Talking Up a Storm: How Backers Use Public Discourse to Exert Control in Crowdfunded Systems Development Projects

References

• Adler PS, Borys B (1996) Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(1):61–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agile Alliance (2001) Manifesto for agile software development. Accessed December 3, 2018, http://www.agilemanifesto.org.Google Scholar
• Agrawal A, Catalini C, Goldfarb A (2015) Crowdfunding: Geography, social networks, and the timing of investment decisions. J. Econom. Management Strategy 24(2):253–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Argyres NS, Liebeskind JP (1999) Contractual commitments, bargaining power, and governance inseparability: Incorporating history into transaction cost theory. Acad. Management Rev. 24(1):49–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avgerou C (2005) Doing critical research in information systems: some further thoughts. Inform. Systems J. 15(2):103–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bachmann R (2001) Trust, power and control in trans-organizational relations. Organ. Stud. 22(2):337–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beaulieu T, Sarker S (2013) Discursive meaning creation in crowdfunding: A socio-material perspective. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Milan, Italy.Google Scholar
• Beck K (2000) Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
• Belleflamme P, Lambert T, Schwienbacher A (2013) Individual crowdfunding practices. Venture Capital 15(4):313–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belleflamme P, Lambert T, Schwienbacher A (2014) Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. J. Bus. Venturing 29(5):585–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry DM (2004) The contestation of code: A preliminary investigation into the discourse of the free/libre and open source movements. Critical Discourse Stud. 1(1):65–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birks DF, Fernandez W, Levina N, Nasirin S (2013) Grounded theory method in information systems research: Its nature, diversity and opportunities. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 22(1):1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonabeau E (2009) Decisions 2.0: The power of collective intelligence. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 50(2):45–52.Google Scholar
• Boss SR, Kirsch LJ, Angermeier I, Shingler RA, Boss RW (2009) If someone is watching, I’ll do what I’m asked: Mandatoriness, control, and information security. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 18(2):151–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowen GA (2006) Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. Internat. J. Qualitative Methods 5(3):12–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brabham DC (2011) Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: An introduction and cases. Convergence (London) 14(1):75–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bretschneider U, Knaub K, Wieck E (2014) Motivations for crowdfunding: What drives the crowd to invest in start-ups? Eur. Conf. Inform. Systems, Tel Aviv, Israel.Google Scholar
• Brooke C (2009) Critical Management Perspectives on Information Systems (Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Cecez‐Kecmanovic D, Klein HK, Brooke C (2008) Exploring the critical agenda in information systems research. Inform. Systems J. 18(2):123–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charmaz K (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Choudhury V, Sabherwal R (2003) Portfolios of control in outsourced software development projects. Inform. Systems Res. 14(3):291–314.Link, Google Scholar
• Chua C, Lim W, Soh C, Sia S (2012) Enacting clan control in complex IT projects: A social capital perspective. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 36(2):577–600.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colombo MG, Franzoni C, Rossi‐Lamastra C (2015) Internal social capital and the attraction of early contributions in crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice 39(1):75–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cukier W, Ngwenyama O, Bauer R, Middleton C (2009) A critical analysis of media discourse on information technology: Preliminary results of a proposed method for critical discourse analysis. Inform. Systems J. 19(2):175–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cutting G (2003) Michel Foucault. Zalta EN, ed. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed July 6, 2017, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/foucault/#4.4.Google Scholar
• Das T (1993) A multiple paradigm approach to organizational control. Internat. J. Organ. Anal. 1(4):385–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Das TK, Teng BS (1998) Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3):491–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Das TK, Teng BS (2001) Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework. Organ. Stud. 22(2):251–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawson GS, Watson RT, Boudreau MC (2010) Information asymmetry in information systems consulting: Toward a theory of relationship constraints. J. Management Inform. Systems 27(3):143–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis A, Martin PJ (2005) Symbolic interactionism and the concept of power. British J. Sociol. 56(2):191–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1985) Control: Organizational and economic approaches. Management Sci. 31(2):134–149.Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fairclough NL, Wodak R (1997) Critical discourse analysis. van Dijk TA, ed. Discourse as Social Interaction, Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, vol. 2 (Sage, London), 258–284.Google Scholar
• Feller J, Gleasure R, Treacy S (2017) Information sharing and user behavior in internet-enabled peer-to-peer lending systems: An empirical study. J. Inform. Tech. 32(2):127–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foucault M (1971) The Order of Discourse (Gallimard, Paris).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foucault M (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge (Tavistock, London).Google Scholar
• Foucault M (1975) Alan S (trans.), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Vintage, New York).Google Scholar
• Foucault M (1977) Nietzsche, genealogy, history. Bouchard DF, ed. Language, Counter-memory, Practice (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY), 139–164.Google Scholar
• Foucault M (1980) Two lectures. Gordon C, ed. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977 (Pantheon Books, New York), 78–108.Google Scholar
• Foucault M (1981) The order of discourse. Young R, ed. Untying the Text: A Post-structural Anthology (Routledge & Kegan Paul, Boston), 48–78.Google Scholar
• Gallivan MJ, Depledge G (2003) Trust, control and the role of interorganizational systems in electronic partnerships. Inform. Systems J. 13(2):159–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garland D (2014) What is a “history of the present”? On Foucault's genealogies and their critical preconditions. Punishment Soc. 16(4):365–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerber EM, Hui J (2013) Crowdfunding: Motivations and deterrents for participation. ACM Trans. Comput.-Human Interaction 20(6):Article No. 34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glaser BS, Strauss A (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory (Aldine, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Gleasure R (2015) Resistance to crowdfunding among entrepreneurs: An impression management perspective. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 24(4):219–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gleasure R, Feller J (2016) A rift in the ground: Theorizing the evolution of anchor values in crowdfunding communities through the Oculus Rift case study. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 17(10):708–736.Google Scholar
• Gleasure R, Morgan L (2018) The pastoral crowd: Exploring self‐hosted crowdfunding using activity theory and social capital. Inform. Systems J. 28(3):489–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregory RW, Keil M (2014) Blending bureaucratic and collaborative management styles to achieve control ambidexterity in IS projects. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 23(3):343–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregory RW, Beck R, Keil M (2013) Control balancing in information systems development offshoring projects. MIS Quart. 37(4):1211–1232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffin ZJ (2012) Crowdfunding: Fleecing the American masses. Case Western Reserve J. Law Tech. Internet 4(2):375–410.Google Scholar
• Harris ML, Collins RW, Hevner AR (2009) Control of flexible software development under uncertainty. Inform. Systems Res. 20(3):400–419.Link, Google Scholar
• Hartman F, Ashrafi R (2002) Project management in the information systems and information technologies. Project Management J. 33(3):5–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henkel J (2006) Selective revealing in open innovation processes: The case of embedded Linux. Res. Policy 35(7):953–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hippel EV, Krogh GV (2003) Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organ. Sci. 14(2):209–223.Link, Google Scholar
• Hobbs J, Grigore G, Molesworth M (2016) Success in the management of crowdfunding projects in the creative industries. Internet Res. 26(1):146–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howe J (2006) The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired 14(6):1–4.Google Scholar
• Jaworski BJ (1988) Toward a theory of marketing control: Environmental context, control types, and consequences. J. Marketing 52(3):23–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaworski BJ, Stathakopoulos V, Krishnan HS (1993) Control combinations in marketing: Conceptual framework and empirical evidence. J. Marketing 57(1):57–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirsch LJ (1996) The management of complex tasks in organizations: Controlling the systems development process. Organ. Sci. 7(1):1–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Kirsch LJ, Cummings LL (1996) Contextual influences on self-control of IS professionals engaged in systems development. Accounting Management Inform. Tech. 6(3):191–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirsch LJ, Ko DG, Haney MH (2010) Investigating the antecedents of team-based clan control: Adding social capital as a predictor. Organ. Sci. 21(2):469–489.Link, Google Scholar
• Kirsch LJ, Sambamurthy V, Ko DG, Purvis RL (2002) Controlling information systems development projects: The view from the client. Management Sci. 48(4):484–498.Link, Google Scholar
• Kirsch LS (1997) Portfolios of control modes and IS project management. Inform. Systems Res. 8(3):215–239.Link, Google Scholar
• Kittur A, Kraut RE (2010) Beyond Wikipedia: Coordination and conflict in online production groups. Proc. 2010 ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 215–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein M, Garcia ACB (2015) High-speed idea filtering with the bag of lemons. Decision Support Systems 78:39–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koch JA, Siering M (2015) Crowdfunding success factors: The characteristics of successfully funded projects on crowdfunding platforms. Eur. Conf. Inform. Systems, Münster, Germany.Google Scholar
• Lee AS (1994) Electronic mail as a medium for rich communication: An empirical investigation using hermeneutic interpretation. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 18(2):143–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee G, Xia W (2010) Toward agile: An integrated analysis of quantitative and qualitative field data on software development agility. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 34(1):87–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leimeister JM, Huber M, Bretschneider U, Krcmar H (2009) Leveraging crowdsourcing: Activation-supporting components for IT-based ideas competition. J. Management Inform. Systems 26(1):197–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levina N (2005) Collaborating on multiparty information systems development projects: A collective reflection-in-action view. Inform. Systems Res. 16(2):109–130.Link, Google Scholar
• Levina N, Vaast E (2008) Innovating or doing as told? Status differences and overlapping boundaries in offshore collaboration. MIS Quart. 32(2):307–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lincoln Y, Guba EG (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K, Robey D (1999) Learning failure in information systems development. Inform. Systems J. 9(2):85–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maruping LM, Venkatesh V, Agarwal R (2009) A control theory perspective on agile methodology use and changing user requirements. Inform. Systems Res. 20(3):377–399.Link, Google Scholar
• Matavire R, Brown I (2013) Profiling grounded theory approaches in information systems research. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 22(1):119–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathiesen T (1997) The viewer society: Michel Foucault’s 'Panopticon' revisited. Theoret. Criminology 1(2):215–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGhee G, Marland GR, Atkinson J (2007) Grounded theory research: Literature reviewing and reflexivity. J. Advanced Nursing 60(3):334–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath K (2005) Doing critical research in information systems: A case of theory and practice not informing each other. Inform. Systems J. 15(2):85–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad. Management Rev. 22(4):853–886.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitra T, Gilbert E (2014) The language that gets people to give: Phrases that predict success on Kickstarter. Proc. 17th ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work Social Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 49–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mollick E (2014) The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. J. Bus. Venturing 29(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myers MD, Klein HK (2011) A Set of principles for conducting critical research in information systems. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 35(1):17–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanaswamy R, Grover V, Henry RM (2013) The impact of influence tactics in information system development projects: A control-loss perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems 30(1):191–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nidumolu SR, Subramani MR (2003) The matrix of control: Combining process and structure approaches to managing software development. J. Management Inform. Systems 20(3):159–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Baroudi JJ (1991) Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Inform. Systems Res. 2(1):1–28.Link, Google Scholar
• Ouchi WG (1977) The relationship between organizational structure and organizational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. 22(1):95–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouchi WG (1979) A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Emmanuel C, Otley D, Merchant K, eds. Readings in Accounting for Management Control (Springer, New York), 63–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouchi WG (1980) Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Admin. Sci. Quart. 25(1):129–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouchi WG, Johnson JB (1978) Types of organizational control and their relationship to emotional well being. Admin. Sci. Quart. 23(2):293–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Phillips N, Hardy C (2002) Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pitschner S, Pitschner-Finn S (2014) Non-profit differentials in crowd-based financing: Evidence from 50,000 campaigns. Econom. Lett. 123(3):391–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross A, Chiasson M (2011) Habermas and information systems research: New directions. Inform. Organ. 21(3):123–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V, Jarvenpaa S (2002) Trust in the digital economy (editorial). J. Strategic Inform. Systems 11(2):183–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt VA (2008) Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Political Sci. 11(1):303–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwaber K, Beedle M (2002) Agile Software Development with Scrum, vol. 1 (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Scott SG, Lane VR (2000) A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Acad. Management Rev. 25(1):43–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sia CL, Tan B, Wei K (2002) Group polarization and computer-mediated communication: Effects of communication cues, social presence, and anonymity. Inform. Systems Res. 13(1):70–90.Link, Google Scholar
• Soh C, Chua CEH, Singh H (2011) Managing diverse stakeholders in enterprise systems projects: A control portfolio approach. J. Inform. Tech. 26(1):16–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stahl BC (2008) Information Systems: Critical Perspectives (Routledge, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steinmacher I, Silva MAG, Gerosa MA, Redmiles DF (2015) A systematic literature review on the barriers faced by newcomers to open source software projects. Inform. Software Tech. 59:67–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart KJ, Gosain S (2006) The impact of ideology on effectiveness in open source software development teams. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 30(2):291–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin JM (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Suddaby R (2006) From the editors: What grounded theory is not. Acad. Management J. 49(4):633–642.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Summers JD, Chidambaram L, Young AG (2016) Venture signals and social media buzz in crowdfunding: Are “buzzworthy” projects worth the hype? 49th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (IEEE, New York), 3515–3524.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thom-Santelli J, Cosley DR, Gay G (2009) What’s mine is mine: territoriality in collaborative authoring. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1481–1484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thies F, Wessel M, Benlian A (2014) Understanding the dynamic interplay of social buzz and contribution behavior within and between online platforms—Evidence from crowdfunding. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
• Tiwana A (2010) Systems development ambidexterity: Explaining the complementary and substitutive roles of formal and informal controls. J. Management Inform. Systems 27(2):87–126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Townley B (1993) Foucault, power/knowledge, and its relevance for human resource management. Acad. Management Rev. 18(3):518–545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trevino LK, Lengel RH, Daft RL (1987) Media symbolism, media richness, and media choice in organizations: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Comm. Res. 14(5):553–574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urquhart C, Fernandez W (2013) Using grounded theory method in information systems: The researcher as blank slate and other myths. J. Inform. Tech. 28(3):224–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urquhart C, Lehmann H, Myers MD (2010) Putting the ‘theory’ back into grounded theory: Guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. Inform. Systems J. 20(4):357–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Krogh G, Spaeth S, Lakhani KR (2003) Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Res. Policy 32(7):1217–1241.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wash R, Solomon J (2014) Coordinating donors on crowdfunding websites. Proc. 17th ACM Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work Soc. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 38–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wessel M, Thies F, Benlian A (2016) The emergence and effects of fake social information: Evidence from crowdfunding. Decision Support Systems 90:75–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• West J (2003) How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Res. Policy 32(7):1259–1285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• West J, Gallagher S (2006) Challenges of open innovation: The paradox of firm investment in open‐source software. R&D Management 36(3):319–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wicks AC, Berman SL, Jones TM (1999) The structure of optimal trust: Moral and strategic implications. Acad. Management Rev. 24(1):99–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiener M, Mähring M, Remus U, Saunders CS (2016) Control configuration and control enactment in information systems projects: Review and expanded theoretical framework. MIS Quart. 40(3):741–774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wodak R, Meyer M (2009) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (Longman, London).Google Scholar
• Yoo Y, Alavi M (2001) Media and group cohesion: Relative influences on social presence, task participation, and group consensus. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 25(3):371–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zheng H, Li D, Wu J, Xu Y (2014) The role of multidimensional social capital in crowdfunding: A comparative study in China and US. Inform. Management 51(4):488–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zheng H, Xu B, Zhang M, Wang T (2018) Sponsor’s cocreation and psychological ownership in reward‐based crowdfunding. Inform. Systems J. 28(6):1213–1238.Crossref, Google Scholar