A Theory of Strategic Information Technology Unavailability

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2019.0208

References

  • Alpaslan CM, Green SE, Mitroff II (2009) Corporate governance in the context of crises: Towards a stakeholder theory of crisis management. J. Contingencies Crisis Management 17(1):38–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arend RJ (2004) The definition of strategic liabilities, and their impact on firm performance. J. Management Stud. 41(6):1003–1027.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azzopardi M, Levine A, Lamb J (2011) Defining a risk-based approach to the design and technology usage of systems to attain it availability and recoverability requirements. 8th Internat. Conf. Expo Emerging Tech. Smarter World (New York), 1–6.Google Scholar
  • Banker RD, Bardhan IR, Chang H, Lin S (2006) Plant information systems, manufacturing capabilities, and plant performance. MIS Quart. 30(2):315–337.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barney JB (1995) Looking inside for competitive advantage. Acad. Management Perspect. 9(4):49–61.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bharadwaj AS (2000) A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 24(1):169–196.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bharadwaj S, Bharadwaj A, Bendoly E (2007) The performance effects of complementarities between information systems, marketing, manufacturing, and supply chain processes. Inform. Systems Res. 18(4):437–453.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bharadwaj A, Keil M, Mähring M (2009) Effects of information technology failures on the market value of firms. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 18(2):66–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bharadwaj SS, Saxena KBC, Halemane MD (2010) Building a successful relationship in business process outsourcing: An exploratory study. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 19(2):168–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhattacherjee A (2001) Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quart. 25(3):351–370.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bitsch V (2005) Qualitative research: A grounded theory example and evaluation criteria. J. Agribusiness 23(1):75–91.Google Scholar
  • Borger G (2014) How Obama and the Democrats lost the election. CNN (November 5), http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/05/opinion/borger-how-democrats-lost-the-election/.Google Scholar
  • Brown JA, Buchholtz AK, Dunn P (2016) Moral salience and the role of goodwill in firm-stakeholder trust repair. Bus. Ethics Quart. 26(2):181–199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bundy J, Pfarrer MD (2015) A burden of responsibility: The role of social approval at the onset of a crisis. Acad. Management Rev. 40(3):345–369.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bundy J, Pfarrer MD, Short CE, Coombs WT (2017) Crises and crisis management: Integration, interpretation, and research development. J. Management 43(6):1661–1692.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton-Jones A, McLean ER, Monod E (2015) Theoretical perspectives in IS research: From variance and process to conceptual latitude and conceptual fit. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 24(6):664–679.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collins J, Ruefli TW (1992) Strategic risk: An ordinal approach. Management Sci. 38(12):1707–1731.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Coombs WT (2021) Ongoing Crisis Communication: Planning, Managing, and Responding (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • de Gooyert V (2016) Nothing so practical as a good theory; five ways to use system dynamics for theoretical contributions. 34th Internat. Conf. System Dynam. Soc. (Delft, Netherlands), 590–599.Google Scholar
  • Dynes S, Johnson ME, Andrijcic E, Horowitz B (2007) Economic costs of firm-level information infrastructure failures: Estimates from field studies in manufacturing supply chains. Internat. J. Logist. Management 18(3):420–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fang Y, Lim KH, Qian Y, Feng B (2018) System dynamics modeling for information systems research: Theory development and practical application. MIS Quart. 42(4):1303–1329.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forrester JW (1971) Counterintuitive behavior of social systems. Theory Decision 2(2):109–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell C, Rust R, Dekimpe M (2010) The effect of customer satisfaction on consumer spending growth. J. Marketing Res. 47(1):28–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glaser BG (1978) Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory (Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA).Google Scholar
  • Glaser BG (1992) Emergence vs. Forcing: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis (Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA).Google Scholar
  • Glaser BG (2005) The Grounded Theory Perspective III: Theoretical Coding (Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA).Google Scholar
  • Glaser BG, Holton J (2007) Remodeling grounded theory. Historical Soc. Res. 19(2007):47–68.Google Scholar
  • Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Res. (Aldine Publishing Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Goldstein J, Chernobai A, Benaroch M (2011) An event study analysis of the economic impact of IT operational risk and its subcategories. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 12(9):606–631.Google Scholar
  • Grover V, Lyytinen K (2015) New state of play in information systems research. MIS Quart. 39(2):271–296.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grummit A (2009) Capacity Management—A Practitioner Guide (Van Haren Publishing, Zaltbommel, Netherlands).Google Scholar
  • Gwebu K, Wang J, Wang L (2018) The role of corporate reputation and crisis response strategies in data breach management. J. Management Inform. Systems 35(2):683–714.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herbane B, Elliott D, Swartz EM (2004) Business continuity management: Time for a strategic role? Long Range Planning 37(5):435–457.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hillmann J, Guenther E (2021) Organizational resilience: A valuable construct for management research? Internat. J. Management Rev. 23(1):7–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holtzer G, ed. (2004) Voies vers le Plurilinguisme, vol. 772 (Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté, Besancon, France).Google Scholar
  • Homann U (2006) A business-oriented foundation for service orientation, Microsoft Developer Network. Accessed July 11, 2015, http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa479368.aspx.Google Scholar
  • Idalovichi IBY (2014) Symbolic Forms as the Metaphysical Groundwork of the Organon of the Cultural Sciences (Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • James EH, Wooten LP, Dushek K (2011) Crisis management: Informing a new leadership research agenda. Acad. Management Ann. 5(1):455–493.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan RS, Norton DP (2004) Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes (Harvard Business Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Kim DJ, Ferrin D, Rao H (2009) Trust and satisfaction, two stepping stones for successful e-commerce relationships: A longitudinal exploration. Inform. Systems Res. 20(2):237–257.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kirsch LJ (2004) Deploying common systems globally: The dynamics of control. Inform. Systems Res. 15(4):374–395.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kohli R, Grover V (2008) Business value of IT: An essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 9(1):1–23.Google Scholar
  • Levina N, Ross J (2003) From the vendor’s perspective: Exploring the value proposition in IT outsourcing. MIS Quart. 27(3):331–364.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levina N, Vaast E (2015) Leveraging archival data from online communities for grounded process theorizing. Elsbach KD, Kramer R, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Organizational Research: Innovative Pathways and Methods, 1st ed. (Routledge, New York), 247–256.Google Scholar
  • Limoncelli TA, Chalup SR, Hogan CJ (2014) The Practice of Cloud System Administration: Designing and Operating Large Distributed Systems, vol. 2 (Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Martin J, Leben J (1989) Strategic Information Planning Methodologies (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • McFarlan FW, McKenney JL (1983) Corporate Information Systems Management: The Issues Facing Senior Executives (Richard Irwin Publishers, Homewood, IL).Google Scholar
  • McNeil G (2014) Independent Review: SkyTrain Service Disruptions on July 17 and July 21, 2014 (McNeil Management Services, Vancouver).Google Scholar
  • Mehrizi MHR, Nicolini D, Modol JR (2022) How do organizations learn from information system incidents? A synthesis of the past, present, and future. MIS Quart. 46(1):531–590.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Melville N, Kraemer K, Gurbaxani V (2004) Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quart. 28(2):283–322.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mithas S, Ramasubbu N, Sambamurthy V (2011) How information management capability influences firm performance. MIS Quart. 35(1):237–256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pentland BT (1999) Building process theory with narrative: From description to explanation. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):711–724.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell TC, Arregle JL (2007) Firm performance and the axis of errors. J. Management Res. 7(2):59–77.Google Scholar
  • Punzo G, Tewari A, Butans E, Vasile M, Purvis A, Mayfield M, Varga L (2020) Engineering resilient complex systems: The necessary shift toward complexity science. IEEE Systems J. 14(3):3865–3874.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raju M (2014) Reid’s new mission: Blocking “crazy stuff”. Politico (December 9), http://www.politico.com/story/2014/12/harry-reids-new-mission-blocking-crazy-stuff-113452.Google Scholar
  • Rhee M, Valdez ME (2009) Contextual factors surrounding reputation damage with potential implications for reputation repair. Acad. Management Rev. 34(1):146–168.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ruefli TW, Collins JM, Lacugna JR (1999) Risk measures in strategic management research: Auld lang syne? Strategic Management J. 20(2):167–194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sarker S, Chatterjee S, Xiao X, Elbanna A (2019) The sociotechnical axis of cohesion for the IS discipline: Its historical legacy and its continued relevance. MIS Quart. 43(3):695–719.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sarker S, Xiao X, Beaulieu T, Lee A (2018) Learning from first-generation qualitative approaches in the IS discipline: An evolutionary view and some implications for authors and evaluators (PART 1/2). J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(8):752–774.Google Scholar
  • Sterman JD (2000) Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World (Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Strauss A, Corbin JM (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
  • Su N (2018) Positivist qualitative methods. Cassell C, Cunliffe A, Grandy G, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Business and Management: History and Traditions (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA), 17–32.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tafti A, Rahmati P, Mithas S, Krishnan MS (2022) How human resource and information systems practices amplify the returns on information technology investments. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 23(5):1150–1183.Google Scholar
  • Tanriverdi H, Konana P, Ge L (2007) The choice of sourcing mechanisms for business processes. Inform. Systems Res. 18(3):280–299.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Triche J, Walden E (2018) The use of impression management strategies to manage stock market reactions to IT failures. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(4):333–357. Google Scholar
  • Trochim WMK (2007) The Research Methods Knowledge Base, 3rd ed. (Atomic Dog, Mason, OH).Google Scholar
  • Trope Y, Liberman N (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psych. Rev. 117(2):440–463.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsai DR, Sang HA (2010) Constructing a risk dependency-based availability model. Internat. Carnahan Conf. Security Tech. (San Jose, CA), 218–220.Google Scholar
  • Ulrich W, Rosen M (2011) The business capability map: The Rosetta stone of business/IT alignment. Enterprise Architecture 14(2):1–23.Google Scholar
  • Urquhart C, Fernández W (2013) Using grounded theory method in information systems: The researcher as blank slate and other myths. J. Inform. Tech. 28(3):224–236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vaast E, Walsham G (2013) Grounded theorizing for electronically mediated social contexts. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 22(1):9–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wade M, Hulland J (2004) The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quart. 28(1):107–142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • West P III, DeCastro J (2001) The Achilles heel of firm strategy: Resource weaknesses and distinctive inadequacies. J. Management Stud. 38(3):417–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westerman G, Hunter R (2007) IT Risk: Turning Business Threats into Competitive Advantage (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Williams TA, Gruber DA, Sutcliffe KM, Shepherd DA, Zhao EY (2017) Organizational response to adversity: Fusing crisis management and resilience research streams. Acad. Management Ann. 11(2):733–769.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.