The Impact of Twitter Adoption on Lawmakers’ Voting Orientations

References

• Aldrich JH, Battista JSC (2002) Conditional party government in the states. Amer. J. Political Sci. 46(1):164–172.Google Scholar
• Aldrich JH, Montgomery JM, Sparks DB (2014) Polarization and ideology: Partisan sources of low dimensionality in scaled roll call analyses. Political Anal. 22(4):435–456.Google Scholar
• Andrade AD, Doolin B (2016) Information and communication technology and the social inclusion of refugees. MIS Quart. 40(2):405–416.Google Scholar
• Bertot JC, Jaeger PT, Grimes JM (2010) Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-Government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Gov. Inform. Quart. 27(3):264–271.Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Google Scholar
• Bond RM, Fariss CJ, Jones JJ, Kramer ADI, Marlow C, Settle JE, Fowler JH (2012) A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature 489(7415):295–298.Google Scholar
• Bonica A (2014) Mapping the ideological marketplace. Amer. J. Political Sci. 58(2):367–386.Google Scholar
• Burmester N, Jankowski M (2014) The EU in the United Nations General Assembly: A comparative perspective. 4th European Union in Internat. Affairs Conf., May 22–24, Brussels, 1–26.Google Scholar
• Burt R (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carter L, Bélanger F (2005) The utilization of E-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Inform. Systems J. 15(1):5–25.Google Scholar
• Chan J, Ghose A (2014) Internet’s dirty secret: Assessing the impact of online intermediaries on HIV transmission. MIS Quart. 38(4):955–976.Google Scholar
• Chen H, Chiang RHL, Storey VC (2012) Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS Quart. 36(4):1165 –1188.Google Scholar
• Clinton J (2006) Representation in Congress: Constituents and roll calls in the 106th House. J. Politics 68(2):397–409.Google Scholar
• Congress.gov (2016) Roll call votes by the U.S. Congress. Accessed October 23, 2016, https://www.congress.gov/roll-call-votes.Google Scholar
• Congressional Management Foundation (2011) #SocialCongress: Perceptions and use of social media on Capitol Hill. Accessed June 18, 2015, http://www.congressfoundation.org/storage/documents/CMF_Pubs/congress.pdf.Google Scholar
• Debating Europe (2013) How is social media changing politics? Accessed June 19, 2015, http://www.debatingeurope.eu/2013/01/22/how-is-social-media-changing-politics/#.VNjKffnF92A.Google Scholar
• DiPrete TA, Gangl M (2004) Assessing bias in the estimation of causal effects: Rosenbaum bounds on matching estimators and instrumental variables estimation with imperfect instruments. Sociol. Methodol. 34(1):271–310.Google Scholar
• Dranove D, Kessler D, Mcclellan M, Satterthwaite M (2003) Is more information better? The effects of ‘report cards’ on health care providers. J. Political Econom. 111(3):555–588.Google Scholar
• Economist (2013) Outrageous bills: Why Congress writes such long laws. Accessed October 23, 2016, http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21590368-why-congress-writes-such-long-laws-outrageous-bills.Google Scholar
• Edvardsson B, Tronvoll B, Gruber T (2011) Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation: A social construction approach. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 39(2):327–339.Google Scholar
• Fitch B, Goldschmidt K (2015) #Social Congress 2015. Congressional Management Foundation, Washington, DC. http://www.congressfoundation.org/storage/documents/CMF_Pubs/congress.pdf.Google Scholar
• Ganju KK, Pavlou PA, Banker RD (2016) Does information and communication technology lead to the well-being of nations? A country-level empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 40(2):417–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghobadi S, Clegg S (2015) ‘These days will never be forgotten...’: A critical mass approach to online activism. Inform. Organ. 25(1):52–71.Google Scholar
• Glassman M (2017) Congressional member organizations: Their purpose and activities, history, and formation. Congressional Research Services Report, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Goh K-Y, Heng C-S, Lin Z (2013) Social media brand community and consumer behavior: Quantifying the relative impact of user- and marketer-generated content. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):88–107.Google Scholar
• Golbeck J, Grimes JM, Rogers A (2010) Twitter use by the U.S. Congress. J. Assoc. Inform. Sci. Tech. 61(8):1612–1621.Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt K, Ochreiter L (2008) Communicating with Congress: How the Internet Has Changed Citizen Engagement (Congressional Management Foundation, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• GovTrack (2016) Statistics and historical comparison. Accessed October 23, 2016, https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/statistics.Google Scholar
• Greenberg SR (2012) Congress + social media. Working paper, Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
• Hattem J (2014) Which phone do lawmakers like the most? Accessed September 16, 2015, http://thehill.com/policy/technology/220096-lawmakers-pick-iphones-over-droids.Google Scholar
• Jin GZ, Leslie P (2003) The effect of information on product quality: Evidence from restaurant hygiene grade cards. Quart. J. Econom. 118(2):409–451.Google Scholar
• Jockers M (2016) Package Syuzhet: Extracts sentiment and sentiment derived plot arcs from text. Accessed September 2, 2016, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/syuzhet/syuzhet.pdf.Google Scholar
• Kernell G (2009) Giving order to districts: Estimating voter distributions with national election returns. Political Anal. 17(3):215–235.Google Scholar
• Kieschnick R, McCullough BD (2003) Regression analysis of variates observed on (0, 1): Percentages, proportions and fractions. Statist. Modelling 3(3):193–213.Google Scholar
• Leuven E, Sianesi B (2014) PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing. Statistical Software Components, Boston College Department of Economics. Accessed November 4, 2014, http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s432001.html.Google Scholar
• Linders D (2012) From E-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Gov. Inform. Quart. 29(4):446–454.Google Scholar
• Luo X, Zhang J, Duan W (2013) Social media and firm equity value. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):146–163.Google Scholar
• Lupu Y (2013) The informative power of treaty commitment: Using the spatial model to address selection effects. Amer. J. Political Sci. 57(4):912–925.Google Scholar
• McCarty N, Poole KT, Rosenthal H (2008) Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Mitchell A, Hitlin P (2013) Twitter reaction to events often at odds with overall public opinion. Accessed December 4, 2017, http://www.pewresearch.org/2013/03/04/twitter-reaction-to-events-often-at-odds-with-overall-public-opinion/.Google Scholar
• Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 49(12):1372–1379.Google Scholar
• Peterson RD (2012) To Tweet or not to Tweet: Exploring the determinants of early adoption of Twitter by House members in the 111th Congress. Soc. Sci. J. 49(4):430–438.Google Scholar
• Piper K (2013) Congress and social media: Use of Twitter and Facebook by senators and congressmen. Accessed October 23, 2016, http://www.piperreport.com/blog/2013/04/15/congress-social-media-twitter-facebook-senators-congressmen.Google Scholar
• Poole K, Lewis J, Lo J, Carroll R (2011) Scaling roll call votes with WNOMINATE in R. J. Statist. Software 42(14):1–21.Google Scholar
• Poole KT, Rosenthal H (1985) A spatial model for legislative roll call analysis. Amer. J. Political Sci. 29(2):357–384.Google Scholar
• Poole KT, Rosenthal H (2007) Ideology & Congress (Transaction Publishers, Piscataway, NJ).Google Scholar
• Riggins FJ, Dewan S (2005) The digital divide: Current and future research directions. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 6(12):298–337.Google Scholar
• Rishika R, Kumar A, Janakiraman R, Bezawada R (2013) The effect of customers’ social media participation on customer visit frequency and profitability: An empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):108–127.Google Scholar
• Ruths D, Pfeffer J (2014) Social media for large studies of behavior. Science 346(6213):1063–1064.Google Scholar
• Selander L, Jarvenpaa S (2016) Digital action repertoires and transforming a social movement organization. MIS Quart. 40(2): 331–352.Google Scholar
• Stone B (2010) Twitter for iPhone. Accessed April 12, 2014, https://blog.twitter.com/official/en_us/a/2010/twitter-for-iphone.html.Google Scholar
• Sun M, Zhu F (2013) Ad revenue and content commercialization: Evidence from blogs. Management Sci. 59(10):2314–2331.Google Scholar
• Tausanovitch C, Warshaw C (2013) Measuring constituent policy preferences in Congress, state legislatures, and cities. J. Politics 75(2):330–342.Google Scholar
• Valenzuela S (2013) Unpacking the use of social media for protest behavior: The roles of information, opinion expression, and activism. Amer. Behav. Sci. 57(7):920–942.Google Scholar
• Victor JN (2013) U.S. Congress caucus data. Accessed July 11, 2016, http://mason.gmu.edu/∼jvictor3/Data/.Google Scholar
• Warshaw C, Rodden J (2012) How should we measure district-level public opinion on individual issues?” J. Politics 74(1):203–219.Google Scholar
• Wattal S, Schuff D, Mandviwalla M, Williams CB (2010) Web 2.0 and politics: The 2008 U.S. Presidential election and an E-politics research agenda. MIS Quart. 34(4):669–688.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams R (2016) Analyzing proportions: Fractional response and zero one inflated beta models. Working paper, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN.Google Scholar
• Wu L (2013) Social network effects on productivity and job security: Evidence from the adoption of a social networking tool. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):30–51.Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Ram S (2015) A comprehensive methodology for extracting signal from social media text using natural language processing and machine learning. Proc. Workshop Inform. Tech. Systems, Dallas, 1–16.Google Scholar