Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2018.0794

References

  • Adner R, Kapoor R (2010) Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management J. 31(3):306–333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adomavicius G, Bockstedt JC, Gupta A, Kauffman RJ (2008) Making sense of technology trends in the information technology landscape: A design science approach. MIS Quart. 32(4):779–809.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agrawal A, Lacetera N, Lyons E (2016) Does standardized information in online markets disproportionately benefit job applicants from less developed countries? J. Internat. Econom. 103:1–12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agrawal A, Horton J, Lacetera N, Lyons E (2015) Digitization and the contract labor market: A research agenda. Economic Analysis of the Digital Economy (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 219–250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alonso R, Dessein W, Matouschek N (2008) When does coordination require centralization? Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(1):145–179.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alonso R, Dessein W, Matouschek N (2015) Organizing to adapt and compete. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 7(2):158–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amaral J, Anderson EG, Parker G (2011) Putting it together: How to succeed in distributed product development. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 52(2):51.Google Scholar
  • Athey S (2018) The impact of machine learning on economics. Agrawal AK, Gans J, Goldfarb A, eds. The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA)Google Scholar
  • Autor D (2015) Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. J. Econom. Perspect. 29(3):3–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin C, Clark K (2000) Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin CY, Woodard CJ (2009) The architecture of platforms: A unified view. Gawer A, ed. Platforms, Markets and Innovation (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 19–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beck R, Avital M, Rossi M, Thatcher JB (2017) Blockchain technology in business and information systems research. Bus. Inform. Systems Engrg. 59(6):381–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Befort SF (2002) Labor and employment law at the millennium: A historical review and critical assessment. Boston College Law Rev. 43:351–460.Google Scholar
  • Blackmer WS (2016) GDPR: Getting ready for the new EU general data protection regulation. Information Law Group, InfoLawGroup LLP. Accessed April 29, 2018, https://www.infolawgroup.com/2016/05/articles/gdpr/gdpr-getting-ready-for-the-new-eu-general-data-protection-regulation/.Google Scholar
  • Boudreau K (2010) Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. devolving control. Management Sci. 56(10):1849–1872.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau K (2012) Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1409–1427.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau K, Hagiu A (2009) Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators. Gawer A, ed. Platforms, Markets and Innovation (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 163–191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boudreau KJ, Lakhani KR (2013) Using the crowd as an innovation partner. Harvard Bus. Rev. 91(4):60–69.Google Scholar
  • Brusoni S, Prencipe A (2001) Unpacking the black box of modularity: Technologies, products and organizations. Indust. Corporate Change 10(1):179–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A (2014) The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies (WW Norton, New York).Google Scholar
  • Burtch G, Carnahan S, Greenwood BN (2018) Can you gig it? An empirical examination of the gig economy and entrepreneurial activity. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print February 27, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2916.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Buterin V (2014) Ethereum white paper, http://www.the-blockchain.com/docs/Ethereum_white_paper-a_next_generation_smart_contract_and_decentralized_application_platform-vitalik-buterin.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Bygstad B (2017) Generative innovation: A comparison of lightweight and heavyweight IT. J. Inform. Tech. 32(2):180–193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Catalini C, Gans JS (2016) Some simple economics of the blockchain. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Ceci F, Prencipe A (2008) Configuring capabilities for integrated solutions: Evidence from the IT sector. Indust. Innovation 15(3):277–296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cennamo C, Ozalp H, Kretschmer T (2018) Platforms architecture and quality trade-offs of multihoming complements. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):461–478.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen DL, Horton J (2016) Research note—Are online labor markets spot markets for tasks? A field experiment on the behavioral response to wage cuts. Inform. Systems Res. 27(2):403–423.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen MK, Sheldon M (2016) Dynamic pricing in a labor market: Surge pricing and flexible work on the uber platform. Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  • Chesbrough HW (2006) Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Ciborra CU, Braa K, Cordella A, Dahlbom B, Failla A, Hanseth O, Hepsø V, Ljungberg J, Monteiro E, Simon KA, eds. (2000) From Control to Drift–The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
  • Colfer LJ, Baldwin CY (2016) The mirroring hypothesis: Theory, evidence, and exceptions. Indust. Corporate Change 25(5):709–738.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collier RB, Dubal VB, Carter C (2017) Labor platforms and gig work: The failure to regulate. Working paper, IRLE, Berkeley, CA, http://irle.berkeley.edu/files/2017/Labor-Platforms-and-Gig-Work.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Consensys (2017) Grid + White Paper, https://gridplus.io/.Google Scholar
  • Constantinides P (2012) Perspectives and Implications for the Development of Information Infrastructures (IGI Global, Hershey, PA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Constantinides P, Barrett M (2014) Information infrastructure development and governance as collective action. Inform. Systems Res. 26(1):40–56.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Conway M (1968) How do committees invent? Datamation 14(4):28–31.Google Scholar
  • Crisp CB, Jarvenpaa SL (2013) Swift trust in global virtual teams: Trusting beliefs and normative actions. J. Personnel Psych. 12(1):45–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davies A, Brady T, Hobday M (2007) Organizing for solutions: Systems seller vs. systems integrator. Indust. Marketing Management 36(2):183–193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Reuver M, Sørensen C, Basole RC (2017) The digital platform: A research agenda. J. Inform. Tech., 1–12.Google Scholar
  • Dhanaraj C, Parkhe A (2006) Orchestrating innovation networks. Acad. Management Rev. 31(3):659–669.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eaton B, Elaluf-Calderwood S, Sorensen C, Yoo Y (2015) Distributed tuning of boundary resources. MIS Quart. 39(1):217–244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Economist, The (2015) The promise of the blockchain: The trust machine. (October 31).Google Scholar
  • Edelman B (2015) Digital business models should have to follow the law, too. Harvard Bus. Rev. https://hbr.org/2015/01/digital-business-models-should-have-to-follow-the-law-too.Google Scholar
  • Eisenmann T, Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW (2006) Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(10):92–101.Google Scholar
  • Eisenmann T, Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW (2011) Platform envelopment. Strategic Management J. 32:1270–1285.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • European Commission-Fact Sheet (2018) Payment services directive: Frequently asked questions. Accessed April 29, 2018, http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-15-5793_en.htm.Google Scholar
  • Evans DS (2013) The consensus among economists on multisided platforms and its implications for excluding evidence that ignores it. Antitrust Chronicle, Competition Policy Internat. 6.Google Scholar
  • Evans DS, Schmalensee R (2007) Industrial organization of markets with two-sided platforms. Competition Policy Internat. 3(1):151–179.Google Scholar
  • Evans P, Gawer A (2016) The rise of the platform enterprise: A global survey. Technical report, Center for Global Enterprise. Accessed March 1, 2018, https://www.thecge.net/app/uploads/2016/01/PDF-WEB-Platform-Survey_01_12.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Faulhaber GR (2011) The economics of network neutrality. Regulation 34(4):18–25.Google Scholar
  • Fisher M, Ramdas K, Ulrich K (1999) Component sharing in the management of product variety: A study of automotive braking systems. Management Sci. 45(3):297–315.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Foerderer J, Kude T, Mithas S, Heinzl A (2018) Does platform owner’s entry crowd out innovation? Evidence from Google photos. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):444–460.Google Scholar
  • Gandhi J (2017) Data center infrastructure. Patent US9606316 B1.Google Scholar
  • Garud R, Kumaraswamy A, Langlois RN, eds. (2003) Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks, and Organizations (Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA).Google Scholar
  • Gawer A (2014) Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Res. Policy 43(7):1239–1249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gawer A, Henderson R (2007) Platform owner entry and innovation in complementary markets: Evidence from Intel. J. Econom. Management Strategy 16(1):1–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gefen D, Carmel E (2008) Is the world really flat? A look at offshoring at an online programming marketplace. MIS Quart. 367–384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghazawneh A, Henfridsson O (2013) Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: The boundary resources model. Inform. Systems J. 23(2):173–192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graham S, Marvin S (2001) Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition (Routledge, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grossman S, Hart O (1986) The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral ownership. J. Political Econom. 94:691–719.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta AK, Tesluk PE, Taylor MS (2007) Innovation at and across multiple levels of analysis. Organ. Sci. 18(6):885–897.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hagiu A, Eisenmann T (2007) A staged solution to the Catch-22. Harvard Bus. Rev. 85(11):25–26.Google Scholar
  • Hagiu A, Wright J (2013) Do you really want to be an eBay? Harvard Bus. Rev. 91(3):102–108.Google Scholar
  • Hagiu A, Wright J (2015) Marketplace or reseller? Management Sci. 61(1):184–203.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hanseth O (2000) The economics of standards. Ciborra C, Braa K, Cordella A, Dahlbom B, Failla A, Hanseth O, Hespø V, Ljungberg J, Monteiro E, Simon KA, eds. From Control to Drift–The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 56–70.Google Scholar
  • Hanseth O, Aanestad M (2003) Bootstrapping networks, infrastructures and communities. Methods Inform. Medicine 42:384–391.Google Scholar
  • Hanseth O, Ciborra C, eds. (2007) Risk, Complexity and ICT (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hanseth O, Lyytinen K (2010) Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building Internet. J. Inform. Tech. 25(1):1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hart O, Moore J (1990) Property rights and the nature of the firm. J. Political Econom. 98:1119–1158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henfridsson O, Bygstad B (2013) The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. MIS Quart. 37(3):907–931.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hong Y, Pavlou PA (2017) On buyer selection of service providers in online outsourcing platforms for IT services. Inform. Systems Res. 28(3):547–562.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hong Y, Wang CA, Pavlou PA (2016) Comparing open and sealed bid auctions: Evidence from online labor markets. Inform. Systems Res. 27(1):49–69.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Horton JJ (2017) The effects of algorithmic labor market recommendations: Evidence from a field experiment. J. Labor Econom. 35(2):345–385.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Horton JJ, Rand DG, Zeckhauser RJ (2011) The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experiment. Econom. 14(3):399–425.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huang J, Henfridsson O, Liu MJ, Newell S (2017) Growing on steroids: Rapidly scaling the user base of digital ventures through digital innovation. MIS Quart. 41(1):301–314.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacobides MG (2006) The architecture and design of organizational capabilities. Indust. Corporate Change 15(1):151–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacobides MG, Knudsen T, Augier M (2006) Benefiting from innovation: Value creation, value appropriation and the role of industry architectures. Res. Policy 35(8):1200–1221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacobides M, Cennamo C, Gawer A (2018) Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management J. Forthcoming.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson J (2012) Precision agriculture: Higher profit, lower cost. Accessed March 1, 2018, http://www.precisionag.com/institute/precision-agriculture-higher-profit-lower-cost/.Google Scholar
  • Karhu K, Gustafsson R, Lyytinen K (2018) Exploiting and defending open digital platforms with boundary resources: Android’s five platform forks. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):479–497.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Katz M, Shapiro C (1986) Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. J. Political Econom. 94:822–841.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelly S, Truong M, Shahbaz A, Earp M, White J (2017) Freedom on the net 2017: Manipulating social media to undermine democracy. Freedom of the Net project. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/freedom-net-2017.Google Scholar
  • Kirsch LS (1997) Portfolios of control modes and IS project management. Inform. Systems Res. 8(3):215–239.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Koutroumpis P, Leiponen A, Thomas LD (2017) The (unfulfilled) potential of data marketplaces. Working paper, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  • Krämer J, Wiewiorra L, Weinhardt C (2013) Net neutrality: A progress report. Telecomm. Policy 37(9):794–813.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kruchten P, Nord RL, Ozkaya I (2012) Technical debt: From metaphor to theory and practice. IEEE Software 29(6):18–21.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuek SC, Paradi-Guilford C, Fayomi T, Imaizumi S, Ipeirotis P, Pina P, Singh M (2015) The global opportunity in online outsourcing. Technical report, The World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 12(1):1–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee HCB, Ba S, Li X, Stallaert J (2018) Salience bias in crowdsourcing contests. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):401–418.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee J, Berente N (2012) Digital innovation and the division of innovative labor: Digital controls in the automobile industry. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1428–1447.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liang C, Hong Y, Gu B (2016) IT-enabled monitoring and labor contracting in online platforms: Evidence from a natural experiment. Working paper, Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
  • Lin M, Liu Y, Viswanathan S (2018) Effectiveness of reputation in contracting for customized production: Evidence from online labor markets. Management Sci. 64(1):345–359.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lustig C, Nardi B (2015) Algorithmic authority: The case of bitcoin. System Sci. (HICSS), 2015 48th Hawaii Internat. Conf., 743–752.Google Scholar
  • Lyytinen K, Sorensen C, Tilson D (2018) Generativity in digital infrastructure: A research note. Galliers RD, Stein M-K, eds. Handbook of Information Systems Companion Book (Routledge, New York), 253–275.Google Scholar
  • Matsakis L (2018) Microsoft’s supreme court case has big implications for data. Wired (February 27), Accessed March 1, 2018, https://www.wired.com/story/us-vs-microsoft-supreme-court-case-data/.Google Scholar
  • Maurer B, Nelms TC, Swartz L (2013) When perhaps the real problem is money itself! The practical materiality of bitcoin. Soc. Semiotics 23(2):261–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAfee A, Brynjolfsson E, Davenport TH (2012) Big data: The management revolution. Harvard Bus. Rev. 90(10):60–68.Google Scholar
  • McGinnis M, ed. (1999) Polycentric Governance and Development: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Messerschmitt D, Szyperski C (2003) Software Ecosystem (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Möhlmann M, Zalmanson L (2017) Hands on the wheel: Navigating algorithmic management and uber drivers’ autonomy. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS 2017), Seoul, South Korea.Google Scholar
  • Monteiro E (1998) Scaling information infrastructure: The case of the next generation IP in Internet. Inform. Soc. 14(3):229–245.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Montemayor L, Boersma T, van Dorp T (2018) Comprehensive guide to companies involved in blockchain and energy. Blockchain Business. Report.Google Scholar
  • Moreno A, Terwiesch C (2014) Doing business with strangers: Reputation in online service marketplaces. Inform. Systems Res. 25(4):865–886.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Naughton J (2017) Why american farmers are hacking their own tractors. The Guardian (March 26), Accessed March 1, 2018, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/mar/26/why-american-farmers-hacking-own-tractors.Google Scholar
  • Niculescu MF, Wu DJ, Xu L (2018) Strategic intellectual property sharing: Competition on an open technology platform under network effects. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):498–519.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pallais A (2014) Inefficient hiring in entry-level labor markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(11):3565–3599.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parker GG, Anderson EG (2002) From buyer to integrator: The transformation of the supply-chain manager in the vertically disintegrating firm. Production Oper. Management 11(1):75–91.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW (2005) Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. 51(10):1494–1504.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW (2017) Innovation, openness, and platform control. Management Sci. ePub ahead of print August 11, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2757.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW, Choudary SP (2016) Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You (W. W. Norton, New York).Google Scholar
  • Pisano GP, Teece DJ (2007) How to capture value from innovation: Shaping intellectual property and industry architecture. California Management Rev. 50(1):278–296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Plansky J, O’Donnell T, Richards K (2016) A strategist’s guide to blockchain. Strategy Bus. (Spring), https://www.strategy-business.com/article/A-Strategists-Guide-to-Blockchain.Google Scholar
  • Pon B, Seppälä T, Kenney M (2014) Android and the demise of operating system-based power: Firm strategy and platform control in the post-PC world. Telecomm. Policy 38(11):979–991.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter ME, Heppelmann JE (2014) How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Bus. Rev. 92(11):64–88.Google Scholar
  • Puranam P, Raveendran M, Knudsen T (2012) Organization design: The epistemic interdependence perspective. Acad. Management Rev. 37(3):419–440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Qiu Y, Gopal A, Hann I (2017) Logic pluralism in mobile platform ecosystems: A study of indie app developers on the iOS app store. Inform. Systems Res. 28(2):225–249.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ramasubbu N, Kemerer CF (2016) Technical debt and the reliability of enterprise software systems: A competing risks analysis. Management Sci. 62(5):1487–1510.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ransbotham S, Kiron D, Gerbert P, Reeves M (2017) Reshaping business with artificial intelligence. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 59(1):1–17.Google Scholar
  • Risius M, Spohrer K (2017) A blockchain research framework. Bus. Inform. Systems Engrg. 59(6):385–409.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robert LP, Denis AR, Hung YTC (2009) Individual swift trust and knowledge-based trust in face-to-face and virtual team members. J. Management Inform. Systems 26(2):241–279.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rochet JC, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided market. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 1(4):990–1029.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rochet JC, Tirole J (2006) Two-sided markets: A progress report. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):645–667.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rolland KN, Mathiassen L, Rai A (2018) Managing digital platforms in user organizations: The interactions between digital options and digital debt. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):419–440.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Roubini D, Byrne P (2018) The blockchain pipe dream. Project Syndicate (March 5), https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/blockchain-technology-limited-applications-by-nouriel-roubini-and-preston-byrne-2018-03.Google Scholar
  • Sandberg J, Mathiassen L, Napier N (2014) Digital options theory for IT capability investment. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 15(7):422–453.Google Scholar
  • Sassen S (2001) The Global City, 2nd ed. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilling MA (2000) Towards a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Acad. Management Rev. 25(2):312–334.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilling MA (2002) Technology success and failure in winner-take-all markets: The impact of learning orientation, timing, and network externalities. Acad. Management J. 45(2):387–398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilling M, Steensma K (2001) The use of modular organizational forms: An industry-level analysis. Acad. Management J. 44(6):1149–1168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwartz PM (1994) European data protection law and restrictions on international data flows. Iowa L. Rev. 80:471–496.Google Scholar
  • Sedlmeir J, Hopf S, Neuburger R, Picot A (2017) Convergent digital infrastructures and the role of (net-) neutrality. 28th Eur. Regional ITS Conf., Passau 2017, Internat. Telecomm. Soc.Google Scholar
  • Seetharaman D, Bindley K (2018) Facebook controversy: What to know about Cambridge Analytica and your data. Wall Street Journal (March 23).Google Scholar
  • Spiekermann S, Acquisti A, Böhme R, Hui KL (2015) The challenges of personal data markets and privacy. Electronic Markets 25(2):161–167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Statovci-Halimi B, Franzl G (2013) QoS differentiation and Internet neutrality. Telecomm. Systems 52(3):1605–1614.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Svahn F, Lindgren R, Mathiassen L (2015) Applying options thinking to shape generativity in digital innovation: An action research into connected cars. System Sci. (HICSS), 2015 48th Hawaii Internat. Conf., 4141–4150.Google Scholar
  • Svahn F, Mathiassen L, Lindgren R (2017) Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: How volvo cars managed competing concerns. MIS Quart. 41(1):239–253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Talton E, Tonar R (2018) Why blockchain is key to transforming how physical infrastructure works and how we think about it. Forbes (January 22), https://www.forbes.com/sites/ellistalton/2018/01/22/why-blockchain-is-key-to-transforming-how-physical-infrastructure-works-and-how-we-think-about-it/#59fc8f748754.Google Scholar
  • Tapscott D, Tapscott A (2016) The impact of the blockchain goes beyond financial services. Harvard Bus. Rev. (May 10).Google Scholar
  • Thomas LDW, Autio E, Gann DM (2014) Architectural leverage: Putting platforms in context. Acad. Management Perspect. 28(2):198–219.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  • Tilson D, Lyytinen K, Sørensen C (2010) Research commentary—Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):748–759.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tiwana A (2013) Platform Ecosystems: Aligning Architecture, Governance, and Strategy (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  • Tiwana A (2015) Evolutionary competition in platform ecosystems. Inform. Systems Res. 26(2):266–281.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tiwana A, Konsynski B, Bush AA (2010) Research commentary—Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):675–687.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tschorsch F, Scheuermann B (2016) Bitcoin and beyond: A technical survey on decentralized digital currencies. IEEE Comm. Surveys and Tutorials 18(3):2084–2123.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ulrich K (1995) The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy 24(3):419–440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Von Hippel E (2005) Democratizing Innovation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vosoughi S, Roy D, Aral S (2018) The spread of true and false news online. Science 359(6380):1146–1151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wareham J, Fox PB, Giner JLC (2014) Technology ecosystem governance. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1195–1215.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Whitman JQ (2004) The two western cultures of privacy: Dignity versus liberty. Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CT, http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/649.Google Scholar
  • Wolfert S, Ge L, Verdouw C, Bogaardt M-J (2017) Big data in smart farming—A review. Agricultural Systems 153:69–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yoo Y, Boland R, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A (2012) Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ. Sci. 23(5):1398–1408.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K (2010) Research commentary—The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):724–735.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zheng A, Hong Y, Pavlou PA (2016) Matching in two-sided platforms for IT services: Evidence from online labor markets. Working paper, Temple University, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  • Zittrain J (2006) The generative Internet. Harvard Law Rev. 119:1974–2040.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.