The Impact of Process- vs. Outcome-Oriented Reviews on the Sales of Healthcare Services

References

• Bai X, Marsden JR, Ross WT, Wang G (2020) A note on the impact of daily deals on local retailers’ online reputation: Mediation effects of the consumer experience. Inform. Systems Res. 31(4):1132–1143.Link, Google Scholar
• Balli HO, Sørensen BE (2013) Interaction effects in econometrics. Empir. Econom. 45(1):583–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barton BH (2015) Some early thoughts on liability standards for online providers of legal services. Hofstra Law Rev. 44:541.Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J. Econometrics 87(1):115–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Hong Y, Bapna R, Griskevicius V (2018) Stimulating online reviews by combining financial incentives and social norms. Management Sci. 64(5):2065–2082.Link, Google Scholar
• Cao Z, Hui KL, Xu H (2018) When discounts hurt sales: The case of daily-deal markets. Inform. Systems Res. 29(3):567–591.Link, Google Scholar
• Chakraborty U, Biswal SK (2023) Are online reviews credible? The effects of online reviews for the adoption of MOOCs for E-learning. J. Decision Systems 32(4):678–699.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee P, Zhou B (2021) Sponsored content advertising in a two-sided market. Management Sci. 67(12):7560–7574.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Xie J (2008) Online consumer review: Word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Management Sci. 54(3):477–491.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen PY, Hong Y, Liu Y (2018) The value of multidimensional rating systems: Evidence from a natural experiment and randomized experiments. Management Sci. 64(10):4629–4647.Link, Google Scholar
• Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cian L, Longoni C, Krishna A (2020) Advertising a desired change: When process simulation fosters (vs. hinders) credibility and persuasion. J. Marketing Res. 57(3):489–508.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collier JE, Bienstock CC (2006) Measuring service quality in E-retailing. J. Service Res. 8(3):260–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper-Martin E (1991) Consumers and movies: Some findings on experiential products. Adv. Consumer Res. 18(1):372–378.Google Scholar
• Dabholkar PA, Overby JW (2005) Linking process and outcome to service quality and customer satisfaction evaluations: An investigation of real estate agent service. Internat. J. Service Indust. Management 16(1):10–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daniel RK (2018) The preservation rhinoplasty: A new rhinoplasty revolution. Aesthet. Surg. J. 38(2):228–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C, Zhang X, Awad NF (2007) Exploring the value of online product reviews in forecasting sales: The case of motion pictures. J. Interactive Marketing 21(4):23–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dixon MJ, Victorino L, Kwortnik RJ, Verma R (2017) Surprise, anticipation, and sequence effects in the design of experiential services. Production Oper. Management 26(5):945–960.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dosovitskiy A, Beyer L, Kolesnikov A, Weissenborn D, Zhai X, Unterthiner T, Dehghani M, et al. (2020) An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. Preprint, submitted October 22, https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.11929.Google Scholar
• Duan W, Gu B, Whinston AB (2008) Do online reviews matter?—An empirical investigation of panel data. Decision Support Systems 45(4):1007–1016.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elder RS, Krishna A (2022) A review of sensory imagery for consumer psychology. J. Consumer Psych. 32(2):293–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Escalas JE, Luce MF (2004) Understanding the effects of process-focused vs. outcome-focused thought in response to advertising. J. Consumer Res. 31(2):274–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang L (2022) The effects of online review platforms on restaurant revenue, consumer learning, and welfare. Management Sci. 68(11):8116–8143.Link, Google Scholar
• Gao G (Gordon), Greenwood BN, Agarwal R, McCullough JS (2015) Vocal minority and silent majority: How do online ratings reflect population perceptions of quality? MIS Quart. 39(3):565–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goh KY, Heng CS, Lin Z (2013) Social media brand community and consumer behavior: Quantifying the relative impact of user- and marketer-generated content. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):88–107.Link, Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer PM, Moskowitz GB (1996) Goal effects on action and cognition. Higgins ET, Kruglanski AW, eds. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (The Guilford Press, New York), 361–399.Google Scholar
• Harris K, Buntin M (2008) Choosing a healthcare provider: The role of quality information. Policy 1(6):1–25.Google Scholar
• Hildebrand C, Häubl G, Herrmann A (2014) Product customization via starting solutions. J. Marketing Res. 51(6):707–725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hou JR, Zhang J, Zhang K (2023) Pictures that are worth a thousand donations: How emotions in project images drive the success of online charity fundraising campaigns? An image design perspective. MIS Quart. 47(2):535–584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lei Z, Yin D, Mitra S, Zhang H (2022) Swayed by the reviews: Disentangling the effects of average ratings and individual reviews in online word-of-mouth. Production Oper. Management 31(6):2393–2411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li Y, Xie Y (2020) Is a picture worth a thousand words? An empirical study of image content and social media engagement. J. Marketing Res. 57(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li H, Peng J, Li X, Stallaert J (2023) When more can be less: The effect of add-on insurance on the consumption of professional services. Inform. Systems Res. 34(1):363–382.Link, Google Scholar
• Liberman N, Trope Y (1998) The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 75(1):5–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin Z, Zhang Y, Tan Y (2019) An empirical study of free product sampling and rating bias. Inform. Systems Res. 30(1):260–275.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu Y (2006) Word of mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. J. Marketing 70(3):74–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Feng J (2021) Does money talk? The impact of monetary incentives on user-generated content contributions. Inform. Systems Res. 32(2):394–409.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Mao H, Wu CY, Feichtenhofer C, Darrell T, Xie S (2022) A ConvNet for the 2020s. 2022 IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), 11966–11976.Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Lin Y, Cao Y, Hu H, Wei Y, Zhang Z, Lin S, Guo B (2021) Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. 2021 IEEE/CVF Internat. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ICCV) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), 9992–10002.Google Scholar
• Lu SF, Rui H (2018) Can we trust online physician ratings? Evidence from cardiac surgeons in Florida. Management Sci. 64(6):2557–2573.Link, Google Scholar
• Lu T, Yuan M, Wang C, Zhang X (2022) Histogram distortion bias in consumer choices. Management Sci. 68(12):8963–8978.Link, Google Scholar
• Mejia J, Mankad S, Gopal A (2019) A for effort? Using the crowd to identify moral hazard in New York City restaurant hygiene inspections. Inform. Systems Res. 30(4):1363–1386.Link, Google Scholar
• Mobayed N, Nguyen JK, Jagdeo J (2020) Minimally invasive facial cosmetic procedures for the millennial aesthetic patient. J. Drugs Dermatol. 19(1):100–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peng J, Van den Bulte C (2024) Participation vs. effectiveness in sponsored tweet campaigns: A quality-quantity conundrum. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print January 29, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.01897.Google Scholar
• Pham LB, Taylor SE (1999) From thought to action: Effects of process-vs. outcome-based mental simulations on performance. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 25(2):250–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell D (2022) Quantile regression with nonadditive fixed effects. Empir. Econom. 63(5):2675–2691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sahoo N, Dellarocas C, Srinivasan S (2018) The impact of online product reviews on product returns. Inform. Systems Res. 29(3):723–738.Link, Google Scholar
• Shukla AD, Gao G, Agarwal R (2021) How digital word-of-mouth affects consumer decision making: Evidence from doctor appointment booking. Management Sci. 67(3):1546–1568.Link, Google Scholar
• Stock JH, Yogo M (2005) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. Andrews DWK, Stock JH, eds. Identification and Inference for Econometric Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), 80–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun M (2012) How does the variance of product ratings matter? Management Sci. 58(4):696–707.Link, Google Scholar
• Tan M, Pang R, Le QV (2020) EfficientDet: Scalable and efficient object detection. 2020 IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), 10778–10787.Google Scholar
• Taylor SE, Pham LB, Rivkin ID, Armor DA (1998) Harnessing the imagination: Mental simulation, self-regulation, and coping. Amer. Psych. 53(4):429–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson DV, Hamilton RW, Petrova PK (2009) When mental simulation hinders behavior: The effects of process-oriented thinking on decision difficulty and performance. J. Consumer Res. 36(4):562–574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker C, Zhang J (2011) How does popularity information affect choices? A field experiment. Management Sci. 57(5):828–842.Link, Google Scholar
• Waytz A, Hershfield HE, Tamir DI (2015) Mental simulation and meaning in life. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 108(2):336–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westerman D, Spence PR, Van Der Heide B (2014) Social media as information source: Recency of updates and credibility of information. J. Comput. Comm. 19(2):171–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wharton S, Serodio KJ, Kuk JL, Sivapalan N, Craik A, Aarts MA (2016) Interest, views and perceived barriers to bariatric surgery in patients with morbid obesity. Clin. Obes. 6(2):154–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 2nd ed. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Wu C, Che H, Chan TY, Lu X (2015) The economic value of online reviews. Marketing Sci. 34(5):739–754.Link, Google Scholar
• Xie H, Minton EA, Kahle LR (2016) Cake or fruit? Influencing healthy food choice through the interaction of automatic and instructed mental simulation. Marketing Lett. 27(4):627–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Armony M, Ghose A (2021) The interplay between online reviews and physician demand: An empirical investigation. Management Sci. 67(12):7344–7361.Link, Google Scholar
• Yaraghi N, Wang W, Gao GG, Agarwal R (2018) How online quality ratings influence patients’ choice of medical providers: Controlled experimental survey study. J. Med. Internet Res. 20(3):e99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin D, Bond SD, Zhang H (2021) Anger in consumer reviews: Unhelpful but persuasive? MIS Quart. 45(3):1059–1086.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Sun Q (2024) The transformation mechanism of fitness clubs: Pricing of joint fitness courses by online platforms and well-known coaches. J. Retailing Consumer Services 76:103539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Lee D, Singh PV, Srinivasan K (2022) What makes a good image? Airbnb demand analytics leveraging interpretable image features. Management Sci. 68(8):5644–5666.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhao M, Hoeffler S, Dahl DW (2009) The role of imagination-focused visualization on new product evaluation. J. Marketing Res. 46(1):46–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao M, Hoeffler S, Zauberman G (2011) Mental simulation and product evaluation: The affective and cognitive dimensions of process vs. outcome simulation. J. Marketing Res. 48(5):827–839.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou T, Yan L, Wang Y, Tan Y (2022) Turn your online weight management from zero to hero: A multidimensional, continuous-time evaluation. Management Sci. 68(5):3507–3527.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Zhang X (2010) Impact of online consumer reviews on Sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. J. Marketing 74(2):133–148.Crossref, Google Scholar