“Monday Effect” on Performance Variations in Supply Chain Fulfillment: How Information Technology–Enabled Procurement May Help

References

• Argote L, Beckman SL, Epple D (1990) The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. 36(2):140–154.Link, Google Scholar
• Bakar AA, Siganos A, Vagenas-Nanos E (2014) Does mood explain the Monday effect? J. Forecasting 33(6):409–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benkard CL (2000) Learning and forgetting: The dynamics of aircraft production. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):1034–1054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendoly E, Cotteleer MJ (2008) Understanding behavioral sources of process variation following enterprise system deployment. J. Oper. Management 26:23–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendoly E, Kaefer F (2004) Business technology complementarities: Impacts of the presence and strategic timing of ERP on B2B e-commerce technology efficiencies. Omega 32:395–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bendoly E, Schoenherr T (2005) ERP system and implementation-process benefits: Implications for B2B e-procurement. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management 25(4):304–319.Google Scholar
• Bryson A, Forth J (2007) Are there day of the week productivity effects? Manpower Human Resources Lab Discussion Paper No. 4, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics, London.Google Scholar
• Calvo E, Cui R, Serpa J (2017) Oversight and efficiency on public projects: A regression dis-continuity analysis. Working paper, IESE Business School, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
• Campolieti M, Hyatt DE (2006) Further evidence on the ‘Monday Effect’ in workers’ compensation. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 59(3):438–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Card D, McCall BP (1996) Is workers’ compensation covering uninsured medical costs? Evidence from the ‘Monday Effect.’ Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 49(4):690–706.Google Scholar
• Chen J, Sohal AS, Prajogo DI (2013) Supply chain operational risk mitigation: A collaboration approach. Internat. J. Production Res. 57(1):2186–2199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen S, Lee H (2016) Incentive alignment and coordination of project supply chains. Management Sci. 63(4):1011–1025.Link, Google Scholar
• Chopra S, Sodhi M (2014) Reducing the risk of supply chain disruptions. MIT Sloan Management Rev. 55(3):72–80.Google Scholar
• Cotteleer MJ, Bendoly E (2006) Order lead-time improvement following enterprise information technology implementation: An empirical study. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 30:643–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Donohue K (2006) Behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect and the observed value of inventory information. Management Sci. 52(3):323–336.Link, Google Scholar
• Cui R, Allon G, Bassamboo A, Van Mieghem JA (2015) Information sharing in supply chains: An empirical and theoretical valuation. Management Sci. 61(11):2803–2824.Link, Google Scholar
• Cui R, Zhang D, Bassamboo A (2017) Learning from inventory availability information. Evidence from field experiments on Amazon. Management Sci. 65(3):1216–1235.Link, Google Scholar
• Devaraj S, Krajewski L, Wei JC (2007) Impact of eBusiness technologies on operational performance: The role of production information integration in the supply chain. J. Oper. Management 25:1199–1216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devaraj S, Ow TT, Kohli R (2013) Examining the impact of information technology and patient flow on healthcare performance: A Theory of Swift and Even Flow (TSEF) perspective. J. Oper. Management 31(4):181–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dong S, Xu S, Zhu K (2009) Information technology in supply chains: The value of IT-enabled resources under competition. Inform. Systems Res. 20(1):18–32.Link, Google Scholar
• Folkard S, Tucker P (2003) Shift work, safety, and productivity. Occupational Medicine 53(2):95–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fredendall LD, Craig JB, Fowler PJ, Damali U (2009) Barriers to swift, even flow in the internal supply chain of perioperative surgical services department: A case study. Decision Sci. 40(2):327–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fritz C, Ellis AM, Demsky CA, Lin BC, Guros F (2013) Embracing work breaks: Recovering from work stress. Organ. Dynamics 42:274–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fritz C, Sonnentag S (2005) Recovery, health, and job performance: Effects of weekend experiences. J. Occupational Health Psych. 10(3):187–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Germain R, Dröge C, Christensen W (2001) The mediating role of operations knowledge in the relationship of context with performance. J. Oper. Management 19:453–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goh J, Hall NG (2013) Total cost control in project management via satisficing. Management Sci. 59(6):1354–1372.Link, Google Scholar
• Gottselig JM, Hofer-Tinguely G, Borbely AA, Regel SJ, Landolt HP, Retey JV, Achermann P (2004) Sleep and rest facilitate auditory learning. Neuroscience 127(3):557–561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene WH (1997) Econometric Analysis (Prentice Hall, Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Hamermesh DS, Stancanelli E (2014) Long workweeks and strange hours. NBER Working Paper No. 20449, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Karwan KR, Markland RE (2006) Integrating service design principles and information technology to improve delivery and productivity in public sector operations: The case of the South Carolina DMV. J. Oper. Management 24:347–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kristal MM, Huang X, Schroeder RG (2010) The effect of quality management on mass customization capability. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management 30(9):900–922.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kulp SC, Lee HL, Ofek E (2004) Manufacturer benefits from information integration with retail customers. Management Sci. 50(4):431–444.Link, Google Scholar
• Macher JT, Mowery DC (2003) ‘Managing’ learning by doing: An empirical study in semiconductor manufacturing. J. Production Innovation Management 20:391–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Rust RT (2016) How information technology strategy and investments influence firm performance: Conjecture and empirical evidence. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 40(1):223–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay T, Rajiv S, Srinivasan K (1997) Information technology impact on process output and quality. Management Sci. 43(12):1645–1659.Link, Google Scholar
• Pettengill GN (1993) An experimental study of the ‘Blue Monday’ hypothesis. J. Socio-Economics 22(3):241–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pettengill GN (2003) A survey of the Monday Effect literature. Quart. J. Bus. Econom. 42(3–4):3–27.Google Scholar
• Schmenner RW, Swink ML (1998) On theory in operations management. J. Oper. Management 17:97–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith L, Folkard S, Poole CJM (1994) Increased injuries on night shift. Lancet 344(8930):1137–1139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Subramani M (2004) How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships? Management Inform. Systems Quart. 28(1):45–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tang CS (2006) Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. Internat. J. Logistics Res. Appl. 9(1):33–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornton RA, Thompson R (2001) Learning from experience and learning from others: An exploration of learning and spillovers in wartime shipbuilding. Amer. Econom. Rev. 91(5):1350–1368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang ETG, Tai JCF, Wei HL (2006) A virtual integration theory of improved supply-chain performance. J. Management Inform. Systems 23(2):41–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yao Y, Dresner M, Palmer J (2009) Private network EDI vs. internet electronic markets: A direct comparison of fulfillment performance. Management Sci. 55(5):843–852.Link, Google Scholar
• Yao Y, Zhu K (2012) Do electronic linkages reduce the bullwhip effect? An empirical analysis of the U.S. manufacturing supply chains. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3):1042–1055.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu K (2004) Information transparency of business-to-business electronic markets: A game-theoretic analysis. Management Sci. 50(5):670–685.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu K, Kraemer K, Gurbaxani V, Xu S (2006a) Migration to open-standard interorganizational systems: Network effects, switching costs, and path dependency. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 30:515–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu K, Kraemer K, Xu S (2006b) The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries: A technology diffusion perspective. Management Sci. 52(10):1557–1576.Link, Google Scholar