Relative Privacy Valuations Under Varying Disclosure Characteristics
References
- (2004) Privacy in electronic commerce and the economics of immediate gratification. Breese J, Feigenbaum J, Seltzer M, eds. Proc. 5th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM Press, New York), 21–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. Proc. 6th Privacy Enhancing Technologies Sympos. (Cambridge, UK), 36–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Privacy and rationality in individual decision making. IEEE Security Privacy 3(1):24–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science 347(6221):509–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) What is privacy worth? J. Legal Stud. 42(2):249–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Adoption of electronic health records in the presence of privacy concerns: The elaboration likelihood model and individual persuasion. MIS Quart. 33(2):339–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) The impact of timing on the salience of smartphone app privacy notices. Proc. 5th Annual ACM CCS Workshop Security Privacy Smartphones Mobile Devices (ACM, New York), 63–74.Google Scholar
- (2006) A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday 11(9) (September 4), https://firstmonday.org/article/view/1394/1312.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1964) Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behav. Sci. 9(3):226–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Privacy in e-commerce: Stated preferences vs. actual behavior. Comm. ACM. 48(4):101–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Why Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak is joining the #DeleteFacebook movement. Washington Post (April 9), https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/04/09/why-apple-co-founder-steve-wozniak-is-joining-the-deletefacebook-movement/?utm_term=.23fd8cffcf64.Google Scholar
- (2015) Data, data everywhere, but not a bit your own. Huffington Post (June 25), https://www.huffingtonpost.com/techonomy/data-data-everywhere-but_b_7662348.html.Google Scholar
- (2000) Consumer online privacy: Legal and ethical issues. J. Public Policy Marketing 19(1):7–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Personalization versus privacy: An empirical examination of the online consumer’s dilemma. Inform. Tech. Management 6(2-3):181–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Generalizability of information systems research using student subjects—a reflection on our practices and recommendations for future research. Inform. Systems Res. 23(4):1093–1109.Link, Google Scholar
- (1987) The disparity between willingness to accept and willingness to pay measures of value. Quart. J. Econom. 102(3):679–690.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) How did they get my name? An exploratory investigation of consumer attitudes toward secondary information use. MIS Quart. 17(3):341–363.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Organ. Sci. 10(1):104–115.Link, Google Scholar
- (2006) A study on the value of location privacy. Proc. 5th ACM Workshop Privacy Electronic Soc. (ACM, New York), 109–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) How much is location privacy worth? Proc. Workshop Econom. Inform. Security, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2006) An extended privacy calculus transactions model for e-commerce transactions. Inform. Systems Res. 17(1):61–80.Link, Google Scholar
- (1998) Limited dependent variables in willingness to pay studies: Applications in health care. Appl. Econom. 30(5):667–677.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Students as experimental participants. Druckman J, Green D, Kuklinski J, Lupia A, eds. Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science (Cambridge University Press, New York), 41–57.Google Scholar
- (2017) The Unroll.me controversy is a good reminder that tech companies and consumers don’t understand each other. New York Magazine (April 26), http://nymag.com/selectall/2017/04/unroll-mes-lesson-legal-ass-covering-isnt-enough.html.Google Scholar
- (2013) Americans growing more concerned over their online privacy: Study. Huffington Post (November 5), https://www.nbcnews.com/technolog/half-americans-online-worry-about-privacy-says-study-8C11079652.Google Scholar
- (1991) Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: How much can they differ? Amer. Econom. Rev. 81(3):635–647.Google Scholar
- (2007) Overcoming information privacy concerns: An information processing theory approach. J. Management Inform. Systems 24(2):13–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Building consumer trust online. Comm. ACM 42(4):80–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Valuating privacy. IEEE Security Privacy 3(5):22–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) The value of privacy assurance: An exploratory field experiment. MIS Quart. 31(1):19–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Dialogues on Perception (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (2001) Saliency, scale, and image description. Internat. J. Comput. Vision 45(2):83–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1977) The concept of privacy and its biological basis. J. Soc. Issues 33(3):52–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) The data brokers: Selling your personal information. CBS News (August 24), https://www.cbsnews.com/news/data-brokers-selling-personal-information-60-minutes/.Google Scholar
- (1977) Privacy as a concept and a social issue: A mutlidimensional developmental theory. J. Soc. Issues 33(3):22–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Mechanical Turk is not anonymous. Working paper, University of Texas at Austin, Austin.Google Scholar
- (2002) Calibration of willingness to accept. J. Environ. Econom. Management 43(2):219–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) How much is your data worth? Mmm somewhere between half a cent and $1,200. Atlantic (March 19), https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/03/how-much-is-your-data-worth-mmm-somewhere-between-half-a-cent-and-1-200/254730/.Google Scholar
- (2004) Internet Users’ Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Inform. Systems Res. 15(4):336–355.Link, Google Scholar
- (2010) Guide to protecting the confidentiality of personally identifiable information (PII). Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. NIST Special Publication 800-122, National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, MD.Google Scholar
- (1980) The uses of tobit analysis. Rev. Econom. Statist. 62:318–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) The hidden privacy threat of ... flashlight apps. Wired (October 20), https://www.wired.com/2014/10/iphone-apps/.Google Scholar
- (1992) Understanding privacy concerns: An assessment of consumer’s information-related knowledge and beliefs. J. Direct Marketing 6(4):28–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Broken promises of privacy: Responding to the surprising failure of anonymization. UCLA Law Rev. 57(6):1701–1777.Google Scholar
- (2000) Privacy concerns and consumer willingness to provide personal information. J. Public Policy Marketing 19(1):27–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) The willingness to pay-willingness to accept gap, the ‘endowment effect,’ subject misconceptions, and procedures for eliciting valuations experimental. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(3):530–545.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1981) The economics of privacy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 71(2):405–409.Google Scholar
- (2015) How to explore consumer’s privacy choices with behavioral economics. Zeadally S, Badra M, eds. Privacy in a Digital, Networked World (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 313–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Radioshack still plans to sell customer personal data despite state objections. PCWorld (April 14), https://www.pcworld.com/article/2909772/radioshack-presses-ahead-plan-for-sale-of-customer-data.html.Google Scholar
- (2011) Experimentally elicited beliefs explain privacy behavior. Working paper, College of Business Administration, University of Central Florida, Orlando.Google Scholar
- (2009) Privacy costs and personal data protection: Economic and legal perspectives. Berkeley Tech. Law J. 24(3):1061–1102.Google Scholar
- (2015) Do privacy concerns really change with the internet of things? Forbes (July 2), https://www.forbes.com/sites/rawnshah/2015/07/02/do-privacy-concerns-really-change-with-the-internet-of-things/#3ae779425707.Google Scholar
- (2000) Dimensions of privacy concern among online consumers. J. Public Policy Marketing 19(1):62–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Facebook’s revenue per user topped $5 for the first time. CNBC.com (November 2), https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/02/facebooks-revenue-topped-5-per-user-for-the-first-time.html.Google Scholar
- (1994) Resolving differences in willingness to pay and willingness to accept. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(1):255–270.Google Scholar
- (2012) What Facebook knows. MIT Tech. Rev. (June 13), https://www.technologyreview.com/s/428150/what-facebook-knows/.Google Scholar
- (2011) Information privacy research: An interdisciplinary review. MIS Quart. 35(4):989–1015.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Taxonomy of privacy. Univ. Pennsylvania Law Rev. 154(3):477–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Content personalization: It’s what consumers want! Social Media Today (April 4), https://www.socialmediatoday.com/marketing/2015-04-04/content-personalization-its-what-consumers-want.Google Scholar
- (2014) Money walks: A human-centric study on the economics of personal mobile data. Proc. 2014 ACM Internat. Joint Conf. Pervasive Ubiquitous Comput. (ACM, New York), 583–594.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) How much is your personal data worth? Financial Times (June 12), https://ig.ft.com/how-much-is-your-personal-data-worth/.Google Scholar
- (2013) Addressing the personalization-privacy paradox: An empirical assessment from a field experiment on smartphone users. MIS Quart. 37(4):1141–1164.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1978) Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 11:249–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1985) Preattentive processing in vision. Comput. Vision Graphics Image Processing 31(2):156–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) The effect of online privacy information on purchasing behavior: An experimental study. Inform. Systems Res. 22(2):254–268.Link, Google Scholar
- (2008) Grooming, gossip, Facebook and MySpace: What can we learn about these sites from those who won’t assimilate? Inform. Comm. Soc. 11(4):544–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) The role of push-pull technology in privacy calculus: The case of location-based services. J. Management Inform. Systems 26(3):137–176.Google Scholar
- (2018) Despite all the #DeleteFacebook talk, data shows we’re using it more, not less. Accessed March 29, 2018, https://www.inc.com/minda-zetlin/for-all-deletefacebook-talk-data-shows-were-using-it-more-not-less.html.Google Scholar

