Adopting Seekers’ Solution Exemplars in Crowdsourcing Ideation Contests: Antecedents and Consequences

References

• Archak N (2010) Money, glory and cheap talk: Analyzing strategic behavior of contestants in simultaneous crowdsourcing contests on TopCoder.com. Proc. 19th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (ACM, New York), 21–30.Google Scholar
• Archak N, Sundararajan A (2009) Optimal design of crowdsourcing contests. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS) 2009 Proc. (Association for Information Systems Electronic Library, Atlanta), http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2009/200.Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Goncalo JA (2007) Past success and creativity over time: A study of inventors in the hard disk drive industry. Management Sci. 53(1):1–15.Link, Google Scholar
• Bergkvist L, Rossiter JR (2007) The predictive validity of multiple-item vs. single-item measures of the same constructs. J. Marketing Res. 44(2):175–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bockstedt J, Druehl C, Mishra A (2015) Problem-solving effort and success in innovation contests: The role of national wealth and national culture. J. Oper. Management 36:187–200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bockstedt J, Druehl C, Mishra A (2016) Heterogeneous submission behavior and its implications for success in innovation contests with public submissions. Production Oper. Management 25(7):1157–1176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boudreau KJ, Lacetera N, Lakhani KR (2011) Incentives and problem uncertainty in innovation contests: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. 57(5):843–863.Link, Google Scholar
• Brabham DC (2010) Moving the crowd at Threadless. Inform. Comm. Soc. 13(8):1122–1145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cahalane M, Feller J, Finnegan P, Hayes J, O’Reilly P (2014) Leveraging distributed collective intelligence: An investigation of solver engagement with innovation challenges. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS) 2014 Proc. (Association for Information Systems Electronic Library, Atlanta), https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2014/proceedings/SocialMedia/20/.Google Scholar
• Cason TN, Masters WA, Sheremeta RM (2010) Entry into winner-take-all and proportional-prize contests: An experimental study. J. Public Econom. 94(9–10):604–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos A, Sarstedt M, Fuchs C, Wilczynski P, Kaiser S (2012) Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 40(3):434–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dow SP, Fortuna J, Schwartz D, Altringer B, Schwartz DL, Klemmer SR (2011) Prototyping dynamics: Sharing multiple designs improves exploration, group rapport, and results. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 2807–2816.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dow SP, Glassco A, Kass J, Schwarz M, Schwartz DL, Klemmer SR (2010) Parallel prototyping leads to better design results, more divergence, and increased self-efficacy. ACM Trans. Comput.-Human Interaction 17(4):18:11–18:24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drolet AL, Morrison DG (2001) Do we really need multiple-item measures in service research? J. Service Res. 3(3):196–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Füller J, Hutter K, Hautz J, Matzler K (2017) The role of professionalism in innovation contest communities. Long Range Planning 50(2):243–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Girotra K, Terwiesch C, Ulrich KT (2010) Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Sci. 56(4):591–605.Link, Google Scholar
• Herring SR, Chang C-C, Krantzler J, Bailey BP (2009) Getting inspired!: Understanding how and why examples are used in creative design practice. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 87–96.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeppesen LB, Lakhani KR (2010) Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organ. Sci. 21(5):1016–1033.Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. 14:95–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke EA (2000) Motivation, cognition, and action: An analysis of studies of task goals and knowledge. Appl. Psych.: Internat. Rev. 49(3):408–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke EA, Bryan JF, Kendall LM (1968) Goals and intentions as mediators of the effects of monetary incentives on behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 52(2):104–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maas CJM, Hox JJ (2005) Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology 1(3):86–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Malhotra A (2013) Toward an information systems perspective and research agenda on crowdsourcing for innovation. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 22(4):257–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87.Link, Google Scholar
• Montgomery DC (2009) Design and Analysis of Experiments, 6th ed. (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
• Moreau CP, Dahl DW (2005) Designing the solution: The impact of constraints on consumers’ creativity. J. Consumer Res. 32(1):13–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan J, Wang R (2010) Tournaments for ideas. Calif. Management Rev. 52(2):77–97.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Nguyen D, Trieschnigg D, Theune M (2014) Using crowdsourcing to investigate perception of narrative similarity. Proc. 23rd ACM Internat. Conf. Inform. Knowledge Management (ACM, New York), 321–330.Google Scholar
• O’Cass A, Heirati N, Ngo LV (2014) Achieving new product success via the synchronization of exploration and exploitation across multiple levels and functional areas. Indust. Marketing Management 43(5):862–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Poetz MK, Schreier M (2012) The value of crowdsourcing: Can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas? J. Product Innovation Management 29(2):245–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rahmanian B, Davis JG (2014) User interface design for crowdsourcing systems. Proc. 2014 Internat. Working Conf. Adv. Visual Interfaces (ACM, New York), 405–408.Google Scholar
• Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS (2002) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Rossiter JR (2002) The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 19(4):305–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen F (2002) Banner advertisement pricing, measurement, and pretesting practices: Perspectives from interactive agencies. J. Advertising 31(3):56–67.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1990) Invariants of human behavior. Annual Rev. Psych. 41(1):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith SM, Ward TB, Schumacher JS (1993) Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task. Memory Cognition 21(6):837–845.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Ulrich K (2009) Innovation Tournaments: Creating and Selecting Exceptional Opportunities (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C, Xu Y (2008) Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. 54(9):1529–1543.Link, Google Scholar
• Toh CA, Miller SR (2014) The impact of example modality and physical interactions on design creativity. J. Mech. Design 136(9):091004-091004-8.Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481):453–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ülkümen G, Cheema A (2011) Framing goals to influence personal savings: The role of specificity and construal level. J. Marketing Res. 48(6):958–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooten JO, Ulrich KT (2017) Idea generation and the role of feedback: Evidence from field experiments with innovation tournaments. Production Oper. Management 26(1):80–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang J, Adamic LA, Ackerman MS (2008) Crowdsourcing and knowledge sharing: Strategic user behavior on taskcn. Proc. 9th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York), 246–255.Google Scholar
• Ye H, Kankanhalli A (2017) Solvers’ participation in crowdsourcing platforms: Examining the impacts of trust, and benefit and cost factors. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 26(2):101–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Youmans RJ, Arciszewski T (2014) Design fixation: A cloak of many colors. Gero JS, ed. Design Computing and Cognition '12 (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands), 115–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zheng H, Li D, Hou W (2011) Task design, motivation, and participation in crowdsourcing contests. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce 15(4):57–88.Crossref, Google Scholar