A Dynamic Model of Embeddedness in Digital Infrastructures

References

• Aanestad M, Jensen TB (2011) Building nation-wide information infrastructures in healthcare through modular implementation strategies. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 20(2):161–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R, Tiwana A (2015) Editorial—Evolvable systems: Through the looking glass of IS. Inform Systems Res. 26(3):473–479.Link, Google Scholar
• Andersson M, Lindgren R, Henfridsson O (2008) Architectural knowledge in inter-organizational IT innovation. J. Strategic Inform. Systems 17(1):19–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arthur WB (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econom. J. (London) 99(394):116–131.Google Scholar
• Arthur WB (1994) Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arthur, WB (2018) Self-reinforcing mechanisms in economics. Anderson PW, Arrow KJ, Pines D, eds. The Economy as an Evolving Complex System (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL), 9–32.Google Scholar
• Baiyere A, Salmela H (2013) Review: Disruptive innovation & information Technology—Charting a Path. Proc. 24th Australasian Conf. Inform. Systems (RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia), 1–11.Google Scholar
• Barabási A-L (2016) Network Science (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK)Google Scholar
• Barabási A-L, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439):509–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Behrens S (2009) Shadow systems: The good, the bad and the ugly. Comm. ACM 52(2):124–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bennett K (1995) Legacy systems: Coping with success. IEEE Software 12(1):19–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger PL, Luckmann T (1966) The Social Construction of Reality, 1st ed. (Penguin, London)Google Scholar
• Bidan M, Rowe F, Truex D (2012) An empirical study of IS architectures in French SMEs: Integration approaches. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 21(3):287–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bisbal J, Lawless D, Grimson J (1999) Legacy information systems: Issues and directions. IEEE Software 16(5):2–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blichfeldt BS, Eskerod P (2008) Project portfolio management—There’s more to it than what management enacts. Internat. J. Project Management 26(4):357–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowker GC, Star SL (1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.)Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brass DJ, Galaskiewicz J, Greve HR, Tsai W (2004) Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Acad. Management J. 47(6):795–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Callon M (1991) Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. Law J, ed. A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination (Routledge, Abingdon, UK), 132–165.Google Scholar
• Chua CEH, Storey VC (2017) Bottom-up enterprise information systems: Rethinking the roles of central IT departments. Comm. ACM 60(1):66–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ciborra CU, Failla A (2000) Infrastructure as a process: The case of CRM at IBM. Ciborra C, Braa K, Cordella A, Dahlbom B, Failla A, Hanseth O, Hepsø V, Ljungberg J, Monteiro E, Simon KA, eds. From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures, 1st ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 105–124.Google Scholar
• Ciborra CU, Hanseth O (2000) Introduction. Ciborra C, Braa K, Cordella A, Dahlbom B, Failla A, Hanseth O, Hepsø V, Ljungberg J, Monteiro E, Simon KA, eds. From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures, 1st ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 1–14.Google Scholar
• Constantinides P, Barrett M (2014) Information infrastructure development and governance as collective action. Inform. Systems Res. 26(1):40–56.Link, Google Scholar
• Constantinides P, Henfridsson O, Parker G (2018) Platforms and infrastructures in the digital age. Inform. Systems Res. 29(2):iii–vi.Link, Google Scholar
• David PA (1985) Clio and the economics of QWERTY. Amer. Econom. Rev. 75(2):332–337.Google Scholar
• Dobusch L, Schüßler E (2013) Theorizing path dependence: A review of positive feedback mechanisms in technology markets, regional clusters, and organizations. Indust. Corporate Change 22(3):617–647.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Donselaar KH, Gaur V, van Woensel T, Broekmeulen RACM, Fransoo JC (2010) Ordering behavior in retail stores and implications for automated replenishment. Management Sci. 56(5):766–784.Link, Google Scholar
• Dreyfus D, Iyer B (2008) Managing architectural emergence: A conceptual model and simulation. Decision Support Systems 46(1):115–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. 14(4):532–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellingsen G, Monteiro E (2003) A patchwork planet: Integration and cooperation in hospitals. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work 12(1):71–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellingsen G, Røed K (2010) The role of integration in health-based information infrastructures. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work 19(6):557–584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eriksson O, Âgerfalk PJ (2010) Rethinking the meaning of identifiers in information infrastructures. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 11(8):433–454.Google Scholar
• Farjoun M (2010) Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Acad. Management Rev. 35(2):202–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer G, Giaccardi E, Ye Y, Sutcliffe AG, Mehandjiev N (2004) Meta-design: A manifesto for end-user development. Comm. ACM 47(9):33–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flinders K (2015) SAP core banking platform will ease Deutsche Bank split following strategic retail review. Comput. Weekly (April 21), http://www.computerweekly.com/news/4500244734/SAP-core-banking-platform-will-ease-Deutsche-Bank-split-following-strategic-retail-review.Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg B (2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry 12(2):219–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman LC (1977) A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40(1):35–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furneaux B, Wade M (2011) An exploration of organizational level information systems discontinuance intentions. MIS Quart. 35(3):573–598.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furstenau D, Rothe H, Sandner M (2017) Shadow systems, risk, and shifting power relations in organizations. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 41(1):43–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gal U, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y (2008) The dynamics of IT boundary objects, information infrastructures, and organisational identities: The introduction of 3D modelling technologies into the architecture, engineering, and construction industry. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 17(3):290–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gioia DA, Corley KG, Hamilton AL (2012) Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organ. Res. Methods 16(1):15–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. 91(3):481–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenstein SM (1997) Lock-in and the costs of switching mainframe computer vendors: What do buyers see? Indust. Corporate Change 6(2):247–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregory RW, Kaganer E, Henfridsson O, Ruch TJ (2018) IT consumerization and the transformation of IT governance. MIS Quart. 42(4):1225–1253.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregory RW, Keil M, Muntermann J, Mähring M (2015) Paradoxes and the nature of ambidexterity in IT transformation programs. Inform. Systems Res. 26(1):57–80.Link, Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2014) Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. (Pearson Education Limited, Harlow, UK)Google Scholar
• Hanseth O (2000) The economics of standards. Ciborra C, Braa K, Cordella A, Dahlbom B, Failla A, Hanseth O, Hepsø V, Ljungberg J, Monteiro E, Simon KA, eds. From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures, 1st ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 56–70.Google Scholar
• Hanseth O (2010) From systems and tools to networks and infrastructures—From design to cultivation: Toward a design theory of information infrastructures. Industrial Informatics Design, Use and Innovation: Perspectives and Services (IGI Global, Hershey, PA), 122–156.Google Scholar
• Hanseth O, Aanestad M (2003) Design as bootstrapping. On the evolution of ICT networks in healthcare. Methods Inform. Medicine 42(4):385–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanseth O, Braa K (2000) Globalization and “risk society.” Ciborra C, Braa K, Cordella A, Dahlbom B, Failla A, Hanseth O, Hepsø V, Ljungberg J, Monteiro E, Simon KA, eds. From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures, 1st ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 41–55.Google Scholar
• Hanseth O, Braa K (2001) Hunting for the treasure at the end of the rainbow: Standardizing corporate IT infrastructure. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work 10(3–4):261–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanseth O, Lyytinen K (2004) Theorizing about the design of information infrastructures: Design kernel theories and principles. Sprouts: Working Papers Inform. Environments Systems Organ. 4(4):207–241.Google Scholar
• Hanseth O, Lyytinen K (2010) Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building Internet. J. Inform. Tech. 25(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanseth O, Monteiro E, Hatling M (1996) Developing information infrastructure: The tension between standardisation and flexibility. Sci. Tech. Human Values 21(4):407–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanson NR (1963) The law of inertia: A philosopher’s touchstone. Philos. Sci. 30(2):107–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henfridsson O, Bygstad B (2013) The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. MIS Quart. 37(3):907–931.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henfridsson O, Yoo Y (2014) The liminality of trajectory shifts in institutional entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 25(3):932–950.Link, Google Scholar
• Henningsson S, Hanseth O (2011) The essential dynamics of information infrastructures. Beath C, Myers MD, Wei KK, eds. Proc. 32nd Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS) (AIS, Atlanta), 1–19.Google Scholar
• Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Quart. 28(1):75–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hughes TP (1987) The evolution of large technological systems. Bijker WE, Hughes TP, Pinch T, eds. The Social Construction of Technological Systems (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 51–82.Google Scholar
• Jackson MO (2008) Social and Economic Networks (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karasti H, Blomberg J (2018) Studying infrastructuring ethnographically. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work 27(2):233–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly S, Gibson N, Holland C, Light B (1999) Focus issue on legacy information systems and business process change: A business perspective of legacy information systems. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems 2(7):1–27.Google Scholar
• Ketchen DJJ, Shook CL (1996) The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: An analysis and critique. Strategic Management J. 17(6):441–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• King JL (1983) Centralized vs. decentralized computing: Organizational considerations and management options. ACM Comput. Surveys 15(4):319–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koch C (2007) ERP—A moving target. Internat. J. Bus. Inform. Systems 2(4):426–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lagerström R, Baldwin CY, MacCormack A, Aier S (2014) Visualizing and measuring enterprise application architecture: An exploratory telecom case. HICSS '14 Proc. 2014 47th Hawaii Internati. Conf. System Sci. (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), 3847–3856.Google Scholar
• Langley A (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. 24(4):691–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latour B (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Latour B (2005) Reassembling the Social—An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW (1967) Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. 12(1):1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levina N, Vaast E (2006) Turning a community into a market: A practice perspective on information technology use in boundary spanning. J. Management Inform. Systems 22(4):13–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lingo EL, O’Mahony S (2010) Nexus work: Brokerage on creative projects. Admin. Sci. Quart. 55(1):47–81.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lipnack J, Stamps J (1997) Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology, 1st ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K, Sørensen C, Tilson D (2017) Generativity in digital infrastructures. Galliers RD, Stein M-K, eds. The Routledge Companion to Management Information Systems (Routledge, Abingdon, UK), 253–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacArthur PJ, Crosslin RL, Warren JR (1994) A strategy for evaluating alternative information system designs for business process reengineering. Internat. J. Inform. Management 14(4):237–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monteiro E (2003) Integrating health information systems: A critical appraisal. Methods Inform. Medicine 42(4):428–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monteiro E, Pollock N, Williams R (2014) Innovation in information infrastructures: Introduction to the special issue. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 15:i–x.Google Scholar
• Monteiro E, Pollock N, Hanseth O, Williams R (2013) From artefacts to infrastructures. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work 22(4–6):575–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman M, Robey D (1992) A social process model of user-analyst relationships. MIS Quart. 16(2):249–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ortmann G (1984) Der zwingende Blick: Personalinformationssysteme - Architektur der Disziplin [in German] (Campus, Frankfurt, Germany).Google Scholar
• Palla G, Barabási A-L, Vicsek T (2007) Quantifying social group evolution. Nature 446(7136):664–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pettigrew AM (1990) Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organ. Sci. 3(1)267–292.Google Scholar
• Pipek V, Wulf V (2009) Infrastructuring: Toward an Integrated Perspective on the design and use of information technology. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems. 10(5):447–473.Google Scholar
• Podolny JM (2001) Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Amer. J. Sociol. 107(1):33–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polites GL, Karahanna E (2012) Shackled to the status quo: The inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit, switching costs, and inertia on new system acceptance. MIS Quart. 36(1):21–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollock N (2010) When is a workaround? Conflict & negotiation in computer systems development. Sci. Tech. Human Values 30(4):496–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pollock N, Williams R, D'Adderio L (2007) Global software and its provenance: Generification work in the production of organizational software packages. Soc. Stud. Sci. 37(2):254–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ribes D, Finholt TA (2009) The long now of technology infrastructure: Articulating tensions in development. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 10(5):375–398.Google Scholar
• Rolland KH, Monteiro E (2002) Balancing the local and the global in infrastructural information systems. Inform. Soc. 18(2):87–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schutz A, Luckmann T (1973) The Structures of the Life-World (Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL).Google Scholar
• Sein MK, Henfridsson O, Purao S, Rossi M, Lindgren R (2011) Action design research. MIS Quart. 35(1):37–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N (2007) Persuasion with case studies. Acad. Management J. 50(1):20–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh PV, Tan Y, Mookerjee V (2011) Network effects: The influence of structural capital on open source project success. MIS Quart. 35(4):813–829.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Star SL, Ruhleder K (1996) Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Inform. Systems Res. 7(1):111–134.Link, Google Scholar
• Street CT, Ward KW (2011) Improving validity and reliability in longitudinal case study timelines. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 21(2):160–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sundararaja A, Provost F, Oestreicher-Singer G, Aral S (2014) Research commentary: Information in digital, economic, and social networks. Inform. Systems Res. 24(4):883–905.Link, Google Scholar
• Swanson EB, Dans E (2005) System life expectancy and the maintenance effort: Exploring their equilibration. MIS Quart. 24(2):277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sydow J, Schreyögg G, Koch J (2009) Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Acad. Management Rev. 34(4):689–709.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tanriverdi H (2006) Performance effects of information technology synergies in multibusiness firms. MIS Quart. 30(1):57–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tilson D, Lyytinen K, Sørensen C (2010) Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda. Inform. Systems Res. 21(4):748–759.Link, Google Scholar
• Vaast E, Walsham G (2009) Trans-situated learning: Supporting a network of practice with an information infrastructure. Inform. Systems Res. 20(4):547–564.Link, Google Scholar
• van de Ven AH, Poole MS (1995) Explaining development and change in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. 20(3):510–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Brown SA, Bala H (2013) Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS Quart. 37(1):21–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wareham J, Fox PB, Cano Giner JL (2014) Technology ecosystem governance. Organ. Sci. 25(4):1195–1215.Link, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, 19th ed., Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences, vol. 8 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winkler TJ, Brown CV, Ozturk P (2014) The interplay of top-down and bottom-up: Approaches for achieving sustainable health information exchange. Proc. Eur. Conf. Inform. Systems (ECIS) 2014 (AIS, Atlanta), 1–7.Google Scholar
• Yin RK (2013) Case Study Research: Design and Methods: Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, 5th ed., Applied Social Research Methods Series, vol. 5 (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar