Jack of All, Master of Some: Information Network and Innovation in Crowdsourcing Communities

References

• Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. 45(3):425–455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ales L, Cho SH, Korpeoglu E (2016) Innovation tournaments with multiple contributors. Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
• Ales L, Cho SH, Korpeoglu E (2017) Optimal award scheme in innovation tournaments. Oper. Res. 65(3):693–702.Link, Google Scholar
• Amabile TM, Conti R, Coon H, Lazenby J, Herron M (1996) Assessing the work environment for creativity. Acad. Management J. 39(5):1154–1184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Van Alstyne M (2011) The diversity-bandwidth trade-off. Amer. J. Sociol. 117(1):90–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argote L (2012) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Baker N, Freeland J (1972) Structuring information flow to enhance innovation. Management Sci. 19(1):105–116.Link, Google Scholar
• Baker NR, Siegman J, Rubenstein AH (1967) The effects of perceived needs and means on the generation of ideas for industrial research and development projects. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management 14(4):156–163.Google Scholar
• Bayus BL (2013) Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm community. Management Sci. 59(1):226–244.Link, Google Scholar
• Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Machine Learn. Res. 3:993–1022.Google Scholar
• Boh WF, Evaristo R, Ouderkirk A (2014) Balancing breadth and depth of expertise for innovation: A 3M story. Res. Policy 43(2):349–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1992) Structural Holes (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. 110(2):349–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casakin H (2004) Visual analogy as a cognitive strategy in the design process: Expert versus novice performance. J. Design Res. 4(2):197–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chase WG, Simon HA (1973) Perception in chess. Cognitive Psych. 4(1):55–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christensen BT, Schunn CD (2007) The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: The case of engineering design. Memory Cognition 35(1):29–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collins BA, Burstein M (1989) Afterword: Comments on Parts I, II, and III: A framework for a theory of comparison and mapping. Vosniadou S, Ortony A, eds. Similarity and Analogical Reasoning (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA), 546–566.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cummings JN (2004) Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci. 50(3):352–364.Link, Google Scholar
• Cummings JN, Espinosa JA, Pickering CK (2009) Crossing spatial and temporal boundaries in globally distributed projects: A relational model of coordination delay. Inform. Systems Res. 20(3):420–439.Link, Google Scholar
• Dahl DW, Fuchs C, Schreier M (2015) Why and when consumers prefer products of user-driven firms: A social identification account. Management Sci. 61(8):1978–1988.Link, Google Scholar
• Dahl M, Moreau P (2002) The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. J. Marketing Res. 39(1):47–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dosi G, Levinthal DA, Marengo L (2003) Bridging contested terrain: Linking incentive-based and learning perspectives on organizational evolution. Indust. Corporate Change 12(2):413–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dugosh P, Roland Y (2000) Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79(5):722–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunbar K (1995) How Scientists Really Reason: Scientific Reasoning in Real-World Laboratories. The Nature of Insight (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 65–395.Google Scholar
• Dunbar K (1997) How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. Ward TB, Smith SS, Vaid J, eds. Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC), 461–493.Google Scholar
• Duncker K (1945) On problem-solving. Psych. Monographs 58(5):1–113.Google Scholar
• Eckert CM, Stacey MK, Wiley J (1999) Expertise and designer burnout. Proc. 12th Internat. Conf. Engrg. Design (Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany), 195–200.Google Scholar
• Fichman RG (2004) Going beyond the dominant paradigm for information technology innovation research: Emerging concepts and methods. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 5(8):11.Google Scholar
• Fleming L (2001) Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. 47(1):117–132.Link, Google Scholar
• Franke N, Keinz P, Klausberger K (2013) “Does this sound like a fair deal?”: Antecedents and consequences of fairness expectations in the individual’s decision to participate in firm innovation. Organ. Sci. 24(5):1495–1516.Link, Google Scholar
• Fu K, Chan J, Cagan J, Kotovsky K, Schunn C, Wood K (2013) The meaning of “near” and “far”: the impact of structuring design databases and the effect of distance of analogy on design output. J. Mech. Design 135(2):021007.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gentner D (1983) Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Sci. 7(2):155–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gentner D, Brem S, Ferguson R, Wolff P, Markman AB, Forbus KD (1997) Analogy and creativity in the works of Johannes Kepler. Ward TB, Smith SS, Vaid J, eds. Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC), 403–459.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gick ML, Holyoak KJ (1983) Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psych. 15(1):1–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilfillan SC (1935) Inventing the Ship (Follett, Westchester, IL).Google Scholar
• Glaser R (1989) Expertise and learning: How do we think about instructional processes now that we have discovered knowledge structures. Klahr D, Kotovsky K, eds. Complex Information Processing: The Impact of Herbert A. Simon (Psychology Press, Sussex, UK), 269–282.Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1983) The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociol. Theory 1(1):201–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene W (2011) Econometric Analysis, 7th ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Griffiths TL, Steyvers M (2004) Finding scientific topics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101(suppl 1):5228–5235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hargadon A, Sutton R (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. 42(4):716–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman JA (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46(6):1251–1271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayes JR (1989) Cognitive processes in creativity. Kaufman JC, Sternberg RJ, eds. Handbook of Creativity (Plenum, New York), 135–145.Google Scholar
• Higgins ET (1996) Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. Kruglanski AW, Higgins ET, eds. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (Guilford Press, New York), 133–168.Google Scholar
• Holyoak KJ, Koh K (1987) Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer. Memory Cognition 15(4):332–340.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Singh PV, Srinivasan K (2014) Crowdsourcing new product ideas under consumer learning. Management Sci. 60(9):2138–2159.Link, Google Scholar
• Hwang EH, Singh PV, Argote L (2015) Knowledge sharing in online communities: Learning to cross geographic and hierarchical boundaries. Organ. Sci. 26(6):1593–1611.Link, Google Scholar
• Jeppesen LB, Frederiksen L (2006) Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments. Organ. Sci. 17(1):45–63.Link, Google Scholar
• Jeppesen LB, Lakhani KR (2010) Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1016–1033.Link, Google Scholar
• Korpeoglu E, Cho SH (2017) Incentives in contests with heterogeneous solvers. Management Sci. 64(6):2709–2715.Link, Google Scholar
• Kulkarni D, Simon HA (1988) The processes of scientific discovery: The strategy of experimentation. Cognitive Sci. 12(2):139–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakhani K (2009) InnoCentive (A). Harvard Business School Case 608-170, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Lakhani K, Lifshitz-Assaf H, Tushman M (2013) Open innovation and firm boundaries: task decomposition, knowledge distribution and the locus of innovation. Grandori A, ed. Handbook of Economic Organization: Integrating Economic and Organization Theory (Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA), 355–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levina N (2005) Collaborating on multiparty information systems development projects: A collective reflection-in-action view. Inform. Systems Res. 16(2):109–130.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu TX, Yang J, Adamic LA, Chen Y (2014) Crowdsourcing with all-pay auctions: A field experiment on Taskcn. Management Sci. 60(8):2020–2037.Link, Google Scholar
• Maier NR (1931) Reasoning and learning. Psych. Rev. 38(4):332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marengo L, Dosi G, Legrenzi P, Pasquali C (2000) The structure of problem-solving knowledge and the structure of organizations. Indust. Corporate Change 9(4):757–788.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marquaridt DW (1970) Generalized inverses, ridge regression, biased linear estimation, and nonlinear estimation. Technometrics 12(3):591–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCaffrey T (2012) Why we can’t see what’s right in front of us. Harvard Bus. Rev. (May 10), https://hbr.org/2012/05/overcoming-functional-fixednes.Google Scholar
• Millard A (1990) Edison and the Business of Innovation (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore).Google Scholar
• Montgomery J (1992) Job search and network composition: Implications of the strength-of-weak-ties hypothesis. Amer. Sociol. Assoc. 57(5):586–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Newell A (1990) Unified Theories of Cognition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Newell A, Simon HA (1972) Human Problem Solving (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Novick LR (1988) Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 14(3):510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Brien R (2007) A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality Quantity 41(5):673–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poetz MK, Schreier M (2012) The value of crowdsourcing: Can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas?: The value of crowdsourcing. J. Product Innovation Management 29(2):245–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ransbotham S, Kane GC, Lurie NH (2012) Network characteristics and the value of collaborative user-generated content. Marketing Sci. 31(3):387–405.Link, Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Argote L, Brooks D (2005) Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Sci. 51(6):869–881.Link, Google Scholar
• Rietzschel EF, Nijstad BA, Stroebe W (2007) Relative accessibility of domain knowledge and creativity: The effects of knowledge activation on the quantity and originality of generated ideas. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 43(6):933–946.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J (1934) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle (President and Fellows of Harvard College, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1981) The Sciences of the Artificial (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Simonton DK (2004) Creativity in Science: Chance, Logic, Genius, and Zeitgeist (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Singh PV, Tan Y, Youn N (2011) A hidden Markov model of developer learning dynamics in open source software projects. Inform. Systems Res. 22(4):790–807.Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor A, Greve HR (2006) Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Acad. Management J. 49(4):723–740.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. 54(9):1529–1543.Link, Google Scholar
• Usher AP (1954) A History of Mechanical Inventions (Courier Dover Publications, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Vosniadou S (1989) Analogical reasoning as a mechanism in knowledge acquisition: a developmental perspective. Vosniadou S, Ortony A, eds. Similarity and Analogical Reasoning (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA), 413–437.Google Scholar
• Weisberg RW (1999) Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. Kaufman JC, Sternberg RJ, eds. Handbook of Creativity (Plenum, New York), 226–250.Google Scholar
• Wolf G (1996) Steve Jobs: The next insanely great thing. Wired (February 1), https://www.wired.com/1996/02/jobs-2/.Google Scholar
• Wu L (2013) Social network effects on productivity and job security: Evidence from the adoption of a social networking tool. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):30–51.Link, Google Scholar