Examining the Heterogeneous Impact of Ride-Hailing Services on Public Transit Use

References

• Alemi F, Circella G, Handy S, Mokhtarian P (2018) What influences travelers to use Uber? Exploring the factors affecting the adoption of on-demand ride services in California. Travel Behav. Soc. 13:88–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Brynjolfsson E, Van Alstyne M (2012) Information, technology, and information worker productivity. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3, part 2):849–867.Google Scholar
• Arana P, Cabezudo S, Peñalba M (2014) Influence of weather conditions on transit ridership: A statistical study using data from Smartcards. Transportation Res. Part A: Policy Practice 59:1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brazil N, Kirk DS (2016) Uber and metropolitan traffic fatalities in the United States. Amer. J. Epidemiology 184(3):192–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brodeur A, Nield K (2018) An empirical analysis of taxi, Lyft and Uber rides: Evidence from weather shocks in NYC. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 152:1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brustein J (2016) Uber and Lyft want to replace public buses. Bloomberg (August 15), https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-08-15/uber-and-lyft-want-to-replace-public-buses.Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Carnahan S, Greenwood BN (2017) Can you gig it? An empirical examination of the gig economy and entrepreneurial activity. Management Sci. 64(12):5497–5520.Link, Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Gelbach JB, Miller DL (2008) Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. Rev. Econom. Statist. 90(3):414–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Center for Neighborhood Technology (2018) AllTransit. Accessed January 24, 2019, https://alltransit.cnt.org.Google Scholar
• Clewlow RR, Mishra GS (2017) Disruptive transportation: The adoption, utilization, and impacts of ride-hailing in the United States. Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-17-07, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, Davis.Google Scholar
• Dills AK, Mulholland SE (2018) Ride-sharing, fatal crashes, and crime. Southern Econom. J. 84(4):965–991.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dittmar H, Ohland G (2012) The New Transit Town: Best Practices in Transit-Oriented Development (Island Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Duncan DT, Aldstadt J, Whalen J, Melly SJ (2013) Validation of walk scores and transit scores for estimating neighborhood walkability and transit availability: A small-area analysis. GeoJournal 78(2):407–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erhardt GD, Roy S, Cooper D, Sana B, Chen M, Castiglione J (2019) Do transportation network companies decrease or increase congestion? Sci. Adv. 5(5):eaau2670.Google Scholar
• Federal Transportation Administration (2018a) National transit database. Accessed September 24, 2018, https://www.transit.dot.gov/ntd.Google Scholar
• Federal Transportation Administration (2018b) National transit database annual reporting guide. Accessed September 19, 2018, https://www.transit.dot.gov/ntd/ntd-annual-reporting-guide.Google Scholar
• Gong J, Greenwood B, Song Y (2017) Uber might buy me a Mercedes-Benz: An empirical examination of ridesharing platforms and durable goods purchase. Preprint, submitted May 19, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2971072.Google Scholar
• Grabar H (2016) Cities are cutting public transportation because they think Uber will fill the gap. They'll regret it. Slate (December 14), http://www.slate.com/articles/business/metropolis/2016/12/cities_are_cutting_transportation_service_because_they_think_uber_will_fill.html.Google Scholar
• Greenwood BN, Wattal S (2017) Show me the way to go home: An empirical investigation of ride sharing and alcohol related motor vehicle homicide. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 41(1):163–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo Z, Wilson NH, Rahbee A (2007) Impact of weather on transit ridership in Chicago, Illinois. Transportation Res. Record 2034(1):3–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall JD, Palsson C, Price J (2018) Is Uber a substitute or complement for public transit? J. Urban Econom. 108:36–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendrickson C (1986) A note on trends in transit commuting in the United States relating to employment in the central business district. Transportation Res. Part A: General 20(1):33–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt LM, Snir EM (1999) The role of information technology in modern production: Complement or substitute to other inputs. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Hoffman K, Ipeirotis P, Sundararajan A (2016) Ridesharing and the use of public transportation. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta).Google Scholar
• Iseki H, Ali R (2014) Net effects of gasoline price changes on transit ridership in us urban areas. Technical report, Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose, CA.Google Scholar
• Jiang S, Chen L, Mislove A, Wilson C (2018) On ridesharing competition and accessibility: Evidence from Uber, Lyft, and taxi. Proc. 2018 World Wide Web Conf. (ACM, New York), 863–872.Google Scholar
• Jin F, Cheng Y, Li X, Hu YJ (2018) The effect of dockless bike-sharing on public transportation: An empirical study. HEC Paris Research Paper MOSI-2018-1312, HEC Paris, Jouy-en-Josas, France.Google Scholar
• Lane BW (2010) The relationship between recent gasoline price fluctuations and transit ridership in major us cities. J. Transportation Geography 18(2):214–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner M, Kocher JG, Herst J (2017) System and method for assessing quality of transit networks at specified locations. U.S. Patent 9,677,892.Google Scholar
• Li Z, Hong Y, Zhang Z (2016) Do ride-sharing services affect traffic congestion? An empirical study of Uber entry. Working paper, Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
• Litman T (2008) Valuing transit service quality improvements. J. Public Transportation 11(2):43–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loukaitou-Sideris A, Liggett R, Iseki H (2002) The geography of transit crime: Documentation and evaluation of crime incidence on and around the green line stations in Los Angeles. J. Planning Ed. Res. 22(2):135–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy C (2016) Shared mobility and the transformation of public transit. Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 188, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• National Climatic Data Center (2018) Global surface summary of the day. Accessed September 5, 2019, https://data.nodc.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/iso?id=gov.noaa.ncdc:C00516.Google Scholar
• Nelson E, Sadowsky N (2018) Estimating the impact of ride-hailing app company entry on public transportation use in major US urban areas. B.E. J. Econom. Anal. Policy 19(1):1–21.Google Scholar
• Noel EC (1988) Park-and-ride: Alive, well, and expanding in the United States. J. Urban Planning Dev. 114(1):2–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park J, Kim J, Lee B (2016) Are Uber really to blame for sexual assault? Evidence from New York City. Proc. 18th Annual Internat. Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York).Google Scholar
• Pearlstein A, Wachs M (1982) Crime in public transit systems: An environmental design perspective. Transportation 11(3):277–297.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pelletier MP, Trépanier M, Morency C (2011) Smart card data use in public transit: A literature review. Transportation Res. Part C: Emerging Tech. 19(4):557–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rayle L, Shaheen S, Chan N, Dai D, Cervero R (2014) App-based, on-demand ride services: Comparing taxi and ridesourcing trips and user characteristics in San Francisco. University of California Transportation Center Technical Report UCTC-FR-2014-08, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Schank J (2002) Encouraging kiss-and-ride at commuter railroad stations. Transportation Res. Record 1793(1):7–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor BD, Fink CN (2003) The factors influencing transit ridership: A review and analysis of the ridership literature. Working paper, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Taylor BD, Miller D, Iseki H, Fink C (2009) Nature and/or nurture? Analyzing the determinants of transit ridership across us urbanized areas. Transportation Res. Part A: Policy Practice 43(1):60–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (2018) Current population survey 2018 annual social and economic (ASEC) supplement. Accessed December 21, 2018, http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37075.v1.Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Justice (2014) Uniform crime reporting program data: County-level detailed arrest and offense data, 2008–2012. Accessed December 10, 2018, http://dx.doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36399.v2.Google Scholar
• U.S. Energy Information Administration (2018) Gasoline and diesel fuel update. Accessed September 24, 2018, https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/gasdiesel/gas_geographies.php#pricesbyregion.Google Scholar
• Vuchic VR (2005) Urban Transit: Operations, Planning, and Economics (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Wang GH, Skinner D (1984) The impact of fare and gasoline price changes on monthly transit ridership: Empirical evidence from seven us transit authorities. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 18(1):29–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ward JW, Michalek JJ, Azevedo IL, Samaras C, Ferreira P (2018) On-demand ridesourcing has reduced per-capita vehicle registrations and gasoline use in U.S. states. Technical report, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Young A (1993) Substitution and complementarity in endogenous innovation. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):775–807.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zervas G, Proserpio D, Byers JW (2017) The rise of the sharing economy: Estimating the impact of Airbnb on the hotel industry. J. Marketing Res. 54(5):687–705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Lee D, Singh PV, Mukhopadhyay T (2018) Demand interactions in sharing economies: Evidence from a natural experiment involving Airbnb and Uber/Lyft. Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar