.to Nachfolger berets online: Video2k.tv. Accessed January 18, 2018, http://tinyurl.com/kkj3bbb.Google Scholar
  • Handke C, Balazs B, Vallbé JJ (2016) Going means trouble and staying makes it double: The value of licensing recorded music online. J. Cultural Econom. 40(3):227–259.Google Scholar
  • Hennig-Thurau T, Henning V, Sattler H (2007) Consumer file sharing of motion pictures. J. Marketing 71:1–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Howell DC (2005) External validity. Everitt BS, Howell DC, eds. Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science, Vol. 2 (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Hoboken, NJ), 588–591.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hui KL, Png I (2003) Piracy and the legitimate demand for recorded music. B.E. J. Econom. Anal. Policy 2(1):1–22.Google Scholar
  • Hui KL, Kim SH, Wang QH (2017) Cybercrime deterrence and international legislation: Evidence from distributed denial of service attacks. MIS Quart. 41(2):497–523.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jain S (2008) Digital piracy: A competitive analysis. Marketing Sci. 27(4):610–626.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kiema I (2008) Commercial piracy and intellectual property policy. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 68(1):304–318.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lang B (2017) Studios flirt with offering movies early in home for $30. Variety (March 21), accessed January 17, 2018, https://variety.com/2017/film/news/studios-premium-vod-early-1202013205/.Google Scholar
  • Lauinger T, Szydlowski M, Onarlioglu K, Wondracek G, Kirda E, Kruegel C (2013) Clickonomics: Determining the effect of anti-piracy measures for one-click hosting. Proc. NDSS Sympos. 2013, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  • Lechner M (2002) Program heterogeneity and propensity score matching: An application to the evaluation of active labor market policies. Rev. Econom. Statist. 84(2):205–220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt SD (1997) Using electoral cycles in police hiring to estimate the effect of police on crime. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(3):270–290.Google Scholar
  • Liao C, Lin HN, Liu YP (2010) Predicting the use of pirated software: A contingency model integrating perceived risk with the theory of planned behavior. J. Bus. Ethics 91(2):237–252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu M, Zhang Z, Hui P, Qin Y, Kulkarni S (2013) Measurement and understanding of Cyberlocker URL-sharing sites: Focus on movie files. Adv. Soc. Networks Anal. Mining, 2013 IEEE/ACM Internat. Conf., 902–909.Google Scholar
  • Lu Y, Poddar S (2012) Accommodation or deterrence in the face of commercial piracy: The impact of intellectual property rights protection. Oxford Econom. Papers 64(3):518–538.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luo H, Mortimer JH (2016) Copyright infringement in the market for digital images. Amer. Econom. Rev. Papers Proc. 106(5):140–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKenzie J (2017) Graduated response policies to digital piracy: Do they increase box office revenues of movies? Inform. Econom. Policy 38:1–11.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • NTV (2011) Millionen Nutzer haben Angst–Polizei schließt Kino.to. (June 9), accessed January 18, 2018, http://tinyurl.com/3mfm9tq.Google Scholar
  • Orme T (2014) The short- and long-term effectiveness of anti-piracy laws and enforcement actions. J. Cultural Econom. 38:351–368.Google Scholar
  • Peitz M, Waelbroeck P (2006) Piracy of digital products: A critical review of the theoretical literature. Inform. Econom. Policy 18:449–476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peukert C, Claussen J, Kretschmer T (2017) Piracy and box office movie revenues: Evidence from Megaupload. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 52:188–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Poort J, Weda J (2015) Elvis is returning to the building: Understanding a decline in unauthorized file sharing. J. Media Econom. 28(2):63–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Poort J, Leenheer J, van der Ham J, Dumitru C (2014) Baywatch: Two approaches to measure the effects of blocking access to the Pirate Bay. Telecomm. Policy 38:383–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Proserpio L, Salvemini S, Ghiringhelli V (2005) Entertainment pirates: Determinants of piracy in the software, music and movie industries. Internat. J. Arts Management 8(1):33–47.Google Scholar
  • Protalinski E (2016) KickassTorrents mirrors go down, but new KAT sites quickly spring up. Venture Beat (July 31), accessed January 17, 2018, https://venturebeat.com/2016/07/31/kickasstorrents-mirrors-go-down-but-new-kat-sites-quickly-spring-up/.Google Scholar
  • Reimers I (2016) Can private copyright protection be effective? Evidence from book publishing. J. Law Econom. 59(2):411–440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reißmann VO (2011) Ermittler verhaften mutmaßliche Betreiber von Raubkopie-Seite. Spiegel Online (June 8), accessed January 17, 2018, http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/netzpolitik/kino-to-ermittler-verhaften-mutmassliche-betreiber-von-raubkopie-seite-a-767375.html.Google Scholar
  • Rob R, Waldfogel J (2006) Piracy on the high C’s: Music downloading, sales displacement, and social welfare in a sample of college students. J. Law Econom. 49(1):29–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rob R, Waldfogel J (2007) Piracy on the silver screen. J. Indust. Econom. 55(3):379–395.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sinha R, Mandel N (2008) Preventing digital music piracy: The carrot or the stick? J. Marketing 72:1–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spiegel Online (2012) kino.to: Angeklagte und Urteile im Überblick. (June 14). Accessed January 17, 2018, http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/web/kino-to-angeklagte-und-urteile-im-ueberblick-a-838822.html.Google Scholar
  • Süddeutsche Zeitung (2011) Millionenkonten bei kino.to entdeckt. (June 19), accessed January 17, 2018, http://tinyurl.com/mam4sx9.Google Scholar
  • Sundararajan A (2004) Managing digital piracy: Pricing and protection. Inform. Systems Res. 15(3):287–308.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • The Guardian (2017) Film and TV streaming and downloads overtake DVD sales for first time. (January 5), accessed January 17, 2018, http://tinyurl.com/guqwkya.Google Scholar
  • Thomes TP (2013) An economic analysis of online streaming music services. Inform. Econom. Policy 25(2):81–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsai MF, Chiou JR (2012) Counterfeiting, enforcement and social welfare. J. Econom. 107(1):1–21.Google Scholar
  • Tual M (2016) Zone Téléchargement est-il vraiment de retour? Le Monde (December 15), accessed January 17, 2018, https://www.lemonde.fr/pixels/article/2016/12/15/zone-telechargement-est-il-vraiment-de-retour_5049581_4408996.html.Google Scholar
  • Tunca T, Wu Q (2013) Fighting fire with fire: Commercial piracy and the role of file sharing on copyright protection for digital goods. Inform. Systems Res. 24(2):436–453.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • UK Intellectual Property Office (2016) Online copyright infringement tracker—Latest wave of research Mar 16–May 16. Report, UK Intellectual Property Office, New port, UK.Google Scholar
  • van Kranenburg H, Hogenbirk A (2005) Multimedia, entertainment, and business software copyright piracy: A cross-national study. J. Media Econom. 18(2):109–129.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vida I, Kos Koklič M, Kukar-Kinney M, Penz E (2012) Predicting consumer digital piracy behavior: The role of rationalization and perceived consequences. J. Res. Interactive Marketing 6(4):298–313.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wagner GG, Frick JR, Schupp J (2007) The German socio-economic panel study (SOEP)-evolution, scope and enhancements. Schmollers Jahrbuch 127(1):139–169.Google Scholar
  • Walls W (2008) Cross-country analysis of movie piracy. Appl. Econom. 40(5):625–632.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watson S, Zizzo D, Fleming P (2015) Determinants of unlawful file sharing: A scoping review. PLoS One 10(6):e0127921.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yanagizawa-Drott D (2014) Propaganda and conflict: Evidence from the Rwandan genocide. Quart. J. Econom. 129(4):1947–1994.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zamoon S, Curley SP (2008) Ripped from the headlines: What can the popular press teach us about software piracy? J. Bus. Ethics 83(3):515–533.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zeit Online (2011) Polizei schaltet kino.to ab. (June 8), accessed January 17, 2018, http://tinyurl.com/6bjxxo2.Google Scholar
  • Zhang L (2018) Intellectual property strategy and the long tail: Evidence from the recorded music industry. Management Sci. 64(1):24–42.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.