Unraveling the “Social” in Social Norms: The Conditioning Effect of User Connectivity

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2019.0862

References

  • Adair JG (1984) The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifact. J. Appl. Psych. 69(2):334–345.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R, Gao G, DesRoches C, Jha AK (2010) Research commentary—the digital transformation of healthcare: Current status and the road ahead. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):796–809.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Allcott H (2011) Social norms and energy conservation. J. Public Econom. 95(9):1082–1095.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • An R (2016) Weekend-weekday differences in diet among US adults, 2003–2012. Ann. Epidemiology 26(1):57–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aral S, Walker D (2014) Tie strength, embeddedness, and social influence: A large-scale networked experiment. Management Sci. 60(6):1352–1370.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aral S, Muchnik L, Sundararajan A (2009) Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(51):21544–21549.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ariely D, Wertenbroch K (2002) Procrastination, deadlines, and performance: Self-control by precommitment. Psych. Sci. 13(3):219–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ball K, Jeffery RW, Abbott G, McNaughton SA, Crawford D (2010) Is healthy behavior contagious: Associations of social norms with physical activity and healthy eating. Internat. J. Behav. Nutrition Physical Activity 7(1):86–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bapna R, Umyarov A (2015) Do your online friends make you pay? A randomized field experiment on peer influence in online social networks. Management Sci. 61(8):1902–1920.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6):1173–1182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Biddle SJ, Mutrie N (2007) Psychology of Physical Activity: Determinants, Well-Being and Interventions, 2nd ed. (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
  • Blackwell M, Iacus S, King G, Porro G (2009) CEM: Coarsened exact matching in Stata. Stata J. 9(4):524–546.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloom N, Liang J, Roberts J, Ying ZJ (2014) Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 130(1):165–218.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brunstein JC, Gollwitzer PM (1996) Effects of failure on subsequent performance: The importance of self-defining goals. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 70(2):395–407.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buffardi LE, Campbell WK (2008) Narcissism and social networking web sites. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 34(10):1303–1314.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burchell K, Rettie R, Patel K (2013) Marketing social norms: Social marketing and the ‘social norm approach.’ J. Consumer Behav. 12(1):1–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2016) Secret admirers: An empirical examination of information hiding and contribution dynamics in online crowdfunding. Inform. Systems Res. 27(3):478–496.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burtch G, Hong Y, Bapna R, Griskevicius V (2017) Stimulating online reviews by combining financial incentives and social norms. Management Sci. 64(5):2065–2082.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Harper FM, Konstan J, Xin Li S (2010) Social comparisons and contributions to online communities: A field experiment on Movielens. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1358–1398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Costa DL, Kahn ME (2013) Energy conservation “nudges” and environmentalist ideology: Evidence from a randomized residential electricity field experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(3):680–702.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dann S (2010) Twitter content classification. First Monday 15(12):1–12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dawson JF (2014) Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. J. Bus. Psych. 29(1):1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Maesschalck R, Jouan-Rimbaud D, Massart DL (2000) The Mahalanobis distance. Chemometrics Intelligent Laboratory Systems 50(1):1–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dewan S, Ho Y-J, Ramaprasad J (2017) Popularity or proximity: Characterizing the nature of social influence in an online music community. Inform. Systems Res. 28(1):117–136.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Doran GT (1981) There’s a smart way to write management’s goals and objectives. Management Rev. 70(11):35–36.Google Scholar
  • Dorresteijn JA, Visseren FL, Ridker PM, Wassink AM, Paynter NP, Steyerberg EW, van der Graaf Y, Cook NR (2011) Estimating treatment effects for individual patients based on the results of randomised clinical trials. BMJ 343(2011):d5888.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dugas M, Crowley K, Gao G, Xu T, Agarwal R, Kruglanski A, Steinle N (2018) Individual differences in regulatory mode moderate the effectiveness of a pilot Mhealth trial for diabetes management among older veterans. PLoS One 13(3):e0192807.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Estrin D, Sim I (2010) Open Mhealth architecture: An engine for health care innovation. Science 330(6005):759–760.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Exley CL, Naecker JK (2016) Observability increases the demand for commitment devices. Management Sci. 63(10):3262–3267.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feller A, Holmes CC (2009) Beyond toplines: Heterogeneous treatment effects in randomized experiments. Technical report, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  • Ferraro PJ, Miranda JJ (2013) Heterogeneous treatment effects and mechanisms in information-based environmental policies: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Resource Energy Econom. 35(3):356–379.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fjeldsoe BS, Marshall AL, Miller YD (2009) Behavior change interventions delivered by mobile telephone short-message service. Amer. J. Preventative Medicine 36(2):165–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Free C, Phillips G, Galli L, Watson L, Felix L, Edwards P, Patel V, Haines A (2013) The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: A systematic review. PLoS Medicine 10(1):e1001362.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman LC (1978) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks 1(3):215–239.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gerber AS, Rogers T (2009) Descriptive social norms and motivation to vote: Everybody’s voting and so should you. J. Politics 71(1):178–191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldstein NJ, Cialdini RB, Griskevicius V (2008) A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. J. Consumer Res. 35(3):472–482.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V, Cialdini RB (2007) Invoking social norms a social psychology perspective on improving hotels’ linen-reuse programs. Cornell Hotel Restaurant Admin. Quart. 48(2):145–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene WH (2012) Econometric Analysis, 7th ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Hackman JR (1992) Group Influences on Individuals in Organizations, 2nd ed. (Consulting Psychologists Press).Google Scholar
  • Harries T, Eslambolchilar P, Rettie R, Stride C, Walton S, van Woerden HC (2016) Effectiveness of a smartphone app in increasing physical activity amongst male adults: A randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health 16(1):925.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman JJ (1976) The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Ann. Econom. Soc. Measurement 5(4):475–492.Google Scholar
  • Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Higgs S (2015) Social norms and their influence on eating behaviours. Appetite 86:38–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinz O, Spann M, Hann I-H (2015) Research note—can’t buy me love…or can I? Social capital attainment through conspicuous consumption in virtual environments. Inform. Systems Res. 26(4):859–870.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hinz O, Skiera B, Barrot C, Becker JU (2011) Seeding strategies for viral marketing: An empirical comparison. J. Marketing 75(6):55–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsiaw A (2013) Goal-setting and self-control. J. Econom. Theory 148(2):601–626.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hurling R, Catt M, De Boni M, Fairley BW, Hurst T, Murray P, Richardson A, Sodhi JS (2007) Using internet and mobile phone technology to deliver an automated physical activity program: Randomized controlled trial. J. Medical Internet Res. 9(2):1–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iyengar R, Van den Bulte C, Valente TW (2011) Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. 30(2):195–212.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Java A, Song X, Finin T, Tseng B (2007) Why we Twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities. Proc. 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 Workshop Web Mining Soc. Network Anal. (ACM, San Jose), 56–65.Google Scholar
  • Johnston M (2015) Fitbit has a smart way of getting everyone to exercise more — and people love it.Bus. Insider (April 27), https://www.businessinsider.com/fitbit-step-tracking-motivation-and-competition-2015-4?r=UK&IR=T.Google Scholar
  • Jones NP, Papadakis AA, Orr CA, Strauman TJ (2013) Cognitive processes in response to goal failure: A study of ruminative thought and its affective consequences. J. Soc. Clinical Psych. 32(5):482–503.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kast F, Meier S, Pomeranz D (2012) Under-savers anonymous: Evidence on self-help groups and peer pressure as a savings commitment device. NBER Working Paper No. 18417, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Kent DM, Hayward RA (2007) Limitations of applying summary results of clinical trials to individual patients: The need for risk stratification. JAMA 298(10):1209–1212.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koch AK, Nafziger J (2011) Self‐regulation through goal setting. Scandinavian J. Econom. 113(1):212–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krämer NC, Winter S (2008) Impression management 2.0: The relationship of self-esteem, extraversion, self-efficacy, and self-presentation within social networking sites. J. Media Psych. 20(3):106–116.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krebs P, Duncan DT (2015) Health app use among US mobile phone owners: A national survey. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 3(4):1–12.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krishnamurthy B, Gill P, Arlitt M (2008) A few chirps about Twitter. Proc. First Workshop Online Soc. Networks (ACM, Seattle), 19–24.Google Scholar
  • Lally P, Bartle N, Wardle J (2011) Social norms and diet in adolescents. Appetite 57(3):623–627.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lampe CA, Ellison N, Steinfield C (2007) A familiar face (book): Profile elements as signals in an online social network. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, San Jose), 435–444.Google Scholar
  • Leunga R, Lawb R, Masieroc L, Hatterd R (2016) Behavior of online visitors to hotel icon: A weekday-weekend analysis. e-Review Tourism Res. 7(7):1–5.Google Scholar
  • Leuven E, Sianesi B (2015) PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing. Working paper S432001, Boston College, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Liebowitz J (2006) Keynote paper: Developing knowledge and learning strategies in mobile organisations. Internat. J. Mobile Learn. Organ. 1(1):5–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • List JA, Rasul I (2011) Field experiments in labor economics. Handbook Labor Econom. 4:103–228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke EA, Latham GP (2002) Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. Amer. Psych. 57(9):705–717.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lu Y, Jerath K, Singh PV (2013) The emergence of opinion leaders in a networked online community: A dyadic model with time dynamics and a heuristic for fast estimation. Management Sci. 59(8):1783–1799.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mackie G, Moneti F, Denny E, Shakya H (2012) What are social norms? How are they measured. University of California at San Diego–UNICEF working paper, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
  • Manago AM, Graham MB, Greenfield PM, Salimkhan G (2008) Self-presentation and gender on Myspace. J. Appl. Developmental Psych. 29(6):446–458.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):531–542.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marshall S, Kerr J, Carlson J, Cadmus-Bertram L, Patterson R, Wasilenko K, Crist K, Rosenberg D, Natarajan L (2015) Patterns of weekday and weekend sedentary behavior among older adults. J. Aging Physical Activity 23(4):534–541.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McFarlane J, Martin CL, Williams TM (1988) Mood fluctuations. Psych. Women Quart. 12(2):201–223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mento AJ, Steel RP, Karren RJ (1987) A meta-analytic study of the effects of goal setting on task performance: 1966–1984. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 39(1):52–83.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ntoumanis N, Healy LC, Sedikides C, Smith AL, Duda JL (2014) Self-regulatory responses to unattainable goals: The role of goal motives. Self Identity 13(5):594–612.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peluchette J, Karl K (2009) Examining students’ intended image on Facebook: “What were they thinking?!” J. Ed. Bus. 85(1):30–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perkins HW (2003) The emergence and evolution of the social norms approach to substance abuse prevention. Perkins HW, ed. The Social Norms Approach to Preventing School and College Age Substance Abuse: A Handbook for Educators, Counselors, and Clinicians (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 3–18.Google Scholar
  • Rice RE, Collins‐Jarvis L, Zydney‐Walker S (1999) Individual and structural influences on information technology helping relationships. J. Appl. Communication Res. 27(4):285–309.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson E, Harris E, Thomas J, Aveyard P, Higgs S (2013) Reducing high calorie snack food in young adults: A role for social norms and health based messages. Internat. J. Behav. Nutrition Physical Activity 10(73):1–18.Google Scholar
  • Rubin DB (1980) Bias reduction using mahalanobis-metric matching. Biometrics 36(2):293–298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ryan RM, Bernstein JH, Brown KW (2010) Weekends, work, and well-being: Psychological need satisfactions and day of the week effects on mood, vitality, and physical symptoms. J. Soc. Clinical Psych. 29(1):95–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rybczynski W (1992) Waiting for the Weekend (Penguin Books, New York).Google Scholar
  • Schlotz W, Hellhammer J, Schulz P, Stone AA (2004) Perceived work overload and chronic worrying predict weekend–weekday differences in the cortisol awakening response. Psychosomatic Medicine 66(2):207–214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schultz PW, Nolan JM, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V (2007) The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psych. Sci. 18(5):429–434.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shilts MK, Horowitz M, Townsend MS (2004) Goal setting as a strategy for dietary and physical activity behavior change: A review of the literature. Amer. J. Health Promotion 19(2):81–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soman D, Cheema A (2004) When goals are counterproductive: The effects of violation of a behavioral goal on subsequent performance. J. Consumer Res. 31(1):52–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Susarla A, Oh J-H, Tan Y (2012) Social networks and the diffusion of user-generated content: Evidence from Youtube. Inform. Systems Res. 23(1):23–41.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tong ST, Van Der Heide B, Langwell L, Walther JB (2008) Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. 13(3):531–549.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van de Ven WP, Van Praag BM (1981) The demand for deductibles in private health insurance: A probit model with sample selection. J. Econometrics 17(2):229–252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Hooff ML, Geurts SA, Kompier MA, Taris TW (2007) Workdays, in-between workdays and the weekend: A diary study on effort and recovery. Internat. Arch. Occupational Environ. Health 80(7):599–613.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V, Rai A, Sykes TA, Aljafari R (2016) Combating infant mortality in rural India: Evidence from a field study of ehealth kiosk implementations. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 40(2):353–380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walther JB, Van Der Heide B, Kim SY, Westerman D, Tong ST (2008) The role of friends’ appearance and behavior on evaluations of individuals on Facebook: Are we known by the company we keep? Human Comm. Res. 34(1):28–49.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wechsler H, Nelson TE, Lee JE, Seibring M, Lewis C, Keeling RP (2003) Perception and reality: A national evaluation of social norms marketing interventions to reduce college students’ heavy alcohol use. J. Stud. Alcohol 64(4):484–494.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.