Platform Architecture and Quality Trade-offs of Multihoming Complements

References

• Ambrus A, Calvano E, Reisinger M (2016) Either or both competition: A two-sided theory of advertising with overlapping viewerships. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics 8(3):189–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson EG Jr, Parker GG, Tan B (2014) Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities. Inform. Systems Res. 25(1):152–172.Link, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M (2006) Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):668–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M, Wright J (2007) Two-sided markets, competitive bottlenecks and exclusive contracts. Econom. Theory 32(2):353–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Calvano E, Gans JS (2016) The impact of consumer multi-homing on advertising markets and media competition. Management Sci. 64(4):1574–1590.Link, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C, Clark K (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C, Woodard CJ (2009) The architecture of platforms: A unified view. Gawer A, ed. Platforms, Markets and Innovation (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 19–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Binken JLG, Stremersch S (2009) The effect of superstar software on hardware sales in system markets. J. Marketing 73(2):88–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Lacetera N, Lakhani KR (2011) Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 57(5):843–863.Link, Google Scholar
• Bresnahan T, Orsini J, Yin P (2015) Demand heterogeneity, inframarginal multihoming, and platform market stability: Mobile app. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Caillaud B, Jullien B (2003) Chicken and egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. RAND J. Econom. 34(2):309–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cennamo C (2016) Building the value of next-generation platforms: The paradox of diminishing returns. J. Management, ePub ahead of print July 15, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316658350.Google Scholar
• Cennamo C, Santalo J (2013) Platform competition: Strategic tradeoffs in platform markets. Strategic Management J. 34(11):1331–1350.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Claussen J, Essling C, Kretschmer T (2015a) When less can be more—Setting technology levels in complementary goods markets. Res. Policy 44(2):328–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Claussen J, Kretschmer T, Mayrhofer P (2013) The effects of rewarding user engagement: The case of Facebook apps. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):186–200.Link, Google Scholar
• Claussen J, Kretschmer T, Stieglitz N (2015b) Vertical scope, turbulence, and the benefits of commitment and flexibility. Management Sci. 61(4):915–929.Link, Google Scholar
• Clements M, Ohashi H (2005) Indirect network effects and the product cycle: Video games in the U.S., 1994–2002. J. Indust. Econom. 53(4):515–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corts KS, Lederman M (2009) Software exclusivity and the scope of indirect network effects in the U.S. home video game market. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 27(2):121–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenmann T, Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2011) Platform envelopment. Strategic Management J. 32(12):1270–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• ESA of Canada (2013) Essential facts about the Canadian video game industry. Entertainment Software Association of Canada. theesa.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Essential-Facts-2013-EN.pdf.Google Scholar
• Gawer A (2014) Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Res. Policy 43(7):1239–1249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gawer A, Cusumano M (2002) Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Gawer A, Henderson R (2007) Platform owner entry and innovation in complementary markets: Evidence from Intel. J. Econom. Management Strategy 16(1):1–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gimeno J (1999) Reciprocal threats in multimarket rivalry: Staking out “spheres of influence” in the U.S. airline industry. Strategic Management J. 20(2):101–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A, Wright J (2015) Multi-sided platforms. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 43:162–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Cennamo C, Gawer A (2018) Towards a theory of ecosystem. Strategic Management J. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobides MG, Knudsen T, Augier M (2006) Benefiting from innovation: Value creation, value appropriation and the role of industry architectures. Res. Policy 35(6):1200–1221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeitschko TD, Tremblay MJ (2017) Platform competition with endogenous homing. Working paper, Michigan State University, East Lansing.Google Scholar
• Kapoor R, Agarwal S (2017) Sustaining superior performance in business ecosystems: Evidence from application software developers in the iOS and Android smartphone ecosystems. Organ. Sci. 28(3):531–551.Link, Google Scholar
• Kent SL (2001) The Ultimate History of Video Games: From Pong to Pokemon—The Story Behind the Craze That Touched Our Lives and Changed the World (Prima Publishing, New York).Google Scholar
• Klompmaker JE, Hughes DG, Haley RI (1976) Test marketing in new product development. Harvard Bus. Rev. 54(3):128–138.Google Scholar
• Kotaku (2014) How much does it cost to make a big video game? (January 15). Accessed August 23, 2016. http://kotaku.com/how-much-does-it-cost-to-make-a-big-video-game-1501413649.Google Scholar
• Kretschmer T, Claussen J (2016) Generational transitions in platform markets—The role of backward compatibility. Strategy Sci. 1(2):90–104.Link, Google Scholar
• Kretschmer T, Reitzig M (2013) How much to integrate? Firms’ profit-maximizing R&D allocations in emerging standard settings. Acad. Management Proc. 1:11679–11684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landsman V, Stremersch S (2011) Multihoming in two-sided markets: An empirical inquiry in the video game console industry. J. Marketing 75(6):39–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee RS (2013) Vertical integration and exclusivity in platform and two-sided markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(7):2960–3000.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McIntyre DP, Srinivasan A (2017) Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps. Strategic Management J. 38(1):141–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pachter M, McKay N, Citrin N (2014) Post hoc ergo propter hoc; Why the next generation will be as big as ever. Wedbush Securities.Google Scholar
• Parish J (2014) The lost child of a house divided: A Sega Saturn retrospective. USGamer. Accessed August 27, 2016. http://www.usgamer.net/articles/the-lost-child-of-a-house-divided-a-sega-saturn-retrospective.Google Scholar
• Parker G, Van Alstyne M (2005) Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. 51(10):1494–1504.Link, Google Scholar
• Pettus S (2013) Service Games: The Rise and Fall of SEGA: Enhanced Edition (CreateSpace Independent Publishing, Charleston, SC).Google Scholar
• Reimer J (2005) Cross-platform game development and the next generation of consoles. arsTechnica. Accessed August 20, 2016. http://arstechnica.com/articles/paedia/hardware/crossplatform.ars.Google Scholar
• Reimer J (2007) Sony PS3 defense: Developers can do more with IT. arsTechnica. Accessed November 14, 2017. https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2007/06/sony-ps3-defense-developers-can-do-more-with-it/.Google Scholar
• Rochet JC, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rochet JC, Tirole J (2006) Two-sided markets: A progress report. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):645–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth S (2013) Coding “To The Metal” is a dangerous ideal. Gamasutra. Accessed September 7, 2016. http://www.gamasutra.com/blogs/SimonRoth/20130522/192814/Coding_quotTo_The_Metalquot_is_a_dangerous_ideal.php.Google Scholar
• Rysman M (2007) An empirical analysis of payment card usage. J. Indust. Econom. 55(1):1–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling M (2000) Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Acad. Management Rev. 25(2):312–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seamans R, Zhu F (2014) Responses to entry in multi-sided markets: The impact of Craigslist on local newspapers. Management Sci. 60(2):476–493.Link, Google Scholar
• Sorenson O, Rivkin JW, Fleming L (2006) Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Res. Policy 35(7):994–1017.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A (2015) Evolutionary competition in platform ecosystems. Inform. Systems Res. 26(2):266–281.Link, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush AA (2010) Research commentary–Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):675–687.Link, Google Scholar
• Wareham J, Fox P, Giner J (2014) Technology ecosystem governance. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1195–1215.Link, Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):724–735.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Iansiti M (2012) Entry into platform-based markets. Strategic Management J. 33(1):88–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Zhang M (2010) Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. J. Marketing 74(2):133–148.Crossref, Google Scholar