The Impacts of Internet Monitoring on Employees’ Cyberloafing and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Longitudinal Field Quasi-Experiment

References

• Acquisti A, Brandimarte L, Loewenstein G (2015) Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science 347(6221):509–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal U (2019) Impact of supervisors’ perceived communication style on subordinate’s psychological capital and cyberloafing. Australasian J. Inform. Systems 23:1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alder GS, Noel TW, Ambrose ML (2006) Clarifying the effects of internet monitoring on job attitudes: The mediating role of employee trust. Inform. Management 43(7):894–903.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alder GS, Schminke M, Noel TW, Kuenzi M (2008) Employee reactions to internet monitoring: The moderating role of ethical orientation. J. Bus. Ethics 80(3):481–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alge BJ (2001) Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice. J. Appl. Psych. 86(4):797–804.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aryee S, Chen ZX, Sun LY, Debrah YA (2007) Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. J. Appl. Psych. 92(1):191–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashton-James CE, Ashkanasy NM (2005) What lies beneath? A process analysis of affective events theory. Ashkanasy NM, Zerbe WJ, Hartel CEJ, eds. The Effect of Affect in Organizational Settings. Research on Emotion in Organizations, vol. 1 (Elsevier Science, Oxford), 23–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(6):1173–1182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beal DJ, Trougakos JP, Weiss HM, Green SG (2006) Episodic processes in emotional labor: Perceptions of affective delivery and regulation strategies. J. Appl. Psych. 91(5):1053–1065.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bélanger F, Crossler RE (2011) Privacy in the digital age: A review of information privacy research in information systems. MIS Quart. 35(4):1017–1042.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belot M, Schröder M (2015) The spillover effects of monitoring: A field experiment. Management Sci. 62(1):37–45.Link, Google Scholar
• Bolino MC, Hsiung HH, Harvey J, LePine JA (2015) “Well, I’m tired of tryin’!” Organizational citizenship behavior and citizenship fatigue. J. Appl. Psych. 100(1):56–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bulgurcu B, Cavusoglu H, Benbasat I (2010) Information security policy compliance: An empirical study of rationality-based beliefs and information security awareness. MIS Quart. 34(3):523–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiaburu DS, Byrne ZS (2009) Predicting OCB role definitions: Exchanges with the organization and psychological attachment. J. Bus. Psych. 24:201–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cram WA, D’Arcy J, Proudfoot JG (2019) Seeing the forest and the trees: A meta-analysis of the antecedents to information security policy compliance. MIS Quart. 43(2):525–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Arcy J, Devaraj S (2012) Employee misuse of information technology resources: Testing a contemporary deterrence model. Decision Sci. 43(6):1091–1124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Arcy J, Lowry PB (2019) Cognitive-affective drivers of employees’ daily compliance with information security policies: A multilevel, longitudinal study. Inform. Systems J. 29(1):43–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Arcy J, Herath T, Shoss MK (2014) Understanding employee responses to stressful information security requirements: A coping perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems 31(2):285–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• D’Arcy J, Hovav A, Galletta D (2009) User awareness of security countermeasures and its impact on information systems misuse: A deterrence approach. Inform. Systems Res. 20(1):79–98.Link, Google Scholar
• Dawson GS, Karahanna E, Buchholtz A (2014) A study of psychological contract breach spillover in multiple-agency relationships in consulting professional service firms. Organ. Sci. 25(1):149–170.Link, Google Scholar
• Dekas KH, Bauer TN, Welle B, Kurkoski J, Sullivan S (2013) Organizational citizenship behavior, version 2.0: A review and qualitative investigation of OCBs for knowledge workers at Google and beyond. Acad. Management Perspect. 27(3):219–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dickinson D, Villeval MC (2008) Does monitoring decrease work effort?: The complementarity between agency and crowding-out theories. Games Econom. Behav. 63(1):56–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dirks KT, Ferrin DL (2001) The role of trust in organizational settings. Organ. Sci. 12(4):450–467.Link, Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A (2007) G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39(2):175–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferrin DL, Bligh MC, Kohles JC (2007) Can I trust you to trust me? A theory of trust, monitoring, and cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup relationships. Group Organ. Management 32(4):465–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finnegan M (2020) The new normal: When work-from-home means the boss is watching. Computerworld (October 29), https://www.computerworld.com/article/3586616/the-new-normal-when-work-from-home-means-the-boss-is-watching.html.Google Scholar
• Gibbs JP (1975) Crime, Punishment, and Deterrence (Elsevier, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
• Glassman J, Prosch M, Shao BBM (2015) To monitor or not to monitor: Effectiveness of a cyberloafing countermeasure. Inform. Management 52(2):170–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey J, Bolino MC, Kelemen TK (2018) Organizational citizenship behavior in the 21st century: How might going the extra mile look different at the start of the new millennium? Buckley MR, Wheeler AR, Halbesleben JRB, eds. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK), 51–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hensel PG, Kacprzak A (2021) Curbing cyberloafing: Studying general and specific deterrence effects with field evidence. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 30(2):219–235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu JSC, Shih SP, Hung YW, Lowry PB (2015) The role of extra-role behaviors and social controls in information security policy effectiveness. Inform. Systems Res. 26(2):282–300.Link, Google Scholar
• Hui C, Lam SS, Law KK (2000) Instrumental values of organizational citizenship behavior for promotion: A field quasi-experiment. J. Appl. Psych. 85(5):822–828.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ivaturi K, Chua C (2021) Rethinking time: Ubichronic time and its impact on work. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 32(2):315–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang H, Siponen M, Tsohou A (2023) Personal use of technology at work: A literature review and a theoretical model for understanding how it affects employee job performance. Eur. J. Inform. Systems 32(2):331–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judd CM, Kenny DA, McClelland GH (2001) Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. Psych. Methods 6(2):115–134.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khansa L, Kuem J, Siponen M, Kim SS (2017) To cyberloaf or not to cyberloaf: The impact of the announcement of formal organizational controls. J. Management Inform. Systems 34(1):141–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleiman M, Kilmer B (2009) The dynamics of deterrence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(34):14230–14235.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koay KY, Lim VKG, Soh PCH, Ong DLT, Ho JSY, Lim PK (2022) Abusive supervision and cyberloafing: A moderated moderation model of moral disengagement and negative reciprocity belifes. Inform. Management 59(2):1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Konovsky MA, Pugh SD (1994) Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Acad. Management J. 37(3):656–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larson JR, Callahan C (1990) Performance monitoring: How it affects work productivity. J. Appl. Psych. 75(5):530–538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lester SW, Brower HH (2003) In the eyes of the beholder: The relationship between subordinates’ felt trustworthiness and their work attitudes and behaviors. J. Leadership Organ. Stud. 10(2):17–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li N, Liang J, Crant JM (2010) The role of proactive personality in job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: A relational perspective. J. Appl. Psych. 95(2):395–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim VKG (2002) The IT way of loafing on the job: Cyberloafing, neutralizing and organizational justice. J. Organ. Behav. 23(5):675–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim VKG, Chen DJQ (2012) Cyberloafing at the workplace: Gain or drain on work? Behav. Inform. Tech. 31(4):343–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra NK, Kim SS, Agarwal J (2004) Internet users’ information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model. Inform. Systems Res. 15(4):336–355.Link, Google Scholar
• McNall LA, Roch SG (2009) A social exchange model of employee reactions to electronic performance monitoring. Human Perform. 22(3):204–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meagher KJ, Wait A (2020) Worker trust in management and delegation in organizations. J. Law Econom. Organ. 36(3):495–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Minor WW, Harry J (1982) Deterrent and experiential effects in perceptual deterrence research: A replication and extension. J. Res. Crime Delinquency 19(2):190–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mishra J, Morrissey MA (1990) Trust in employee/employer relationships: A survey of West Michigan managers. Public Personnel Management 19(4):443–486.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Molm LD (2003) Theoretical comparisons of forms of exchange. Sociol. Theory 21(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montoya AK, Hayes AF (2017) Two-condition within-participant statistical mediation analysis: A path-analytic framework. Psych. Methods 22(1):6–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moody GD, Siponen M (2013) Using the theory of interpersonal behavior to explain non-work-related personal use of the internet at work. Inform. Management 50(6):322–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moody GD, Siponen M, Pahnila S (2018) Toward a unified model of information security policy compliance. MIS Quart. 42(1):285–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mooijman M, Van Dijk WW, Ellemers N, Van Dijk E (2015) Why leaders punish: A power perspective. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 109(1):75–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy K (2004) The role of trust in nurturing compliance: A study of accused tax avoiders. Law Hum. Behav. 28(2):187–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy ST, Zajonc RB (1993) Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 64(5):723–739.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagin DS (1998) Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the twenty-first century. Crime Justice 23:1–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagin DS, Pogarsky G (2001) Integrating celerity, impulsivity, and extralegal sanction threats into a model of general deterrence: Theory and evidence. Criminology 39(4):865–892.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niehoff BP, Moorman RH (1993) Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Acad. Management J. 36(3):527–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nielsen TM, Hrivnak GA, Shaw M (2009) Organizational citizenship behavior and performance: A meta-analysis of group-level research. Small Group Res. 40(5):555–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Organ DW, Konovsky M (1989) Cognitive vs. affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 74(1):157–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oulasvirta A, Pihlajamaa A, Perkio J, Ray D, Vahakangas T, Hasu T, Vainio N, Myllymaki P (2012) Long-term effects of ubiquitous surveillance in the home. ACM Conf. Ubiquitous Comput (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 41–50.Google Scholar
• Parke MR, Tangirala S, Hussain I (2021) Creating organizational citizens: How and when supervisor-vs. peer-led role interventions change organizational citizenship behavior. J. Appl. Psych. 106(11):1714–1733.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA (2011) State of the information privacy literature: Where are we now and where should we go? MIS Quart. 35(4):977–988.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petrosino A, Boruch RF, Rounding C, McDonald S, Chalmers I (2000) The Campbell Collaboration Social, Psychological, Educational and Criminological Trials Register (C2-SPECTR) to facilitate the preparation and maintenance of systematic reviews of social and educational interventions. Evaluation Res. Ed. 14(3–4):206–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce L, Snow DC, McAfee A (2015) Cleaning house: The impact of information technology monitoring on employee theft and productivity. Management Sci. 61(10):2299–2319.Link, Google Scholar
• Piquero AR, Paternoster R, Pogarsky G, Loughran T (2011) Elaborating the individual difference component in deterrence theory. Annual Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 7:335–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff NP, Whiting SW, Podsakoff PM, Blume BD (2009) Individual-and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 94(1):122–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porath CL, Erez A (2007) Does rudeness really matter? The effects of rudeness on task performance and helpfulness. Acad. Management J. 50(5):1181–1197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Posey C, Bennett B, Roberts T, Lowry PB (2011) When computer monitoring backfires: Invasion of privacy and organizational injustice as precursors to computer abuse. J. Inform. System Security 7(1):24–47.Google Scholar
• Puhakainen P, Siponen M (2010) Improving employees’ compliance through information systems security training: An action research study. MIS Quart. 34(4):757–778.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravid DM, Tomczak DL, White JC, Behrend TS (2020) EPM 20/20: A review, framework, and research agenda for electronic performance monitoring. J. Management 46(1):100–126.Google Scholar
• Reychav I, Sharkie R (2010) Trust: An antecedent to employee extra-role behaviour. J. Intellectual Capital 11(2):227–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson SL (1996) Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Admin. Sci. Quart. 41(4):574–599.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rousseau DM, Sitkin SB, Burt RS, Camerer C (1998) Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Management Rev. 23(3):393–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarkar S, Vance A, Ramesh B, Demestihas M, Wu DT (2020) The influence of professional subculture on information security policy violations: A field study in a healthcare context. Inform. Systems Res. 31(4):1240–1259.Link, Google Scholar
• Schweitzer ME, Ho TH, Zhang X (2018) How monitoring influences trust: A tale of two faces. Management Sci. 64(1):253–270.Link, Google Scholar
• Sherman LW (1990) Police crackdowns: Initial and residual deterrence. Crime Justice 12:1–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siponen M, Vance A (2010) Neutralization: New insights into the problem of employee information systems security policy violations. MIS Quart. 34(3):487–502.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siponen M, Vance A, Willison R (2012) New insights into the problem of software piracy: The effects of neutralization, shame, and moral beliefs. Inform. Management 49(7–8):334–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith HJ, Milberg SJ, Burke SJ (1996) Information privacy: Measuring individuals’ concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quart. 20(2):167–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Staats BR, Dai H, Hofmann D, Milkman KL (2017) Motivating process compliance through individual electronic monitoring: An empirical examination of hand hygiene in healthcare. Management Sci. 63(5):1563–1585.Link, Google Scholar
• Stanton JM, Julian AL (2002) The impact of electronic monitoring on quality and quantity of performance. Comput. Human Behav. 18(1):85–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stanton JM, Weiss EM (2000) Electronic monitoring in their own words: An exploratory study of employees’ experiences with new types of surveillance. Comput. Human Behav. 16(4):423–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Straub DW, Nance WD (1990) Discovering and disciplining computer abuse in organizations: A field study. MIS Quart. 14(1):45–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thornberry TP (1987) Toward an interactional theory of delinquency. Criminology 25(4):863–892.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tourigny L, Han J, Baba VV, Pan P (2019) Ethical leadership and corporate social responsibility in China: A multilevel study of their effects on trust and organizational citizenship behavior. J. Bus. Ethics 158(2):427–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trougakos JP, Hideg I, Cheng BH, Beal DJ (2014) Lunch breaks unpacked: The role of autonomy as a moderator of recovery during lunch. Acad. Management J. 57(2):405–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Truelove V, Freeman J, Watson B, Kaye SA, Davey J (2020) Are perceptions of penalties stable across time? The problem of causal ordering in deterrence applied to road safety. Accident Anal. Prev. 146:105746.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagner DT, Barnes CM, Lim VK, Ferris DL (2012) Lost sleep and cyberloafing: Evidence from the laboratory and a daylight saving time quasi-experiment. J. Appl. Psych. 97(5):1068–1076.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang B, Liu Y, Qian J, Parker SK (2021) Achieving effective remote working during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Appl. Psych. 70(1):16–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang J, Tian J, Shen Z (2013) The effects and moderators of cyber-loafing controls: An empirical study of Chinese public servants. Inform. Tech. Management 14:269–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westin AF (1967) Privacy and Freedom (Atheneum, New York).Google Scholar
• Williams LJ, Anderson SE (1991) Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. J. Management 17(3):601–617.Google Scholar
• Willison R, Lowry PB, Paternoster R (2018) A tale of two deterrents: Considering the role of absolute and restrictive deterrence to inspire new directions in behavioral and organizational security research. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems 19(12):1187–1216.Google Scholar
• Xu E, Huang X, Lam CK, Miao Q (2012) Abusive supervision and work behaviors: The mediating role of LMX. J. Organ. Behav. 33(4):531–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoo CW, Ahn HJ, Rao HR (2012) An exploration of the impact of information privacy invasion. Proc. 33rd Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 2260–2278.Google Scholar
• Zhao H, Wayne SJ, Glibkowski BC, Bravo J (2007) The impact of psychological contract breach on work‐related outcomes: A meta‐analysis. Person. Psych. 60(3):647–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara P, Olivares-Mesa A (2010) Bringing cyber loafers back on the right track. Indust. Management Data Systems 110(7):1038–1053.Crossref, Google Scholar